This document discusses aligning the interests of pedestrians and cyclists for a more livable city. It notes that while everyone walks, there is no powerful lobby to advocate for walking. It also states that pedestrians and cyclists dream of the same things - they want livable streets and to not have to put up with poor conditions. The document calls for a coherent vision and strategy to reclaim streets for a more livable city that prioritizes walking, cycling, and public transit over cars. It advocates for traffic calming and safer streets for all.
VIP Model Call Girls Kalyani Nagar ( Pune ) Call ON 8005736733 Starting From ...
We dream the same dreams: Aligning pedestrian and cyclist’s interests for a more liveable city
1. We dream the same dreams:
Aligning pedestrian and cyclist’s interests for a more liveable city
Hackney Cycling Conference
6th June 2014
Bruce McVean, Founder, Movement for Liveable London
@liveablelondon
@brucemcvean
2.
3. “Lowly, unpurposeful, and random as they may appear,
sidewalk contacts are the small change from which a city’s
wealth may grow.”
Jane Jacobs, The Death & Life of Great American Cities
Image: Living Streets
4. Everybody walks … but nobody cares
“No powerful lobby upholds the general interest in being able to
walk without constraint or danger. There's no money in it and
everyone expects someone else to put in the hard work.”
Nick Cohen, Why is Britain such a dangerous place for walkers? The Observer
16. “On any great urban street, every part of the current use has
it’s fierce defenders.”
Jarrett Walker, Human Transit
17. We need a coherent vision and strategy for London’s streets
“No goal, then no direction: no underlying plan, no consensus,
then no effective practical action. If society is paralysed today,
it is not for lack of means but for lack of purpose.”
Lewis Mumford, The Culture of Cities
I imagine most of you came here today because you want to make London a great city for cycling.
I have a confession, I don’t.
I want to make London a great city for walking – and playing, and watching the world go by, and gossiping on street corner – a great place to be
The measure of a great city is not how it treats its cyclists, but how it treats its pedestrions
Of course it’s actually both – and the real measure of a great city is whether it’s a fantastic place to live
Can’t turn London into an even better city for living in and walking around if we don’t get more people onto bikes – but need to make sure that every project to improve conditions for cyclists also improves conditions for pedestrians
City exist to bring people together
Hand’s up if you’re a member of London Cycling Campaign or CTC
Hand’s up if you’re a member of Living Streets
Hard to motivate people to campaign on pedestrian issues
People don’t identify as pedestrians – walking is almost a subconscious act and nobody leaves the house without shoes on their feet
London has relatively high levels of walking despite at times treating pedestrians appallingly – people are resilient and seemingly prepared to put up with a lot
Cycling – a specialist interest group that needs to become the vocal minority for the silent majority
Champions for a more liv able city not just space for cycling
1 = Better road safety
2 = Better conditions of pavements / better conditions of streets and better cycling infrastructure
Bike parking in between
Pedestrian and cyclist experience is often unpleasant and at time dangerous
Treated like idiots
Fob us off with sticking plaster solutions to the very real danger posed by poor driving
It’s always our responsibility to stay safe, despite the fact that we’re the ones posing no danger to others
A common enemy – not drivers – but political, business and media perception of the importance of drivers as voters and of driving to the good of society and the economy
Streets have to work hard – movement v place
Balance is wrong – too many streets are about movement, including many residential streets
Restoring the balance is just about creating safe conditions for cycling – it’s about creating high quality places where people want to send their time – where they can engage with city life
Everyone can agree on the problem – but can we all agree on the solution?
Competing demands – walk, bus, bike – but legitimate concerns
Can’t afford to fall out – because powerful voices to counter
Need a coherent vision and strategy – not individual visions and projects
Define what the transport system needs to look like if we’re to address the social, economic and environmental impacts of our current system – and work back from there
Strategy covering all surface modes of transport and the interrelationship between them
Traffic and road danger reduction has to be at the heart of any future vision – congestion charging mentioned once in the Mayor’s Cycling Vision – in Leon Daniels foreword as an example of previous innovation by TfL
A lot of the streets that currently have traffic volumes and speeds that would require segregated tracks hopefully won’t need them in the future
Reframing the role of streets
‘nothing to od with cycling’ ‘just cosmetic change’
Importance of adaptability – we may need it now but will we need it in the future?
Even ‘light segregation’ is an opportunity to improve conditions for all
How can your policies, projects or campaigns make the city a better place for walking?