2. PHILOSOPHERS

4. philosopher and cognitive
scientist
professor at the University of Pavia,
Italy
director of its Computational
Philosophy Laboratory.
A visiting professor at the Sun Yat-sen
University, Canton (Guangzhou), China.
He has taught at the Georgia Institute of
Technology and at The City University of
New York.
currently directs international research
programs in the EU, USA, and China

5. Italian philosopher
professor at the University of Genoa
He is a graduate of the University of
Milan
visiting professor at the University of
Düsseldorf, the University of Berne,
the University of Pittsburgh, Stanford
University, and the University of Geneva
currently president of the International
Academy of Philosophy of Science
previously served as president of the Italian Society
of Logic and Philosophy of Science, the Italian
Philosophical Society, and the Swiss Society of Logic
and Philosophy of Science. He served as treasurer of
the International Council for Philosophy and
Humanities of UNESCO.

6. For the two philosopher’s
endeavors

7. EVANDRO MAGNANI
-ethics of science &
LORENZO MAGNANI
technology,
- metaphysics,
-philosophy of
language,
- cognitive science,
- philosophical
-artificial intelligence,
anthropology,
-philosophy of medicine
- systems theory
-ABDUCTIVE
-philosophy of nature
REASONING
-SCIENTIFIC REALISM

8. On Philosophy of Science

9. is concerned with the
assumptions, foundations,
methods, implications
of science, and with the use
and merit of science. This
discipline sometimes
overlaps metaphysics and
epistemology, viz., when it
explores whether scientific
results comprise a study
of truth

10. philosophy of science,
accepting in it also an axiology
of science that could enable us
to retain the cognitive value of
science and at the same time
to make techno-scientific
activity compatible with the
satisfaction of a great variety
of values that inspire our
societies.

11. Ideals and its Focus

12. Lorenzo Magnani Evandro Agazzi
There views are
almost the same,
because it
requires TRUE
EVIDENCES and
ABDUCTIVE REFERENCES in
SCIENTIFIC
REASONING order for them to REALISM
achieve a he characterizes the
is a form of logical
deepened and scientific objectivity and
inference that goes from
reliable outcome. the defense of a
data description of
"scientific realism“ is
something to a
based on a deepening of
hypothesis that accounts
the notions of reference
for the reliable data and
and truth, with its
seeks to explain relevant
implications of
evidence
ontological type

13. Prepared by: