1. Graduate Report – 2012-13
Sustainable Environmental Planning
(CE-636)
Non Point Pollution
&
Urban Planning Measures
Submitted By
Malvika Jiashal
(P12UP004)
Faculty Adviser
Dr. J. E. M. Macwan
Post Graduate Section in Urban Planning
Civil Engineering Department,

2. Graduate Report – 2012-13
Contents:
1. Introduction
2. Pollution:
2.1 Difference between Point & Non Point Pollution:
3. Non Point Pollution:
3.1 Principal sources
3.1.1. 1. Urban and suburban areas
3.1.2. Agricultural operations
3.1.3. Atmospheric inputs
3.1.4. Forestry and mining operations
3.1.5. Marinas and boating activities
4. Impact of Non Point Pollution
5. Counter Measures For Non-Point Pollution
6. Case Study : Non-Point regulation in India
7. Conclusion
References

3. Graduate Report – 2012-13
1. Introduction:
Pollution refers to the contamination of water, land, or the air by substances that can
adversely impact the environment and human health. Usually, these substances are waste
materials. Pollution is “something in the wrong place at the wrong time in the wrong quantity”
(Holdgate, 1979). Pollution can be classified in various categories, Non-point pollution is also a
kind of pollution that is affecting the environment in a larger way. Non point pollution loads are
load with their sources dispersed over wide areas. These loads flow into water bodies including
river, lakes, reservoir, ponds, wetlands, ground water and the sea, and they may contain organic
matter, nitrogen, phosphorus and agricultural fields, cleared forest and urban runoff are typical
non-point sources.
This graduate report attempts to be a brief summary on the cause and counter measures
for Non-Point Source Pollution. It also give a short description on difference between point
pollution and non-point pollution. The report includes a case studies on Non-point regulation in
India.
2. Pollution:
The word pollution is derived from the Latin term “polluere”, which means-“ to soil” or
“defile”. Pollution is the introduction of contaminants into the natural environment that cause
adverse change. Pollution can take the form of chemical substances or energy, such as noise, heat
or light. Pollutants, the components of pollution, can be either foreign substances/energies or
naturally occurring contaminants. Sometimes it is not the type of material, but its concentration,
that determines if it is a pollutant. For example, nutrients such as nitrogen and phosphorus are
essential elements for plant growth. If they are overabundant in a body of water, they can lead to
conditions that have a negative effect on people's health.
Pollution is often classed as :
i. Point pollution
ii. Nonpoint pollution.
Point Pollution:
`Point pollution is pollution that comes from a single source. Point source is the emissions or
waste that can be tracked back to a specific individual or company There are a few examples of
Point pollution:
a) Water pollution from an oil refinery wastewater discharge outlet.
b) Noise pollution from a jet engine
c) Disruptive seismic vibration from a localized seismic study
d) Light pollution from an intrusive street light

4. Graduate Report – 2012-13
e) Thermal pollution from an industrial process outfall
f) Radio emissions from an interference-producing electrical device
Non Point Pollution:
Nonpoint pollution refers to both water and air pollution from diffuse sources. Nonpoint
water pollution affects a water body from sources such as polluted runoff from agricultural areas
draining into a river, or wind-borne debris blowing out to sea. Nonpoint air pollution affects air
quality from sources such as smokestacks or car tailpipes. Although these pollutants have
originated from a point source, the long-range transport ability and multiple sources of the
pollutant make it a nonpoint pollution. Nonpoint pollution can be contrasted with point pollution,
where discharges occur to a body of water or into the atmosphere at a single location.
Fig-1: Sources of Point and Non-point Pollution
Sources: A map published by National Geographic Society,1993

5. Graduate Report – 2012-13
2.1. Difference between Point & Non Point Pollution:
Sr.
No.
Point pollution Non-Point Pollution
1 Point pollution is pollution that
comes from a single source
Non-point pollution does not have one
specific source,.
2 Point source is the emissions or
waste that can be tracked back to a
specific individual or company
Non point source is most commonly
credited to runoff and has harder to trace
back to the source
3 If the source of the pollution is
stationary or immobile then that is
point source pollution.
Example: domestic waste
The pollution is a non point one if the
origin of the pollutants is mobile or non-
stationary. Examples are means of
transportation such as buses, airplanes and
ships.
4 Point Pollution is more readily
identifiable and measurable
Non Point pollutionis more difficult to
identify or measuring because of the
specific source.
5 Point Pollution is easier to control
and regulate.
Non Point pollutionis more difficult,
related to monitoring and enforcement of
mitigating controls, due to the
heterogeneity of soil and water systems at
large scales

6. Graduate Report – 2012-13
3. Non Point Pollution:
Non-point pollution are those whose discharge source are dispersed over a large area .
3.1 Principal sources
Nonpoint pollution, which is pollution from diffuse sources that can't be tied to a specific
location. The precise location of non point source load cannot be identified as they are scattered
through out the catchment area.It is generally difficult to regulate them because their discharge
location cannot be clarified. They may contain pollutants
 Excess fertilizers, herbicides, and insecticides from agricultural lands and residential
areas;
 Oil, grease, and toxic chemicals from
urban runoff and energy production;
 Sediment from improperly managed
construction sites, crop and forest lands,
and eroding streambanks;
 Salt from irrigation practices and acid
drainage from abandoned mines;
 Bacteria and nutrients from livestock,
pet wastes, and faulty septic systems;
The main principal sources of Non point
pollution are as follows:
i. Urban and suburban areas
ii. Agricultural operations
iii. Atmospheric inputs
iv. Forestry and mining operations
v. Marinas and boating activities
Fig-3: principles of Non-point pollution Source: bakker, Jane.
A Guide to the Housatonic River Estuary. Cromwell;The Houstanic Valley
Association,1998
3.1. 1 Urban and suburban areas
Urban and Suburban Areas are a main sources of nonpoint pollution due to the amount of
runoff that is produced due to the large amount of paved surfaces. Paved surfaces, such as

7. Graduate Report – 2012-13
asphalt and concrete are impervious to water penetrating them. Any water that is on contact with
these surfaces will run off and be absorbed by the surrounding environment. These surfaces
make it easier for stormwater to carry pollutants into the surrounding soil. Construction sites
located in urban and suburban areas tend to have disturbed soil that is easily eroded by
precipitation like rain, snow, and hail.Additionally, discarded debris on the site can be carried
away by runoff waters and enter the aquatic environment.
Typically, in suburban areas, chemicals are used for lawn care. These chemicals can end up in
runoff and enter the surrounding environment via storm drains in the city. Since the water in
storm drains is not treated before flowing into surrounding water bodies, the chemicals enter the
water directly.
3.1.2 Agricultural operations
Agricultural operations account for a large percentage of all nonpoint pollution . When large
tracts of land are plowed to grow crops, it exposes and loosens soil that was once buried. This
makes the exposed soil more vulnerable to erosion during rainstorms. It also can increase the
amount of fertilizer and pesticides carried into nearby bodies of water.
3.1.3 Atmospheric inputs
Atmospheric inputs of pollution into the air can come from multiple sources. Typically,
industrial facilities, like factories, discharge pollution via a smokestack. Although this is a point
source of pollution, due to the distributed nature, long-range transport, and multiple sources of
the pollution, it is considered a nonpoint source. Additionally, atmospheric pollution can become
water pollution by being washed out of the atmosphere in the form of rain or snow.
3.1.4 Forestry and mining operations
Forestry and mining operations can have significant inputs to nonpoint pollution.
Forestry: Forestry operations reduce the number of trees in a given area, thus reducing the soil
stability in that area as well. This action, coupled with the heavy machinery rolling over the soil
increases the risk of erosion.
Mining: Active mining operations are considered point of pollution, however runoff from
abandoned mining operations contribute to nonpoint source pollution. In strip mining operations,
the top of the mountain is removed to expose the desired ore. If this area is not properly
reclaimed once the mining has finished, soil erosion can occur. Additionally, there can be
chemical reactions with the air and newly exposed rock to create acidic runoff. Water that seeps
out of abandoned subsurface mines can also be highly acidic. This can seep into the nearest body
of water and change the pH in the aquatic environment.

8. Graduate Report – 2012-13
3.1.5. Marines and boating activities
Chemicals used for boat maintenance, like paint, solvents, and oils find their way into
water through runoff. Additionally, spilling fuels or leaking fuels directly into the water from
boats contribute to nonpoint pollution. Nutrient and bacteria levels are increased by poorly
maintained sanitary waste receptacles on the boat and pump-out stations.
4. Impact of Non Point Pollution:
Influence of non-point pollution is very severe on environment and the people. Few impacts
are given in the following points:
1. A major nonpoint pollutant from agricultural activities is an excess of nutrients, which
can occur through applications of crop fertilizers and manure from animal production
facilities. Excessive nutrients may over stimulate the growth of aquatic weeds and algae,
depleting the oxygen available for a healthy aquatic community.
2. It is deteriorating water quality nationwide. The most common nonpoint source pollutants
causing water-quality problems include nutrients (nitrogen and phosphorus), siltation
(soil particles), metals, and pathogens (bacteria and viruses
3. Urban runoff transports a variety of pollutants, including sediment from new
development; oil, grease, and toxic chemicals from vehicles; and nutrients and pesticides
from turf management and gardening. It can also carry pathogenic bacteria and viruses
released from failing septic systems and inadequately treated sewage, which can result in
closed beaches and shellfish beds, contaminated drinking water sources, and even severe
human illness
4. Medical waste enters water through prescription drugs taken by individuals. As the senior
population increases, so does the amount of prescription drugs taken by the population as
a whole. Many waste water treatment plants do not have the necessary filtering systems
installed to remove these waste products from sewer systems. This diffuse source of
pollution contributes to the amount of NSP in waterways and consequently, soil
5. Rainwaters introduce toxins such as fuel, oil, and other contaminants found on these
surfaces into water resources. An additional risk is soil erosion. Water flowing over the
impervious surfaces can gather much speed, causing it to erode stream banks and
shorelines. This action introduces sediment into the waters, with the potential to kill
micro-organisms and filter-feeding wildlife. Removal of this food base can impact entire
ecosystems

9. Graduate Report – 2012-13
6. Planning Measures For Non-Point Pollution:
Non point sources cause eutrophication and disruption of ecological balance. Measures to
effectively deal with these sources are therefore extremely important.
6.1. Urban and suburban areas
To control nonpoint pollution, many different approaches can be undertaken in both
urban and suburban areas.
i. Buffer strips provide a barrier of grass in between impervious paving material like
parking lots and roads, and the closest body of water. This allows the soil to absorb any
pollution before it enters the local aquatic system.
ii. Retention ponds can be built in drainage areas to create an aquatic buffer between runoff
pollution and the aquatic environment. Runoff and storm water drain into the retention
pond allowing for the contaminates to settle out and become trapped in the pond.
iii. The use of porous pavement allows for rain and storm water to drain into the ground
beneath the pavement, reducing the amount of runoff that drains directly into the water
body.
iv. Restoration methods such as constructing wetlands are also used to slow runoff as well as
absorb contamination.
v. Construction sites typically implement simple measures to reduce pollution and runoff.
Firstly, sediment or silt fences are erected around construction sites to reduce the amount
of sediment and large material draining into the nearby water body.
vi. Laying grass or straw along the border of construction sites also work to reduce nonpoint
source pollution.
6.2. Agricultural operations
i. To control sediment and runoff, farmers may utilize erosion controls to reduce runoff
flows and retain soil on their fields.
ii. Conservation tillage is a concept used to reduce runoff while planting a new crop.
iii. Nutrients (nitrogen and phosphorus) are typically applied to farmland as commercial
fertilizer; animal manure; or spraying of municipal or industrial wastewater (effluent) or
sludge. Nutrients may also enter runoff from crop residues, irrigation water, wildlife, and
atmospheric deposition. Farmers can develop and implement nutrient management plans
to reduce excess application of nutrients.
iv. To minimize pesticide impacts, farmers may use Integrated Pest Management (IPM)
techniques (which can include biological pest control) to maintain control over pests,
reduce reliance on chemical pesticides, and protect water quality.

10. Graduate Report – 2012-13
6.3. Forestry operations
With well planned placement of both logging trails, also called skid trails, can reduce the
amount of sediment generated. By planning the trails location as far away from the logging
activity as possible as well as contouring the trails with the land, it can reduce the amount of
loose sediment in the runoff. Additionally, by replanting trees on the land after logging, it
provides a structure for the soil to regain stability as well as replaces the logged environment.
6.4. Marines
By installing shut off valves on fuel pumps at the dock, it can help reduce the amount of
spillover into the water. Additionally, pump-out stations that are easily accessible to boaters in
the marina can provide a clean place in which to dispose of sanitary waste without dumping it
directly into the water. Finally, something as simple as having trash containers around the marina
can prevent larger objects entering the water.
7. Case Study : Non-Point regulation in India:
National Laws and Policies:
The Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act of 1974 (the Act) is the primary
water quality management law in India. It requires the establishment of a Central Pollution
Control Board (CPCB) and individual State Pollution Control Boards (SPCBs)The main function
of the CPCB is to “promote cleanliness of streams and wells in different areas of the States” .The
SPCBs are responsible for routine water quality monitoring and setting effluent standards but
they are bound by the directions of the CPCB. The CPCB has established a national network of
monitoring stations, at which samples are taken monthly, quarterly, or (in the case
ofgroundwater) every six months. Quality objectives have been set according to the use to which
a water resource is put.
The Act does not explicitly address nonpoint source pollution, but several of its
provisions could be used to control pollution from nonpoint as well as point sources. For
example, it is an offense under the Act to knowingly cause or permit any “poisonous, noxious or
polluting matter” on land or to enter into any stream, well, or sewer.
It was recognized by the CPCB in its 2000/01 annual report that nonpoint water pollution
sources were becoming increasingly prominent and were likely to include farming, mining,rural
hamlets, leaks and spillovers from point pollution sources, leachates and deposition ofair-
pollutants (CPCB, 2001). More recently, in its 2007 report on the Status of Ground water Quality
in India—Part I, the CPCB talked of the “alarming picture” of declining ground water quality. It

11. Graduate Report – 2012-13
was observed that “all activities carried out on land have thepotential to contaminate
groundwater, whether associated with urban, industrial oragricultural activities” (CPCB, 2007).
Diffuse sources of groundwater pollution were listed,including the leaching of agrochemicals
and animal wastes, subsurface discharges fromlatrines and septic tanks and infiltration of
polluted urban run-off and sewage wheresewerage does not exist or is defunct. The Report
concluded that “the only solution to diffuse sources of pollution is to integrate land use with
water management” (CPCB, 2007).
State Regulation
With little emphasis from the CPCB and other national authorities on nonpoint source
pollution as well as no clear mandates from the Act to address it, SPCBs have focused their
resources on monitoring compliance with point source authorizations issued under the Act.A
2006 study of India’s environmental compliance and enforcement programmes found there was
an “over emphasis” on permitting, monitoring and inspection of the activities of large industry
while the “significant cumulative pollution impacts” from small and medium-sized enterprises,
municipal sources, transport and agriculture are “virtually disregarded” (Organisation for
Economic Co-operation & Development (OECD), 2006).
The same study highlighted various existing enforcement challenges faced by the
SPCBs(OECD, 2006) and it seems likely that, in the absence of national initiatives, non point
source pollution will remain a low priority at the state level unless and until industrial and
municipal point sources of pollution are regulated effectively.
Summary
Water quality regulation is driven nationally, primarily through the Water (Prevention
and Control of Pollution) Act of 1974, but responsibility for enforcement is vested in the
individual SPCBs. Emphasis is placed on the regulation of point source discharges, and there are
no laws that specifically address nonpoint sources of water pollution. Although it would appear
that the central government has the power to regulate nonpoint sources under that Act and the
Environment (Protection) Act of 1986, no substantive action has been taken. However, a number
of policy documents and initiatives have drawn attentionto the problem over the course of
several years.
8. Conclusion:
Proper enforcement and other implementation measures will be necessary to achieve in
nonpoint source pollution even just those reductions thus far accomplished from point sources.
The level of government at which those authorities and programmes are created and
implemented will necessarily be unique to each country, but should be strategic rather than

12. Graduate Report – 2012-13
patchwork to be effective. Regardless of the level of national involvement in water pollution
control writ large or on nonpoint source pollution specifically, the national government likely
will need to play a role in trans-boundary nonpoint pollution issues because the states or
provinces cannot address those problems internally. The national government could be a more
efficient level of governance at which to establish such policies. In addition, a national
government should be cognizant of the political, financial, structural and scientific capacity of
state or provincial governments to control nonpoint sources of pollution adequately.
References
1. Keith Loague and Dennis L Corwin (2005) “Point and NonPoint Source
Pollution”.published in Encyclopedia of Hydrological Sciences.
2. Priyanka Jamwal,Atul K. Mittal,(2002) “Point and non-point microbial source pollution:
A case study of Delhi” published in Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, 490-499.
3. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Association (NOAA), "Nonpoint Source Pollution"
published in. Washington D.C. (September 2007)
4. Susan, Adam & Jessica (March 2011), “Regulating Nonpoint Source Water Pollution in
a Federal Government: Four Case Studies”, published in Water Resources Development,
Vol. 27, No. 1, 53–69,
5. Yuhei Inamori , Nsoshi Fujimoto, “Non-Point Sources of Pollution” , published in Water
Qualty abd standards-Vol II
6. Mark E.,Anthony & David (2006)“Vegetative FIlter Strips for Non-point Control in
Agriculture,regents of university of California 8195,3-4
7. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nonpoint_source_pollution
8. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pollution