SlideShare ist ein Scribd-Unternehmen logo
1 von 3
This is an open letter to some of the people who
use Twitter to challenge my views about adoption.
Some of those people have written or e mailed me
and have received replies (albeit often necessarily
brief replies). Others have preferred to stay
anonymous and that’s fine. Some who tweet and
blog have been abusive. I don’t much like that but I
understand it because I believe it reflects an anger
and sometimes a helplessness about their
individual cases. I would, I am sure, feel the same
way were our positions reversed.

I have never denied the reality that sometimes
children are taken into care unnecessarily. It would
be silly to believe otherwise when we have a
workforce which is fallible. But I believe, and all I
have read and seen supports this, that we have a
far greater number of cases where we leave
children at home when they should be removed.

My interest is in children who are neglected (I know
that children are taken into care for other reasons). I
believe that, as a society, we tolerate neglect for too
long. We do not, as many people believe, have
record numbers of children in care. At the end of
the eighties the care population was half as big
again as it is now. And that was at a time when
there were at least three times as many adoptions.

So I believe the case for care, for intervening earlier
to stop neglect and then securing a new
permanence for a neglected child is overwhelming
and of course I shall continue to argue for that.

Incidentally, I do not – as many tweeters suggest -
profit in any way from adoptions. And Barnardo’s,
which I ran for six years never, in all that time,
made any profit or surplus from the very small
number of adoptions they dealt with. Nor do I have
any power to intervene in cases. So I cannot, even
if I wished, help to achieve the return of anyone’s
child.

My role is simply to offer a view to Ministers about
adoption. That view is based on my experience at
Barnardo’s and, since my resignation, many, many
days spent visiting local authorities, voluntary
adoption agencies and speaking to adopters and
the adopted as well as children in care and charities
which support families struggling to keep their
children. Some people call me the Adoption Czar,
evoking an image of a large salary and a retinue of
staff. Those things, like the Adoption Czar title, are
inventions of the press. I have no staff and last year
my total earnings from the Department for
Education were about £40,000.

So what advice can I offer those who feel their
children have been wrongly removed? It is this.
Fight your case of course. But do not seek to do so
by attacking adoption in general. Whatever the
circumstances of your case it is demonstrably true
that thousands and thousands of adoptions are
successful. The number which breakdown are
much lower than is commonly believed (new
research from the University of Bristol is likely to
confirm this) and there are thousands of adult
adoptees willing to speak positively about their
experience. I am very close personally to four such
adoptees and have met hundreds of others.

Nevertheless, I believe (and say frequently) that
adoption is only appropriate for a small minority of
the children taken into care in England, largely
those neglected by parents who are unlikely ever to
be able to be successful parents. It is indisputably
right that for those children adoption brings stability
and compensates for that neglect.

So, continue to pursue that which you believe in.
But don't undermine the specifics of your argument
by ignoring the reality of neglect and the need for us
as a society, when parents cannot be supported to
offer decent homes (often because of drink and
drug addictions) and if good quality kinship carers
cannot be found, to find an alternative stability
through adoption.Those who might advise that the
way to seek resolution of your own cases is by
seeking to undermine adoption are – at best -
misguided. Instead, and I offer this advice sincerely,
concentrate on demonstrating that the authorities
have made grave mistakes in your case


Kind Regards


Martin Narey

Weitere ähnliche Inhalte

Andere mochten auch

Rainsbrook report for publication
Rainsbrook report for publicationRainsbrook report for publication
Rainsbrook report for publicationSir Martin Narey
 
Pcc, guardian and medomsley
Pcc, guardian and medomsleyPcc, guardian and medomsley
Pcc, guardian and medomsleySir Martin Narey
 
Extracts about HCPC from Narey report on Sw education
Extracts about HCPC from Narey report on Sw educationExtracts about HCPC from Narey report on Sw education
Extracts about HCPC from Narey report on Sw educationSir Martin Narey
 
Adoption and my ADCS speech
Adoption and my ADCS speechAdoption and my ADCS speech
Adoption and my ADCS speechSir Martin Narey
 
Adoption: Resignation as Chair of the Leadership Board
Adoption: Resignation as Chair of the Leadership BoardAdoption: Resignation as Chair of the Leadership Board
Adoption: Resignation as Chair of the Leadership BoardSir Martin Narey
 

Andere mochten auch (7)

Rainsbrook report for publication
Rainsbrook report for publicationRainsbrook report for publication
Rainsbrook report for publication
 
Pcc, guardian and medomsley
Pcc, guardian and medomsleyPcc, guardian and medomsley
Pcc, guardian and medomsley
 
Extracts about HCPC from Narey report on Sw education
Extracts about HCPC from Narey report on Sw educationExtracts about HCPC from Narey report on Sw education
Extracts about HCPC from Narey report on Sw education
 
Adoption and my ADCS speech
Adoption and my ADCS speechAdoption and my ADCS speech
Adoption and my ADCS speech
 
Adoption: Resignation as Chair of the Leadership Board
Adoption: Resignation as Chair of the Leadership BoardAdoption: Resignation as Chair of the Leadership Board
Adoption: Resignation as Chair of the Leadership Board
 
1966
19661966
1966
 
Rcr jchr extract
Rcr jchr extractRcr jchr extract
Rcr jchr extract
 

Mehr von Sir Martin Narey

Icpa forget the bogus cures. just make prisons decent
Icpa forget the bogus cures. just make prisons decentIcpa forget the bogus cures. just make prisons decent
Icpa forget the bogus cures. just make prisons decentSir Martin Narey
 
Forget about rehabilitation, concentrate on making prisons decent.
Forget about rehabilitation, concentrate on making prisons decent.Forget about rehabilitation, concentrate on making prisons decent.
Forget about rehabilitation, concentrate on making prisons decent.Sir Martin Narey
 
Joining the prison service brief reflections
Joining the prison service brief reflectionsJoining the prison service brief reflections
Joining the prison service brief reflectionsSir Martin Narey
 
2903652 rotherham response_acc2
2903652 rotherham response_acc22903652 rotherham response_acc2
2903652 rotherham response_acc2Sir Martin Narey
 
Need we panic about the fall in placement orders?
Need we panic about the fall in placement orders?Need we panic about the fall in placement orders?
Need we panic about the fall in placement orders?Sir Martin Narey
 
Adoption muddle is costing children their futures
Adoption muddle is costing children their futuresAdoption muddle is costing children their futures
Adoption muddle is costing children their futuresSir Martin Narey
 
Adoption luckock and broadhurst
Adoption luckock and broadhurstAdoption luckock and broadhurst
Adoption luckock and broadhurstSir Martin Narey
 
The case for adoption in a nutshell from Sir James Munby, December 2014
The case for adoption in a nutshell from Sir James Munby, December 2014The case for adoption in a nutshell from Sir James Munby, December 2014
The case for adoption in a nutshell from Sir James Munby, December 2014Sir Martin Narey
 
Munby judgement on adoption: December 2014
Munby judgement on adoption: December 2014Munby judgement on adoption: December 2014
Munby judgement on adoption: December 2014Sir Martin Narey
 
Adoption cypn nov 2014 (1)
Adoption cypn nov 2014 (1)Adoption cypn nov 2014 (1)
Adoption cypn nov 2014 (1)Sir Martin Narey
 
Alb impact of court judgments on adoption - november 2014 (1) (1)
Alb   impact of court judgments on adoption - november 2014 (1) (1)Alb   impact of court judgments on adoption - november 2014 (1) (1)
Alb impact of court judgments on adoption - november 2014 (1) (1)Sir Martin Narey
 
Mythbuster op ed final mon 10 nov
Mythbuster op ed final mon 10 novMythbuster op ed final mon 10 nov
Mythbuster op ed final mon 10 novSir Martin Narey
 
Press release pupil premium + adop register july2014
Press release pupil premium + adop register july2014Press release pupil premium + adop register july2014
Press release pupil premium + adop register july2014Sir Martin Narey
 
Practice Educator's view of the Narey report on Children's SW Education
Practice Educator's view of the Narey report on Children's SW EducationPractice Educator's view of the Narey report on Children's SW Education
Practice Educator's view of the Narey report on Children's SW EducationSir Martin Narey
 
The Times the Adoption Leadership Board
The Times  the Adoption Leadership BoardThe Times  the Adoption Leadership Board
The Times the Adoption Leadership BoardSir Martin Narey
 
Section 9 of the 2014 children and families act
Section 9 of the 2014 children and families actSection 9 of the 2014 children and families act
Section 9 of the 2014 children and families actSir Martin Narey
 
ELEVEN THINGS THAT PEOPLE TOLD ME ABOUT MY REPORT (BEFORE THEY’D SEEN IT)
ELEVEN THINGS THAT PEOPLE TOLD ME ABOUT MY REPORT (BEFORE THEY’D SEEN IT)ELEVEN THINGS THAT PEOPLE TOLD ME ABOUT MY REPORT (BEFORE THEY’D SEEN IT)
ELEVEN THINGS THAT PEOPLE TOLD ME ABOUT MY REPORT (BEFORE THEY’D SEEN IT)Sir Martin Narey
 
Fathers should not fear family courts
Fathers should not fear family courtsFathers should not fear family courts
Fathers should not fear family courtsSir Martin Narey
 
Making The Education Of Social Workers Consistently Effective
Making The Education Of Social Workers Consistently EffectiveMaking The Education Of Social Workers Consistently Effective
Making The Education Of Social Workers Consistently EffectiveSir Martin Narey
 

Mehr von Sir Martin Narey (20)

Icpa forget the bogus cures. just make prisons decent
Icpa forget the bogus cures. just make prisons decentIcpa forget the bogus cures. just make prisons decent
Icpa forget the bogus cures. just make prisons decent
 
Forget about rehabilitation, concentrate on making prisons decent.
Forget about rehabilitation, concentrate on making prisons decent.Forget about rehabilitation, concentrate on making prisons decent.
Forget about rehabilitation, concentrate on making prisons decent.
 
Joining the prison service brief reflections
Joining the prison service brief reflectionsJoining the prison service brief reflections
Joining the prison service brief reflections
 
Adcs speech july 2015
Adcs speech july 2015Adcs speech july 2015
Adcs speech july 2015
 
2903652 rotherham response_acc2
2903652 rotherham response_acc22903652 rotherham response_acc2
2903652 rotherham response_acc2
 
Need we panic about the fall in placement orders?
Need we panic about the fall in placement orders?Need we panic about the fall in placement orders?
Need we panic about the fall in placement orders?
 
Adoption muddle is costing children their futures
Adoption muddle is costing children their futuresAdoption muddle is costing children their futures
Adoption muddle is costing children their futures
 
Adoption luckock and broadhurst
Adoption luckock and broadhurstAdoption luckock and broadhurst
Adoption luckock and broadhurst
 
The case for adoption in a nutshell from Sir James Munby, December 2014
The case for adoption in a nutshell from Sir James Munby, December 2014The case for adoption in a nutshell from Sir James Munby, December 2014
The case for adoption in a nutshell from Sir James Munby, December 2014
 
Munby judgement on adoption: December 2014
Munby judgement on adoption: December 2014Munby judgement on adoption: December 2014
Munby judgement on adoption: December 2014
 
Adoption cypn nov 2014 (1)
Adoption cypn nov 2014 (1)Adoption cypn nov 2014 (1)
Adoption cypn nov 2014 (1)
 
Alb impact of court judgments on adoption - november 2014 (1) (1)
Alb   impact of court judgments on adoption - november 2014 (1) (1)Alb   impact of court judgments on adoption - november 2014 (1) (1)
Alb impact of court judgments on adoption - november 2014 (1) (1)
 
Mythbuster op ed final mon 10 nov
Mythbuster op ed final mon 10 novMythbuster op ed final mon 10 nov
Mythbuster op ed final mon 10 nov
 
Press release pupil premium + adop register july2014
Press release pupil premium + adop register july2014Press release pupil premium + adop register july2014
Press release pupil premium + adop register july2014
 
Practice Educator's view of the Narey report on Children's SW Education
Practice Educator's view of the Narey report on Children's SW EducationPractice Educator's view of the Narey report on Children's SW Education
Practice Educator's view of the Narey report on Children's SW Education
 
The Times the Adoption Leadership Board
The Times  the Adoption Leadership BoardThe Times  the Adoption Leadership Board
The Times the Adoption Leadership Board
 
Section 9 of the 2014 children and families act
Section 9 of the 2014 children and families actSection 9 of the 2014 children and families act
Section 9 of the 2014 children and families act
 
ELEVEN THINGS THAT PEOPLE TOLD ME ABOUT MY REPORT (BEFORE THEY’D SEEN IT)
ELEVEN THINGS THAT PEOPLE TOLD ME ABOUT MY REPORT (BEFORE THEY’D SEEN IT)ELEVEN THINGS THAT PEOPLE TOLD ME ABOUT MY REPORT (BEFORE THEY’D SEEN IT)
ELEVEN THINGS THAT PEOPLE TOLD ME ABOUT MY REPORT (BEFORE THEY’D SEEN IT)
 
Fathers should not fear family courts
Fathers should not fear family courtsFathers should not fear family courts
Fathers should not fear family courts
 
Making The Education Of Social Workers Consistently Effective
Making The Education Of Social Workers Consistently EffectiveMaking The Education Of Social Workers Consistently Effective
Making The Education Of Social Workers Consistently Effective
 

Adoption twitter open letter

  • 1. This is an open letter to some of the people who use Twitter to challenge my views about adoption. Some of those people have written or e mailed me and have received replies (albeit often necessarily brief replies). Others have preferred to stay anonymous and that’s fine. Some who tweet and blog have been abusive. I don’t much like that but I understand it because I believe it reflects an anger and sometimes a helplessness about their individual cases. I would, I am sure, feel the same way were our positions reversed. I have never denied the reality that sometimes children are taken into care unnecessarily. It would be silly to believe otherwise when we have a workforce which is fallible. But I believe, and all I have read and seen supports this, that we have a far greater number of cases where we leave children at home when they should be removed. My interest is in children who are neglected (I know that children are taken into care for other reasons). I believe that, as a society, we tolerate neglect for too long. We do not, as many people believe, have record numbers of children in care. At the end of the eighties the care population was half as big again as it is now. And that was at a time when there were at least three times as many adoptions. So I believe the case for care, for intervening earlier to stop neglect and then securing a new permanence for a neglected child is overwhelming
  • 2. and of course I shall continue to argue for that. Incidentally, I do not – as many tweeters suggest - profit in any way from adoptions. And Barnardo’s, which I ran for six years never, in all that time, made any profit or surplus from the very small number of adoptions they dealt with. Nor do I have any power to intervene in cases. So I cannot, even if I wished, help to achieve the return of anyone’s child. My role is simply to offer a view to Ministers about adoption. That view is based on my experience at Barnardo’s and, since my resignation, many, many days spent visiting local authorities, voluntary adoption agencies and speaking to adopters and the adopted as well as children in care and charities which support families struggling to keep their children. Some people call me the Adoption Czar, evoking an image of a large salary and a retinue of staff. Those things, like the Adoption Czar title, are inventions of the press. I have no staff and last year my total earnings from the Department for Education were about £40,000. So what advice can I offer those who feel their children have been wrongly removed? It is this. Fight your case of course. But do not seek to do so by attacking adoption in general. Whatever the circumstances of your case it is demonstrably true that thousands and thousands of adoptions are successful. The number which breakdown are much lower than is commonly believed (new
  • 3. research from the University of Bristol is likely to confirm this) and there are thousands of adult adoptees willing to speak positively about their experience. I am very close personally to four such adoptees and have met hundreds of others. Nevertheless, I believe (and say frequently) that adoption is only appropriate for a small minority of the children taken into care in England, largely those neglected by parents who are unlikely ever to be able to be successful parents. It is indisputably right that for those children adoption brings stability and compensates for that neglect. So, continue to pursue that which you believe in. But don't undermine the specifics of your argument by ignoring the reality of neglect and the need for us as a society, when parents cannot be supported to offer decent homes (often because of drink and drug addictions) and if good quality kinship carers cannot be found, to find an alternative stability through adoption.Those who might advise that the way to seek resolution of your own cases is by seeking to undermine adoption are – at best - misguided. Instead, and I offer this advice sincerely, concentrate on demonstrating that the authorities have made grave mistakes in your case Kind Regards Martin Narey