1. DENTAL IMPLANTS
Presented by : Vikram Singh Pundir
Guided by: Dr Deepak Grover
Presented to : Dr Viniti Goel (Professor and Head)
Dr Deepak Grover (Professor)
Dr. Deepak Bala (Reader)
Dr. Tanvi Ohri (Sr.Lecturer)
Shikha and Jaspreet (3rd year)
Sarvani (2nd year)
Sonam and Malti (1st year)
3. CONTENT
1.Defination
2.Parts of Dental Implants
3.Various implant systems
4.Concepts of Osseointegration
5.Surgical Technique
6.Latest advances in implantology
7.Conclusion
8.Refrences
4.
5.
6. DENTAL IMPLANT
A Prosthetic device of alloplastic material(s)
implanted into the oral tissues beneath the
mucosal &/or periosteal layer &/or within the
bone to provide retention & support for a fixed
or removable prosthesis
7. RATIONAL OF IMPLANTS
• Maintenance of bone
• Maintenance of occlusal vertical dimension
• Esthetics
• Proper occlusion
• Improved patient psychological health
• Regained propioception
• Increased retention and stability
• Improved phonetics
• Improved success rates of prosthesis
8. PARTS OF A MODERN DENTAL
IMPLANT…
I-Implant PFZ-Post Cylinder PFS-Abutment Screw
9. Basic Parts of Dental Implant
• Sealing Screw
• Healing cap
• Laboratory Analogue
10. VARIOUS IMPLANT SYSTEMS
These differ mainly in biomaterial design
and surgical procedure.
3 implants design are:
• Screw shaped
• Cylinder shaped
• Tapered screw shaped
11. VARIOUS IMPLANT SYSTEMS
• NOBEL Biocare/Branemark
• International Team for Oral Implantology(ITOI)
• 3i (Implant Innovations)
• Astra Dental Implant System
• IMZ
• Osstem
• Indident (Indigenous) & many more
14. According To Material Groups
OSBORNE & NEWSELEY
DISTANT
OSTEOGENESIS
CONTACT
OSTEOGENESIS
Osteoconduction
Osteoinduction
15. Osseointegration
• As first described by
Brånemark denotes at
least some direct
contact of living bone
with surface of
implants at light
microscopic level.
• Without interposition
of non-bone tissue.
• Direct structural &
functional connection.
OSSEOINTEGRATION
OSSEOINTEGRATION
18. Osseointegration
• The concept also named ‘Functional Ankylosis’
by Shroeder
• Also called Osteo-integration as
Osseointegration considered a trademark of
Brånemark & manufacturers NobelPharma
19. Histological Aspects of
Osseointegration
• Electron Microscopy contradicts direct
implant-bone contact.Amorphous cell free
layer of glycosaminoglycans-or lamina
limitans like line-50nm wide &
mineralization 2um from metal.
• However a rigid Fixation or functional
Osseointegration is present.
20. FIBRO-OSSEOUS INTEGRATION
• Tissue to implant contact by interposition
of a healthy dense collagenous tissue
between the implant and the bone
interface.
• Normally, fibro osseous union between
the implant surface and adjoining alveolar
bone is not desirable because union
formed is a week union.
21. • The formation of fibro osseous integration
is attributed to proliferation of connective
tissue into the interface, which hampers
the osseous integration process.
22. EVALUATION OF IMPLANT
STABILITY
NON INVASIVE METHODS
• Percussion
• Radiographs
• Periotest
• Resonance Frequency analysis(Meredith et al)
• Implatest
• Dyanamic Model Testing
• Reverse removal test
• GCF Evaluation-Presence of (AST)
• Synchrotron Radiation imaging
• High resolution Micro focus X-Ray
25. Invasive Methods
• GRINDING using L.M. Tech (Donath
et al)
Enables 10mm thick section at interface
• HISTOMORHOMETRY-fr. Ground
section
• ULTRASTRUCTURAL STUDIES-TEM
26. CRITERIA FOR IMPLANT
SUCCESS
• Immobile when tested clinically
• No peri-implant radiolucency on radiograph
• Vertical bone loss less than 0.2mm annually
• Absence of pain, infections, neuropathies
27. KEY FACTORS FOR
OSSEOINTEGRATION
ALBREKTSSON(1981)
• Implant Material
• Implant Design
• Surface Quality
• Status of Bone
• Surgical Technique
• Loading Condition
HOBO(1988)
• Biocompatibility
Material
• Design of Fixture
• Prevention of excessive
heat
• Loading Consideration
28. IMPLANT Materials
TITANIUM - most suitable
• Excellent Biocompatibility
• Non-reactive
• Formation of oxide on surface
• Strong & Malleable
• Favours osteoconduction
29. Implant (Fixture) Designs
Various Classifications based on design:
• According to Anchorage Components
• According to Geometry
• Dyanamic Dental Implant
Classification(A.F.N.O.R)-1998
• According to Diameter
39. Ramus Blade & Ramus frame
A three blade one piece device designed
for a relatively atrophied mandible
40. Transosteal
It is a one piece Transmandibular complex
implant penetrating both cortical plates &
passing through the full thickness of Alveolar
bone
49. Surgical Technique
Prerequisites for Osseointegration
• Minimum trauma during surgery
• Rotation of cutting instrument less than 800
rpm
• Cooling with physiologic saline
• Establishment of Primary stability
• Avoidance of infection
• Bio-inert implant material
• Healing period of at least 3 months
50. Surgical Technique
Prerequisites for Osseointegration
• Minimum trauma during surgery
• Rotation of cutting instrument less than 800
rpm
• Cooling with physiologic saline
• Establishment of Primary stability
• Avoidance of infection
• Bio-inert implant material
• Healing period of at least 3 months
51. • Diagnostic wax Up
• Sectioned duplicate
cast of Wax-up
• Saggital bone outline
drawn using bone
mapping procedure
52. • Determination of
mucosal thickness
• Sectioned cast with
bone outline
• Saw-cut cast with
hollow cylinder
implant
62. • Loss of upper
incisors
• Surgical Template in
place
63.
64. Overload Consideration
Strategies to avoid implant Overload
• Place implants perpendicular to occlusal
plane
• Place implants in curvilinear manner
• Avoid use of Cantilevers
• Control Occlusal factors(cusp
angles,width of occlusal table)
66. Indications
• Distal Extension case
• Severely atrophied residual ridge
• Insufficient number of teeth
• Unfavourable position of teeth
• Single tooth replacement
• Orthopedic anchor
82. Implants for Growing Patients
• Used when there is congenital partial anodontia or
traumatic bone loss
• Conservation of bone is most important reason
• Minimum age is 18-20years.
• Favoured sites-mandible midline
• Implants in max. Post. Quad. Delayed till 15yrs in
females & 17yrs in males.
84. • Implants as source of absolute
anchorage- Onplant
- Aarhus Implant
- Mini Implant
• Anchorage & abutments
• Implant site preparation
improved by orthodontics
85. LATEST ADVANCES IN IMPLANTOLOGY
“ALWAYS CONSULT A PERIODONTIST BEFORE
PLANNING A IMPLANT”
• Digital Implantology (2-D to 3-D)
• Basal Implantology
• Immediate Loading implants
• Immediate Insertion Implants
• Flapless design in Implants
87. References
• Contemporary Oral and Maxillofacial
Surgery 5th edition
• Jan Lindhe Clinical periodontology and
implant dentistry 5th edition
• Carl E Mish implant dentistry