The presentation might explain, why some people, especially people in industry, are afraid of contributing to web 2.0 communities. See also discussion at http://ff.im/3cGW3

1. Science 2.0
We need compliant commenting
Mining Drug Space
http://miningdrugs.blogspot.com
Jörg Kurt Wegner, PhD
2009-05-26
(c) 2009, JKW, miningdrugs.blogspot.com

2. Fact ! - We need scientific collaboration
How? - Communicate
Since we can not all share the same room, time
zone, or flip-chart, can Web 2.0 support
communication.
(c) 2009, JKW, miningdrugs.blogspot.com

3. But wait ... in science ...
technology alone is not a solution
There are communication barriers caused by
• scientists from different disciplines using
different terminologies
• different personalities and communication
layers, e.g. emotional versus technical
• Fear! Yes, fear, of
– being non-compliant
– unknown reactions of peers
(c) 2009, JKW, miningdrugs.blogspot.com

4. Let us look at the real
road-stoppers for communication
Different terminologies
Not easy, but standards and semantics will evolve.
So, disarmed.
Different personalities
Example, often men and women think differently, but
still, the man-/woman-kind is evolving anyway.
So, disarmed, especially with moderation in-place.
Fear
This is tricky, it is all about you and the only thing we can
say is that we need YOU and your input!
Let us discuss this topic for a few slides.
(c) 2009, JKW, miningdrugs.blogspot.com

5. Now
(c) 2009, JKW, miningdrugs.blogspot.com

6. (c) 2009, JKW, miningdrugs.blogspot.com
The actual situation
A sender-receiver dilemma
Receiver
The Web 2.0 Sender
community. YOU
People, like you
„We need YOUr input“

7. (c) 2009, JKW, miningdrugs.blogspot.com
The actual situation
A sender-receiver dilemma
Forget it, a non-responder
Receiver
The Web 2.0 Sender
community. YOU
People, like you
„I am afraid of answering“
• I do not know if I am non-compliant
• The web 2.0 might laugh at me
• I just hide here, then I am save
Good news: You are safe
Bad news: The world will evolve
without knowing YOU.
Beside, are you not alone?

8. (c) 2009, JKW, miningdrugs.blogspot.com
The actual situation
A sender-receiver dilemma
Receiver
The Web 2.0 Sender
community. YOU
People, like you
SPAM and
Comment
being a dick
Douane The bad guys
Nobody invited them, but
Moderation, and disable
anonymous posts. some people are sending nonsense
or are non-constructive

9. The future
(c) 2009, JKW, miningdrugs.blogspot.com

10. (c) 2009, JKW, miningdrugs.blogspot.com
The future
A compliant collaboration
Receiver
The Web 2.0 Sender
community. YOU
People, like you
„We need YOUr input“

11. (c) 2009, JKW, miningdrugs.blogspot.com
The future
A compliant collaboration
Receiver
The Web 2.0 Sender
community. YOU
People, like you
„I am happy
Comment
to help!“
Comment
Douane
Douane
Observer
Provides
tokens and „Build trust and
slots serve!“

12. (c) 2009, JKW, miningdrugs.blogspot.com
The future
A compliant collaboration
„Good input.
Receiver Let us stay
The Web 2.0 in touch.“* Sender
community. YOU
People, like you
* By the way, nobody is laughing at you !
The community sees how valuable YOUr
input is.

13. (c) 2009, JKW, miningdrugs.blogspot.com
Get support from people knowing the
compliance regulations in all details !
Receiver
The Web 2.0 Sender
community. YOU
People, like you Your business
process or legal
Comment department can
check if you are
Douane compliant.
There is no need
being afraid of the
MANY compliance
A third party makes sure,
Observer regulations.
They can help YOU !
that only approved comment tokens Provides This should be easy
will be transfered to the web 2.0. tokens and and part of the
They also make sure that the web 2.0 will process, not be a
reserve a (hidden till public) slot for your comment. slots challenge !

14. References
Science 2.0
• Yes, collaboration - Science journalism: Supplanting the old media?
http://www.nature.com/news/2009/090318/full/458274a.html
• Web 2.0 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Web_2.0
Compliance and fear
• Even if online, what is missing for a good collaboration?
http://miningdrugs.blogspot.com/2006/09/even-if-online-what-is-missing-for.html
• „People are afraid of what they do not know and failure.“
http://books.google.be/books?id=s52lUTjYPHoC
• Process Innovation versus Governance, Risk and Compliance
http://www.slideshare.net/mzurmuehlen/process-innovation-vs-governance-risk-and-compliance-presentation-664426
In German (sorry)
• There are world-wide more than 10000 compliance regulations
http://www.computerzeitung.de/articles/compliance_nicht-einhalten_von_regularien_ist_kein_kavaliersdelikt:/2009016/31905201_ha_CZ.html?thes=&&page=1
• Compliance must be organized
http://www.computerzeitung.de/aktuell/compliance_muss_verwaltet_werden:/compliance_muss_verwaltet_werden.html?thes=
(c) 2009, JKW, miningdrugs.blogspot.com