Conference presentation in Bled econference. Presents results of a small study I did in 2011. In the study Social media usage in the Aalto University is described.

6. How we did things before 2010 Tools (in adopted order) Issues (+/-) for students Issues (+/-) for teacher Issues (+/-) for school Learning outcomes Webpage Privacy issues-public, Download material, If knowledgeable easy to use Easy to admistrate (cost to serve etc) Passively if at all achieved Secured webpage with a discussion group Security, Download material, discuss with other students If knowledgeable easy to use (deliver material, discuss) Easy to admistrate (cost to serve etc) A bit more active , maybe other studens views are visible Optima (intranet) Secured, material available, discussions, return excercixe, teachers comments and other students comments If knowledgeable easy to use (deliver material, discuss, usually teacher had to force students to discuss) More resources needed for educating teachings, helping when needed. Altogether admistrative cost are higher A bit better outcomes, other students are posting general comments and specific comments for exercises and teachers are participating on discussions

8. After 2010 (in some programs and courses)

13. Aalto Department of Marketing (internal group)

15. Some of my Linkedin groups