Altmetrics & Scholarly Publishing: the LIbrary Lay of the Land
•Als PPTX, PDF herunterladen•
1 gefällt mir•149 views
Academic librarian's experience with utilizing various metrics as a barometer for deciding what to order and what to cancel in library collections.
Empfohlen
Empfohlen
Weitere ähnliche Inhalte
Ă„hnlich wie Altmetrics & Scholarly Publishing: the LIbrary Lay of the Land
Ă„hnlich wie Altmetrics & Scholarly Publishing: the LIbrary Lay of the Land (20)
Mehr von Elaine Lasda
Mehr von Elaine Lasda (20)
KĂĽrzlich hochgeladen
KĂĽrzlich hochgeladen (20)
Altmetrics & Scholarly Publishing: the LIbrary Lay of the Land
- 1. Altmetrics & Scholarly Publishing: The Library Lay of the Land Elaine Lasda, MLS, CAS Associate Librarian, University at Albany Society for Scholarly Publishing Annual Meeting June 1, 2017
- 6. The Death of the Big Deal?
- 7. The Open Access Factor
- 9. The role of metrics in general
- 10. The role of Altmetrics
- 11. References •Bornmann, L., & Haunschild, R. (2016). To what extent does the Leiden manifesto also apply to altmetrics? A discussion of the manifesto against the background of research into altmetrics. Online Information Review, 40(4):529-543. •Busby, L. (2016). Intimdated by a number. The Serials Librarian, 71:1, 9-13. •Dhiman, A.K., (2015). Bibliometrics to altmetrics: Changing trends in assessing research impact. DESIDOC Journal of Library and Information Technology, 35(4); 310-315. •Galligan, F. & Dyas-Correia, S. (2013). Altmetrics: rethinking the way we measure. Serials Review, 39:56-61. •Michalek, Andrea, et al. (2014). Analyze this: Altmetrics and your collection. Statistics and collection development. Against the grain, 4/2014: 80-81. •Mock, Emily. (2017) “Problems with Collection Usage Statitstics.” University at Albany Libraries internal memorandum, May 25, 2017. •Rathmel,A., & Currie, L. (2015). “Big Deals” and squeaky wheels: Taking stock of your stats. The Serials Librarian, 68:26-37. •Roemer, R.C, & Borchadt, R. (2015). Issues, controversies and opportunities for altmetrics. Library Technology Reports, 20-30. •Sumlewtiz, G., et al. (2013). ROI or bust: A glimpse into how librarians, publishers, and agents create value for survival. The Serials Librarian, 64:216-223. •Vaughan, L., et al, (2017). Investigating disciplinary differences in the relationships between citations and downloads. Scientometrics, 111:1533-1545.
- 12. Image credits (in order of appearance): • Francebluebird Photography, 2017. LOUGH FOOEY. https://flic.kr/p/TpG49G (CC BY-NC-ND 2.0) • Thompson, Devlin, 2008. Mystery Edge box. https://flic.kr/p/5nQJeG (CC BY-NC- ND 2.0) • Ferencak, Daniel, 2012. BROKY. https://flic.kr/p/bMm36e (CC BY-NC-ND 2.0) • PAPELMURAL.COM, 2013. Fotomural163. https://flic.kr/p/kYreqV (CC BY 2.0) • Frahm, Britta, 2007. Good-Bad-Ugly. https://flic.kr/p/LdyjL (CC BY 2.0) • David, 2007. Deal? https://flic.kr/p/CauvW (CC BY-ND 2.0) • 2016. Open Access Logo http://www.openaccessweek.org/page/englishhigh- resolution-1 • Clede, Jonathan, 2006. Scholarly Journal. https://flic.kr/p/hAEmP (CC BY 2.0) • Dalziel, Karin, 2007. 100 feet of tape measure. https://flic.kr/p/MjCWp (CC BY-NC 2.0)
- 13. Elaine M. Lasda, MLS, CAS University at Albany Libraries Email: elasda@albany.edu Twitter: @ElaineLibrarian SlideShare: http://slideshare.net/librarian68
Hinweis der Redaktion
- Challenges keep us on our toes
- Successes Challenges
- The “Big Deal” Elsevier Wiley
- Low cost access Non-profit publishing