Weitere ähnliche Inhalte Mehr von Lora Cecere (20) Kürzlich hochgeladen (20) Planning Software June 2014 Summary Charts1. Supply Chain Insights LLC Copyright © 2014, p. 1
Planning Software Study
Summary Charts
February - June 2014
2. Supply Chain Insights LLC Copyright © 2014, p. 2
Agenda
Study Overview
Planning Software Overview
Planning Software Implementation
Team Alignment
4. Supply Chain Insights LLC Copyright © 2014, p. 4
Most Respondents Work for a Manufacturer;
Company Revenue is $5B on Average
5. Supply Chain Insights LLC Copyright © 2014, p. 5
Over Two-Thirds of Manufacturers/Retailers
Work in a Process Industry
6. Supply Chain Insights LLC Copyright © 2014, p. 6
Over Half of Respondents Are Director Level or Higher;
62% Work in a Supply Chain Role
7. Supply Chain Insights LLC Copyright © 2014, p. 7
Agenda
Study Overview
Planning Software Overview
Planning Software Implementation
Team Alignment
8. Supply Chain Insights LLC Copyright © 2014, p. 8
90% of Respondents Have Demand Planning Software;
83% Have a Supply Planning Software
9. Supply Chain Insights LLC Copyright © 2014, p. 9
On Average, Respondents Report Having 3 Demand
or 3 Supply Planning Instances
10. Supply Chain Insights LLC Copyright © 2014, p. 10
Respondents Have More Demand Planners
Than Supply Planners on Average
11. Supply Chain Insights LLC Copyright © 2014, p. 11
Respondents with Higher Revenue Have More
Demand/Supply Planners
12. Supply Chain Insights LLC Copyright © 2014, p. 12
There Is No Statistical Difference in Number of Planners
Based on Number of Items
13. Supply Chain Insights LLC Copyright © 2014, p. 13
Respondents Have an Average of 52K SKUs,
58 Distribution Centers and 46 Production Facilities
14. Supply Chain Insights LLC Copyright © 2014, p. 14
Agenda
Study Overview
Planning Software Overview
Planning Software Implementation
Team Alignment
15. Supply Chain Insights LLC Copyright © 2014, p. 15
Respondents Were Split Into Groups Asked About
Either Demand or Supply Planning Software
16. Supply Chain Insights LLC Copyright © 2014, p. 16
Planning Software Vendors Are Broken Into 3 Groups for
Analysis: ERP Expansionist, Best of Breed and Other
17. Supply Chain Insights LLC Copyright © 2014, p. 17
Type of Vendor Is Consistent Across Demand
and Supply Planning Instances Asked About
18. Supply Chain Insights LLC Copyright © 2014, p. 18
One-Third of Instances Were Implemented In-house;
Implementation Took 14 Months on Average;
Nearly Half Were Early or On-Time
19. Supply Chain Insights LLC Copyright © 2014, p. 19
Over Half Were Under or On Budget;
Companies Got Their ROI in 9 Months on Average
20. Supply Chain Insights LLC Copyright © 2014, p. 20
69% Are Satisfied with the Performance of
Their Planning Instances Asked About
21. Supply Chain Insights LLC Copyright © 2014, p. 21
Satisfaction Is Higher for the Demand Planning
Instances Asked About Compared to Supply
22. Supply Chain Insights LLC Copyright © 2014, p. 22
Satisfaction Is Higher for Best of Breed and
Other Instances Overall
23. Supply Chain Insights LLC Copyright © 2014, p. 23
Satisfaction Is Higher for Those Planning Instances
Implemented Faster
24. Supply Chain Insights LLC Copyright © 2014, p. 24
Satisfaction Is Higher for Those Planning Instances
Implemented Early or On-Time
25. Supply Chain Insights LLC Copyright © 2014, p. 25
Satisfaction Is Higher for Those Planning Instances
Implemented Under or On Budget
26. Supply Chain Insights LLC Copyright © 2014, p. 26
Satisfaction Is Higher for Those Planning Instances
Implemented by the Technology Provider
28. Supply Chain Insights LLC Copyright © 2014, p. 28
Supply Planning Instances Were Somewhat More Likely
Than Demand to be Implemented by the Technology Provider
29. Supply Chain Insights LLC Copyright © 2014, p. 29
Best of Breed and Other Instances Were More Likely to Be
Implemented by the Technology Vendor
30. Supply Chain Insights LLC Copyright © 2014, p. 30
Time to Implement Was Less for Demand Than Supply
Instances Asked About
31. Supply Chain Insights LLC Copyright © 2014, p. 31
Time to Implement Was Less for Best of Breed
and Other Vendor Types
32. Supply Chain Insights LLC Copyright © 2014, p. 32
Time to Implement Was Less When Implemented by
the Technology Vendor
33. Supply Chain Insights LLC Copyright © 2014, p. 33
Demand Instances Were More Likely Than Supply to Be
Implemented Early or On-time
34. Supply Chain Insights LLC Copyright © 2014, p. 34
Instances from Other Vendors (Not ERP Expansionist
or Best of Breed) Were Implemented Faster
35. Supply Chain Insights LLC Copyright © 2014, p. 35
There Is No Difference in Implementation Speed by
How It Was Implemented
36. Supply Chain Insights LLC Copyright © 2014, p. 36
Demand Instances Were More Likely to Be
Under / On Budget Than Supply Instances
37. Supply Chain Insights LLC Copyright © 2014, p. 37
Instances from Best of Breed and Other Vendors Were
More Likely to Be Implemented Under or On Budget
38. Supply Chain Insights LLC Copyright © 2014, p. 38
There Is No Difference in Implementation Cost
Compared to Budget by How It Was Implemented
39. Supply Chain Insights LLC Copyright © 2014, p. 39
Instances That Were Early / On-Time Were
More Likely to Be Implemented Under or On Budget
41. Supply Chain Insights LLC Copyright © 2014, p. 41
Instances from Best of Breed and Other Vendors Were
More Likely to Get to ROI Faster
42. Supply Chain Insights LLC Copyright © 2014, p. 42
There Are No Significant Differences in Time to ROI
Based on How Software Was Implemented
43. Supply Chain Insights LLC Copyright © 2014, p. 43
Agenda
Study Overview
Planning Software Overview
Planning Software Implementation
Team Alignment
44. Supply Chain Insights LLC Copyright © 2014, p. 44
Most Important and Highest Performing on Alignment:
Sales & Marketing, Sales & Operations,
Manufacturing & Procurement
45. Supply Chain Insights LLC Copyright © 2014, p. 45
Greatest Gaps in Team Alignment:
Sales & IT and Operations & IT
47. Supply Chain Insights LLC Copyright © 2014, p. 47
Those with More Demand or Supply Planners Rate
Demand-Supply Team Alignment as Higher