SlideShare ist ein Scribd-Unternehmen logo
1 von 40
Downloaden Sie, um offline zu lesen
Introduction to formal
logic
Tutorial 3
Summary Syllogistic Logic
D: Drug dealers in the U.S.

P: People who protested in Eastern Germany

S: Students in the course Application of Theories
Language
Capital letters are used for categories
Small letters are used for individuals
d: Tom the drug dealer

c: Charlie the protester

s: Silvia the student
5 words
To formulate a correct wff, you need only five words:
all
no
some
is
not
8 Wff’s (woofs)
There are only eight (8) forms of wffs:
all A is B
no A is B
some A is B
some A is not B
x is B
x is not B
x is y
x is not y
More notation
a ≠ A
A ≠ A’ ≠ A’’
Use of capital letters
All syllogistic wff’s have the verb is
Wff’s beginning with a word (not a letter) use two capital letters
Wff’s beginning with a letter (not a word) begin with a small
some C is D
g is C
If a wff begins with a letter, the second letter can be either capital
or small
(g is D) or (g is d)
The Star Test
The Star Test (1)
A syllogism is a vertical sequence of one or more wff’s in which each
letter occurs twice and the letters form a chain.
Each wff has at least one letter in common with the wff just below it (if
there is one)
no P is B
some C is B
----------------
some C is not P
Distributed: An instance of a letter is distributed in a wff if it occurs just
after all or anywhere after no or not.
To test validity, use the star test. Star premise letters that are
distributed and conclusion letters that are not distributed.
The syllogism is valid if and only if every capital letter is starred exactly
once and there is exactly one star on the right hand side.
all A is B
some C is A
----------------
some C is B
Valid or not?
The Star Test (2)
all A* is B
some C is A
----------------
some C* is B*
A, B and C have only one *
Only one star on the right hand side (B*)
The Star Test (3)
The argument is valid
Translation
Different ways to say: all A is B
Every (each, any) A is B
Whoever is A is B
A’s are B’s
Those who are A are B
If a person is A, then he or she is B
If your are A, then you are B
Only B’s are A’s
None but B’s are A’s
No one is A unless he or she is B
No one is A without being B
A thing is not A unless it is B
It is false that some A is not B
A’s are not B’s
Ever (each, any) A is non-B
Whoever is A is not B
If a person is A, then he or she is not B
If you are A, then you are not B
No one that is A is B
There is not a single A that is B
Not any A is B
It is false that there is an A that is B
It is false that some A is B
Different ways to say: no A is B
A’s are sometimes B’s
One or more A’s are B’s
There are A’s that are B’s
It’s false that no A is B
Different ways to say: some A is B
One or more A’s are not B’s
There are A’s that are not B’s
Not all A’s are B’s
It’s false that all A is B
Different ways to say: some A is not B
Contradictions: If the one is false, the other one is true
no A is B is contradictory to some A is B.
all A is B is contradictory to some A is not B
Deriving Conclusions
Steps to derive conclusions
Step 1: Translate the premises and star
Step 2: Figure out the letters in the conclusions
(the two letters that occur just once in the premises)
Step 3: Figure out the form of the conclusion
Step 4: Add the conclusion and do the star test
Form of the conclusion
If all premises are universal (all, no), then use (all A is B) or (no A is B)
Otherwise, use (some A is B) or (some A is not B)
Use (x is A) or (x is not A)
Use (x is y) or (x is not y)
If both conclusion letters are capital
If just one conclusion letter is small
If both conclusion letters are small
Use no or not if there are any negative premises
Idiomatic arguments
Hence, thus, so, therefore...
It must be, it can’t be...
This proves (or shows) that...
These often indicate premises
These often indicate conclusions
Because, for, since, after all...
I assume that, as we know...
For these reasons...
Problem Set A
(1) Rewrite the arguments as wf's (verbally), (2) translate to syllogisms, (3) test
validity by means of (3.a) the star test, and (3.b) a venn diagram
1. No physical actions are chance occurrences, so no random events are physical
actions, since all chance occurrences are random events. 	

!
2. All mental decisions are things describable by science, because all events are
things describable by science, and all mental decisions are events. 	

!
3. No free decisions are things describable by science; therefore, no free decisions
are predictable events, inasmuch as all things describable by science are
predictable events.
1
No	
  physical	
  ac,ons	
  (P)	
  are	
  chance	
  occurrences	
  (C)	
  
All	
  chance	
  occurrences	
  (C)	
  are	
  random	
  events	
  (R)	
  
No	
  random	
  events	
  (R)	
  are	
  physical	
  ac,ons	
  (P)
1
No	
  physical	
  ac,ons	
  (P)	
  are	
  chance	
  occurrences	
  (C)	
  
All	
  chance	
  occurrences	
  (C)	
  are	
  random	
  events	
  (R)	
  
No	
  random	
  events	
  (R)	
  are	
  physical	
  ac,ons	
  (P)
No	
  P	
  is	
  C	
  
All	
  C	
  is	
  R	
  
No	
  R	
  is	
  P
1
No	
  physical	
  ac,ons	
  (P)	
  are	
  chance	
  occurrences	
  (C)	
  
All	
  chance	
  occurrences	
  (C)	
  are	
  random	
  events	
  (R)	
  
No	
  random	
  events	
  (R)	
  are	
  physical	
  ac,ons	
  (P)
No	
  P	
  is	
  C	
  
All	
  C	
  is	
  R	
  
No	
  R	
  is	
  P
1
No	
  physical	
  ac,ons	
  (P)	
  are	
  chance	
  occurrences	
  (C)	
  
All	
  chance	
  occurrences	
  (C)	
  are	
  random	
  events	
  (R)	
  
No	
  random	
  events	
  (R)	
  are	
  physical	
  ac,ons	
  (P)
No	
  P*	
  is	
  C*	
  
All	
  C*	
  is	
  R	
  
No	
  R	
  is	
  P
1
No	
  physical	
  ac,ons	
  (P)	
  are	
  chance	
  occurrences	
  (C)	
  
All	
  chance	
  occurrences	
  (C)	
  are	
  random	
  events	
  (R)	
  
No	
  random	
  events	
  (R)	
  are	
  physical	
  ac,ons	
  (P)
No	
  P*	
  is	
  C*	
  
All	
  C*	
  is	
  R	
  
No	
  R	
  is	
  P
Invalid	
  argument
1
No	
  physical	
  ac,ons	
  (P)	
  are	
  chance	
  occurrences	
  (C)	
  
All	
  chance	
  occurrences	
  (C)	
  are	
  random	
  events	
  (R)	
  
No	
  random	
  events	
  (R)	
  are	
  physical	
  ac,ons	
  (P)
No	
  P*	
  is	
  C*	
  
All	
  C*	
  is	
  R	
  
No	
  R	
  is	
  P
Invalid	
  argument
2
All	
  events	
  (E)	
  are	
  things	
  describable	
  by	
  science	
  (D)	
  
All	
  mental	
  decisions	
  (M)	
  are	
  events	
  (E)	
  
All	
  mental	
  decisions	
  (M)	
  are	
  things	
  describable	
  by	
  science	
  (D)
All	
  E	
  is	
  D	
  
All	
  M	
  is	
  E	
  
All	
  M	
  is	
  D
All	
  things	
  describable	
  by	
  science	
  (D)	
  are	
  predictable	
  events	
  (P)	
  
No	
  free	
  decisions	
  (F)	
  are	
  things	
  describable	
  by	
  science	
  (D)	
  
No	
  free	
  decisions	
  (F)	
  are	
  predictable	
  events	
  (P)
3
All	
  D	
  is	
  P	
  
No	
  F	
  is	
  D	
  
No	
  F	
  is	
  P
1
No	
  physical	
  ac,ons	
  (P)	
  are	
  chance	
  occurrences	
  (C)	
  
All	
  chance	
  occurrences	
  (C)	
  are	
  random	
  events	
  (R)	
  
No	
  random	
  events	
  (R)	
  are	
  physical	
  ac,ons	
  (P)
No	
  P*	
  is	
  C*	
  
All	
  C*	
  is	
  R	
  
No	
  R	
  is	
  P
Invalid	
  argument
2
All	
  events	
  (E)	
  are	
  things	
  describable	
  by	
  science	
  (D)	
  
All	
  mental	
  decisions	
  (M)	
  are	
  events	
  (E)	
  
All	
  mental	
  decisions	
  (M)	
  are	
  things	
  describable	
  by	
  science	
  (D)
All	
  E	
  is	
  D	
  
All	
  M	
  is	
  E	
  
All	
  M	
  is	
  D
All	
  things	
  describable	
  by	
  science	
  (D)	
  are	
  predictable	
  events	
  (P)	
  
No	
  free	
  decisions	
  (F)	
  are	
  things	
  describable	
  by	
  science	
  (D)	
  
No	
  free	
  decisions	
  (F)	
  are	
  predictable	
  events	
  (P)
3
All	
  D	
  is	
  P	
  
No	
  F	
  is	
  D	
  
No	
  F	
  is	
  P
1
No	
  physical	
  ac,ons	
  (P)	
  are	
  chance	
  occurrences	
  (C)	
  
All	
  chance	
  occurrences	
  (C)	
  are	
  random	
  events	
  (R)	
  
No	
  random	
  events	
  (R)	
  are	
  physical	
  ac,ons	
  (P)
No	
  P*	
  is	
  C*	
  
All	
  C*	
  is	
  R	
  
No	
  R	
  is	
  P
Invalid	
  argument
2
All	
  events	
  (E)	
  are	
  things	
  describable	
  by	
  science	
  (D)	
  
All	
  mental	
  decisions	
  (M)	
  are	
  events	
  (E)	
  
All	
  mental	
  decisions	
  (M)	
  are	
  things	
  describable	
  by	
  science	
  (D)
All	
  E*	
  is	
  D	
  
All	
  M*	
  is	
  E	
  
All	
  M	
  is	
  D*
All	
  things	
  describable	
  by	
  science	
  (D)	
  are	
  predictable	
  events	
  (P)	
  
No	
  free	
  decisions	
  (F)	
  are	
  things	
  describable	
  by	
  science	
  (D)	
  
No	
  free	
  decisions	
  (F)	
  are	
  predictable	
  events	
  (P)
3
All	
  D*	
  is	
  P	
  
No	
  F*	
  is	
  D*	
  
No	
  F	
  is	
  P
1
No	
  physical	
  ac,ons	
  (P)	
  are	
  chance	
  occurrences	
  (C)	
  
All	
  chance	
  occurrences	
  (C)	
  are	
  random	
  events	
  (R)	
  
No	
  random	
  events	
  (R)	
  are	
  physical	
  ac,ons	
  (P)
No	
  P*	
  is	
  C*	
  
All	
  C*	
  is	
  R	
  
No	
  R	
  is	
  P
Invalid	
  argument
2
All	
  events	
  (E)	
  are	
  things	
  describable	
  by	
  science	
  (D)	
  
All	
  mental	
  decisions	
  (M)	
  are	
  events	
  (E)	
  
All	
  mental	
  decisions	
  (M)	
  are	
  things	
  describable	
  by	
  science	
  (D)
All	
  E*	
  is	
  D	
  
All	
  M*	
  is	
  E	
  
All	
  M	
  is	
  D*
All	
  things	
  describable	
  by	
  science	
  (D)	
  are	
  predictable	
  events	
  (P)	
  
No	
  free	
  decisions	
  (F)	
  are	
  things	
  describable	
  by	
  science	
  (D)	
  
No	
  free	
  decisions	
  (F)	
  are	
  predictable	
  events	
  (P)
3
All	
  D*	
  is	
  P	
  
No	
  F*	
  is	
  D*	
  
No	
  F	
  is	
  P
Valid	
  argument
Invalid	
  argument
(1) Rewrite the arguments as wf's (verbally), (2) translate to syllogisms, (3) test
validity by means of (3.a) the star test, and (3.b) a venn diagram
1. All mental decisions are things describable by science, but no things describable by science are
uncaused happenings; it follows that no mental decisions are uncaused happenings. 	

2. Some natural processes are not free choices, because some natural processes are not caused
occurrences, and no free choices are caused events. 	

3. All free decisions are uncaused happenings, and no mental decisions are uncaused happenings;
consequently, no mental decisions are free decisions. 	

4. All uses of free will are decisions, yet some decisions are careful reflections, hence some uses of
free will are careful reflections. 	

5. All persons who decide least are persons who are most free, so, since all persons who are most
free are persons who decide most, all persons who decide least are persons who decide most. 	

6. Some coerced decision are not free choices, hence some desires are coerced decisions, as some
desires are free choices.	

7. All uncaused events are free decisions, but no mental decisions are free decisions, from which it
follows that no uncaused events are mental decisions. 	

8. All acts of free will are uncaused events, since all mental decisions are uncaused events, and all
acts of free will are mental decisions. 	

9. All acts of free will are uncaused events, so no acts of free will are existent things, because no
uncaused events are existent things.
Problem Set B
(1) Rewrite the arguments (verbally), (2) translate to wffs, (3) come up
with a conclusion that is valid (include implicit assumptions if necessary.
1. Ceausescu’s ban on abortion was designed to achieve one of his major aims: to
rapidly strengthen Romania by boosting its population.
1
A	
  boost	
  of	
  the	
  popula,on	
  (B)	
  strengthens	
  a	
  country	
  (S)	
  
The	
  ban	
  on	
  abor,on	
  (A)	
  gives	
  a	
  boost	
  to	
  the	
  popula,on	
  of	
  a	
  country	
  (B)	
  
Therefore,	
  a	
  ban	
  on	
  abor,on	
  (A)	
  strengthens	
  a	
  country	
  (S)
All	
  B	
  is	
  S	
  
All	
  A	
  is	
  B	
  
All	
  A	
  is	
  S
1. Ceausescu’s ban on abortion was designed to achieve one of his major aims: to
rapidly strengthen Romania by boosting its population.
1
A	
  boost	
  of	
  the	
  popula,on	
  (B)	
  strengthens	
  a	
  country	
  (S)	
  
The	
  ban	
  on	
  abor,on	
  (A)	
  gives	
  a	
  boost	
  to	
  the	
  popula,on	
  of	
  a	
  country	
  (B)	
  
Therefore,	
  a	
  ban	
  on	
  abor,on	
  (A)	
  strengthens	
  a	
  country	
  (S)
All	
  B	
  is	
  S	
  
All	
  A	
  is	
  B	
  
All	
  A	
  is	
  S
1. Ceausescu’s ban on abortion was designed to achieve one of his major aims: to
rapidly strengthen Romania by boosting its population.
1
A	
  boost	
  of	
  the	
  popula,on	
  (B)	
  strengthens	
  a	
  country	
  (S)	
  
The	
  ban	
  on	
  abor,on	
  (A)	
  gives	
  a	
  boost	
  to	
  the	
  popula,on	
  of	
  a	
  country	
  (B)	
  
Therefore,	
  a	
  ban	
  on	
  abor,on	
  (A)	
  strengthens	
  a	
  country	
  (S)
All	
  B*	
  is	
  S	
  
All	
  A*	
  is	
  B	
  
All	
  A	
  is	
  S*
1. Ceausescu’s ban on abortion was designed to achieve one of his major aims: to
rapidly strengthen Romania by boosting its population.
1
A	
  boost	
  of	
  the	
  popula,on	
  (B)	
  strengthens	
  a	
  country	
  (S)	
  
The	
  ban	
  on	
  abor,on	
  (A)	
  gives	
  a	
  boost	
  to	
  the	
  popula,on	
  of	
  a	
  country	
  (B)	
  
Therefore,	
  a	
  ban	
  on	
  abor,on	
  (A)	
  strengthens	
  a	
  country	
  (S)
All	
  B*	
  is	
  S	
  
All	
  A*	
  is	
  B	
  
All	
  A	
  is	
  S*
1. Ceausescu’s ban on abortion was designed to achieve one of his major aims: to
rapidly strengthen Romania by boosting its population.
Valid	
  argument
(1) Rewrite the arguments (verbally), (2) translate to wffs, (3) come up
with a conclusion that is valid (include implicit assumptions if necessary.
1. Government agents sardonically known as the Menstrual Police regularly rounded up women
in their work places to administer pregnancy tests. If a woman repeatedly failed to conceive,
she was forced to pay a steep “celibacy tax.”	

2. On Christmas day of 1989 crime was at its peak in the United States... Experts were predicting
darker scenarios.	

3. The evidence linking increased punishment with lower crime rates is very strong. Harsh prison
terms have been shown to act as both deterrent (for the would-be criminals on the street) and
prophylactic (for the would-be criminals who is already locked up)	

4. Researchers found that in the instances where the woman was denied an abortion, she often
resented her baby and failed to provide it with good home... The researchers found that these
children were more likely to become criminals. (for the solution generalize this example from
MORE LIKELY to ALL and focus it in the case of unwanted children)

Weitere ähnliche Inhalte

Was ist angesagt?

Liquid limit & plastic limit test
Liquid limit & plastic limit testLiquid limit & plastic limit test
Liquid limit & plastic limit testRaz Azad
 
Chapter 6 concrete dam engineering with examples
Chapter 6 concrete dam engineering with examplesChapter 6 concrete dam engineering with examples
Chapter 6 concrete dam engineering with examplesMohsin Siddique
 
Engineering Geology (Civil Engineering Applications)
Engineering Geology (Civil Engineering Applications)Engineering Geology (Civil Engineering Applications)
Engineering Geology (Civil Engineering Applications)GAURAV. H .TANDON
 
Sigmund Freud Part 1
Sigmund Freud Part 1Sigmund Freud Part 1
Sigmund Freud Part 1Sam Georgi
 
Categorical syllogism
Categorical syllogismCategorical syllogism
Categorical syllogism3842
 
CATEGORICAL SYLLOGISM
CATEGORICAL SYLLOGISMCATEGORICAL SYLLOGISM
CATEGORICAL SYLLOGISMashelle14
 
The categorical-syllogism
The categorical-syllogismThe categorical-syllogism
The categorical-syllogismanandhjose
 
Cross section of the canal, balancing depth and canal fsl
Cross section of the canal, balancing depth  and canal fslCross section of the canal, balancing depth  and canal fsl
Cross section of the canal, balancing depth and canal fslAditya Mistry
 
Hydraulic Design of Energy Dissipators for Culverts and Channels, 3rd Edition...
Hydraulic Design of Energy Dissipators for Culverts and Channels, 3rd Edition...Hydraulic Design of Energy Dissipators for Culverts and Channels, 3rd Edition...
Hydraulic Design of Energy Dissipators for Culverts and Channels, 3rd Edition...Todd Lewis
 
Significance of thesis
Significance of thesisSignificance of thesis
Significance of thesisAwan Kamal
 
Impediments to morality
Impediments to moralityImpediments to morality
Impediments to moralityJeremie Ann Ho
 
Braced cut in deep excavation
Braced cut in deep excavationBraced cut in deep excavation
Braced cut in deep excavationYogesh Pandey
 
_lateral_earth_pressure_(foundation engineering)
_lateral_earth_pressure_(foundation engineering)_lateral_earth_pressure_(foundation engineering)
_lateral_earth_pressure_(foundation engineering)sharda university
 
Mediate Inference/Syllogisms
Mediate Inference/SyllogismsMediate Inference/Syllogisms
Mediate Inference/SyllogismsShane Guillergan
 
The Importance of Logic
The Importance of LogicThe Importance of Logic
The Importance of LogicJonathan Fan
 
Examples on soil classification
Examples on soil classification Examples on soil classification
Examples on soil classification Malika khalil
 

Was ist angesagt? (20)

theory of seepage
theory of seepagetheory of seepage
theory of seepage
 
Liquid limit & plastic limit test
Liquid limit & plastic limit testLiquid limit & plastic limit test
Liquid limit & plastic limit test
 
Chapter 6 concrete dam engineering with examples
Chapter 6 concrete dam engineering with examplesChapter 6 concrete dam engineering with examples
Chapter 6 concrete dam engineering with examples
 
Engineering Geology (Civil Engineering Applications)
Engineering Geology (Civil Engineering Applications)Engineering Geology (Civil Engineering Applications)
Engineering Geology (Civil Engineering Applications)
 
Sigmund Freud Part 1
Sigmund Freud Part 1Sigmund Freud Part 1
Sigmund Freud Part 1
 
Categorical syllogism
Categorical syllogismCategorical syllogism
Categorical syllogism
 
CATEGORICAL SYLLOGISM
CATEGORICAL SYLLOGISMCATEGORICAL SYLLOGISM
CATEGORICAL SYLLOGISM
 
300 solved-problems
300 solved-problems300 solved-problems
300 solved-problems
 
The categorical-syllogism
The categorical-syllogismThe categorical-syllogism
The categorical-syllogism
 
Cross section of the canal, balancing depth and canal fsl
Cross section of the canal, balancing depth  and canal fslCross section of the canal, balancing depth  and canal fsl
Cross section of the canal, balancing depth and canal fsl
 
Hydraulic Design of Energy Dissipators for Culverts and Channels, 3rd Edition...
Hydraulic Design of Energy Dissipators for Culverts and Channels, 3rd Edition...Hydraulic Design of Energy Dissipators for Culverts and Channels, 3rd Edition...
Hydraulic Design of Energy Dissipators for Culverts and Channels, 3rd Edition...
 
Significance of thesis
Significance of thesisSignificance of thesis
Significance of thesis
 
Impediments to morality
Impediments to moralityImpediments to morality
Impediments to morality
 
Deep excavations
Deep excavationsDeep excavations
Deep excavations
 
Braced cut in deep excavation
Braced cut in deep excavationBraced cut in deep excavation
Braced cut in deep excavation
 
_lateral_earth_pressure_(foundation engineering)
_lateral_earth_pressure_(foundation engineering)_lateral_earth_pressure_(foundation engineering)
_lateral_earth_pressure_(foundation engineering)
 
Mediate Inference/Syllogisms
Mediate Inference/SyllogismsMediate Inference/Syllogisms
Mediate Inference/Syllogisms
 
Title defense
Title defenseTitle defense
Title defense
 
The Importance of Logic
The Importance of LogicThe Importance of Logic
The Importance of Logic
 
Examples on soil classification
Examples on soil classification Examples on soil classification
Examples on soil classification
 

Ähnlich wie AppTheories_T3

1 oriental bank-of-commerce-probationary-officers-exam.,-2009
1 oriental bank-of-commerce-probationary-officers-exam.,-20091 oriental bank-of-commerce-probationary-officers-exam.,-2009
1 oriental bank-of-commerce-probationary-officers-exam.,-2009Kumar Nirmal Prasad
 
1 oriental bank-of-commerce-probationary-officers-exam.,-2009
1 oriental bank-of-commerce-probationary-officers-exam.,-20091 oriental bank-of-commerce-probationary-officers-exam.,-2009
1 oriental bank-of-commerce-probationary-officers-exam.,-2009Kumar Nirmal Prasad
 
Solutions manual for analysis with an introduction to proof 5th edition by lay
Solutions manual for analysis with an introduction to proof 5th edition by laySolutions manual for analysis with an introduction to proof 5th edition by lay
Solutions manual for analysis with an introduction to proof 5th edition by layteckli
 
Analysis with an introduction to proof 5th edition lay solutions manual
Analysis with an introduction to proof 5th edition lay solutions manualAnalysis with an introduction to proof 5th edition lay solutions manual
Analysis with an introduction to proof 5th edition lay solutions manualPatrick492
 
ASSIGNMENT 1 7.4 EXERCISES Using the predicates listed for each.docx
ASSIGNMENT 1 7.4 EXERCISES Using the predicates listed for each.docxASSIGNMENT 1 7.4 EXERCISES Using the predicates listed for each.docx
ASSIGNMENT 1 7.4 EXERCISES Using the predicates listed for each.docxtrippettjettie
 
Logical Reasoning for NET SET Exam
Logical Reasoning for NET SET ExamLogical Reasoning for NET SET Exam
Logical Reasoning for NET SET ExamGaneshWagh31
 

Ähnlich wie AppTheories_T3 (11)

Epistemology and Formal Logic
Epistemology and Formal LogicEpistemology and Formal Logic
Epistemology and Formal Logic
 
AppTheories_T7
AppTheories_T7AppTheories_T7
AppTheories_T7
 
1 oriental bank-of-commerce-probationary-officers-exam.,-2009
1 oriental bank-of-commerce-probationary-officers-exam.,-20091 oriental bank-of-commerce-probationary-officers-exam.,-2009
1 oriental bank-of-commerce-probationary-officers-exam.,-2009
 
1 oriental bank-of-commerce-probationary-officers-exam.,-2009
1 oriental bank-of-commerce-probationary-officers-exam.,-20091 oriental bank-of-commerce-probationary-officers-exam.,-2009
1 oriental bank-of-commerce-probationary-officers-exam.,-2009
 
Solutions manual for analysis with an introduction to proof 5th edition by lay
Solutions manual for analysis with an introduction to proof 5th edition by laySolutions manual for analysis with an introduction to proof 5th edition by lay
Solutions manual for analysis with an introduction to proof 5th edition by lay
 
Analysis with an introduction to proof 5th edition lay solutions manual
Analysis with an introduction to proof 5th edition lay solutions manualAnalysis with an introduction to proof 5th edition lay solutions manual
Analysis with an introduction to proof 5th edition lay solutions manual
 
ASSIGNMENT 1 7.4 EXERCISES Using the predicates listed for each.docx
ASSIGNMENT 1 7.4 EXERCISES Using the predicates listed for each.docxASSIGNMENT 1 7.4 EXERCISES Using the predicates listed for each.docx
ASSIGNMENT 1 7.4 EXERCISES Using the predicates listed for each.docx
 
Seating arr
Seating arrSeating arr
Seating arr
 
6sittingarrangement
6sittingarrangement6sittingarrangement
6sittingarrangement
 
Logical Reasoning for NET SET Exam
Logical Reasoning for NET SET ExamLogical Reasoning for NET SET Exam
Logical Reasoning for NET SET Exam
 
Logical reasoning For NET/SET
Logical reasoning For NET/SET Logical reasoning For NET/SET
Logical reasoning For NET/SET
 

Mehr von Manu Muñoz H (20)

AppTheories_L7
AppTheories_L7AppTheories_L7
AppTheories_L7
 
AppTheories_T6
AppTheories_T6AppTheories_T6
AppTheories_T6
 
AppTheories_L6
AppTheories_L6AppTheories_L6
AppTheories_L6
 
AppTheories_T5
AppTheories_T5AppTheories_T5
AppTheories_T5
 
AppTheories_L5
AppTheories_L5AppTheories_L5
AppTheories_L5
 
AppTheories_T4
AppTheories_T4AppTheories_T4
AppTheories_T4
 
AppTheories_L4
AppTheories_L4AppTheories_L4
AppTheories_L4
 
AppTheories_L3
AppTheories_L3AppTheories_L3
AppTheories_L3
 
AppTheories_T2
AppTheories_T2AppTheories_T2
AppTheories_T2
 
AppTheories_L2
AppTheories_L2AppTheories_L2
AppTheories_L2
 
AppTheories_T1
AppTheories_T1AppTheories_T1
AppTheories_T1
 
AppTheories_L1
AppTheories_L1AppTheories_L1
AppTheories_L1
 
SN-Lecture 13
SN-Lecture 13SN-Lecture 13
SN-Lecture 13
 
SN- Lecture 12
SN- Lecture 12SN- Lecture 12
SN- Lecture 12
 
SN- Lecture 11
SN- Lecture 11SN- Lecture 11
SN- Lecture 11
 
SN- Lecture 10
SN- Lecture 10SN- Lecture 10
SN- Lecture 10
 
SN- Lecture 9
SN- Lecture 9SN- Lecture 9
SN- Lecture 9
 
SN- Lecture 8
SN- Lecture 8SN- Lecture 8
SN- Lecture 8
 
SN- Lecture 7
SN- Lecture 7SN- Lecture 7
SN- Lecture 7
 
SN- Lecture 6
SN- Lecture 6SN- Lecture 6
SN- Lecture 6
 

Kürzlich hochgeladen

4.18.24 Movement Legacies, Reflection, and Review.pptx
4.18.24 Movement Legacies, Reflection, and Review.pptx4.18.24 Movement Legacies, Reflection, and Review.pptx
4.18.24 Movement Legacies, Reflection, and Review.pptxmary850239
 
Like-prefer-love -hate+verb+ing & silent letters & citizenship text.pdf
Like-prefer-love -hate+verb+ing & silent letters & citizenship text.pdfLike-prefer-love -hate+verb+ing & silent letters & citizenship text.pdf
Like-prefer-love -hate+verb+ing & silent letters & citizenship text.pdfMr Bounab Samir
 
Science 7 Quarter 4 Module 2: Natural Resources.pptx
Science 7 Quarter 4 Module 2: Natural Resources.pptxScience 7 Quarter 4 Module 2: Natural Resources.pptx
Science 7 Quarter 4 Module 2: Natural Resources.pptxMaryGraceBautista27
 
ISYU TUNGKOL SA SEKSWLADIDA (ISSUE ABOUT SEXUALITY
ISYU TUNGKOL SA SEKSWLADIDA (ISSUE ABOUT SEXUALITYISYU TUNGKOL SA SEKSWLADIDA (ISSUE ABOUT SEXUALITY
ISYU TUNGKOL SA SEKSWLADIDA (ISSUE ABOUT SEXUALITYKayeClaireEstoconing
 
Grade 9 Q4-MELC1-Active and Passive Voice.pptx
Grade 9 Q4-MELC1-Active and Passive Voice.pptxGrade 9 Q4-MELC1-Active and Passive Voice.pptx
Grade 9 Q4-MELC1-Active and Passive Voice.pptxChelloAnnAsuncion2
 
What is Model Inheritance in Odoo 17 ERP
What is Model Inheritance in Odoo 17 ERPWhat is Model Inheritance in Odoo 17 ERP
What is Model Inheritance in Odoo 17 ERPCeline George
 
INTRODUCTION TO CATHOLIC CHRISTOLOGY.pptx
INTRODUCTION TO CATHOLIC CHRISTOLOGY.pptxINTRODUCTION TO CATHOLIC CHRISTOLOGY.pptx
INTRODUCTION TO CATHOLIC CHRISTOLOGY.pptxHumphrey A Beña
 
Visit to a blind student's school🧑‍🦯🧑‍🦯(community medicine)
Visit to a blind student's school🧑‍🦯🧑‍🦯(community medicine)Visit to a blind student's school🧑‍🦯🧑‍🦯(community medicine)
Visit to a blind student's school🧑‍🦯🧑‍🦯(community medicine)lakshayb543
 
Difference Between Search & Browse Methods in Odoo 17
Difference Between Search & Browse Methods in Odoo 17Difference Between Search & Browse Methods in Odoo 17
Difference Between Search & Browse Methods in Odoo 17Celine George
 
ACC 2024 Chronicles. Cardiology. Exam.pdf
ACC 2024 Chronicles. Cardiology. Exam.pdfACC 2024 Chronicles. Cardiology. Exam.pdf
ACC 2024 Chronicles. Cardiology. Exam.pdfSpandanaRallapalli
 
AMERICAN LANGUAGE HUB_Level2_Student'sBook_Answerkey.pdf
AMERICAN LANGUAGE HUB_Level2_Student'sBook_Answerkey.pdfAMERICAN LANGUAGE HUB_Level2_Student'sBook_Answerkey.pdf
AMERICAN LANGUAGE HUB_Level2_Student'sBook_Answerkey.pdfphamnguyenenglishnb
 
ENGLISH 7_Q4_LESSON 2_ Employing a Variety of Strategies for Effective Interp...
ENGLISH 7_Q4_LESSON 2_ Employing a Variety of Strategies for Effective Interp...ENGLISH 7_Q4_LESSON 2_ Employing a Variety of Strategies for Effective Interp...
ENGLISH 7_Q4_LESSON 2_ Employing a Variety of Strategies for Effective Interp...JhezDiaz1
 
ECONOMIC CONTEXT - PAPER 1 Q3: NEWSPAPERS.pptx
ECONOMIC CONTEXT - PAPER 1 Q3: NEWSPAPERS.pptxECONOMIC CONTEXT - PAPER 1 Q3: NEWSPAPERS.pptx
ECONOMIC CONTEXT - PAPER 1 Q3: NEWSPAPERS.pptxiammrhaywood
 
Computed Fields and api Depends in the Odoo 17
Computed Fields and api Depends in the Odoo 17Computed Fields and api Depends in the Odoo 17
Computed Fields and api Depends in the Odoo 17Celine George
 
call girls in Kamla Market (DELHI) 🔝 >༒9953330565🔝 genuine Escort Service 🔝✔️✔️
call girls in Kamla Market (DELHI) 🔝 >༒9953330565🔝 genuine Escort Service 🔝✔️✔️call girls in Kamla Market (DELHI) 🔝 >༒9953330565🔝 genuine Escort Service 🔝✔️✔️
call girls in Kamla Market (DELHI) 🔝 >༒9953330565🔝 genuine Escort Service 🔝✔️✔️9953056974 Low Rate Call Girls In Saket, Delhi NCR
 
Gas measurement O2,Co2,& ph) 04/2024.pptx
Gas measurement O2,Co2,& ph) 04/2024.pptxGas measurement O2,Co2,& ph) 04/2024.pptx
Gas measurement O2,Co2,& ph) 04/2024.pptxDr.Ibrahim Hassaan
 

Kürzlich hochgeladen (20)

4.18.24 Movement Legacies, Reflection, and Review.pptx
4.18.24 Movement Legacies, Reflection, and Review.pptx4.18.24 Movement Legacies, Reflection, and Review.pptx
4.18.24 Movement Legacies, Reflection, and Review.pptx
 
Like-prefer-love -hate+verb+ing & silent letters & citizenship text.pdf
Like-prefer-love -hate+verb+ing & silent letters & citizenship text.pdfLike-prefer-love -hate+verb+ing & silent letters & citizenship text.pdf
Like-prefer-love -hate+verb+ing & silent letters & citizenship text.pdf
 
Science 7 Quarter 4 Module 2: Natural Resources.pptx
Science 7 Quarter 4 Module 2: Natural Resources.pptxScience 7 Quarter 4 Module 2: Natural Resources.pptx
Science 7 Quarter 4 Module 2: Natural Resources.pptx
 
ISYU TUNGKOL SA SEKSWLADIDA (ISSUE ABOUT SEXUALITY
ISYU TUNGKOL SA SEKSWLADIDA (ISSUE ABOUT SEXUALITYISYU TUNGKOL SA SEKSWLADIDA (ISSUE ABOUT SEXUALITY
ISYU TUNGKOL SA SEKSWLADIDA (ISSUE ABOUT SEXUALITY
 
Grade 9 Q4-MELC1-Active and Passive Voice.pptx
Grade 9 Q4-MELC1-Active and Passive Voice.pptxGrade 9 Q4-MELC1-Active and Passive Voice.pptx
Grade 9 Q4-MELC1-Active and Passive Voice.pptx
 
LEFT_ON_C'N_ PRELIMS_EL_DORADO_2024.pptx
LEFT_ON_C'N_ PRELIMS_EL_DORADO_2024.pptxLEFT_ON_C'N_ PRELIMS_EL_DORADO_2024.pptx
LEFT_ON_C'N_ PRELIMS_EL_DORADO_2024.pptx
 
What is Model Inheritance in Odoo 17 ERP
What is Model Inheritance in Odoo 17 ERPWhat is Model Inheritance in Odoo 17 ERP
What is Model Inheritance in Odoo 17 ERP
 
INTRODUCTION TO CATHOLIC CHRISTOLOGY.pptx
INTRODUCTION TO CATHOLIC CHRISTOLOGY.pptxINTRODUCTION TO CATHOLIC CHRISTOLOGY.pptx
INTRODUCTION TO CATHOLIC CHRISTOLOGY.pptx
 
Visit to a blind student's school🧑‍🦯🧑‍🦯(community medicine)
Visit to a blind student's school🧑‍🦯🧑‍🦯(community medicine)Visit to a blind student's school🧑‍🦯🧑‍🦯(community medicine)
Visit to a blind student's school🧑‍🦯🧑‍🦯(community medicine)
 
Difference Between Search & Browse Methods in Odoo 17
Difference Between Search & Browse Methods in Odoo 17Difference Between Search & Browse Methods in Odoo 17
Difference Between Search & Browse Methods in Odoo 17
 
YOUVE GOT EMAIL_FINALS_EL_DORADO_2024.pptx
YOUVE GOT EMAIL_FINALS_EL_DORADO_2024.pptxYOUVE GOT EMAIL_FINALS_EL_DORADO_2024.pptx
YOUVE GOT EMAIL_FINALS_EL_DORADO_2024.pptx
 
OS-operating systems- ch04 (Threads) ...
OS-operating systems- ch04 (Threads) ...OS-operating systems- ch04 (Threads) ...
OS-operating systems- ch04 (Threads) ...
 
ACC 2024 Chronicles. Cardiology. Exam.pdf
ACC 2024 Chronicles. Cardiology. Exam.pdfACC 2024 Chronicles. Cardiology. Exam.pdf
ACC 2024 Chronicles. Cardiology. Exam.pdf
 
AMERICAN LANGUAGE HUB_Level2_Student'sBook_Answerkey.pdf
AMERICAN LANGUAGE HUB_Level2_Student'sBook_Answerkey.pdfAMERICAN LANGUAGE HUB_Level2_Student'sBook_Answerkey.pdf
AMERICAN LANGUAGE HUB_Level2_Student'sBook_Answerkey.pdf
 
YOUVE_GOT_EMAIL_PRELIMS_EL_DORADO_2024.pptx
YOUVE_GOT_EMAIL_PRELIMS_EL_DORADO_2024.pptxYOUVE_GOT_EMAIL_PRELIMS_EL_DORADO_2024.pptx
YOUVE_GOT_EMAIL_PRELIMS_EL_DORADO_2024.pptx
 
ENGLISH 7_Q4_LESSON 2_ Employing a Variety of Strategies for Effective Interp...
ENGLISH 7_Q4_LESSON 2_ Employing a Variety of Strategies for Effective Interp...ENGLISH 7_Q4_LESSON 2_ Employing a Variety of Strategies for Effective Interp...
ENGLISH 7_Q4_LESSON 2_ Employing a Variety of Strategies for Effective Interp...
 
ECONOMIC CONTEXT - PAPER 1 Q3: NEWSPAPERS.pptx
ECONOMIC CONTEXT - PAPER 1 Q3: NEWSPAPERS.pptxECONOMIC CONTEXT - PAPER 1 Q3: NEWSPAPERS.pptx
ECONOMIC CONTEXT - PAPER 1 Q3: NEWSPAPERS.pptx
 
Computed Fields and api Depends in the Odoo 17
Computed Fields and api Depends in the Odoo 17Computed Fields and api Depends in the Odoo 17
Computed Fields and api Depends in the Odoo 17
 
call girls in Kamla Market (DELHI) 🔝 >༒9953330565🔝 genuine Escort Service 🔝✔️✔️
call girls in Kamla Market (DELHI) 🔝 >༒9953330565🔝 genuine Escort Service 🔝✔️✔️call girls in Kamla Market (DELHI) 🔝 >༒9953330565🔝 genuine Escort Service 🔝✔️✔️
call girls in Kamla Market (DELHI) 🔝 >༒9953330565🔝 genuine Escort Service 🔝✔️✔️
 
Gas measurement O2,Co2,& ph) 04/2024.pptx
Gas measurement O2,Co2,& ph) 04/2024.pptxGas measurement O2,Co2,& ph) 04/2024.pptx
Gas measurement O2,Co2,& ph) 04/2024.pptx
 

AppTheories_T3

  • 3. D: Drug dealers in the U.S. P: People who protested in Eastern Germany S: Students in the course Application of Theories Language Capital letters are used for categories Small letters are used for individuals d: Tom the drug dealer c: Charlie the protester s: Silvia the student
  • 4. 5 words To formulate a correct wff, you need only five words: all no some is not
  • 5. 8 Wff’s (woofs) There are only eight (8) forms of wffs: all A is B no A is B some A is B some A is not B x is B x is not B x is y x is not y
  • 6. More notation a ≠ A A ≠ A’ ≠ A’’
  • 7. Use of capital letters All syllogistic wff’s have the verb is Wff’s beginning with a word (not a letter) use two capital letters Wff’s beginning with a letter (not a word) begin with a small some C is D g is C If a wff begins with a letter, the second letter can be either capital or small (g is D) or (g is d)
  • 9. The Star Test (1) A syllogism is a vertical sequence of one or more wff’s in which each letter occurs twice and the letters form a chain. Each wff has at least one letter in common with the wff just below it (if there is one) no P is B some C is B ---------------- some C is not P
  • 10. Distributed: An instance of a letter is distributed in a wff if it occurs just after all or anywhere after no or not. To test validity, use the star test. Star premise letters that are distributed and conclusion letters that are not distributed. The syllogism is valid if and only if every capital letter is starred exactly once and there is exactly one star on the right hand side. all A is B some C is A ---------------- some C is B Valid or not? The Star Test (2)
  • 11. all A* is B some C is A ---------------- some C* is B* A, B and C have only one * Only one star on the right hand side (B*) The Star Test (3) The argument is valid
  • 13. Different ways to say: all A is B Every (each, any) A is B Whoever is A is B A’s are B’s Those who are A are B If a person is A, then he or she is B If your are A, then you are B Only B’s are A’s None but B’s are A’s No one is A unless he or she is B No one is A without being B A thing is not A unless it is B It is false that some A is not B
  • 14. A’s are not B’s Ever (each, any) A is non-B Whoever is A is not B If a person is A, then he or she is not B If you are A, then you are not B No one that is A is B There is not a single A that is B Not any A is B It is false that there is an A that is B It is false that some A is B Different ways to say: no A is B
  • 15. A’s are sometimes B’s One or more A’s are B’s There are A’s that are B’s It’s false that no A is B Different ways to say: some A is B
  • 16. One or more A’s are not B’s There are A’s that are not B’s Not all A’s are B’s It’s false that all A is B Different ways to say: some A is not B
  • 17. Contradictions: If the one is false, the other one is true no A is B is contradictory to some A is B. all A is B is contradictory to some A is not B
  • 19. Steps to derive conclusions Step 1: Translate the premises and star Step 2: Figure out the letters in the conclusions (the two letters that occur just once in the premises) Step 3: Figure out the form of the conclusion Step 4: Add the conclusion and do the star test
  • 20. Form of the conclusion If all premises are universal (all, no), then use (all A is B) or (no A is B) Otherwise, use (some A is B) or (some A is not B) Use (x is A) or (x is not A) Use (x is y) or (x is not y) If both conclusion letters are capital If just one conclusion letter is small If both conclusion letters are small Use no or not if there are any negative premises
  • 21. Idiomatic arguments Hence, thus, so, therefore... It must be, it can’t be... This proves (or shows) that... These often indicate premises These often indicate conclusions Because, for, since, after all... I assume that, as we know... For these reasons...
  • 23. (1) Rewrite the arguments as wf's (verbally), (2) translate to syllogisms, (3) test validity by means of (3.a) the star test, and (3.b) a venn diagram 1. No physical actions are chance occurrences, so no random events are physical actions, since all chance occurrences are random events. ! 2. All mental decisions are things describable by science, because all events are things describable by science, and all mental decisions are events. ! 3. No free decisions are things describable by science; therefore, no free decisions are predictable events, inasmuch as all things describable by science are predictable events.
  • 24. 1 No  physical  ac,ons  (P)  are  chance  occurrences  (C)   All  chance  occurrences  (C)  are  random  events  (R)   No  random  events  (R)  are  physical  ac,ons  (P)
  • 25. 1 No  physical  ac,ons  (P)  are  chance  occurrences  (C)   All  chance  occurrences  (C)  are  random  events  (R)   No  random  events  (R)  are  physical  ac,ons  (P) No  P  is  C   All  C  is  R   No  R  is  P
  • 26. 1 No  physical  ac,ons  (P)  are  chance  occurrences  (C)   All  chance  occurrences  (C)  are  random  events  (R)   No  random  events  (R)  are  physical  ac,ons  (P) No  P  is  C   All  C  is  R   No  R  is  P
  • 27. 1 No  physical  ac,ons  (P)  are  chance  occurrences  (C)   All  chance  occurrences  (C)  are  random  events  (R)   No  random  events  (R)  are  physical  ac,ons  (P) No  P*  is  C*   All  C*  is  R   No  R  is  P
  • 28. 1 No  physical  ac,ons  (P)  are  chance  occurrences  (C)   All  chance  occurrences  (C)  are  random  events  (R)   No  random  events  (R)  are  physical  ac,ons  (P) No  P*  is  C*   All  C*  is  R   No  R  is  P Invalid  argument
  • 29. 1 No  physical  ac,ons  (P)  are  chance  occurrences  (C)   All  chance  occurrences  (C)  are  random  events  (R)   No  random  events  (R)  are  physical  ac,ons  (P) No  P*  is  C*   All  C*  is  R   No  R  is  P Invalid  argument 2 All  events  (E)  are  things  describable  by  science  (D)   All  mental  decisions  (M)  are  events  (E)   All  mental  decisions  (M)  are  things  describable  by  science  (D) All  E  is  D   All  M  is  E   All  M  is  D All  things  describable  by  science  (D)  are  predictable  events  (P)   No  free  decisions  (F)  are  things  describable  by  science  (D)   No  free  decisions  (F)  are  predictable  events  (P) 3 All  D  is  P   No  F  is  D   No  F  is  P
  • 30. 1 No  physical  ac,ons  (P)  are  chance  occurrences  (C)   All  chance  occurrences  (C)  are  random  events  (R)   No  random  events  (R)  are  physical  ac,ons  (P) No  P*  is  C*   All  C*  is  R   No  R  is  P Invalid  argument 2 All  events  (E)  are  things  describable  by  science  (D)   All  mental  decisions  (M)  are  events  (E)   All  mental  decisions  (M)  are  things  describable  by  science  (D) All  E  is  D   All  M  is  E   All  M  is  D All  things  describable  by  science  (D)  are  predictable  events  (P)   No  free  decisions  (F)  are  things  describable  by  science  (D)   No  free  decisions  (F)  are  predictable  events  (P) 3 All  D  is  P   No  F  is  D   No  F  is  P
  • 31. 1 No  physical  ac,ons  (P)  are  chance  occurrences  (C)   All  chance  occurrences  (C)  are  random  events  (R)   No  random  events  (R)  are  physical  ac,ons  (P) No  P*  is  C*   All  C*  is  R   No  R  is  P Invalid  argument 2 All  events  (E)  are  things  describable  by  science  (D)   All  mental  decisions  (M)  are  events  (E)   All  mental  decisions  (M)  are  things  describable  by  science  (D) All  E*  is  D   All  M*  is  E   All  M  is  D* All  things  describable  by  science  (D)  are  predictable  events  (P)   No  free  decisions  (F)  are  things  describable  by  science  (D)   No  free  decisions  (F)  are  predictable  events  (P) 3 All  D*  is  P   No  F*  is  D*   No  F  is  P
  • 32. 1 No  physical  ac,ons  (P)  are  chance  occurrences  (C)   All  chance  occurrences  (C)  are  random  events  (R)   No  random  events  (R)  are  physical  ac,ons  (P) No  P*  is  C*   All  C*  is  R   No  R  is  P Invalid  argument 2 All  events  (E)  are  things  describable  by  science  (D)   All  mental  decisions  (M)  are  events  (E)   All  mental  decisions  (M)  are  things  describable  by  science  (D) All  E*  is  D   All  M*  is  E   All  M  is  D* All  things  describable  by  science  (D)  are  predictable  events  (P)   No  free  decisions  (F)  are  things  describable  by  science  (D)   No  free  decisions  (F)  are  predictable  events  (P) 3 All  D*  is  P   No  F*  is  D*   No  F  is  P Valid  argument Invalid  argument
  • 33. (1) Rewrite the arguments as wf's (verbally), (2) translate to syllogisms, (3) test validity by means of (3.a) the star test, and (3.b) a venn diagram 1. All mental decisions are things describable by science, but no things describable by science are uncaused happenings; it follows that no mental decisions are uncaused happenings. 2. Some natural processes are not free choices, because some natural processes are not caused occurrences, and no free choices are caused events. 3. All free decisions are uncaused happenings, and no mental decisions are uncaused happenings; consequently, no mental decisions are free decisions. 4. All uses of free will are decisions, yet some decisions are careful reflections, hence some uses of free will are careful reflections. 5. All persons who decide least are persons who are most free, so, since all persons who are most free are persons who decide most, all persons who decide least are persons who decide most. 6. Some coerced decision are not free choices, hence some desires are coerced decisions, as some desires are free choices. 7. All uncaused events are free decisions, but no mental decisions are free decisions, from which it follows that no uncaused events are mental decisions. 8. All acts of free will are uncaused events, since all mental decisions are uncaused events, and all acts of free will are mental decisions. 9. All acts of free will are uncaused events, so no acts of free will are existent things, because no uncaused events are existent things.
  • 35. (1) Rewrite the arguments (verbally), (2) translate to wffs, (3) come up with a conclusion that is valid (include implicit assumptions if necessary. 1. Ceausescu’s ban on abortion was designed to achieve one of his major aims: to rapidly strengthen Romania by boosting its population.
  • 36. 1 A  boost  of  the  popula,on  (B)  strengthens  a  country  (S)   The  ban  on  abor,on  (A)  gives  a  boost  to  the  popula,on  of  a  country  (B)   Therefore,  a  ban  on  abor,on  (A)  strengthens  a  country  (S) All  B  is  S   All  A  is  B   All  A  is  S 1. Ceausescu’s ban on abortion was designed to achieve one of his major aims: to rapidly strengthen Romania by boosting its population.
  • 37. 1 A  boost  of  the  popula,on  (B)  strengthens  a  country  (S)   The  ban  on  abor,on  (A)  gives  a  boost  to  the  popula,on  of  a  country  (B)   Therefore,  a  ban  on  abor,on  (A)  strengthens  a  country  (S) All  B  is  S   All  A  is  B   All  A  is  S 1. Ceausescu’s ban on abortion was designed to achieve one of his major aims: to rapidly strengthen Romania by boosting its population.
  • 38. 1 A  boost  of  the  popula,on  (B)  strengthens  a  country  (S)   The  ban  on  abor,on  (A)  gives  a  boost  to  the  popula,on  of  a  country  (B)   Therefore,  a  ban  on  abor,on  (A)  strengthens  a  country  (S) All  B*  is  S   All  A*  is  B   All  A  is  S* 1. Ceausescu’s ban on abortion was designed to achieve one of his major aims: to rapidly strengthen Romania by boosting its population.
  • 39. 1 A  boost  of  the  popula,on  (B)  strengthens  a  country  (S)   The  ban  on  abor,on  (A)  gives  a  boost  to  the  popula,on  of  a  country  (B)   Therefore,  a  ban  on  abor,on  (A)  strengthens  a  country  (S) All  B*  is  S   All  A*  is  B   All  A  is  S* 1. Ceausescu’s ban on abortion was designed to achieve one of his major aims: to rapidly strengthen Romania by boosting its population. Valid  argument
  • 40. (1) Rewrite the arguments (verbally), (2) translate to wffs, (3) come up with a conclusion that is valid (include implicit assumptions if necessary. 1. Government agents sardonically known as the Menstrual Police regularly rounded up women in their work places to administer pregnancy tests. If a woman repeatedly failed to conceive, she was forced to pay a steep “celibacy tax.” 2. On Christmas day of 1989 crime was at its peak in the United States... Experts were predicting darker scenarios. 3. The evidence linking increased punishment with lower crime rates is very strong. Harsh prison terms have been shown to act as both deterrent (for the would-be criminals on the street) and prophylactic (for the would-be criminals who is already locked up) 4. Researchers found that in the instances where the woman was denied an abortion, she often resented her baby and failed to provide it with good home... The researchers found that these children were more likely to become criminals. (for the solution generalize this example from MORE LIKELY to ALL and focus it in the case of unwanted children)