2017 Guia Para Publicar Emerald
•
1 gefällt mir•653 views
Conselhos práticos de editores de revistas Emerald para um artigo de qualidade e sucesso durante o processo de publicação
![The thing you do not want to do is
irritate the reviewer such that they
form a poor opinion of your paper.
Do not force a reviewer to return
something like Figure 4 to you [...]
Majid (2014) notes that “bad writing
often goes hand-in-hand with murky
thinking, so by writing clearly you
are forced to clarify your
understanding”.]()
Empfohlen
Weitere ähnliche Inhalte
Was ist angesagt?
Was ist angesagt? (20)
Andere mochten auch
Andere mochten auch (20)
Ähnlich wie 2017 Guia Para Publicar Emerald
Ähnlich wie 2017 Guia Para Publicar Emerald (20)
Mehr von Andre Jun
Mehr von Andre Jun (17)
Kürzlich hochgeladen
Kürzlich hochgeladen (20)
2017 Guia Para Publicar Emerald
- 1. Guia para publicar conselhos dos editores-chefe da Emerald para um artigo de qualidade André Jun Isabela Daneluci 2017
- 2. The thing you do not want to do is irritate the reviewer such that they form a poor opinion of your paper. Do not force a reviewer to return something like Figure 4 to you [...] Majid (2014) notes that “bad writing often goes hand-in-hand with murky thinking, so by writing clearly you are forced to clarify your understanding”.
- 5. Joining a conversation Conferences provide an effective way of joining a scholarly conversation. They present more recent developments in a field than articles that may have been written more than two or three years before their eventual publication [...] For example, target two or three conferences in a field, in a row, to get to know personally some of the people interested in an area [...] That is, joining in the formal and informal discussions after [...]
- 6. Joining a conversation [...] So the first step in getting published is to picture the audience who will be reading and judging an article. For instance, is the journal aimed at academics in a wide range of general areas of marketing, or academics in a particular field like franchising, or practitioners and consultants? [...] In contrast, Marketing Intelligence & Planning is read by consultants as well as academics, and many of its consultant readers would expect a more balanced range of academic and practitioner‐relevant articles in an issue. Practitioners Titles: www.emeraldgrouppublishing.com/authors/guides/write/practitioner.htm?part=2
- 7. Joining a conversation [...] Finally, find one or two exemplars of your type of article from the target journal (Huff, 1999). Exemplars are not necessarily about your topic, but they do show how an article is written that uses your methodology and/or makes the same sort of arguments. [...] While doing this literature review, do not criticise other writers in the conversation circle, instead, use words like “complement”, “build on” and “synthesise”, and avoid phrases such a “omitted” or “failed to address”. After all, the writers you reference may be asked by the editor to review your submission.
- 8. Joining a conversation [...] In the penultimate discussion section, findings for each research issue or hypothesis are linked to the literature, thus identifying and emphasising contributions to the field. In this section, conclusions and implications are different (Perry, 1997). Conclusions arise directly from the findings, whereas implications are speculations arising indirectly from the findings. In the article, consider implications for theory, and implications for policy and practice. Findings Conclusions X Implications Theory, Policy and Practice
- 9. Getting published These points are particularly important for non-Western authors, or those who are not at mainstream academic institutions. [...] The first is a limited access to literature. Second, you may have limited access to ideas and rebuttals. Developing that network will allow you contacts that may stimulate research ideas or at least give you some input on your research. Third, access to data can be a problem. Increasingly free data can be found online, particularly, historical data. Additionally, co-authors may be a source of data. A final issue of concern is language. If you are trying to publish in English and English is not your first language then you are going to need a proofreader [...] Jerry Paul Sheppard, (2015) "Getting published: achieving acceptance from reviewers and editors", Journal of Asia Business Studies, Vol. 9 Issue: 2, pp.117-132, doi: 10.1108/JABS-02-2015-0024
- 10. Então, a qual revista devo enviar meu artigo?
- 11. Então, a qual revista devo enviar meu artigo?
- 12. Quais critérios existem para selecionar uma revista? Fator de Impacto CITESCORE Emerald: editora com mais revistas em BMA (Business, Management and Accounting) Ranking nacional (por exemplo: QUALIS) Opinião dos pares
- 13. Sobre o Fator de Impacto... “If I could get rid of the Impact Factor tomorrow, I would. I hate it… It totally distorts decision- making and it is a very, very bad influence on science” Richard Horton, Editor de The Lancet (Fator de impacto: 39,06) Fonte: http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/407705.article
- 14. Após a submissão de seu artigo... Um pedido de revisão é um excelente sinal! Agora você está dentro do ciclo de publicação. Quase todo trabalho é revisado pelo menos uma vez! Mesmo se os comentários forem incisivos ou desencorajadores, não os tome pessoalmente “Um autor Emerald costuma deixar de lado seu artigo com os comentários, por 1 semana, para permitir que sua pressão arterial volte à normalidade”
- 16. O que editores e revisores buscam? Originalidade (contribuição) – o que é novo? Metodologia? Resultados? Relevância e extensão do conhecimento existente Metodologia – as conclusões são válidas e objetivas? Redação (clareza, estrutura) – o texto se comunica bem? Argumentação com uma construção lógica Implicações teóricas e práticas – o “e daí?” Referências recentes e relevantes Internacionalidade – foco global Aderência ao escopo editorial e objetivos da revista Título, palavras-chave e resumo bem redigidos
- 17. Seja um Literati! Junte-se aos mais de 4000 autores Emerald e 200 membros de comitês editoriais na América Latina! André Jun – Apoio a Autores ajun@emeraldgroup.com Isabela Daneluci – Soluções em Acesso idaneluci@emeraldgroup.com
- 18. ScholarOne: crie o seu perfil
- 19. ScholarOne: perfil São 3 passos para criar seu perfil Passo 1: E-Mail / Nome
- 20. ScholarOne: perfil Passo 2: Endereços
- 21. ScholarOne: perfil Passo 3: User ID & Password
- 22. ScholarOne: perfil Passo 3: User ID & Password
- 24. A partir do menu principal: São 6 passos simples ScholarOne: enviando manuscritos
- 25. ScholarOne: enviando manuscritos Paso 1: Tipo, título y el resumen
- 26. Paso 2: Palabras clave (Keywords) ScholarOne: enviando manuscritos
- 27. Paso 3: Autor(es) e Instituição ScholarOne: enviando manuscritos
- 28. Paso 4: Revisores (não se aplica a todas as revistas) ScholarOne: enviando manuscritos
- 29. Paso 5: Detalhes e Comentários ScholarOne: enviando manuscritos
- 30. Paso 6: Envio dos documentos ScholarOne: enviando manuscritos
- 31. Paso 7: Revisar e Enviar ScholarOne: enviando manuscritos
- 32. Mais informações em: Gerais http://msc.emeraldinsight.com/authors/index.html Para revisores http://msc.emeraldinsight.com/Downloads/Revisio n_guide.doc Obrigado!