Welfare Reform Essay

Essay on Welfare Reform
Welfare Reforms effect on Women and Children The major problem facing poor Women and
Children after the adoption of Welfare Reform is, the lack of adequate healthcare for these families.
The Women and Children facing this problem are mainly from out–of–wedlock families. It is
believed that by removing such benefits it will end such problems like crime, young black men
not feeling sense of accomplishment by not working and the bond of community relationships
deteriorating. In trying to address this problem I have come up with two different alternative
policies to try to tackle the newest welfare reform policy and adjust it in a way that will benefit
families especially Women and Children as well as the tax payers of America. My first...show more
content...
This is going to have and is already having disastrous effects on the American population. Already
more than half of AFDC, Medicaid, food stamps, are attributable to families involved in teen birth
situations. We are spending more to help these families which still is not making our situation
better because most of the families are still "broke" in slang term for not having any cash. They
are unable to support our economy financially because they can't support themselves which is
have a chain effect on society. At least if these families and children did not have to worry about
the lack of health care, than it would be a burden lifted of their chest to look for work and attend
the free Families and Mentoring program that should be created. The free Families Health and
Mentoring Program, which would be paid for mainly by the government, will be the way out for
many of these young mothers, father, and families to get ahead in life. A lot of the problem with the
out–of–wedlock situations are those in the poor, urban setting. Clearly, it is also racially inclined.
That is a whole other subject. Not to get off on a tangent, this program will enrich the lives of these
families by giving them the support and family structure that some of them lacked growing up. This
program will be created to help develop individuals with the skills to go out into our workforce and
find a job. Although there are not enough jobs
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

Benefits Of Welfare Reform
Under TANF it provides states considerable discretion, to organize their own Welfare programs
(Gilbert & Terrell pg.234). The TANF program eliminated national privileges of receiving benefits
and allowed the State you live in to determine whether a person is qualified to receive benefits.
Another change that Gilbert & Terrell notes is that "Welfare reform posed a 5 year lifetime time
limit on federal

Welfare Reform Essay
The welfare reform signed by President Clinton in the United States on August 22, 1966. This
reform's objective was to cause a change in the State's Welfare system because of the increased
level of poverty within the country. It was to offer a personal work opportunity and responsibility
and was to offer support to many needy families and children within the country. This program had
a focus on accountability and work to provide a state with the flexibility in addressing poverty
challenges (Chan & Moffitt 2018). This direction undertaken by the UK Coalition government was
in line with its plan towards a radical reform for the benefits associated with welfare that began at the
establishment of the welfare state. One of the aims associated...show more content...
These changes include the bedroom tax, the Benefit Cap, and the rolling out of the Universal Credit
(ROSENBAUM 2018). The American government plans to create an introduction to the new welfare
reforms within the Welfare and Work Bill.
The housing associations have always revealed their hard work towards supporting the affected
tenants through the occurring changes and the adjustment of their business planning. Apart from
this, the housing associations strife towards making a significant contribution to the reduction of the
welfare bill through the providence of employment and other fundamental skills services, which
offer assistance to people towards setting benefits aside and getting involved into sustainable work.
The housing association has played important roles in making sure that they alleviate food poverty
among the tenants through the establishment of food banks for the tenants (Duncan &
BrooksвЂђGunn,

Welfare Reform
Welfare is a form of public aid where the citizens are provided with a minimal level of social support
and well–being. In developed countries, such as the United States of America, welfare is mainly
offered by the government, other providers include religious groups, informal social groups,
charities, and inter–governmental organizations. The politics of welfare is a governmental concept
where the state plays a major role in protecting and promoting the social and the economic
well–being of its citizens without racial discrimination to form what is known as a welfare state.
The welfare state operates on the principles of equitable distribution of wealth, equality of
opportunities, and public responsibility towards those unable to meet a good...show more content...
Poverty and other human needs cannot be addressed without breaking the barriers to opportunities
which are based on race. Taking the two challenges together will most likely result into effective
solutions. There ought to be development of antidiscrimination enforcement to ensure that people of
races have equal access to the welfare programs. Low –wage workers, mostly African Americans,
ought to be given the right to organize to help them move out of poverty. This must linked with civil
–rights efforts meant to root out racial exclusion which is mainly imbedded in union locals.
Comprehensive immigration reforms will offer Latinos and African Americans pathway to accessing
welfare benefits.
African American and Latino students ought to have access to welfare benefits and grants in
addition to the students' loans which should ideally be coupled with an increment of private sector
scholarship aids. These benefits ought to be offered on the basis of socioeconomic and racial
backgrounds with the aim of promoting a diverse student body which will eventually result to
diverse leaders and workers. The Congress ought to approve the so called DREAM Act which will
pave way for legal immigration status and college degrees for the many undocumented students of
African, Latin America and Iberia students who have shown desire and promise to improve the State
(Raja,

Wellfare Reform Essay
In the past twenty years, welfare fraud and abuse has become an overwhelming problem. Large
numbers of people are living off the government alone, with no attempt of finding work. Our welfare
system is out of date and needs to be slimmed down. Congress needs to eliminate the mindset of
Americans that welfare can be used as a free ride through life.
No matter how liberal or conservative, all politicians agree that welfare costs could be greatly
reduced if abuse and fraud were eliminated. Welfare was first introduced in the 20's as a program to
help people get through the depression. The government created many public works jobs to employ
the thousands that lost their jobs. At the time it was a great program but seventy–five years...show
more content...
Many have said that the current welfare system encourages dependency. They say that the value of
welfare benefits is more attractive to many long–term recipients than are entry level, minimum wage
jobs. In several states, welfare programs pay recipients the equivalent of a $25,000 a year job. The
value of the full benefits of the average welfare recipient exceeds the poverty level ( McCuen
/Rector 29). Welfare benefits are tax–free so the dollar value is greater than that of a comparable
worker. The following are some prime examples of the abuse that takes place within the welfare
system. –In 40 states welfare pays more than an $8.00 an hour job. –In 17 states welfare pays more
than a $10.00 an hour job.
–Hawaii, Connecticut, Massachusetts, Rhode Island, New York, and Washington D.C. pays
recipients the equivalent of $12.00 an hour. That's more than twice minimum wage.(Tanner 18)–9
states pay more than the average first year salary of a teacher last year. –The largest pay off is in
New York City where recipients receive $14.75 an hour.
With these figures it's no wonder why people choose to live off the government. Welfare makes
their lives too comfortable. The goal of welfare should be to encourage recipients to leave the
welfare roles and enter the workforce. 68.6% of welfare recipients report that they aren't actively
seeking work. Why should they? There are plenty of

Social Welfare Reform Paper
The topic of this paper is to shed light on the issue of welfare. The original purpose and intent for
social welfare was to temporarily ease the plight of the poor at no cost to the middle and upper
class. Overtime, it has become a burden America's taxpayers have had to unrightfully carry. Welfare
has been reformed in the past, but many still believe it is a failing program. Citizens and non
citizens are both taking advantage of the program that was intended to help. Even after multiple
reformations, this program continues to fall back into the same issues repeatedly. Taking care of the
poor was not intended to be the role of the government. Biblically, that job has been delegated to the
church. Social welfare is giving the government more...show more content...
Ronald Reagan played a huge role in the efforts to improve the quality of welfare. The Family
Support Act of 1988 was the main expression of his desire for this system to be improved. Reagan
stated after singing the act that the federal government, with the best of intentions, has taken on the
role of parents in the attempt to provide for the children of this country. This bill primarily
focused on two things: securing support for children with absentee parents and emphasizing the
need for work for those in the welfare system (Reagan 1988). Parents were now required in order
to bring in the additional welfare revenue, which was how the system was intended to be from the
beginning. Young parents who had not yet graduated high school were not only encouraged, but
required to stay in school in order to be provided for (Reagan

Essay On Welfare Reform
The welfare programs need to reform and focus on helping all of the lower income class get out of
that class and remove those who are abusing the system. They need to stop the process of
homelessness before it happens because it's hard to give an address when someone no longer have
one and now living on the streets. Which will make the process cost more than it should have to
begin with had welfare step in and help before one becomes homeless. They need to remove
abusers from the system and take into the concentration of the ones who are prescribed medication
by a doctor and none abusers. Welfare, though it can be good, is abused by many lower class people
and is too easily obtained for those merely looking for a way to be lazy and are avoiding getting a
job. Welfare needs to create a way for those using the service to feel like they are a part of helping by
working for it to stop laziness and feeling of it being a free hand out because that will not help them
in the long run. "Low and irregular employment is a major reason why low–income men...show more
content...
Example, if you teach someone to hunt or fish or anything to survive, he or she will get skills to live
and be able to provide food so, why not teach someone how to live a better life and get out of the
lower class. "We all seek a society where every American can reach his or her full potential, where as
few people as possible live in poverty, and where no one must go without the basic necessities of
life." (Tanner Pg. 12). Many people are just having more kids so, they can stay in these programs.
If they did this maybe people would stop having kids for the wrong reasons and learn to do for
themselves rather than relying on these types of programs to take care of

Essay about Welfare Reform
Welfare and welfare reform has been a hot topic amongst politicians and their constituents for
years. Feeling the pressure brought on by people crying out for welfare reform President Clinton
brought about some changes in our welfare system. Prior to President Clinton's sweeping reforms
this is not the first time that the whole idea of welfare has come under fire; former California
governor Wilson, was a strong opponent of welfare. It was he, along with many other people, which
really were the ones to spark the welfare reform that President Clinton enacted. These people
believed that welfare does not solve anything, it is just letting people become reliant on the
government; sucking up money and valuable resources that could be spent...show more content...
African–Americans families tend to have a stronger bond, helping the mother regardless of their
marital status. Blacks realize that their apparent lack of education leaves them in a difficult situation,
finding it almost impossible to support a family. In 1987 Wilson "argued that the decline in the
economic position of many young black men has mad marriage an increasingly unattractive
alternative for young black women. As a result, many black teenage girls may conclude that they
have little to lose by having an out–of–wedlock birth, and motherhood may ant the same time, offer
them some measure of respect and attention."2 This is not a good thing because, when a family is
unable to support itself then they tend to turn to welfare.
Education is key to a good life. Unfortunately for them, black mothers are less likely to reach the
same level of economic status than whites. A reason why might be because African–American
youths tend to have lower academic standards and become more educationally handicapped than
their white counterparts. In today's society we are more aware than ever that knowledge and
education is power and a key to success, without them it is very difficult to become successful in life.
It has been documented time and time again that teen pregnancy and drop out rates are in fact
related. Reason being that a child is an awesome responsibility and extremely time consuming. Teen

Welfare Reform Essays
Welfare Reform
Under the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996 (PRWORA),
Temporary Assistance to Needy Families (TANF) replaced AFDC, ending some Federal
responsibility to welfare assistance. States operate their own programs; determine eligibility
services to be provided to needy families, within Federal guidelines. The Federal government cannot
regulate the conduct of states except to a few requirements, and states have a wide latitude in
administering the program to "provide assistance to needy families so that children can be cared for
in their own homes; to reduce dependency by promoting job preparation, work and marriage; to
prevent out–of–wedlock pregnancies; and to encourage the formation and...show more content...
Under this Act, states are awarded for increasing the number of children below 200 percent of
poverty who reside in married–couple families (Nathan & Gais, 1999). This measure is based on the
theory that children in single–parent homes are at greater risk than those in two–parent families and
the best solution is marriage. In short, the federal government is rewarding states for encouraging
marriage, a very personal decision. How do states measure the results of having more couples getting
married?
Over the past five years, the federal government has also found it difficult to measure "improvement"
in states. Currently, success is based in terms of job entry rate or increases over time in job entry
rate, retention rate, and earnings gain. States may use quarterly unemployment insurance wage
records, surveys, administrative records, or a combination of those data sources. States are given
wide latitude in the sources of information they report. Also, to further distort the findings, there is
no baseline data with which to make comparisons (Danziger, 2000).
Whose interests are best served by the current welfare requirements? TANF encourages states to
provide assistance to those welfare recipients who are most likely to succeed at employment,
ignoring individuals who are harder to place. In order to show increases in employment and wage
rates, the most attention is

Welfare Reform Argumentative Essay
The intentions of welfare reform is simply to reduce dependency, reduce child poverty, and to
strengthen marriages (in line citation website). However, taking away a low income families
chance for help is not going to help their poverty. The idea of getting rid of the help a family
needs, in order to help the family end their poverty is contradictory. This is more likely to leave
families stuck in poverty, or even send them below if their aid gets removed.
Welfare reform sparked a great deal of interest in the 1990's when President Clinton called together
a speech calling for dramatic changes to the welfare policy. In his speech he stated "No one who
works full–time and has children at home should be poor anymore. No one who can work should
...show more content...
Did you know that around 15 million Americans, and single mother and their children are on
welfare? Sometimes working 20 hours is not a possibility for a full time single parent, due to the
expenses of babysitters, and schooling. These parents have only one option, which is to apply for
welfare to get the assistance required to cover those expenditures so they will be able to work the
20 hours mandatory. Other single parents cannot find a job or have a challenging time keeping them
due to mild disabilities and mental health issues( in line citation interview), which are out of their
control. This causes worthy families to lose their rights to their children. When that happens
numerous children will be taken away from their homes and placed into child protection services.
Which could lead to countless future difficulties within the child's life, when in fact this contradicts
the intentions of the welfare reform act. Even though this problem can be completely avoided if
benefits were not cut or denied. Although, the main idea of the welfare reform act is to insure the
well–being of young children, the loss of benefits could leave many children poverty stricken.
Which, ironically is what Clinton and others involved were trying to

Welfare Reform : The Welfare System
Welfare Reform
What would happen if the government made changes to the welfare system? There are
approximately 110,489,000 of Americans on welfare. Many people benefit from what the system has
to offer: food stamps, housing, health insurance, day care, and unemployment. Taxpayers often argue
that the individuals who benefit from the system, abuse the system; however, this is not entirely
true. Many of the people who receive benefits really and truly need the help. Even though some
people believe welfare should be reformed, welfare should not be reformed because 40% of single
mothers are poor, some elderly people do not have a support system, and college students can not
afford to take extra loans.
Welfare should not be reformed because it helps single parents. 40 percent of single mothers are
poor, 12 million single parents–mother–headed families are poor (Freeman). Welfare can help keep
these single parent families stay stable to be an effective families. 12 million single parents mothers
headed families can be reduced to less underachieving families with the assistants of welfare. Also
with single parents they never had an significant other.
They do not have a significant other 37 percent of single–parents families lack self sufficiency and
are officially poor compared with 7 percent of married–couple families (Rector). Welfare can help
the underachieving single parents that do not have a stable income. This proves and shows that
some individuals can and want to be

Is welfare a permanent solution or a temporary fix to a monumental epidemic in society today?
Congress has implemented welfare reform legislation that simply has not helped or changed much.
The question regarding the welfare system remains the same. What is wrong with welfare and how
can it be fixed? This is not a simple question and does not have a simple answer. However, one thing
is extremely clear; welfare is not working and desperately needs to change. The current welfare
system is unfair to the taxpayers who are paying for failed programs, and the poor who remain
trapped in a system that takes away their self–reliance and hope for their children. In the face of
sweeping welfare reform, much still needs to be done to overhaul a...show more content...
Another failure in welfare reform is clear in the welfare–to–work reform that was enacted in 1996. It
has fallen short in regards to what it set out to accomplish. This reform was intended to
discourage everyone but the very ill or disabled from leading a life on benefits. Although, great in
theory, it has failed to move many from the welfare system to the work force, and has two major
stumbling blocks. The first one is very clear, the jobs just aren't there. With the worsening economy
and so many people losing their employment, the job market is flooded with people trying to find
jobs. Many businesses have been forced to close which has contributed to less job openings.
Without jobs for people to move into they continue to rely on welfare for their existence. The second
problem with the welfare–to–work reform is that the jobs that can be obtained aren't what they were
in the past. Many jobs today are temporary, part–time, or have uncertain hours. Leaving the security
of benefits for jobs like these can be related to stepping out on cracking ice, and not many people
are willing to take this step. Unless these problems are dealt with, the welfare–to–work reform will
continue to be unsuccessful in helping people gain employment and they will continue to cling to
benefits for support. Welfare reform has failed miserably in its attempt to address the crisis of
illegitimacy, therefore requiring more and more funding for assistance

Welfare
"Welfare, it is on just about everyone's' mind, whether it is Medicare or the Aid to Families with
Dependent Children, which is also called the AFDC. Some believe there is too much and others
think there is too little. As the years go by, the need for welfare reform increases."(Sara)Welfare is
constantly being taken advantage of, and it needs to be reformed to solve this problem. Welfare in
its current state is a tremendous drain on our economy. With reform, we can keep our economy on
the rise for longer amounts of time. The main problem that Welfare causes is that it gives money to
people who haven't performed any work for it. This is bad for our economy because it devalues the
money that is in circulation. Society...show more content...
"In 1994 alone, 34 million people received some 140 billion dollars in Medicaid benefits. Food
stamps that are used by low–income families, buys food items and work just like money. In 1994,
27 million people used food stamps costing the federal government 24 billion dollars."(Sara)
Thus, we must change our welfare system. In 1935, President Franklin D. Roosevelt said: "I can
now see the end of public assistance in America." FDR's declaration did not come true, despite the
spending what was then an unparalleled amount of federal funds for a variety of programs to
help the poor. "In a Los Angeles Times poll from 1985, 70 percent of poor women said it is
"almost always" or "often" true that "poor young women have babies so they can collect welfare."
Two thirds said that welfare "almost always" or "often" encourages fathers to avoid family
responsibilities. Thus, we can be certain that not only does welfare back wrongful births, but
recipients agree it seems to promote them."(Anonymous) This is ironic because public assistance in
large part is meant to be a last resort for remedying the problems of out–of–wedlock–births, not
creating new ones. Researchers have concluded that Welfare handouts have decreased the recipients'
willingness to work, and often it is the recipients' negative attitude towards work rather than a lack
of available jobs, which is responsible for their

Welfare Reform Act Pros And Cons
People generally enjoy working and being productive members of society. The positive effects of
the Welfare Reform Act is moving to eventually end poverty in America and promote economic
growth. According to the 2005 report measuring welfare dependents "Poverty in 2003 remains
much lower than in 1996, the year of passage of the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity
Reconciliation Act. The official poverty rate for 2003 was 12.5 percent, compared to 13.7 percent
in 1996." ( Gil Crouse, Susan Hauan, Julia Isaacs, Kendall Swenson and Lisa Trivits, 2005 ) States
that design welfare–to–work policies that emphasized getting recipients into jobs by shifting to
"work–first" welfare systems can modify program rules to allow more earned income,

The introduction and subsequent implementation of the Welfare Reform act in 2012 by the
Coalition government, introduced a new era of increased social and economic inequality in the UK.
Through the introduction of welfare reforms, the inequality gap in the UK is at its biggest ever. By
focusing on reforms in two areas; housing and benefits, this essay will present the ways in which
reforms like the introduction of Universal Credit, the Benefit Cap, Housing reform and finally the
reduction and devolvement of many other benefits have severely impacted Somali communities. By
focusing extensively on London, specific boroughs where necessary, this essay will argue that the
impact of welfare reforms is reducing Somali families to relative and...show more content...
However, while the welfare state flourished in post–war Britain, during times of economic downturn,
the welfare state was the first to be targeted. Following the successful post–war years, the
government was met with a period of economic recession, major inflation and rising unemployment.
As a result of this, the 1970s saw the abandonment of post–war policy and "the emergence of a
period of privatisation and deregulation." Ultimately, the great welfare post–war period was removed
and a new "post–welfare" phase was introduced. And the socio–economic policies of the 1970s were
described as 'creating a "crisis" for social policy and the demise of the British welfare state' This,
headed by the then conservative government, was very much a predecessor for the welfare reforms
of 2012. The 1970s saw the introduction of 'means–tested benefits' to tackle the negative opinions
surrounding benefits. In terms of housing, the Conservative government sought to emphasise private
ownership, as opposed to local authority housing, which was introduced through the 1980 Housing
Act and the 'right to buy'. This arguably led to a further divide in inequality, as the increase in
housing ownership led to the increase in rent. Because of this, the government was left with shortage
of housing, which "impacted adversely on housing costs and standards, including overcrowding" .
This also meant local authorities had "difficulties in raising capital" which led to the introduction of

Should Welfare Be Reformed?
Welfare, enacted by one of the greatest presidents of the United States's existence, Mr. Franklin D.
Roosevelt, is an effective and useful means to assist American families in need. Throughout history,
welfare has proven to help people get back on their feet and into society. Despite the system's many
useful benefits, like most attributes in this world, welfare has kinks in the system. In fact, welfare
has yet to be perfected, even though it was established in the year of 1935 and is still in use
today. The system may never be perfected, but it can be improved. There are many different
thoughts and ideas pertaining to how welfare should change. Some believe it should be eliminated
entirely. In doing so, many people all across the nation would be harmed in financial and mental
manners. How can welfare be reformed? Is it even possible? The answer is absolutely. It must be
reformed, and many would agree on the matter. It is, however, a sensitive and controversial topic to
most. Political parties tend to take interest in the discussion of welfare reform, as well. The typical,
left–wing Democrat wishes to give more to welfare users, while the standard right–wing Republican
would like to decrease what is given to Americans. If everything has its imperfections, why should
welfare be reformed? Why not leave it the way it is and let the government figure out the fine print?
There are those that take this sort of stance on welfare reform, and there are some that believe
differently.

Welfare Reform Research Paper
Welfare was designed to reduce poverty, yet the poverty rates have only increased. The Temporary
Assistance for Needy Families program (welfare) was designed to help families struggling with
financial hardships for a short period of time. It is not a lifelong program like so many assume it is.
President Franklin D. Roosevelt once said, "Continued dependence upon relief induces a spiritual
and moral disintegration fundamentally destructive to the national fibre. To dole out relief in this
way is to administer a narcotic, a subtle destroyer of the human spirit" (Gaiser 3). What he meant by
saying this is that we are enabling people to become dependent on others which is detrimental, not
only to the recipients of welfare, but to the nation as a whole. We are not doing any good to anyone
by continually supporting the poor and underprivileged with welfare systems because they are not
doing their job; they are not helping people out of poverty. In fact, the Libertarian Party says they
are doing just the opposite, and now that officials have realized this, they are trying to make up for
it. However, they are doing so in the wrogn ways. The welfare reform has pushed...show more
content...
Individuals in true need of aid were provided the basic necessities to keep them afloat. However,
today that has changed. People constantly freeload off of the system, and nobody stops them.
People who don't really need assistance still get welfare checks each month. This should not be
allowed to happen. People who receive welfare checks each month spend them on luxuries and
unnecessary items. This should not be allowed to happen. Taxpayers are forced to fund a program
that does not reduce poverty like it is supposed to. This should not happen. It is time that Americans
open their eyes. Government officials, lawmakers, taxpayers, welfare recipients, everyone. They
need to open their eyes and take a look at what is happening to

Many have argued and debated about a systematical program called welfare. Some perceive it as
dead weight to our nation and they question whether the programs offered are helping the
community. As taxpayer's, the American populous funds contribute to welfare for others. Due to the
large number of people who receive government assistance, it is not that simple to monitor every
individual. However, I propose that welfare should be reformed. Society is abusing the access to
social welfare and to prevent the downfall sure to come, the government needs to reform the
accessibility and ownership of welfare because it betrays its creation; it is creating a dependent
nation, and affects taxpayers and people who truly need government assistance....show more content...
Citizen of all financial levels from the poor, middle–class and even what some considered first–class,
citizen commit welfare fraud.# In committing federal fraud, Americans risk severe punishment and
extensive debt to pay. So one would think everyone who commits welfare fraud would be
prosecuted and thrown in jail. Too many citizens receive welfare to monitor everyone, which is
understandable. Is society responsible for the well–being of others who depend on another? If so,
what is the cost to the rest of the community? Is the dependent able body citizen to be held in any
way responsible for them selves? How far must poverty go before society is morally bound to
act? Theses are the questions asked about welfare by taxpayers, as stated by Joseph Westfall. #
Numerous question but we do not have a definite answer. Billions of dollars are collected for
welfare yearly. The profits are involuntarily taken from taxpayers and redistributed to those
demonstrating economic need. The problem lies in that from this system is anyone can reap
profit from the money collected from taxpayer's, even the very same taxpayers can fool the
system. For instance, as I was researching information on welfare fraud, I came across the
department of social service website. On this web page, it contained a list of fraudulent crimes by
13 people and among then was a women named Feleni F. Leota. In August 2008, Feleni F. Leota
who worked two jobs making 19,000

Welfare Reform
"The U.S. Congress kicked off welfare reform nationwide last October with the Personal
Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996, heralding a new era in which
welfare recipients are required to look for work as a condition of benefits." http://www.detnews.com
/1997/newsx/welfare/rules/rules.htm. Originally, the welfare system was created to help poor men,
women, and children who are in need of financial and medical assistance. Over the years, welfare
has become a way of life for its recipients and has created a culture of dependency. Currently, the
government is in the process of reforming the welfare system. The welfare reform system's
objective was to get people off the welfare system and onto the...show more content...
This paper will analyze the welfare reform system. Through my analysis I will examine several areas
of concern in the welfare reform system. First, as an overview, I will look at the Personal
Responsibility & Work Opportunity Act. Second, I will look at the Welfare to Workfare program.
We will then examine how welfare recipients with disabilities will be handled under this new reform
and finally this paper will examine how the federal government plans on if at all ensuring job
retention occurs.
THE PERSONAL RESPONSIBILTY AND WORK OPPORTUNITY ACT
"The Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Act of 1996, or the welfare reform law
established the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF). TANF is a block grant program
designed to make dramatic reforms in the nation's welfare system."(http://www.acf.dhls.gov
/HyperNews/get/opre2/wtwreg.html) This grant became effective as of July 1, 1997. This grant
replaced the Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC) program. It also replaced several
other programs such as Emergency Assistance or EA program. The goal of TANF is to promote
family responsibility and self– sufficiency. This program will provide this by placing welfare
recipients into the workforce. Under the TANF program assistance is given to individuals for a
limited time. When that time period has expired, it is the State's

The federal welfare system is a group of program provided by the federal government to give aid
to the poor. The federal welfare system was first introduced by President Theodore Roosevelt.
Since then, welfare programs have expanded to give health care, houses and food to people in
need. The welfare programs were designed to aid the poor, elderly, and disabled, but actually led to
higher taxes and abuse of the system. These effects led to calls for reform. Reforms caused more
damage than good. The public welfare system needs to be mended by reducing federal and state
spending on welfare systems, promoting work for the unemployed and a health care reform.
The public welfare system needs to be mended by reducing federal and state spending on welfare
systems. Annual welfare spending is approaching the 1 trillion dollar mark. About one–third of the
United States population is on the welfare system, that almost 9,000 dollars per beneficiary.
"Under the president's spending plans, by 2022 we'll be spending $2.33 on welfare for every $1 we
spend on defense. (The ratio is currently $1.33 to $1.) Overall, President Obama plans to spend
$12.7 trillion on means–tested welfare over the next decade" (Feulner). The government needs to end
the spiraling spending on welfare systems....show more content...
If the recipients of welfare aid worked there would be less need for welfare programs. If welfare
programs required recipients to work then living on welfare would not become a way of life. By the
welfare system giving aid without requiring work it has become a hand out not a hand up. Welfare
programs do not provide temporary aid to those off their feet it provides a lifestyle. Many people on
welfare find it easier and more logical to stay on welfare instead of working. By promoting working
more people could get off of the welfare system and back on their

Welfare Reform Essay

Empfohlen

Empfohlen

Weitere ähnliche Inhalte

Mehr von Best Online Paper Writing Service

Mehr von Best Online Paper Writing Service (20)

Kürzlich hochgeladen

Kürzlich hochgeladen (20)

Welfare Reform Essay