Capital budgeting

JOIN KHALID AZIZ ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

[object Object],The Capital Budgeting Decision Process ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

Capital Budgeting Decision Techniques ,[object Object],Accounting rate of return (ARR): focuses on project’s impact on accounting profits Net present value (NPV): best technique theoretically; difficult to calculate realistically Internal rate of return (IRR): widely used with strong intuitive appeal Profitability index (PI): related to NPV

A Capital Budgeting Process Should: Account for the time value of money; Account for risk; Focus on cash flow; Rank competing projects appropriately, and Lead to investment decisions that maximize shareholders’ wealth.

Example: Global Wireless ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

Global Wireless $175 Year 5 inflow $160 Year 4 inflow $130 Year 3 inflow $80 Year 2 inflow $35 Year 1 inflow -$250 Initial Outlay $32 Year 5 inflow $30 Year 4 inflow $25 Year 3 inflow $22 Year 2 inflow $18 Year 1 inflow -$50 Initial Outlay

Accounting Rate Of Return (ARR) Can be computed from available accounting data ARR uses accounting numbers, not cash flows; no time value of money. ,[object Object],[object Object],Average profits after taxes Average annual operating cash inflows Average annual depreciation = –

[object Object],Payback Period ,[object Object],[object Object],Management determines maximum acceptable payback period.

[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],Payback Analysis For Global Wireless

Pros and Cons of the Payback Method ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],Disadvantages of payback method: ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],Discounted Payback Reject (46.3<50) Reject (166.2 < 250)

Net Present Value (NPV) NPV: The sum of the present values of a project’s cash inflows and outflows. Discounting cash flows accounts for the time value of money. Choosing the appropriate discount rate accounts for risk. Accept projects if NPV > 0.

[object Object],Net Present Value (NPV) ,[object Object],[object Object]

[object Object],NPV Analysis for Global Wireless Should Global Wireless invest in one project or both? Western Europe project: NPV = $75.3 million Southeast U.S. project: NPV = $25.7 million

The NPV Rule and Shareholder Wealth

Pros and Cons of NPV NPV is the “gold standard” of investment decision rules. ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],Though best measure, NPV has some drawbacks: ,[object Object],[object Object]

Internal Rate of Return (IRR) IRR: the discount rate that results in a zero NPV for a project. The IRR decision rule for an investing project is : ,[object Object],[object Object]

NPV Profile and Shareholder Wealth

IRR Analysis for Global Wireless Global Wireless will accept all projects with at least 18% IRR. Western Europe project: IRR ( r WE ) = 27.8% Southeast U.S. project: IRR (r SE ) = 36.7%

Pros and Cons of IRR ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],Disadvantages of IRR: ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

Multiple IRRs Which IRR do we use? When project cash flows have multiple sign changes, there can be multiple IRRs. IRR IRR

No Real Solution Sometimes projects do not have a real IRR solution . Modify Global Wireless’ s Western Europe project to include a large negative outflow ( -$ 355 million ) in year 6 . ,[object Object],Project is a bad idea based on NPV. At r =1 8 %, project has negative NPV, so reject!

Conflicts Between NPV and IRR: The Scale Problem NPV and IRR do not always agree when ranking competing projects. ,[object Object],The scale problem: $25.7 mn 36.7% Southeast U.S. $75.3 mn 27.8% Western Europe NPV (18%) IRR Project

Conflicts Between NPV and IRR: The Scale Problem ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

Conflicts Between NPV and IRR: The Timing Problem ,[object Object]

Profitability Index Decision rule: Accept project with PI > 1.0, equal to NPV > 0 ,[object Object],Calculated by dividing the PV of a project’s cash inflows by the PV of its initial cash outflows. Like IRR, PI suffers from the scale problem. 1.5 $50 million $75.7 million Southeast U.S. 1.3 $250 million $325.3 million Western Europe PI Initial Outlay PV of CF (yrs1-5) Project

[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],Capital Budgeting

Capital budgeting

Empfohlen

Empfohlen

Weitere ähnliche Inhalte

Was ist angesagt?

Was ist angesagt? (20)

Andere mochten auch

Andere mochten auch (20)

Ähnlich wie Capital budgeting

Ähnlich wie Capital budgeting (20)

Mehr von Khalid Aziz

Mehr von Khalid Aziz (20)

Kürzlich hochgeladen

Kürzlich hochgeladen (20)

Capital budgeting