Diese Präsentation wurde erfolgreich gemeldet.
Wir verwenden Ihre LinkedIn Profilangaben und Informationen zu Ihren Aktivitäten, um Anzeigen zu personalisieren und Ihnen relevantere Inhalte anzuzeigen. Sie können Ihre Anzeigeneinstellungen jederzeit ändern.

Illegal content in P2P networks: first cases in Lithuania

1.402 Aufrufe

Veröffentlicht am

presented on 2010.11.25 at MRU conference "Social Technologies 2010: Challenges, Opportunities, Solutions"

Veröffentlicht in: Business, Reisen, Technologie
  • Als Erste(r) kommentieren

  • Gehören Sie zu den Ersten, denen das gefällt!

Illegal content in P2P networks: first cases in Lithuania

  1. 1. illegal content in P2P networks: first cases in Lithuania Liutauras Ulevičius Mykolas Romeris University
  2. 2. basic facts  P2P usage – overhelming, most frequent uses: − file sharing, audiovisual content − majority of local internet users know/use P2P networks − ISP's used to advertise services as „free to get“ audiovisual content
  3. 3. cases in Lithuania  closing down torrent server − dc.meganet.lt  „106“ case − Kaunas district police vs. S.Bernotas  Microsoft vs. linkomanija.net − server taken-down  ...
  4. 4. I. legal vs. illegal
  5. 5. theoretical discussion  illegal: − IPR priority − no IPR holder consent  legal: − IPR holders are in charge to create a new model for remuneration for information exchange − public interest to protect free flow of information, provide opportunity for free creativity
  6. 6. II. theoretical & pracical problems
  7. 7. theoretical problems - who?  Device is owned by institution vs. employee  free WiFi – user responsibility as contractual clause  „dead PCs“ - no owner will  minors  ISP obligation to inform/educate
  8. 8. theoretical problems - why?  A deliberate action or a mistake  ISP & LANVA agreement?  user to prove safe usage?  „Microsoft“ 30 day trial for „Windows 7“  commercial purposes?
  9. 9. theoretical problems - why?  6 months to keep data?  Temporary PC copy during www browsing?  Privacy vs. „Linkomanija“ / LANVA  Pirate party: a) no damage for owner; b) piracy as good for development; c) too high value for low owner activity; d) it's not a theft  partial distribution = responsibility?  some content is legal to distribute via P2P
  10. 10. theoretical problems - how?  Factual: a) fake IP/MAC addresses; b) IP connection <> copying; c) „Windows 7“usage – PC check needed; d) no certification for „utorrent“ data  No formal procedure, regulation for network devices usage (e.g. France)  prosecutor or user to prove data were transfered  How to check closed-circle networks? (e.g. „Linkomanija“)