Are they any use? Price per use comparisons...
•Als PPT, PDF herunterladen•
0 gefällt mir•421 views
![General hazards -- Broad Strokes ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]]()
Empfohlen
Weitere ähnliche Inhalte
Was ist angesagt?
Was ist angesagt? (7)
Ähnlich wie Are they any use? Price per use comparisons...
Ähnlich wie Are they any use? Price per use comparisons... (20)
Mehr von Jason Price, PhD
Mehr von Jason Price, PhD (20)
Are they any use? Price per use comparisons...
- 1. Hazards of price-per-use comparison in e-journal management Jason S. Price , Ph.D. Claremont Colleges’ Libraries Los Angeles, California Are they any use? Plenary Session 4 30 th Annual UKSG Conference, 16-18 April 2007 University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
- 9. Overall cost per view by Subs Type $1.64
- 12. Variation in use by format Davis and Price, 2006
- 14. Live Link
- 18. S4. Ignoring by-title data
- 19. Cutting off the long tail…
- 20. Before…
- 21. After …
- 22. Before Collaboration After Collaboration
- 23. S5. Lack of Benchmarks Consortium
- 24. S5. Lack of Benchmarks Consortium
- 25. S5. Lack of Benchmarks Consortium
- 26. S5. Lack of Benchmarks Consortium
- 34. S5. Lack of Benchmarks Consortium
- 38. Example of Cumulative Use
- 40. Q1. Which titles should we share? A: not the Unique Title List… For more detail see: http://tinyurl.com/lte96
- 41. Q2. Which titles should we cancel?
- 42. Q2. Which titles should we cancel?
- 43. Q2. Which titles should we cancel?
- 46. Average vs Overall vs Cost per View
Hinweis der Redaktion
- If you get the reference of this poster to the car named the ‘General’ Lee, then the US has had a worse affect on UK culture than I thought possible… Another haz attending a talk by a guy Commercial vs Society Broad verus narrow China Academic Journals LOTS of content, but as in Chinese expect low demand
- IP-based—Delivered by
- Google Scholar
- On the theme of negative impacts of the US on the UK… I’d say this one is very specific, though Glad don’t have to put into words… Outline of rest of talk
- But first, a definition and the magic number… March 2002 Release 2 Without it we couldn’t even discuss this Collaborative effort of librarians publishers & intermediaries founded on well respected industry initiatives
- Big deal Lock-ins & Combined Subscriptions
- For the same publisher pkg in the same year…
- Not exactly red herrings…
- Significantly different? What metric for use?
- An option…
- Elsevier (22%) and Ebsco (28%) partnered with COUNTER ( Publisher/package? Journal? Journal year? Article? Ignoring or Overemphasizing PPU by journal Should depend on question
- Scholar – browsing may require use
- At least among academic libraries… Two reasons not to give up: Swapping Cooperative vendors
- 80-20 Rule
- Based on title by title use stats
- Kakorams
- Majority of collection comprised of added titles (at small fraction of list price) Simple answer: if not all of them, then the ones we use the most Pre-packed – Bad with the good, problem of breadth, OR you can have all these titles that other institutions subscribed to as of 5 years ago
- According to counter Post-analysis pending
- Gorey Details Switch gears to individual library Within a package & only subscribed titles (by definition) Those that have the highest price per use Use multiple years of Data
- Gorey Details Switch gears to individual library Within a package & only subscribed titles (by definition) Those that have the highest price per use Use multiple years of Data
- Gorey Details Switch gears to individual library Within a package & only subscribed titles (by definition) Those that have the highest price per use Use multiple years of Data