1. Differences in Chornobyl and Fukushima nuclear accidents
• In the history of nuclear energy two accidents are classified as 7th
the highest level by the scale of nuclear events, which are: accident
at the 4 Unit of Chornobyl NPP in 1986 and
• accident at Fukushima-Daiichi in 2011.
• Although from the point of view of long-term consequences these
accidents have significant differences.
• Firstly. At the 4 Unit of Chornobyl NPP was the explosion of the
reactor, due to which almost all radionuclides worked out in reactor
at the explosion were released.
• In case with Fukushima-Daichi there was no reactor explosion. As
the result of “melting” of active zone the “flying” radionuclides
released into environment.
• Therefore the quantitative and qualitative compound of radionuclide
release in case of Fukushima-Daiichi is far “easier” according to the
long-term radiological consequences.

2. • Secondly. As the result of placing of Fukushima-Daiichi
at the ocean shore as well as due to meteorological
conditions (the wind blew towards ocean) during the first
days after the accident significant part of radionuclide
release is accumulated in the Pacific ocean which
allowed to decrease the contamination of the territory of
Japan of continental Asia.
• Thirdly. In case of the accident at Fukushima-Daiichi the
reactor vessels and confinement structure are preserved.
This will allow to localize the damaged reactors in
shorter period and with considerably less expenses.

3. STRUCTURE of MOE of Ukraine
MINISTER
MINISTER
HEADQUARTER of MOE
BLOCK OF RESPONSE
BLOCK OF RESPONSE
management of civil protection and
management of civil protection and BLOCK of SUPPORT
BLOCK of SUPPORT Units of interaction and specialized
Units of interaction and specialized
elimination of the consequences of
elimination of the consequences of economics, finance, personnel,
economics, finance, personnel, support of state authorities
support ofpopulation
state authorities
and population
and
emergencies and fires
emergencies and fires legal and logistics support
legal and logistics support
REGIONAL LEVEL
UNITS OF DIRECT
UNITS OF DIRECT EDUCATIONAL
EDUCATIONAL ENTERPRISES
ENTERPRISES
MOE TERRTORIAL ESTABLISHMENTS
ESTABLISHMENTS
MOE TERRTORIAL SUBORDINATION TO
SUBORDINATION TO ORGANIZATIONS AND
ORGANIZATIONS AND
AND SCIENTIFIC
AND SCIENTIFIC
MANAGEMENT BODIES
MANAGEMENT BODIES THE MOE
THE MOE AND RESEARCH
ESTABLISHMENTS THAT
ESTABLISHMENTS THAT
AND RESEARCH ARE MANAGED BY MOE
HEADQUARTERS
HEADQUARTERS INSTITUTES ARE MANAGED BY MOE
INSTITUTES
STATE EXECUTIVE BODIES (AUTHORITIES),
(AUTHORITIES),
COORDINATED AND GUIDED BY THE MINISTER OF UKRAINE FOR EMERGENCIES
STATE AGENCY OF UKRAINE
STATE AGENCY OF UKRAINE INSPECTION
INSPECTION STATE SERVICE FOR
STATE SERVICE FOR
FOR EXCLUSION ZONE MANAGEMENT
FOR EXCLUSION ZONE MANAGEMENT OF INDUSTRIAL (TECHNOLOGICAL) SAFETY
OF INDUSTRIAL (TECHNOLOGICAL) SAFETY MINING OVERSIGHT AND INDUSTRIAL SAFETY
MINING OVERSIGHT AND INDUSTRIAL SAFETY
3
3

4. STRUCTURE OF MOE OF UKRAINE.
MAIN PRINCIPLES OF
FUNCTIONING. JURISDICTION
Ministry of Ukraine for Emergencies is the main body
in the system of state main executive bodies
responsible for development and implementation of
state policy in the sphere of:
civil protection, rescue operations and fire fighting;
state supervision on industrial (technological) and fire
safety;
state supervision on industrial and mine enterprises;
radioactive waste management, elimination of the
Decree
PRESIDENT OF UKRAINE consequences of Chornobyl catastrophe;
№ 402/2011
APRIL 6 2011 prophylaxis of unproductive traumatism;
“ON MINISTRY OF EMERGENCIES
OF UKRAINE”
UKRAINE”
hydrometeorological activity.
4

5. • Centers of social-psychological rehabilitation of
population dealt and are dealing with purposeful
overcoming of psychological problems of suffering
population as well as provision of information to the
population on the issues of elimination of the
consequences of Chornobyl catastrophe which are
located in Borodjanka, Bojarka, Ivankiv, Korosten,
Slavutych.