Empfohlen
Empfohlen
Weitere ähnliche Inhalte
Was ist angesagt?
Was ist angesagt? (19)
Ähnlich wie DERI Stream Meeting 2010: What I'm working on
Ähnlich wie DERI Stream Meeting 2010: What I'm working on (20)
Mehr von jodischneider
Mehr von jodischneider (20)
Kürzlich hochgeladen
Kürzlich hochgeladen (20)
DERI Stream Meeting 2010: What I'm working on
- 1. What I’m Working On: Social Semantic Argumentation, Library Linked Data, Ontologies for Reading & Writing Science Jodi Schneider DERI Social Semantic Information Spaces Stream Meeting 2010-12-13 Galway, Ireland
- 2. My Background Liberal Arts - Great Books Math Automatic theorem proving, Knot theory, PDE’s of traffic flow Psychology Online identity - subpersonalities, image (Goffman) Self-surveillance, Persuasive uses of technology (‘captology’) Libraries + technology FRBR – what is a book? entity/relationship model Code4Lib – library technologists, digital librarians, semweb “library values for the Internet” Hobbies tagging, radio, reading… 2
- 3. DERI Hats Ph.D. Student Argumentation on the Social Semantic Web Standardization Work W3C Library Linked Data Incubator Group W3C Health Care & Life Sciences – Scientific Discourse Task Force
- 5. Social Semantic Web 5
- 6. WWW: Detect Contentious Issues Ennals, R., Trushkowsky, B., & Agosta, J. M. (2010). Highlighting Disputed Claims on the Web. In WICOW at WWW 2010.
- 7. Social Web: Summarize + Map
- 8. Semantic Web: Use Arg Schemes Zablith, F. (2007). ArgDF: Arguments on the Semantic Web (Master's). The British University in Dubai & The University of Edinburgh.
- 9. Social Semantic Web: Analyze
- 10. Different types of argument
- 11. Types of argumentation sites Issue networking Explore the agreements, disagreements, and rationales Get a view of the issues and possibilities Funneling Brainstorm, categorize, vote, … Get to consensus Reputation Compete to find the best answers Get experts, repository of answers
- 12. Cognitive Coherence Relations Polarity Positive vs. Negative Source of coherence Semantic vs. Pragmatic Type Addition or Cause or Sequence Comparativeness Comparison vs. Concurring
- 14. W3C Library Linked Data Incubator Group “incubate” for 1 year Goal: Report on library adoption of Linked Data So far: 40+ use cases in clusters: Bibliographic data Authority data Vocabulary alignment Archives & heterogeneous data Citations Digital objects CKAN data collection
- 15. W3C HCLS – Scientific Discourse Task Force Longterm, ongoing activity Goal: A SemWeb platform for biomedical discourse Previous outcomes: SWAN, SWAN/SIOC Current focus: Annotation Ontology –provenance-aware Mark and connect non-SemWeb docs Models of Rhetorical structure coarse-grained middle-grained Bibliographic Ontologies (align/integrate SWAN citations) “Scientific Article of the Future” – provenance, data,
- 16. Ontology-aware reading? http://www.ihop-net.org screenshot from Renear & Palmer. Science 2009: “Strategic Reading, Ontologies, and the Future of Scientific Publishing.” 325:828-832.
- 17. Thank You! Questions & Comments? jodi.schneider@deri.org
Hinweis der Redaktion
- philosophy, history of math/sci, linguistics, literature, The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life, text message for health promotion
- Inquiry and Pedagogical and Information-seeking dialogues are almost entirely knowledge-based, while knowledge plays only a minor role in Negotiation (aiming at a harmonious settlement) and Quarrel (beneficial mainly for venting emotions). Knowledge plays some role in the remaining three types: in Debate, airing arguments (rather than settling them) is of primary importance; in Deliberation and Persuasion, opinion and belief have a large role. In the following, we focus primarily on knowledge-based argumentation.
- Cognitive Coherence Relations consist of 4 basic attributes: * source: semantic vs. pragmatic* type: addition or sequence or type* comparativeness: comparison vs. concurring * polarity: positive vs. negativeThis results in 17 categories ('type' isn't quite binary, though I think you could create a super-category to contain 'addition' and 'sequence').
- Use of LD principles and perspectiveSuggest further steps
- “Evolve this over time into a more general facility for many types of scientific discourse, and which is linked to key biological categories specified by ontologies.“
- For iHop see A Gene Network for Navigating the Literature. Hoffmann, R., Valencia, A. Nature Genetics 36, 664 (2004).