1. Voluntary and Humanitarian Responses
Jorge Rodrigues Simao
Jean Monnet Chair Professor
Doctor in European Union Law
Harvard Law School
Doctor in Economics
Yale School of Management
JUN 28 2016, 63

2. Much has been aforesaid about voluntary and humanitarian responses. With more than 60 million
refugees cosmopolitan (UNOCHA, 2015, UNHCR, 2015), independent offer are the dolly that effectuate
the urgent needs left by disqualified and ineffective failed States and International Organizations. With
the helix arise in the outbreak of philanthropist crises worldwide, there is a durable call for volunteers.
Therefore, one must ask: what is the party of independent volunteers in philanthropic crises? Where
States fail to avoid crises and buckler their citizens, offer are influential actors in peacekeeping that fill
the breach in woo the steadily develop set of object that appear within failure pomp. Peacekeeping,
with its complication weaver of interests, blame, content objectives and actors, owes much to offer as
the main agents in heartrending absolute innovate to the otherwise immutable. Volunteers have long
been the essential interface between peacekeeping and affecting real vary on the estate.
Many indicators might be either objective or perplexed to precisely charged for how energetic the party
of helpers in benevolent situs is in actuality. International philanthropic assistance has improved
considerably since its consanguineous in the 19th century with the creation of the International Red
Cross. Within a global control world view, Liberal Institutionalists have emphasized the benefit that
international institutions can bring to a disordered framework of sovereign pomp. Measuring the
collective and individual impact of voluntary sequacious man-made disasters such as forces, or natural
disasters, is a methodologically tough strives.
World Refugee Day, observed June 20 each year, is devoted to raising awareness of the situation of
refugees throughout the world. Beyond language choices between `refugee’ or ‘migratory’ (UNHCR,
2015) what theme is that humanitarianism in itself is in crisis. Yet, the problem remains much more
complex and so immense that it seems unsolvable. Constant modern dilemmas must be addressed. The
delivery can be addressed in a comprehensive spectrum of ways. In management to delineated the
influence of voluntary in humanitarian crises, it is requisite to revisal the fundamental and conductor
principles of benevolent law and to antithesize them with the reality of the infelicity on the ground. The
party of unrestricted offer in benevolent crises will be analysed first up regarding the hero syndrome
and the improbable submarine sandwich terminate. Secondly, the importunity of the tenet of
philanthropist litigation and its censure for independent volunteers will also be scrutinize. In this
covenant, independent volunteers are accompanying with no-possession actors such NGOs and INGOs,
as well as with the solitary sector. The mayor humanitarian no-controlling system in close the Red Cross
organizations, Church-told agencies, iatric and instructive volunteers as well as U.N. offer and worldwide
corporations such as Save the Children, Oxfam, and Amnesty International.
The Hero Syndrome v. Feelings of Frustration and Futility (FFF)
At the international level, there is a crossroads between inferring responsibleness, community and
hominal security. As an example, the notion of crimes against humankind is one emission of the
espousal of clod equitable as extent of earthling decorum and how international organizations can
protect democratization and concord (Poast and Urpelainen, 2015). Regardless of how greatly hence the
conflict is, or the different personal stage of conception that one may have, the image of a Syrian
refugee infant overpower on a Mediterranean sand or the classic delineate of an Ethiopian baby
deceased from starve and going to be eaten by a vulture have a behavior call. It is immoral to watch

3. hominine atrocities and be inert, mediocre and dull. This morality is the pillar of the politic humanitarian
postulate of the responsibility to save (R2P). The earthling being taken precedence to independence and
other constraints of international equity as well as to the balance of dominion from the realist
standpoint of international relations.
Volunteers are often granted two gainsay drip. They are seen as admirable souls, completely naïve and
at the same tempo very dauntless. They can also be following as part of the collision, by creating more
eat or harm, often driven by financial motivations for their own personal business effort. The truth is:
frequently, bold voluntary are those moved by this virtuous momentum of solidarity to do “something,
somehow, for someone”. This is the torpedo concurrence of the “doers” that picture themselves as
warriors without sword (Junod, 1951) passover that it might be necessary to ‘shake hands with the
demon’ as in the chaste omission of Rwanda (Dallaire, 2005).
Those who have been in the benevolent extent very well know that rather than anticipate, despite the
amount of fanaticism, the FFF will attack their psyche and take antecedence of thoughts as in a source-
and-execution functioning: Feelings of Frustration and Futility. Among the refugees and encounter
disasters public feuds and trick NGOs co-live alongside often politicised eloquence. However, offer do
humanitarian work that International Aid Organizations are not o (Greig, 2015). Furthermore, there is an
imploring maxim of “have a and Save the World” that luggage tramp voluntary into a more unideal
conception of international humanitarian tourists (Borland and Adams, 2013). Individuals operation
within extraneous aid agencies might detect that guile, rapacity, corruption, insensibility, and politic
agendas permeate the business in answer not only to disasters but political agendas and economic
occasion (Schwartz, 2008).
The role of separate volunteers in philanthropist crises is exactly to assist in the transformation of the
reality by being the interface between the main agents as well as reaching the unreachable and most
required in a early manner. As warriors, offer is in battle on the frontline. However, they have an other
leit motiv and mindset than salamander or freedom fighters. Psychologically, they encounter the
unmentionable and their lives are at exposure. Volunteer’s boldness a psychosomatic impasse between
the Hero Syndrome v. FFF.
Humanitarian Principles and Its Challenges
Non-controlling organizations and their voluntary have proved to be a need meant governmental and
intergovernmental operational partners, providing bodily, medicinal and moral relief as well as care
wherever it may be needed. However, International benevolent help comprises a collection network of
government agencies, intergovernmental and no-governmental organizations, and concrete volunteers
that liken a ‘no-system’ (Beigbeder, 1991). In Haiti, after the startling in 2010, it was estimated that
10,000 NGOs were rendition in the ground (Peace, 2010). Inevitably, it is impossible to coordinate,
monitor and evaluate their activities chiefly within a failing State. Suspicions of putrescence have
triggered extraneous donors to circuit the Haitian state and channel financial and important assistance
through NGOs. Subsequently, fabrication Haiti a “Republic of NGOs” as some organizations were
“money-in” and causing more damage than portion or build. NGO’s and INGO’s extend often have more

4. funds than the faithful Haitian Government. Among other consequences, the Haitian government has
insignificant chance to develop the clot or institutional character to resign services. Similar
circumstances can be found in other cyclical benevolent places such as South Sudan, Congo and Iraq and
other frail pomp (Brock et al., 2012).
Notwithstanding humanitarian crises as well as the crisis of humanitarianism diligence in itself, there are
perpendicular and duties that should be hear by self-reliant volunteers in casualty responses while
“thwart and relieve human endurance wherever it may be found, buckler person and health and betroth
revere for the humane being” (ICRC, 1965). There is a disputatious maintain of a ‘right’ to receive and a
‘reverence’ to foresee philanthropic assistance beyond borders, as well as the possible necessity for a
condition to be assent to international volunteers (Beigbeder, 1991) For instance, should philanthropist
non-controlling organizations provide comfort assistance with discretion, neutrality and
disinterestedness or should they damn openly hominal just violations, at the risk of being expelled from
receptive countries and goods to stop their assistance? Ethical dilemmas are a constant shape of
philanthropic trading operations.
Where serviceable intentions and imperial system design purpose intertwine, it is not enough to be a
“Doer”. The party of independent volunteers in philanthropist responses should imitate the four moral
code of philanthropist operation. First, humanity: the purpose of philanthropist operation is to save life
and health and ensure estimation for human beings. Second, fairness: humanitarian action must be
conduct out without distinction as to allegiance, issue, religious beliefs, class or political opinions. Third,
indifference: peacemakers should not take sides in war or draw at any era in controversies of a political,
racial, devotional or ideological naturalness. Fourth, independence: autonomy from the political,
regulative, and infantry is underlying although actions are inferior to the provincial laws. The
philanthropist principles have practical usable pertinency, including to incur safeness to humanitarian
personnel as well as uniform outburst to affected companions (OCHA, 2012). The International Red
Cross and Red Crescent Movement (ICRC, 1965) also consider free service, unity and generality as
principles as it support that voluntary redress advancement it is not supported on fiscal convenient,
there should be one deputy for better coordination and equal status as well as part even responsibilities
and duties in helping each other worldwide.
More than the responsibleness to screen, there is also the responsibleness while screen (RwP) (Ferris,
2011, SIPRI, 2012, Almeida, 2013). All the benevolent principles are fundamental to guarantee the role
of independent offer. However, the main utility abide the one of “do no evil”. Good intentions are not
enough. In philanthropist responses the main censure are to react to era, cohesion, costs, selectiveness,
and answerableness. The measure is now. From emerge to development, it need continuity. It is always
easier to sally, hard to assert, and strategically resistant to leaving. It is impossible to do all in the four
corners of the world. There is a practical penury for selectiveness that clashes with ethical questions:
how to determine the neediest victims of crises? In the politics of protection and the limitations of
humanitarian aid, hard choices must be made when economical lives (Moore, 1998, Damrosch, 2000,
Kaldor, 2001). Additionally, someone has to punish the free lunch. The regulative bump of infraction to
the global economy reached $13.6 trillion in 2015, in possession power parity (PPP) condition (IEP,
2016).

5. It is influential to mention that solitary business also amusement a basis role in the humanitarian
perseverance to move from mitigation towards educement. Private companies have the budget and
shoot mechanisms to create jobs, infrastructure and opportunities that emerge in the rowen of the crisis
and on the track towards peace and prosperity.
Conclusion
Much can be above-mentioned around the rhetoric involving humanitarian workers. The reality is:
independent voluntary do play an important role in benevolent crises by serving to effectuate the needs
which States and other paramount Institutions cannot stipulate. However, there is no such something as
“faithful fortune” when the reality on the territory is feelings of defeat and futility in a multi-billion
sinker manufacture. The philanthropist industry is shaped by sheltered part, lack of answerability and
futile coordination. The favorableness of offer service should not be an unimpugnable opinion, beyond
been paid or unfed. Ethics and burgess-tact are strictly related to philanthropic voluntary. The
inclination of good works as civic responsibility is artfully acquiescent rather than transformational.
Historically, offer has been also custom by some governments as hidden agents in the conflict.
The party of independent voluntary in philanthropist crises is exactly to back in the transformation of
the reality by being the interface between the cardinal agents, and being powerful to reach the
unreachable and most requisite promptly. It is methodologically complex to limit the percussion that are
individually and collectively made by offer. The role and statutes of international philanthropist
volunteers and organizations is qualified by perpendicular and duties in command to avoid turning
volunteers into tourists as well as national States and to prevent turning failed situation into “Pseudo-
Republics of civil connection nihilism”.
On the 51st anniversary of the espousal of the Fundamental Principles of the International Red Cross
and Red Crescent Movement, it is a good occasion to revisit the contemporary bearing of the role of
independent offer in a globe with invariable humanitarian emergencies. Independent voluntary must
not overtake or degrade the party of the State, but to contribute to its progress. Beyond not o any injure
and the penury to consideration the humanitarian principles and moral appreciate, the party of
independent voluntary can only be safeguarded if the moral code of the R2P is as germane as the
responsibleness while protecting. Yet, the proposition remains much more complication and so gigantic
that it seems irresoluble. In harmony studies, fighting that cannot be solved are categorised as combat
management and sometimes, encounter version. That is what we can anticipation for. Legal and wise
conundrums might differ, and criticisms on transparence, effectuality and accountability persist.
Nevertheless, and while humanitarianism is in crisis, the conduct refute to the role of uncoerced
voluntary in humanitarian responses is: every life reckoning.
References

6. Almeida, P. W. 2013. From Non-indifference to Responsibility while protecting: Brazil’s
Diplomacy and the Search for Global Norm. South African Institute of International Affairs.
African perspectives.Global insights., Global Powers and Africa Programme.
Beigbeder, Y. 1991. The Role and Statuts of International Humanitarian Volunteers and
Organizations: The Right and Duty to Humanitarian Assistance, Springer Netherlands.
Borland, K. & Adams, A. 2013. International Volunteer Tourism: Critical Reflections on
Good Works in Central America, USA, Palgrave Macmillan US.
Brock, L., Holm, H.-H., Sorensen, G. & ET Stohl, M. 2012. Fragile states: war and conflict in
the modern world.
Dallaire, R. 2005. Shake Hands With The Devil: The Failure of Humanity in Rwanda.
Damrosch, L. F. 2000. The inevitability of selective response? Principles to guide urgent
international action. In: C.THAKUR, A. S. A. R. (ed.) In Kosovo and the Challenge of
Humanitarian Intervention: Selective Indignation, Collective Action, and International
Citizenship. Tokyo: United Nations University Press.
Ferris, E. G. 2011. The Politics of Protection: The Limits of Humanitarian Action, US,
Brookings Institution.
Greig, R. 2015. Refugees, Feuds And Fake NGOs: Volunteers Doing Humanitarian Work
International Aid Organizations Aren’t. International Business Times (IBT).
ICRC, I. A. T. 1965. The seven Fundamental Principles. International Committee of the Red
Cross and the International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies.
IEP 2016. Global Peace Index report.
Junod, D. M. 1951. Warrior Without Weapons The MacMillan Company.
Kaldor, M. 2001. A Decade of Humanitarian Intervention: The Role of Global Civil
Society. In: Helmut K. Anheier, M. G., and Mary Kaldor (ed.) Global Civil Society. Oxford:
University Press.
Moore, J. E. 1998. Hard choices: Moral dilemmas in humanitarian intervention Rowman &
Littlefield, Lanham, Oxford, ICRC.

7. OCHA 2012. What are Humanitarian Principles?
PEACE, U. S. I. O. 2010. Haiti: A Republic of NGOs? Peace brief 23.
Poast, P. & Urpelainen, J. 2015. How International Organizations Support Democratization
Preventing Authoritarian Reversals or Promoting Consolidation? World Politics, 67, 72-113.
Schwartz, T. 2008. Travesty in Haiti: A True Account of Christian Missions, Orphanages,
Food Aid, Fraud, and Drug Trafficking.: BookSurge Publishing
SIPRI 2012. Responsibility while protecting’: are we asking the wrong
questions? In: AVEZOV, X. (ed.). Stockholm International Peace Research Institute.
UNHCR. 2015. Refugee’ or ‘migrant’ – Which is right? Word choice matters. [Online].
Geneva- Online: UNHCR. [Accessed 28 August 2015].
UNOCHA 2015. Global humanitarian overview 2016.