this is some how medium (in length) presentation about task-based language teaching or TBLT

1. Mohammed Imad
21712386

2.  Task-Based Language Teaching (TBLT) refers to an approach
based on the use of tasks as the core unit of planning and
instruction in language teaching. Some of its proponents (e.g.,
Willis 1996) present it as a logical development of
Communicative Language Teaching since it draws on several
principles that formed part of the communicative language
teaching movement from the 1980s. For example:
 - Activities that involve real communication are essential for
language learning.
 - Activities in which language is used for carrying out
meaningful tasks promote learning.
 - Language that is meaningful to the learner supports the
learning process.

3.  It’s usually characterized as an approach, rather than a
method. Is not monolithic; it does not constitute one single
methodology. Its multifaced approach, which can be used
creatively with other different syllabus types and different
purposes. Thus it can be linked to other approaches such
as content-based and text based teaching.
 Proponents of TBLT contrasts with earlier grammar-
focused approach to teaching such as audiolingualism,
they are characterized as teacher-dominant, form-oriented
classroom practice.
 Curricula/syllabuses that formulate lower-level goals in
term of linguistic content. Curricula/syllabuses that
formulate lower-level goals in terms of language used.

4.  While in practice, some proponents of TBLT may be
implement the approach only partially and combine it with
more traditional classroom activities. Advocates of TBLT
often seek to contrast it with the PPP [situational
approach]:
• unlike a PPP approach the students are free of language
control. In all three stages they must use all their language
resources rather that just practice one pre-selected item.
• A natural context is developed from the students
experience with the language that is personalized and
relevant to them. With PPP its necessary to create a
context.

5.  the students will have much more varied
exposure to language with TBL[ task based
learning].
 The language explore arises from the students
needs. This need dictates what will be covered
in the lesson.
 It is a strong communication approach where
students spend a lot of time communicating.
PPP lessons seem very teacher-centered by
comparison.
 It’s enjoyable and motivating. (Frost 2004)

6.  Two early applications of a task-based approach within a
communicative framework for language teaching were the
Malaysian Communicational Syllabus (1975) and the
Bangalore Project (Beretta and Davies 1985; Prabhu 1987;
Beretta 1990) both of which were relatively short-lived.
 The role of tasks has received further support from some
researchers in SLA, who are interested in developing
pedagogical applications of second language acquisition
theory.
 An interest in tasks as potential building blocks of second
language instruction emerged when researchers turned to
tasks as SLA research tools in the mid-1980s

7.  Engaging learners in task work provides a better context for the
activation of learning processes than form-focused activities,
and hence ultimately provides better opportunities for language
learning to take place. Language learning is believed to depend
on immersing students not merely in “comprehensible input”
but in tasks that require them to negotiate meaning and engage
in naturalistic and meaningful communication.
 Although PPP lessons are often supplemented with skill
lessons, most students taught mainly through conventional
approaches, such as PPP, leave school unable to communicate
effectively in English. This situation has promoted ELT
professionals to take note of the findings from SLA research
studies and turn towards holistic approaches where meaning is
central and where opportunities for language use abound. Task
based is one such approach.

8. The key assumptions of task-based instruction are summarized by
Feez (1998: 17) as:-
 The focus is on process rather than product.
 Basic elements are purposeful activities and tasks that emphasize
communication and meaning.
 Learners learn language by interacting communicatively and
purposefully while engaged in the activities and tasks.
 Activities and tasks can be either: those that learners might need
to achieve in real life; those that have a pedagogical purpose
specific to the classroom.
 Activities and tasks of a task-based syllabus are sequenced
according to difficulty.
 The difficulty of a task depends on a range of factors including
the previous experience of the learner, the complexity of the task,
the language required to undertake the task, and the degree of
support L available.

9.  Richards explains the growing interest in TBLT because of
its links to Communicative Language Teaching
methodology and support from some prominent SLA
theorists, TBLT has gained considerable attention within
applied linguistics, in recent years it moved beyond
research and small-scale setting and seen a number of
applications in mainstream education, particularly in the
Benelux countries (Van den Branden 2006), it has been
recommended as a component of the reform of language
teaching in China (Wang and Lam 2009). Shehadeh
(2005: 14) reports: American Government Language
Institutions that with the use of this approach the learners
have faced rapid improvements in a short period of time.

10. Leaver and Kaplan 2004: 61) report the benefits of TBLT
after US State Department programs shifted to task-based
approach as the follows:
 Greater motivation
 Opportunity for repetition without boredom
 Greater curricular flexibility
 Promotion of learning how to learn
 An opportunity for natural error correction
 Promotion of risk taking
 Higher proficiency results
 Increased student satisfaction, and better program evaluation
results.

11.  Task-Based Language Teaching proposes the notion of “task”
as a central unit of planning and teaching. Although definitions
of task vary in TBLT, there is a commonsensical understanding
that a task is an activity or goal that is carried out using
language, such as finding a solution to a puzzle, reading a map
and giving directions, making a telephone call, writing a letter,
or reading a set of instructions and assembling a toy
Nunan (1989: 10) offers this definition:
 the communicative task [is] a piece of classroom work which
involves learners in comprehending, manipulating,-producing
or interacting in the target language while their attention is
principally focused on meaning rather than form. The task
should also have a sense of completeness, being able to stand
alone as a communicative act in its own right.
 Page 177-178

12.  The use of tasks as a unit in curriculum planning has a
much older history in education. It first appeared in the
vocational training practices of the 1950s. Task focus here
first derived from training design concerns of the military
regarding new military technologies and occupational
specialties of the period. Task analysis initially focused on
solo psychomotor tasks for which little communication or
collaboration was involved. In task analysis, on-the-job,
largely manual tasks were translated into training tasks.
The process is outlined by Smith (1971: 584)

13.  A similar process is at the heart of the curriculum approach
known as Competency-Based Language Teaching. Task-based
training identified several key areas of concern.
 Analysis of real-world task-use situations.
 The translation of these into teaching tasks descriptions.
 The detailed design of instructional tasks.
 The sequencing of instructional tasks in classroom
training/teaching.
 Doyle noted that in elementary education “the academic task is
the mechanism through which the curriculum is enacted for
students” (Doyle 1983:161). Academic tasks are defined as
having four important dimensions:
 The products students are asked to produce
 The operations they are required to use in order to produce these
 The cognitive operations required and the resources available
 The accountability system involved

14.  Theory of language
 TBLT is motivated primarily by a theory of learning rather than
a theory of language. However, several assumptions about the
nature of language can be said to underlie current approaches
to TBLT. These are:
 1. Language is primarily a means of making meaning. In
common with other realizations of communicative language
teaching, TBLT emphasizes the central role of meaning in
language use. Skehan notes that in task-based instruction
(TBI), “meaning is primary . . . the assessment of the task is in
terms of outcome” and that task-based instruction is not
“concerned with language display” (Skehan 1998: 98).
 2. Language is a means of achieving real-world goals. TBLT
emphasize that developing language proficiency is not an end
in itself but means to an end.

15.  3. Lexical units are central in language use and language
learning. In recent years, vocabulary has been considered to
play a more central role in second language learning than was
traditionally assumed. Vocabulary is here used to include the
consideration of lexical phrases, sentence, and collocations,
and not only words as significant units of linguistic lexical
analysis and language pedagogy.
 4. Spoken interaction is the central focus of language and
the keystone of language acquisition. Speaking and trying to
communicate with others through the spoken language drawing
on the learner’s available linguistic and communicative
resources is considered the basis for SLA in TBLT.
 5. Language use involves integration of skills. TBLT assumes a
holistic view of language one where language use draws on
different skills being used together.

16.  Theory of learning
 TBLT shares the general assumptions about the nature of
language learning underlying Communicative Language
Teaching, however, it draws more centrally on SLA theory, and
many of its proponents describe it from a cognitive perspective.
 1. Language learning is determined by learner internal,
rather than external factors.
 2. Language learning is an organic process. Language
learning develops gradually and learners pass through several
stages as they restrict their language over time.
 3.A focus on form can facilitate language learning. TBLT
does not preclude learners’ attention to form; however,
grammar is not taught as an isolated feature of language but as
it arise from, its role in meaningful communication.

17.  4. Negotiation of meaning provides learners with opportunities
for provision of comprehensible input and modified output. This
draws on an interactional view of learning that sees language
development as resulting from attempts to create meaning through
dialog interaction, in the process the learner receives different forms
of feedback such as confirmation checks, comprehension checks,
clarification requests, and repetition requests.
 5.Tasks provide opportunities for learners to “notice the gap”.
 6. Interaction and communication through tasks provides
opportunities for scaffolded learning.
 Wells (1999: 221) identifies three qualities for a learning event to
qualify as an example of scaffolding:
 a- Learners should be enable to do something they could not do before
the event
 b- Learners should be brought to a state of competence which enables
them to complete the task on their own
 c- Be followed by evidence of learners having achieved a greater level
of independent competence as a result of the scaffolding experience.
 7. Task activity and achievement are motivational.
 8. Learning difficulty can be negotiated and fine-tuned for particular
pedagogical purposes.

18.  Objectives: different learners have different objectives.
 A-(Questionnaires and interviews, the domain and
situations of language used in a course, what should be
focused on).
 B- (Activities should be motivational and meaningful,
such as information gap tasks, problem-solving tasks, and
games).

19.  The syllabus
 A TBLT syllabus differs from conventional syllabus, which
typically specifies such things as language structures,
functions, topics, themes, macro-skills, while a TBLT syllabus
specifies the tasks that should be carried out by learners within
a program.
Nunan (1989) suggests that a task based syllabus can be
developed with two types tasks:
 1. Real-world tasks, which are designed to practice or rehearse
those tasks that are found to be important in a needs analysis and
turn out to be important and useful in the real world.
 2. Pedagogical tasks, which have a psycholinguistic basis in SLA
theory and research but do not necessarily reflect real-world
tasks. This would be the case for learners who do not have clearly
identified needs, such as with young learners.
 Using the telephone would be an example of the former, and an
information-gap task would be an example of the latter.
 Page 185

20.  In task-based approach, students are confronted with
approximation and simulations of the kind of tasks they
are supposed to be able to perform outside the classroom
and learn about relevant forms of language while trying to
understand and produce the language that these
communicative tasks involve.
 Willis (1996) proposes six task types: listing, ordering and
sorting, comparing, problem-solving, sharing personal
experience, creative tasks.

21.  Pica, Kanagy, and Falodun (1993) classify tasks according
to the type of interaction that occurs in task
accomplishment and give the following classification:
 1. Jigsaw tasks: These involve learners combining
different pieces of information to form a whole (e.g., three
individuals or groups may have three different parts of a
story and have to piece the story together).
 2. Information-gap tasks: One student or group of
students has one set of information and another student or
group has a complementary set of information. They must
negotiate and find out what the other party’s information
is in order to complete an activity.

22.  3. Problem-solving tasks: Students are given a problem
and a set of information. They must arrive at a solution to
the problem. There is generally a single resolution of the
outcome.
 4. Decision-making tasks: Students are given a problem
for which there are a number of possible outcomes and
they must choose one through negotiation and discussion.
 5. Opinion exchange tasks: Learners engage in
discussion and exchange of ideas. They do not need to
reach agreement.

23.  Other characteristics of tasks, which apply to both real-life and
pedagogical tasks, have also been described, such as the
following:
 1. One-way or two-way: whether the task involves a one-way
exchange of information or a two-way exchange
 2. Convergent or divergent: whether the students achieve a
common goal or several different goals
 3. Collaborative or competitive: whether the students
collaborate to carry out a task or compete with each other on a
task
 4. Single or multiple outcomes: whether there is a single
outcome or many different outcomes are possible
 5. Concrete or abstract language: whether the task involves the
use of concrete language or abstract language
 6. Simple or complex processing: whether the task requires
relatively simple or complex cognitive processing
 7. Simple or complex language: whether the linguistic demands
of the task are relatively simple or complex
 8. Reality-based or not reality-based: whether the task mirrors a
real-world activity or is a pedagogical activity not found in the
real world

24.  A number of specific roles for learners are assumed in
current proposals for TBLT. Some of these overlap with
the general roles assumed for learners in Communicative
Language Teaching while others are created by the focus
on task completion as a central learning activity. Primary
roles that are implied by task work are:
 1.Group participants. Many tasks will be done in pairs
or small groups. For students more accustomed to whole-
class and/or individual work, this may require some
adaptation.

25.  2.Monitor. In TBLT, tasks are not employed for their own sake
but as a means of facilitating learning. Class activities have to
be designed so that students have the opportunity to notice how
language is used in communication. Learners themselves need
to “attend” not only to the message in task work, but also to the
form in which such messages typically come packed.
Therefore, a learner acts as a “monitor” paying attention to
form during activity.
 3.Risk-taker. Many tasks will require learners to create and
interpret messages for which they lack full linguistic resources
and prior experience. In fact, this is said to be the point of such
tasks. Practice in restating, paraphrasing, using paralinguistic
signals (where appropriate), and so on, will often be needed.
The skill of guessing from linguistic and contextual clues,
asking for clarification, and consulting with other learners may
also need to be developed.

26.  A-Motivate the students to invest mental energy in task
performance, and to support their level of motivation
through the various phases of a task-based activity.
 B- Efficiently organize the task-based activity.
 C- Interactionally support the student while they are
performing the task, and differentiate between students.
 Additional roles are also assumed for teachers in TBLT,
including:'
 1. Selector and sequence of tasks. A central role of the
teacher is in selecting, adapting, and/or creating the tasks
themselves and then forming these into an instructional
sequence in keeping with learner needs, interests, and
language skill level.

27.  2.Preparing learners for tasks. Most TBLT proponents
suggest that learners should not go into new tasks “cold” and
that some sort of pre task preparation or cuing is important.
Such activities might include topic introduction, clarifying task
instructions, helping students learn or recall useful words and
phrases to facilitate task accomplishment, and providing partial
demonstration of task procedures. Such cuing may be inductive
and implicit or deductive and explicit.
 3.Consciousness-raising. Current views of TBLT hold that if
learners are to acquire language through participating in tasks
they need to attend to or notice critical features of the language
they use and hear. This is referred to as “Focus on Form.”
TBLT proponents stress that this does not mean doing a
grammar lesson before students take on a task.
 4.Monitor. The teachers role is not merely to give learners
tasks to carry out but to observe and monitor their performance
on task and make decisions as to whether intervention is
needed during or after a task according to task performance.

28.  Van Grop and Bogaert (2006) describe the following sequence of activities
in task-based lessons:
 1. Introducing the task. This phase of the lesson has three functions:
 a- Motivation learners to perform the task.
 b- Preparing the learners to perform the task by discussing pre-supposed or
useful knowledge of the world.
 c- Organizing the performance phase by providing clear instruction on what
the purpose of the task is, and how it should or can be performed.
 2. Supporting task performance. This involves:
 a- Interactional support in which the teacher mediates between task demands
and the learner’s current abilities.
 b- Supportive intervention focusing on clarifying meaning or guide the
choice of language.
 c- Combining focus on meaning with focus on form.
 3. The post-task phase. This can involve:
 a- Reflection on the task and how it was accomplished.
 b- Focus on form.

29.  Willis (1996: 56-7) describes more detailed sequence of
pre-task, while-task and post-task activities and divides
the sequence into pre-task focus, focus on the task cycle,
and a language focus:

30.  Pre-task
 Introduction to topic and task
 - T helps Ss to understand the theme and objectives of the task,
for example, brainstorming ideas with the class, using pictures,
mime, or personal experience to introduce the topic.
 - Ss may do a pretask, for example, topic-based odd-word-out
games.
 - T may highlight useful words and phrases, but would not
preteach new structures.
 - Ss can be given preparation time to think about how to do the
task.
 - Ss can hear a recording of a parallel task being done (so long
as this does not give away the solution to the problem).
 - If the task is based on a text, Ss read part of it.

31.  The task cycle
 Task
 - The task is done by Ss (in pairs or groups) and gives Ss a
chance to use whatever language they already have to express
themselves and say whatever they want to say. This may be in
response to reading a text or hearing a recording.
 - T walks round and monitors, encouraging in a supportive way
everyone’s attempts at communication in the target language.
 - T helps Ss to formulate what they want to say, but will not
intervene to correct errors of form.
 - The emphasis is on spontaneous, exploratory talk and
confidence building, within the privacy of the small group.
 - Success in achieving the goals of the task helps Ss’
motivation.

32.  Planning
 - Planning prepares for the next stage, when Ss are asked
to report briefly to the whole class how they did the task
and what the outcome was.
 - Ss draft and rehearse what they want to say or write.
 - T goes round to advise students on language, suggesting
phrases and helping Ss to polish and correct their
language.
 - If the reports are in writing, T can encourage peer editing
and use of dictionaries.
 - The emphasis is on clarity, organization, and accuracy, as
appropriate for a public presentation.
 - Individual students often take this chance to ask
questions about specific language items.

33.  Report
 - T asks some pairs to report briefly to the whole class so
everyone can compare findings, or begin a survey. (NB:
There must be a purpose for
 Current communicative approaches
 others to listen.) Sometimes only one or two groups report
in full;, others comment and add extra points. The class
may take notes.
 - T chairs, comments on the content of their reports,
rephrases perhaps, but gives no overt public correction.
 Post-task listening
 - Ss listen to a recording of fluent speakers doing the same
task, and compare the ways in which they did the task
themselves.

34.  The language focus
 Analysis
 _ T sets some language-focused tasks, based on the texts
students have read or on the transcripts of the recordings they
have heard.
 - Examples include the following:
 Find words and phrases relared to the title of the topic or text.
 Read the transcript, find .words ending in s or J s, and say what
the s means.
 .., Find all the verbs in the simple past form. Say which refer to
past time and which do not.
 Underline and classify the questions in the transcript.
 - T starts Ss off, and then Ss continue, often in pairs.
 - T goes round to help; Ss can ask individual questions.
 _ In plenary, T then reviews the analysis, possibly writing
relevant language up on the board in list form; Ss may make
notes.

35.  Practice
 - T conducts practice activities as needed, based on the
language analysis work already on the board, or using
examples from the text or transcript.
 - Practice activities can include:
 -choral repetition of the phrases identified and classified
 -memory challenge games based on partially erased
examples or using
 -lists already on blackboard for progressive deletion
 -sentence completion (set by one team for another)
 -matching the past-tense verbs (jumbled) with the subject
or objects they had in the text

37.  Few would question the pedagogical value of employing tasks
as a vehicle for promoting communication and authentic
language use in second language classrooms, and depending on
one’s definition of a task, tasks have long been part of the
mainstream repertoire of language teaching techniques for
teachers of many different methodological persuasions. TBLT,
however, offers a different rationale for the use of tasks as well
as different criteria for the design and use of tasks. It is the
dependence on tasks as the primary source of pedagogical input
in teaching and the absence of a systematic grammatical or
other type of syllabus that characterizes current versions of
TBLT, and that distinguishes it from the use of tasks in
Competency-Based Language Teaching, another task-based
approach but one that is not wedded to the theoretical
framework and assumptions of TBLT.

38.  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=59XMhMO0FMU