This document discusses editorial cartoons, debunking three common myths. It defines editorial cartoons as any cartoon offering opinionated commentary on current issues. While some think they must be drawn in a certain style or be funny, their real purpose is to make readers think through commentary. Editorial cartoons can comment on any topic, not just politics, and don't need to use caricatures. The document also outlines four types of editorial cartoons and lists the key principles as making a concise, creative, and clear statement. It concludes by questioning the future relevance of editorial cartoons.
7. MYTH #1 Editorial cartoons all have to be drawn in a “certain style,” ie; cross-hatched shading, big heads small bodies, heavily detailed, lots of labels, etc
8. TRUTH! Editorial cartoons span many different artistic styles and formats. There is no “correct” way for an editorial cartoon to look.
9. MYTH #2 An editorial cartoon fails if it is not funny.
10. TRUTH! The purpose of an editorial cartoon is to offer commentary, and make the reader think. Sometimes commentary is funny, sometimes not. Editorial cartoons serve a different purpose than say, Family Circus or Cathy.
11. MYTH #3 An editorial cartoon has to involve caricatures and politicians.
12. TRUTH! Many artists in the editorial cartooning subculture dislike the phrase “political cartoon” for precisely this reason. An editorial cartoon offers commentary about anything, politicians are but one potential target.
13. TYPE #1 THE VISUAL METAPHOR A cartoon that uses labeled visual symbols to make its point, usually by comparing a non-political situation to a political one.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18. TYPE #2 ABSTRACT IMAGE A cartoon that evokes a general theme by using an image that seems to sum up a broad situation.
19.
20.
21.
22. TYPE #3 TEXT BASED A cartoon that makes its point largely through character dialogue.