SlideShare ist ein Scribd-Unternehmen logo
1 von 6
Downloaden Sie, um offline zu lesen
NONPROFIT  INVESTOR 
    I N D E P E N D E N T   R E S E A R C H   F O R   P H I L A N T H R O P Y 
                                                                                            

        Center for Employment                                   SUMMARY 

        Opportunities                                           Center for Employment Opportunities (“CEO”) offers services 
                                                                exclusively for people with criminal records, focusing on a structured 
        Nonprofit Investor Rating:                              program of life skill education, short‐term paid transitional 
                                                                employment, full‐time job placement and post‐placement services. 
        HOLD 
                                                                STRENGTHS  
        Mission Statement                                       ▲ Majority of revenue is generated by program service contracts 
        The Center for Employment Opportunities                 rather than through donations. State, City and Federal contracts 
        (CEO) is dedicated to providing immediate,              provide ~75% of support and revenue. These contracts are likely 
        effective and comprehensive employment                  sustainable given benefit to employers receiving cost effective 
        services to men and women with recent 
                                                                maintenance / cleaning and contract growth in recent years. 
        criminal convictions. Its highly structured and 
        tightly supervised programs help participants           ▲ Low cost per beneficiary. With an average of 2,000 participants, 
        regain the skills and confidence needed for a           CEO’s annual cost per participant is approximately $8,000. If 
        successful transition to a stable, productive life      program revenues are deducted, the cost is reduced to ~$1,700. 
         
        Financial Overview                                      ▲ Compelling immediate impact. Dramatic increase in employment 
        $ in MM, Fiscal Year Ended June 30                      over first year in the program coupled with significant reductions in 
                                   2008       2009     2010     criminal activity. 
        Revenue and Support       $13.2       $14.0    $16.3 
        Operating Expenses        $14.1       $13.7    $16.0 
                                                                ▲ Proven leadership team. 30 year history, with a 15 year track 
                                                                record as an independent nonprofit. Current Chief Executive Officer, 
        % of Total:                                             Mindy Tarlow, has been in the organization since 1994. 
           Program Expenses         78%        78%      81% 
           G&A                      20%        18%      17%     CAUTIONS 
           Fundraising               2%         3%       2% 
                                                                ● Low % of program expenses directly attributable to participants. 
         
                                                                Only 23% of program expenses are directly attributable to wages, 
        Year Founded: 1996 (as independent                      benefits and taxes for transitional job participants.  
        nonprofit) 
                                                                ▼ Lack of demonstrated effect on long‐term employment. Rates of 
         
                                                                employment are consistent with control groups after three years.  
        Contact Details: 
                                                                ▼ High G&A expenses. Nearly 20% of expenses are related to G&A. 
        Center for Employment Opportunities 
        32 Broadway, 15th Floor 
                                                                RECOMMENDATION: HOLD 
        New York, NY 10004 
        (212) 422‐4430                                          CEO has exhibited strength in support and revenue growth but 
                                                                maintains a large exposure to government sources. Further, high G&A 
        http://ceoworks.org/                                    expense and low wages for direct participants relative to program 
        EIN: 13‐3843322                                         expenses put increased pressure on demonstrating program 
                                                                effectiveness. Decreases in criminal activity are encouraging; 
        Analyst: RJ Price                                       however, CEO has not been able to exhibit consistent improvements 
        Peer Review: J. Tran                                    in long‐term employment rates for participants. 
         
        Publication Date: January 4, 2012                                         Nonprofit Investor Research | nonprofitinvestor.org
     
OVERVIEW OF CENTER FOR EMPLOYMENT OPPPORTUNITIES’ ACTIVITIES 
CEO began its mission over 30 years ago as a project of the Vera Institute of Justice. CEO worked within Vera until 1996, 
when it spun‐off to become an independent nonprofit organization. Mindy Tarlow, the current Chief Executive Officer / 
Executive Director of CEO, has been with the organization since 1994 when she managed the successful spin‐off. Over 
the last decade, this continuity in mission and leadership has allowed the organization to make more than 10,000 job 
placements for formerly incarcerated persons into full‐time employment. 

Transitional Jobs 
CEO operates a network of work crews, providing maintenance, janitorial and grounds keeping services to public 
institutions. CEO participants work on these crews, while supervised by CEO staff who teach participants how to adapt 
to working life. CEO is the employer of record and at the end of the shift gives a paycheck to each participant. These 
daily paychecks provide participants with steady employment and cash as they transition from prison to the community, 
further reinforcing the results of hard work. 

Along with their paycheck, CEO’s “Site Supervisors” also evaluate participants on a scale from 1–5 to provide 
participants with constructive feedback on cooperation with supervisor, effort at work, punctuality, cooperation with co‐
workers and personal presentation. 

Vocational Services 
To supplement the transitional employment, participants work with CEO on their permanent job search. All enrollees 
receive one‐on‐one job coaching with CEO staff to address any gaps in job readiness (commitment, interviewing skills, 
management of personal life issues, resume development, etc.). Once job ready, participants meet with CEO’s “Job 
Developers”, who serve as no‐fee employment agents. Job Developers match skills, interests and abilities of program 
participants with specific needs of employers who are open to hiring CEO graduates. Job Developers keep in constant 
contact with receptive employers to understand their human resource needs and the progress displayed by program 
participants. 
CEO provides post‐placement support through “Retention Specialists”, who provide work‐related counseling, crisis 
management, and help with long‐term career planning. Retention Specialists use an incentive‐based work retention 
program, “Rapid Rewards”, which rewards participants who demonstrate employment using their pay stubs and in 
return receive incentives for one year after placement into full‐time employment. 

CEO Academy 
The CEO Academy is a trade preparation program that assists participants through trade school by preparing them for 
entrance, supporting them throughout training, and helping them find jobs in their trade. Participants in the academy 
will receive their hands‐on training and certificates upon completion at Hostos Community College (plumbing and 
electricity) or at LaGuardia Community College (carpentry).  
 
FINANCIAL OVERVIEW 
Approximately 75% of CEO’s support and revenues is sourced through public program service contracts, with the 
remaining ~25% related to contributions. The majority of public sources come from New York State contracts, which 
withstood state budget cuts during the economic downturn in 2008‐09. While NYC contracts and private contributions 
fell by ~$2.5M in 2008, they have rebounded strongly in 2009‐2010. To help during downturns, CEO currently has a 
positive liquidity profile, with a cash balance of $0.7M, net working capital of $1.4M, non‐fixed restricted assets of 
$1.5M and only $0.5M in debt. Overall, CEO exhibited strong growth in public support and revenue in 2009‐2010; 
however, they struggled to lessen their dependency on government sources. Going forward, growth in public support 

                                        Center for Employment Opportunities | Nonprofit Investor Research  2 
 
(especially given the opening of U.S. Federal funding for the program) could be best supplemented by private 
employment programs to simultaneously grow support & revenue while also providing experience for participants in the 
non‐government job market, where presumably they will find employment long‐term.  

                                                     Detailed Financial Statement (GAAP basis)(1) 
 
Fiscal Year Ended June 30                                                                   2007                  2008                 2009                 2010
    Public Support & Revenue
     Program Service Contracts
       United States Direct Federal                                                                $0                   $0                   $0             $173,882
       New York State                                                                       7,346,608            8,180,860            7,945,410             9,923,475
       New York City                                                                        3,557,255            1,936,242            2,802,439             2,402,405
       Other                                                                                  160,778              181,706               84,756                29,046
     Subtotal                                                                             $11,064,641          $10,298,808          $10,832,605           $12,528,808

     Unrestricted Contributions                                                            $3,115,345           $2,106,365           $2,166,311            $2,940,310
     Disposal of Fixed Assets                                                                       0              (20,139)                   0                     0
     Interest and Other Income                                                                 50,535               14,842               35,621                34,205
     Net Assets Released from Restrictions                                                    718,872              823,763              998,988               842,044
    Total Public Support & Revenue                                                        $14,949,393          $13,223,639          $14,033,525           $16,345,367
     % Growth                                                                                                        (12%)                  6%                   16%

Public Support & Revenue Sources
 Federal Contract                                                                                   0%                    0%                   0%                   1%
 NY State Contract                                                                                 49%                   62%                  57%                  61%
 NYC Contract                                                                                      24%                   15%                  20%                  15%
 Contributions                                                                                     26%                   22%                  23%                  23%
 Other                                                                                              1%                    1%                   1%                   0%

    Expenses
      Program Services                                                                    $11,481,608          $11,002,961          $10,763,401           $12,924,837
      General & Administrative                                                              2,894,852            2,821,956            2,537,977             2,675,673
      Fund Raising                                                                            136,075              259,896              428,736               399,597
    Total Expenses                                                                        $14,512,535          $14,084,813          $13,730,114           $16,000,107
      % of Support & Revenue                                                                     97%                 107%                  98%                   98%

Expense Allocation (% of Total)
  Program Services                                                                                 79%                   78%                  78%                  81%
  General & Administrative                                                                         20%                   20%                  18%                  17%
  Fund Raising                                                                                      1%                    2%                   3%                   2%

    Public Support & Revenue Less Expenses                                                   $436,858             ($861,174)            $303,411             $345,260
     Restricted Contributions                                                                 540,000               914,000              940,000              830,000
     Net Assets Released from Restrictions                                                   (718,872)             (823,763)            (998,988)            (842,044)
    Change in Net Assets                                                                     $257,986             ($770,937)            $244,423             $333,216

Average Individuals in the Program(2)                                                            2,000                2,000                2,000                  2,000
 Total Expenses per Individual                                                                  $7,256               $7,042               $6,865                 $8,000
 Total Expenses (excluding Program Revenue) per Individual                                       1,724                1,893                1,449                  1,736

Source: Audited Financial Statements (prepared on GAAP basis), MDRC report "Transitional Jobs: Background, Program Models, and Evaluation Evidence" (Feb 2010)
(1) According to financial statements (prepared on GAAP basis) as audited by Schall & Ashenfarb, LLC
(2) According to MDRC report (Feb 2010)                                                                                                                                    
                                                                                      

CEO has consistently spent ~20% of total expenses through General & Administrative costs. In 2009‐2010 this 
percentage declined slightly, and further decline in subsequent years will be paramount to push increased expenditure 

                                                        Center for Employment Opportunities | Nonprofit Investor Research  3 
 
focus on program services. Furthermore, a breakout of 2010 functional expenses shows that of the ~$12.9M spent on 
program services, $3.3M was spent on non‐personnel charges, $0.6M was spent on payroll taxes and an additional 
$6.2M went to staff wages and benefits, leaving only ~$2.8M to be spent on wages and benefits for participants in CEO’s 
transitional jobs. 

                          Expense Breakdown                                                                 Support & Revenue Breakdown 
$ in MM                                                                                
$20.0                                                                      100%       $20.0

$18.0                                                        81%           90%        $18.0
              79%             78%             78%                                                                                                           $16.3 
                                                             $16.0 
$16.0                                                                      80%        $16.0            $14.9 
              $14.5           $14.1                                                                                                      $14.0 
                                              $13.7 
$14.0                                                                      70%        $14.0                            $13.2 

$12.0                                                                      60%        $12.0

$10.0                                                                      50%        $10.0

    $8.0                                                                   40%            $8.0

    $6.0                                                                   30%            $6.0

    $4.0                                                                   20%            $4.0

    $2.0                                                                   10%            $2.0

    $0.0                                                                   0%             $0.0
              2007            2008            2009           2010                                      2007            2008              2009              2010

           Program Services                     General & Administrative                                        Other
                                                                                                                Net Assets Released from Restrictions
           Fund Raising                         Program Expense % of Total                                      Unrestricted Contributions
                                                                                                                Program Service Contracts                               

 

                                                       2010 Functional Expenses (GAAP Basis) 
 
                                                            Program Services                                        Supporting Services
                                       Transitional     Vocational       CEO                                                      Fund                     2010
                                          Jobs           Services     Academy                    Subtotal           G&A          Raising                   Total
Personnel
 Wages & Benefits
   Staff                                $2,443,765      $3,114,350           $615,168            $6,173,283      $1,662,642           $228,389           $8,064,314
   Participants                          2,785,172               0                  0             2,785,172               0                  0            2,785,172
 Payroll Taxes
   Staff                                   162,091         213,137             43,599               418,827         112,883            14,445               546,155
   Participants                            203,541               0                  0               203,541               0                 0               203,541
Total Personnel                         $5,594,569      $3,327,487           $658,767            $9,580,823      $1,775,525          $242,834           $11,599,182

 Non‐Personnel                            $911,950      $1,850,346           $462,886         $3,225,182           $878,452          $156,763            $4,260,397
 Depreciation                               66,936          26,700             25,196            118,832             21,696                 0               140,528
Total Expenses                          $6,573,455      $5,204,533         $1,146,849        $12,924,837         $2,675,673          $399,597           $16,000,107

Personnel (Staff)                             40%              64%                57%                 51%                66%               61%                 54%
Personnel (Participants)                      45%               0%                 0%                 23%                 0%                0%                 19%
Non‐Personnel                                 14%              36%                40%                 25%                33%               39%                 27%
Depreciation                                   1%               1%                 2%                  1%                 1%                0%                  1%  
 

High levels of spending on G&A, fundraising and non‐participant program services expenditures, puts increased focus on 
the effectiveness of CEO’s ability to increase employment and to reduce recidivism amongst its participants. 
                                                       Center for Employment Opportunities | Nonprofit Investor Research  4 
 
PROGRAM RESULTS AND EFFECTIVENESS 

CEO does not publicly release data on their programs’ effectiveness on increasing employment rates and reducing 
recidivism amongst its participants. Instead, this report relies on the analysis performed by the MDRC, an independent 
organization that performs evaluations of policies and programs targeted to low‐income people. In February 2010, the 
MDRC prepared a paper titled “Transitional Jobs: Background, Program Models, and Evaluation Evidence” directed 
towards the Administration for Children and Families and the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and 
Evaluation. As part of this paper, MDRC evaluated CEO’s transitional jobs and vocational services programs. In 2004‐
2005, nearly 1,000 parolees were randomly assigned to a “Program Group” eligible for CEO’s transitional jobs program 
or to a “Control Group” only eligible for CEO’s basic job search assistance. Program and Control participants were 
tracked over a three year period for employment rates and criminal activity. 

                   % Employed (INCLUDING Transitional Jobs)                                                   % Employed (EXCLUDING Transitional Jobs) 
                 70%                           Program        Control                                       70%                              Program         Control

                 60%                                                                                        60%

                 50%                                                                                        50%




                                                                                               % Employed
    % Employed




                 40%                                                                                        40%

                 30%                                                                                        30%

                 20%                                                                                        20%

                 10%                                                                                        10%

                 0%                                                                                         0%
                       0   1    2     3    4    5    6    7   8     9    10     11   12                           0    1    2     3     4     5      6   7    8    9   10   11   12
                                    Quarters Relative to Random Assignment                                                      Quarters Relative to Random Assignment
                                                                                                                                                                                       
When accounting for total sources of employment, CEO’s programs produce a dramatically increased employment rate 
for the first year that over time converges back to the levels experience in the control group. Furthermore, when 
adjusting to exclude transitional jobs, the program group performs worse than the control group over the first year 
(indicating that if not for transitional jobs, some participants would have found employment on their own) and 
comparable to the control group over the last two years. One area where CEO’s impact is undisputed is its ability to 
reduce criminal activity amongst participants. Arrests, convictions and incarceration all decreased significantly for 
participants, especially those of whom were recently released from prison. 

                                                                  Three‐Year Impacts on Recidivism 
                                                                                      Total                                              Recently Released from Prison
                               Outcome                            Program            Control                 Difference               Program       Control     Difference

Arrested                                                                48.2%             53.0%                       (4.8%)                49.1%            59.1%          (10.0%)
Convicted of a Crime                                                    43.1%             48.8%                       (5.7%)                44.0%            56.7%          (12.7%)
  Felony                                                                10.0%             11.7%                       (1.7%)                    NA               NA              NA
  Misdemeanor                                                           34.0%             39.3%                       (5.3%)                    NA               NA              NA
  Violent Crime                                                          7.0%              9.5%                       (2.5%)                 5.4%            14.3%           (8.9%)
Incarcerated                                                            58.4%             65.3%                       (6.9%)                60.2%            71.3%          (11.1%)
  For New Crime                                                         22.3%             26.1%                       (3.8%)                    NA               NA              NA
  For Technical Parole Violation                                        37.1%             35.6%                        1.5%                     NA               NA              NA
  Total Days                                                              172               186                          (14)                   NA               NA              NA
Arrested, Convicted or Incarcerated                                     65.2%             70.9%                       (5.7%)                    NA               NA              NA
Sample Size (Total: 977)                                                  568               409                                               225              160                     

                                                              Center for Employment Opportunities | Nonprofit Investor Research  5 
 
TRANSPARENCY 

CEO's website provides information about the organization's programs, leadership and financial situation. Program 
services expenses are well documented in their audited financial statements, with detailed breakout of personnel costs 
(staff vs. participants) and non‐personnel expenditures. However, CEO provides limited analysis of the results of their 
efforts and efficacy of their programs, forcing potential donors to rely on third‐party analysis. 
CEO files its Form 990 with the IRS each year and its financial statements are regularly audited by the accounting firm 
Schall & Ashenfarb, LLC. 

OTHER THIRD PARTY RATINGS 
       GiveWell states that CEO “does not currently qualify for our highest ratings”, but GiveWell does not mention 
        what rating it ascribes to CEO. Similar to NPI’s findings, GiveWell struggled with CEO’s lack of demonstrated 
        increases in employment rates amongst participants. 

       Philanthropedia’s expert network rated CEO a “2010 Top Non‐Profit” with 18 experts viewing CEO as the 
        nonprofit with the most impact in its field, while 6 experts disagreed with that assessment. 
            o   Strengths include: 
                       Compelling increase in employment and reduction of criminal activity for immediate period out 
                        of prison. 
                       Operational strength in marketing, finance and data tracking / management. 
                       Strong, consistent leadership under Mindy Tarlow and her team. 
            o   Areas for Improvement include: 
                       Programs to increase long‐term retention and employment. 
                       Personal / social services related to relationship counseling and child support. 
                       Increasing communication to the public and employers on / program results / lessons learned. 

GET INVOLVED 
       Be an employer: http://ceoworks.org/services/who‐we‐serve/employers/  
       Donate: http://ceoworks.org/support‐us/donate/ 
       Stay in touch: http://ceoworks.org/stayintouch/  

DISCLOSURES 
RJ does not have any affiliation with Center for Employment Opportunities and has never made a donation to the 
organization. NPI analysts and NPI as an organization do not receive any form of compensation from reviewed charities. 




                                        Center for Employment Opportunities | Nonprofit Investor Research  6 
 

Weitere ähnliche Inhalte

Ähnlich wie Center for Employment Opportunities

Nexgen Empowerment Solutions (Pty) Ltd - Company Profile Doc 2016 - Empowerme...
Nexgen Empowerment Solutions (Pty) Ltd - Company Profile Doc 2016 - Empowerme...Nexgen Empowerment Solutions (Pty) Ltd - Company Profile Doc 2016 - Empowerme...
Nexgen Empowerment Solutions (Pty) Ltd - Company Profile Doc 2016 - Empowerme...Michelle Richards
 
north-east-salary-survey-2015
north-east-salary-survey-2015north-east-salary-survey-2015
north-east-salary-survey-2015Jenni Rankin
 
TIM Part - Intitutional Presentation - 2Q20
TIM Part - Intitutional Presentation - 2Q20TIM Part - Intitutional Presentation - 2Q20
TIM Part - Intitutional Presentation - 2Q20TIM RI
 
Nokia Corporate Responsibility 1.0
Nokia Corporate Responsibility 1.0Nokia Corporate Responsibility 1.0
Nokia Corporate Responsibility 1.0Jorge Fernandez
 
Flagship Enterprise Center Annual Report
Flagship Enterprise Center Annual ReportFlagship Enterprise Center Annual Report
Flagship Enterprise Center Annual Reportflagshipcenter
 
Genpact_Sustainability_Annual_Report
Genpact_Sustainability_Annual_ReportGenpact_Sustainability_Annual_Report
Genpact_Sustainability_Annual_ReportYogesh Doddamani
 
Recruiter.com Investor Presentation 2023
Recruiter.com Investor Presentation 2023Recruiter.com Investor Presentation 2023
Recruiter.com Investor Presentation 2023RedChip Companies, Inc.
 
NPI Evaluation of New Door Ventures
NPI Evaluation of New Door VenturesNPI Evaluation of New Door Ventures
NPI Evaluation of New Door VenturesNonprofit Investor
 

Ähnlich wie Center for Employment Opportunities (20)

Year Up
Year UpYear Up
Year Up
 
Nexgen Empowerment Solutions (Pty) Ltd - Company Profile Doc 2016 - Empowerme...
Nexgen Empowerment Solutions (Pty) Ltd - Company Profile Doc 2016 - Empowerme...Nexgen Empowerment Solutions (Pty) Ltd - Company Profile Doc 2016 - Empowerme...
Nexgen Empowerment Solutions (Pty) Ltd - Company Profile Doc 2016 - Empowerme...
 
FIRST
FIRSTFIRST
FIRST
 
NPI Evaluation of JobTrain
NPI Evaluation of JobTrainNPI Evaluation of JobTrain
NPI Evaluation of JobTrain
 
The Cara Program
The Cara ProgramThe Cara Program
The Cara Program
 
Year Up Rating Summary
Year Up Rating SummaryYear Up Rating Summary
Year Up Rating Summary
 
north-east-salary-survey-2015
north-east-salary-survey-2015north-east-salary-survey-2015
north-east-salary-survey-2015
 
North East Salary Survey 2015
North East Salary Survey 2015North East Salary Survey 2015
North East Salary Survey 2015
 
Client presentation ppt
Client presentation pptClient presentation ppt
Client presentation ppt
 
Turnover Reduction Plan Model.1
Turnover Reduction Plan Model.1Turnover Reduction Plan Model.1
Turnover Reduction Plan Model.1
 
BFDI Legal Advocacy: Budget Strategy Paper
BFDI Legal Advocacy: Budget Strategy PaperBFDI Legal Advocacy: Budget Strategy Paper
BFDI Legal Advocacy: Budget Strategy Paper
 
TIM Part - Intitutional Presentation - 2Q20
TIM Part - Intitutional Presentation - 2Q20TIM Part - Intitutional Presentation - 2Q20
TIM Part - Intitutional Presentation - 2Q20
 
Citizen Schools
Citizen SchoolsCitizen Schools
Citizen Schools
 
Nokia Corporate Responsibility 1.0
Nokia Corporate Responsibility 1.0Nokia Corporate Responsibility 1.0
Nokia Corporate Responsibility 1.0
 
HR Leads - Making Engagement Happen
HR Leads - Making Engagement HappenHR Leads - Making Engagement Happen
HR Leads - Making Engagement Happen
 
Plateau PresentationAprilL
Plateau PresentationAprilLPlateau PresentationAprilL
Plateau PresentationAprilL
 
Flagship Enterprise Center Annual Report
Flagship Enterprise Center Annual ReportFlagship Enterprise Center Annual Report
Flagship Enterprise Center Annual Report
 
Genpact_Sustainability_Annual_Report
Genpact_Sustainability_Annual_ReportGenpact_Sustainability_Annual_Report
Genpact_Sustainability_Annual_Report
 
Recruiter.com Investor Presentation 2023
Recruiter.com Investor Presentation 2023Recruiter.com Investor Presentation 2023
Recruiter.com Investor Presentation 2023
 
NPI Evaluation of New Door Ventures
NPI Evaluation of New Door VenturesNPI Evaluation of New Door Ventures
NPI Evaluation of New Door Ventures
 

Mehr von Nonprofit Investor

NPI Evaluation of Bill Wilson Center
NPI Evaluation of Bill Wilson CenterNPI Evaluation of Bill Wilson Center
NPI Evaluation of Bill Wilson CenterNonprofit Investor
 
NPI Evaluation of America Needs You
NPI Evaluation of America Needs YouNPI Evaluation of America Needs You
NPI Evaluation of America Needs YouNonprofit Investor
 
NPI Evaluation of Huckleberry Youth Programs
NPI Evaluation of Huckleberry Youth ProgramsNPI Evaluation of Huckleberry Youth Programs
NPI Evaluation of Huckleberry Youth ProgramsNonprofit Investor
 
NPI Evaluation of Children's Literacy Initiative
NPI Evaluation of Children's Literacy InitiativeNPI Evaluation of Children's Literacy Initiative
NPI Evaluation of Children's Literacy InitiativeNonprofit Investor
 
NPI evaluation of charity: water
NPI evaluation of charity: waterNPI evaluation of charity: water
NPI evaluation of charity: waterNonprofit Investor
 
Philadelphia Youth Network Rating Summary
Philadelphia Youth Network Rating SummaryPhiladelphia Youth Network Rating Summary
Philadelphia Youth Network Rating SummaryNonprofit Investor
 
Delancey Street Foundation Rating Summary
Delancey Street Foundation Rating SummaryDelancey Street Foundation Rating Summary
Delancey Street Foundation Rating SummaryNonprofit Investor
 
NPI Evaluation of First Place for Youth
NPI Evaluation of First Place for YouthNPI Evaluation of First Place for Youth
NPI Evaluation of First Place for YouthNonprofit Investor
 
NPI Evaluation of College Possible
NPI Evaluation of College PossibleNPI Evaluation of College Possible
NPI Evaluation of College PossibleNonprofit Investor
 
NPI Evaluation of Room to Read
NPI Evaluation of Room to ReadNPI Evaluation of Room to Read
NPI Evaluation of Room to ReadNonprofit Investor
 
NPI Evaluation of Red Sox Foundation
NPI Evaluation of Red Sox FoundationNPI Evaluation of Red Sox Foundation
NPI Evaluation of Red Sox FoundationNonprofit Investor
 
NPI Evaluation of VisionSpring
NPI Evaluation of VisionSpringNPI Evaluation of VisionSpring
NPI Evaluation of VisionSpringNonprofit Investor
 
NPI Evaluation of One Economy Corporation
NPI Evaluation of One Economy Corporation NPI Evaluation of One Economy Corporation
NPI Evaluation of One Economy Corporation Nonprofit Investor
 
NPI Evaluation of Project GRAD Houston
NPI Evaluation of Project GRAD HoustonNPI Evaluation of Project GRAD Houston
NPI Evaluation of Project GRAD HoustonNonprofit Investor
 

Mehr von Nonprofit Investor (20)

NPI Evaluation of Bill Wilson Center
NPI Evaluation of Bill Wilson CenterNPI Evaluation of Bill Wilson Center
NPI Evaluation of Bill Wilson Center
 
NPI Evaluation of America Needs You
NPI Evaluation of America Needs YouNPI Evaluation of America Needs You
NPI Evaluation of America Needs You
 
NPI Evaluation of Huckleberry Youth Programs
NPI Evaluation of Huckleberry Youth ProgramsNPI Evaluation of Huckleberry Youth Programs
NPI Evaluation of Huckleberry Youth Programs
 
NPI Evaluation of Children's Literacy Initiative
NPI Evaluation of Children's Literacy InitiativeNPI Evaluation of Children's Literacy Initiative
NPI Evaluation of Children's Literacy Initiative
 
Charity: water Rating Summary
Charity: water Rating SummaryCharity: water Rating Summary
Charity: water Rating Summary
 
NPI evaluation of charity: water
NPI evaluation of charity: waterNPI evaluation of charity: water
NPI evaluation of charity: water
 
Do-All, Inc. Rating Summary
Do-All, Inc. Rating SummaryDo-All, Inc. Rating Summary
Do-All, Inc. Rating Summary
 
Philadelphia Youth Network Rating Summary
Philadelphia Youth Network Rating SummaryPhiladelphia Youth Network Rating Summary
Philadelphia Youth Network Rating Summary
 
Delancey Street Foundation Rating Summary
Delancey Street Foundation Rating SummaryDelancey Street Foundation Rating Summary
Delancey Street Foundation Rating Summary
 
iMentor Rating Summary
iMentor Rating SummaryiMentor Rating Summary
iMentor Rating Summary
 
First Book Rating Summary
First Book Rating SummaryFirst Book Rating Summary
First Book Rating Summary
 
NPI Evaluation of First Place for Youth
NPI Evaluation of First Place for YouthNPI Evaluation of First Place for Youth
NPI Evaluation of First Place for Youth
 
NPI Evaluation of College Possible
NPI Evaluation of College PossibleNPI Evaluation of College Possible
NPI Evaluation of College Possible
 
NPI Evaluation of HOBY
NPI Evaluation of HOBYNPI Evaluation of HOBY
NPI Evaluation of HOBY
 
NPI Evaluation of Room to Read
NPI Evaluation of Room to ReadNPI Evaluation of Room to Read
NPI Evaluation of Room to Read
 
NPI Evaluation of NMFA
NPI Evaluation of NMFANPI Evaluation of NMFA
NPI Evaluation of NMFA
 
NPI Evaluation of Red Sox Foundation
NPI Evaluation of Red Sox FoundationNPI Evaluation of Red Sox Foundation
NPI Evaluation of Red Sox Foundation
 
NPI Evaluation of VisionSpring
NPI Evaluation of VisionSpringNPI Evaluation of VisionSpring
NPI Evaluation of VisionSpring
 
NPI Evaluation of One Economy Corporation
NPI Evaluation of One Economy Corporation NPI Evaluation of One Economy Corporation
NPI Evaluation of One Economy Corporation
 
NPI Evaluation of Project GRAD Houston
NPI Evaluation of Project GRAD HoustonNPI Evaluation of Project GRAD Houston
NPI Evaluation of Project GRAD Houston
 

Center for Employment Opportunities