Low incomes, juggling jobs, uncertain futures, and a constant need to be social, available and willing to move: it is fair to say that performing artists live in precarious conditions. But what can be done? How can the position of artists in the field be more sustainable? What will this new, alternative and bright system look like? How to start this paradigm shift?
In fact, this system shift may already be happening today. So many individuals, organisations, artists and art workers from across Europe are responding with a multitude of initiatives that span across funds for artists with families, artist lobby organisations, alternative currency systems, space sharing platforms, fair practice labels, and more. At the same time , there is no list or clear overview of all these initiatives. There is a lot of research and reflection about the issue, but it’s difficult to get an overview or keep track. In a session at the IETM Plenary Meeting in Bucharest, Delphine Hesters and I organised a workshop to stimulate exchange about current collaborative experiments to strengthen the position of artists
Doing it Together - Collective Answers to the Precarious Position of Artists
1. FLANDERS ARTS INSTITUTE1
DO IT TOGETHER (D.I.T.)
Collective answers to the Precarious
Position of Artists
IETM Plenary Meeting - Bucharest - 21 April 2017
Delphine Hesters & Joris Janssens (Flanders Arts Institute)
2. FLANDERS ARTS INSTITUTE2
Introduction
• A working session mapping initiatives that create more sustainable working
conditions for artists
• Hosted by Flanders Arts Institute / Kunstenpunt
• Research into career development of artists & postion of artists in the
field
• Stimulating the development of new working models
• Today = sharing
• our research and your experiences & ideas (10:00-11:00)
• developing a collective learning environment, creating connections
(11:00-13:00)
3. FLANDERS ARTS INSTITUTE3
Previous research Flanders Arts Institute & VTi
Download everything on http://www.flandersartsinstitute.be/specials/perspective-artist
• Foto perspective artist
• Screenshot survey
• Tekst ash > reframing
5. Structure of the presentation
1. ‘Freedom & Frenzy’ - research on
the precarious position of the
performing artists
2.‘Do it together’ (D.I.T.): mapping
solutions
- building a collection of inspiring
experiments
- discussion in small groups
- sharing: live & online
7. FLANDERS ARTS INSTITUTE7
Freedom & Frenzy
1. Dominance of flexwork
• System change: from companies with ensembles and long-term
engagements to project-based work
• Individualization and uncertainty
2. High demands for non-artistic skills
• networking, entrepreneurship…
Research on the precarious position of artists
8. FLANDERS ARTS INSTITUTE8
Freedom & Frenzy
2. The ‘Slashers’ — Multiple-job holding
• Inside and outside of the arts, artistic and non-artistic activities
• Evidence from Flanders:
• more than 50% engaged in more than 4 productions in 2014
• 1/4 has a job outside of the arts
Research on the precarious position of artists
10. FLANDERS ARTS INSTITUTE10
Freedom & Frenzy
4. Socio-economic precarity
Evidence from Flanders:
• Performing artists living solely from core artistic work = 10%
• Performing artists living solely from work in the arts sector = 27%
• Net income performing artists (employees, 2014)
Population Belgium Performing artists Actors (2014)
PC 25 11.360 14.017
Median 24.664 17.142 19.000
PC 75 24.000 24.000
% higher education 40% 85% -
Research on the precarious position of artists
11. FLANDERS ARTS INSTITUTE11
Freedom & Frenzy
5. Fragmentation of means across more and more players
6. Precarization of supporting organisations
7. Inflation of coproductions
• More partners = more coordination and risk of
thinner engagements
Research on the precarious position of artists
13. FLANDERS ARTS INSTITUTE13
Freedom & Frenzy
8. Dominance of ‘project’ logics
• short term horizon
• focus on production and outcome > development or ‘practice’
• how to build a sustainable career in a flex-work context?
9. Peer space under pressure of market logics
• Cf. Gielen: a healthy artistic biotope = balance in 4 spheres:
private / peers / market / civic
• Peer space = space of building and sharing knowledge, negotiation
and discussion, ‘internal’ focus
Research on the precarious position of artists
14. FLANDERS ARTS INSTITUTE14
Do It Together
Working together to create more sustainable working conditions for artists
17. FLANDERS ARTS INSTITUTE17
Maybe we start with exchanging experiences:
start from concrete examples, try to get an
overview of the many experiments happening
today, understand why they inspire us, see
how they resonate with local contexts, and
then see how we can move on.
38. FLANDERS ARTS INSTITUTE38
Title
Subtitle
• Dilemma in art competition
• Idleness Academy
• Dat ding van Hans Bryssinck
• Performing Arts Exploitation Fund.
- Second level
• Third level
49. FLANDERS ARTS INSTITUTE49
8. Connecting to contexts and communities
7. Artist-run self organisation
6. Breaking taboos
5. Work-life balance – artists as human beings
4. Fair practices in the arts
3. Strengthening the artistic peer sphere
2. Sharing non-economic resources
1. Organizing the artist community
9. (…)
50. FLANDERS ARTS INSTITUTE50
- Now: two light bulb moment from every
group
- Write a blog post: http://blog.kunsten.be
Share your learning curve!
Contribute the collection of examples
- Share the initiatives you talked about on the
Freedom & Frenzy FB Group
- Send us a mail with links and examples:
joris@kunsten.be
51. FLANDERS ARTS INSTITUTE51
DO IT TOGETHER (D.I.T.)
Answers to the Precarious Position
of Artists
IETM Plenary Meeting - Bucharest - 21 April 2017
Delphine Hesters & Joris Janssens (Flanders Arts Institute)
52. Evidence from Flanders (2016)
CUDOS research group UGent (sociology) - Jessy Siongers, Astrid Van Steen, John Lievens
Commissioned by: Flemish government, Kunstenpunt, SFP, Kunstenloket, oKo, ACOD-cultuur, VAF, VFL
2706 respondents (in analysis)
• 716 visual artists
• 392 directors & script writers (film)
• 899 musicians & composers
• 308 writers & illustrators
• 391 performing artists
• 457 actors (survey 2014)
Online survey
individual invitations to identified
‘professional artists’ + open call (90/10%
in response)
On the socio-economic conditions
of artists
Themes: activities (artistic and non
artistic), time, income, costs, job
satisfaction, need for support etc.