46. Processes over Bme:
urbaniza)on is a dynamic process
characterized more by terms like fluidity,
spontaneous feedback, and non‐linearity,
than stability, predictability, or ra)onality.
Ecology and systems theory are concepts
inherent to the city.
Corner
84. Surface, not form:
horizontality and sprawl in places like Los Angeles, Atlanta, Houston, San Jose,
and the suburban fringes of most American cites is the new urban reality. As
many theories of urbanism attempt to ignore this fact or retrofit it to new
urbanism, landscape urbanism accepts it and tries to understand it. Traditional
notions of program and structure are not useful in this diffuse urban condition–
their scope is small and limiting. Landscape urbanism uses 'territories' and
'potential' instead of 'program' to define a place's use; it finds thinking in terms of
adaptable 'systems' instead of rigid 'structures' as a better way to organize
space.
Form:
the traditional character of the city; formlessness characterizes nature, that
which has been untouched by human intent. This city/nature duality is critical to
most theories of the city and nature. Landscape urbanists argue that this is
duality is naive and argue for a conflation of landscape and building.
95. new working methods:
landscape urbanism a suggests a reconsideration of
traditional conceptual, representational, and operative
techniques. The possibilities of vast scale shifts across both
time and space, working synoptic maps along side the
intimate recordings of local circumstance, comparing
cinematic and choreographic techniques to spatial notation,
entering the algebraic, digital space of the computer while
messing around with paint, clay, and ink, and engaging real
estate developers and engineers alongside the highly
specialized imagineers and poets of contemporary culture
99. imagination and speculation:
Public spaces are firstly the containers of collective memory
and desire, and secondly they are the places for geographic
and social imagination to extend new relationships and sets
of possibility. Materiality, representation, and imagination
are not separate worlds; political change through practices
of place construction owes as much to the representational
and symbolic realms as to material activities. And so it
seems landscape urbanism is first and last an imaginative
project, a speculative thickening of the world of possibilities.
Walter Christaller's diagrams of population distribution \n
Walter Christaller's diagrams of population distribution \n
Walter Christaller's diagrams of population distribution \n
Walter Christaller's diagrams of population distribution \n
The flow field around an airplane is a vector field in R3, here visualized by bubbles that follow the streamlines showing a wingtip vortex.\n
Magnetic field lines of an iron bar (magnetic dipole)\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
view the entire metropolis as a living arena of processes and exchanges over time\n\n
What we see here is the dominance of the infrastructure that supports commerce, a logical outcome of the Industrial Revolution. Is this what we all need to know? \n