1. CAREER PORTFOLIO
Bryce Lindberg
Northwood University
Career Development
Professor Luzar

2. Table of Contents
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Introduction……………………………………….3
Goals………………………………………………….4
Resume………………………………………………5
Recommendation Letters…………………..6
Samples of work……………………………..7-9
Photos……………………………………….…….10
Awards……………………………………………..11

3. Introduction
• This portfolio in front of you represents who I am, an
energetic, creative individual who has many aspirations in life.
It will represent my work and achievements throughout my
college career
• My focus throughout college has been in business
administration.

4. Goals
• Obtain a job where I can utilize my skills and develop
skills to further my career.
• Future my knowledge in as a business manager.
• Use my skill set to help obtain goals of the company I
work for.
• Make the people that I am surrounded by the best they
can be.

5. Bryce Lindberg
Resume
2515 Rodd Street
Midland, Michigan, 48640
(517)375-4562
lindbergb@northwood.edu
OBJECTIVE
To obtain (Position title)
EDUCATION
Northwood University, midland Michigan
Expected graduation: may 2014
Bachelor in business management GPA: 3.49
Howell High school
High School Diploma GPA: 3.65
WORK EXPERIENCE
TT&C beaches, Howell Michigan
Sales associate, advertised and found people that would like to get beached installed in their lake or
pond. I also did the manual labor for the jobs.
Perfect Pines Landscaping
For this landscaping company I handle most of the financing and quoted most of the jobs. Along with
this I also went out and did manual labor at the job sites
SKILLS/ACTIVITIES
Work well with others
Sports: football, baseball, and golf

6. Letter of recomdendation

7. Samples of work
investment cost
Technology
Fixed O&M
Start year life time $/kW
variable
O&M
var cost cost
income profits years for
brakeven
point
cost: $kW year cost: $/GJ $kW year
Technology
Fossil based power plants
Fossil based power plants
Coal conventional electric
1990
30
1050
69
0.72
22.70
91.70
700.8
609.10
1.72 Coal conventional electric
Coal conventional electric with DeSulf/DeNOx
2000
30
1150
79
1.22
38.47
117.47
700.8
583.33
1.97 Coal conventional electric with DeSulf/DeNOx
Coal conv. with DeSulf/DeNOx and CO2 scrubber
2010
30
2000
80
1.53
48.25
128.25
700.8
572.55
3.49 Coal conv. with DeSulf/DeNOx and CO2 scrubber
Gas combined cycle
1990
20
600
36.6
0.63
19.87
56.47
700.8
644.33
0.93 Gas combined cycle
Gas combined cycle with CO2 scrubber
2010
20
1000
50
0.88
27.75
77.75
700.8
623.05
1.61 Gas combined cycle with CO2 scrubber
Gas turbine
1990
20
350
58.5
0.51
16.08
74.58
700.8
626.22
0.56 Gas turbine
Gas steam conventional
1990
20
987.7
50.63
0.56
17.66
68.29
700.8
632.51
1.56 Gas steam conventional
Cogenaration gas turbine
1990
20
750
51.6
0.63
19.87
71.47
700.8
629.33
1.19 Cogenaration gas turbine
Hydrogen fuel cell (CHP) in industry
2000
20
3500
20
7.5
236.50
256.50
700.8
444.30
7.88 Hydrogen fuel cell (CHP) in industry
Oil electric
1990
20
991
63.6
0.57
17.97
81.57
700.8
619.23
1.60 Oil electric
0.00
0.00
700.8
700.80
0.00 Nuclear and renewable power plants
Nuclear and renewable power plants
LWR Advanced nuclear plant
2000
30
2500
114
0.19
5.99
119.99
700.8
580.81
4.30 LWR Advanced nuclear plant
Hydro-electric plant
1990
50
3563
49.5
0.12
3.78
53.28
700.8
647.52
5.50 Hydro-electric plant
Solar photovoltaics
1990
20
4600
9
1.25
39.42
48.42
700.8
652.38
7.05 Solar photovoltaics
Solar thermal electric
2000
20
2900
9
1.25
39.42
48.42
700.8
652.38
4.45 Solar thermal electric
Wind turbine
1990
20
1150
13.5
0.83
26.17
39.67
700.8
661.13
1.74 Wind turbine
Biomass power plant
1990
20
3075
7.8
2.92
92.08
99.88
700.8
600.92
5.12 Biomass power plant
Geothermal electric
1990
20
3075
7.8
0.9
28.38
36.18
700.8
664.62
4.63 Geothermal electric

8. Michigan, 48640-2398
Phone 517-375-2996
USA
May 19, 2011
The Wall Street Journal
200 Liberty Street
New York City, NY
10281
Dear Editor,
As an avid outdoors man I have been fishing, hunting, and spent most of my life outdoors. I was
surprised after reading your article “Long Arm of the Law Penalizes Texans Who Nab Catfish by Hand”,
to find that they make laws against catfish noodling. Catching catfish with your hands and no technology
seems to be the purest way to fish.
While fishermen use fishing rod, nets and other tools to catch catfish, I find it bizarre that it would be
illegal to catch them with your hands. Noodling dates way back to the Indians, and could be considered
the naturalist way to catch catfish.
As for hurting the catfish population there are many more people that catch catfish using equipment,
why not make it illegal to use those methods of fishing rather than making it illegal to catch them
without using any type of equipment. Also rather than making noodling illegal they can set regulations
on the amount allow to be caught, or at least allow noodlers to catch the catfish and release them.
Sincerely,
Bryce Lindberg
Northwood University

9. Proposal 3 assignment
Bryce Lindberg
1) Michigan jobs and Michigan energy companies are pushing for proposal 3 because it will
bring about 94,000 jobs to Michigan and it also is said to bring about a healthier
environment. The ones that are against proposal 3 that are providing people with
energy (coal companies) they believe that it would be to expensive and they will not be
able to produce enough energy.
2) The money would go to creating the wind mill and the labor to build them. Also the
other devices that they would need for the cleaner environment act.
3) Michigan capacity 54,000
4) The coal for Michigan comes from other states, we import about $1.7 billion worth of
coal.
5) My vote yes.

10. Photos
Student athlete
Working with others

11. Awards