2. All models are Wrong but some are Useful
Box, George EP. "Robustness in the strategy of scientific model building“ Robustness in statistics 1 (1979): 201-236.
2
3. Business Process Models
3
Request a
customized
product
Define product
specification
Manufacture
Check the final
product
Check potential
for mass
production
Deliver
Send invoice
Customer
Product
Owner
Product
Owner
Product
Manufacturer
Marketing
Specialist
Delivery
Manager
Finance
Manager
ActivityStart Condition
End Condition
Inclusive (OR) Gateway
Parallel (AND) Gateway
Resource
Flow
Legend:
Models
Perspectives
Level of abstraction
4. Social Networks
4
Request a
customized
product
Define product
specification
Manufacture
Check the final
product
Check potential
for mass
production
Deliver
Send invoice
Customer
Product
Owner
Product
Owner
Product
Manufacturer
Marketing
Specialist
Delivery
Manager
Finance
Manager
ActivityStart Condition
End Condition
Inclusive (OR) Gateway
Parallel (AND) Gateway
Resource
Flow
Legend:
Organizational
Chart
Product
Owner
Product
Manufacturer
Marketing
Specialist
Delivery
Manager
Finance
Manager
Jack Tina Lili GeorgeEric Aron Hanna Bill
Customer
Product
Owner
Product
Manufacturer
Marketing
Specialist
Delivery
Manager
Finance
Manager
Handover of work?
5. Process Mining
5
Request a
customized
product
Define product
specification
Manufacture
Check the final
product
Check potential
for mass
production
Deliver
Send invoice
Customer
Product
Owner
Product
Owner
Product
Manufacturer
Marketing
Specialist
Delivery
Manager
Finance
Manager
ActivityStart Condition
End Condition
Inclusive (OR) Gateway
Parallel (AND) Gateway
Resource
Flow
Legend:
”World”,
business processes, people,
machines, components,
organizations
Software
Systems
Event
Logs
discover
conformance
enhancement
models
analysis
records events,
e.g. messages,
transactions,
etc.
Support
Control
Customer
Product
Owner
Product
Manufacturer
Marketing
Specialist
Delivery
Manager
Finance
Manager
6. Representing Social Networks
Graphs
Nodes
Representing resources in a
business process
Arcs
Representing relations
between resources
Weighted version
6
a
b c
3
2
1
2
2
8. How they are represented
8
a
b c
3
2
1
2
2
a
b
c
a (outgoing)=2+3 = 5
total outgoing = 10
a outgoing contribution = 50%
c (outgoing)=2+1 = 3
c->c = 2; 2/3 in total
c->a=1; 1/3 in total
no a->c
9. Dealing with the complexity
How to support?
Show/hide parts of the graph
Coloring nodes and edges
Labeling nodes under user
control
supporting user interactions
e.g. through mouse
Design choices:
Interactivity
Selective hints
Colors
9
a
b
c
11. Evaluation
BPI Challenge 2015 log file
Compared with traditional visualization approach
Studied by four cases for four different metrics
Pros:
Resource Involvement
Association direction
Association contributions
Special nodes
Resource abstraction
Association strength
Cons:
Isolation limit
11
12. Case 1: working together
Resource Involvement
how much each resource is contributed
Association direction
the dominant direction in a relation
between two nodes
Association contributions
to identify and compare the degree of
contribution of each node in a relation
Special nodes
e.g. only initiate the work
12
13. Case 2: Handover of Works
Resource abstraction
facilitates identifications of resources
with higher contribution degree in
compare to those who has very small
contributions to others
13
14. Case 3: subcontracting
Isolation limit
does not show nodes which do not
have any relation to others
14
No relation with others
15. Case 4: Similar Task
Association strength
enables comparison of relations
between nodes
15
16. Future work
Apply on more real log file in an accessible
organization
Usefulness and Usability
Performed in workshop
The data will be analyzed
16