SlideShare ist ein Scribd-Unternehmen logo
1 von 49
 Made by: Dr. Isha Jaiswal
 Moderator: Dr. Madhup
Rastogi
 Date: 4th August 2014
Cell survival curves
Cell Survival Curve
 It describes relationship between radiation dose and
the fraction of cells that “survive” that dose.
 This is mainly used to assess biological
effectiveness of radiation.
 To understand it better, we need to know about a few
basic things e.g.
 Meaning of Cell Death and cell survival
 Estimation of Survival fraction / Plating Efficiency
 Nature of Cell killing etc.
Cell Death
3
Cell death can have different meanings:
 loss of a specific function - differentiated cells (nerve,
muscle)
Lethal dose:100 Gy
 loss of the ability to divide - proliferating cells such as
stem cells in hematopoietic system or intestinal epithelium
loss of reproductive integrity - “reproductive death”
Lethal dose: 2 Gy
Survival
4
 “Survival” means retention of reproductive integrity
 ie. the capacity for sustained proliferation
 Can grow into macroscopic colonies
 A SURVIVOR that has retained its reproductive integrity
and is able to proliferate indefinitely is said to be
CLONOGENIC
Estimating Survival
5
 In order to determine the surviving fraction, we must know the
PLATING EFFICIENCY
 PE is the percentage of cells that grow into colonies
 in other words, those cells that survive the plating process
 may be close to 100% in some established cell lines but 1% or
less for fresh explants of human cell
Derivation of Survival Curves
6
 Cells have been taken
from stock culture and
placed in seed dishes
 Then irradiated (0 Gy
to 6 Gy)and allowed to
grow into colonies for
1-2 weeks
 Colonies have been
counted for survival
data
Always will have a control
batch to determine PE.
Surviving Fraction
 Equal to the fraction of cells that plate successfully
and survive irradiation (without losing their
reproductive integrity) to grow into colonies
 A cell survival curve is graph plotted between
surviving fraction on Y axis & absorbed dose on X
axis
 PE/100seededcells
countedColonies
fractionSurviving


7
8
Dose (Gy)
Surviving
Fraction
2 64
0.01
0.1
1
0.001
SF
=
= 0.2
72 colonies
400 seeded x 0.9 plated
Modes of Radiation Injury
• Primarily by ionization (direct) and free radicals(indirect)
mechanism
• Low LET (X- and gamma-rays) damage by free radicals
• High LET (protons and a particles) damage by ionization
 The Poisson model was proposed in 1961 (Munro & Gilbert)
 It states“the object of treating a tumour by radiotherapy is to damage every
single potentially malignant cell to such an extent that it cannot continue to
proliferate.”

Poisson statistics are used to determine the probability of an event occurring
in relation to the known average number of events occurring.(λ)
 When enough radiation is delivered to the tumour mass such that 1 lethal hit
would be expected per cell,…
 the likely percentage of cells receiving one lethal hits is 63%. Therefore,
37% of cells would receive no lethal hits and therefore the tumour would
most likely not be cured.
 The probability of zero surviving tumor cell is given by the tumour control
probability (TCP)

Poisson Model of probability of cell death
 As no of lethal hits increases the probability of survival decreasing
geometrically with dose.
 For example, if 100 clonagens were present within the tumour, an average
of 37 clonagens would survive. Therefore the TCP would be e-37

As the lethal hits per clonagen increases, the TCP also increases.
 The increase occurs rapidly once the lethal hits per clonagen exceeds 3 – 4
(likelihood of surviving clonagens begins to approach zero at this point).
Quantization of cell killing
 A dose of radiation that
introduces an average of one
lethal event per cell leaves
37% still viable is called D0
dose.
 Cell killing follows exponential
relationship. A dose which
reduces cell survival to 50%
will, if repeated, reduce
survival to 25%, and similarly
to 12.5% from a third
exposure.
 This means Surviving fraction
never becomes zero.
Log-linear scale: straight line in invitro cell
culture
 A straight line results when cell
survival (from a series of equal
dose fractions) is plotted on a
logarithmic scale as a function of
dose on linear scale.
 The slope of such a semi-
logarithmic dose curve could be
described by the D0, the dose to
reduce survival to 37%,
 D0 usually lies between 1 and 2
Gy
 D50, the dose to reduce survival to
50%,
 D10, the dose to reduce survival to
10%. D10= 2.3 x D0
Mammalian cell Survival Curve Shape
 Two Component: shoulder and
exponential curve
 Initial portion has a shoulder
and terminal portion become
straight line.
 In low dose region ,some dose
of radiation goes waste to
overcome some threshold
 Terminal portion follow
exponential relationship means
same dose increment result
into equal reduction in
surviving fraction.
Mammalian Cell Survival Curve
 Shoulder Region
 Shows accumulation of SUB-
LETHAL DAMAGE.
 The larger the shoulder
region, the more dose will
initially be needed to kill the
same proportion of cells, so
less radiosensitive
 Beyond shoulder region
 The D0 dose, or the inverse
of the slop of the curve,
indicates the relative radio
sensitivity. The smaller the D0
dose, the greater the radio
sensitivity.
Models of Description of the Curve
 Target theory: Single-target Model
Multi-target Model
 Linear Quadratics Model
Single Target Single Hit Inactivation Model
 single hit on a single target within
the cell leads to cell death.
 This generates an exponential
cell survival curve which appears
as a straight line on a semi-
logarithmic scale.
 This model is useful for highly
sensitive human tissues, if high
LET radiation is used,
 Mammalian cells usually have a
shoulder on their cell survival
curves, which is not seen in this
model.
If, at dose D0 there is an average of one
lethal event/cell, then
S = e-D/D0 where D0 is called the mean
lethal dose
Simple Target Theory: ln S = -D/D0
Multi-target Model
 in an attempt to explain the shoulder of the cell survival curve, this model was
generated.
 It proposes that a single hit to each of n sensitive targets within the cell is
sufficient to cause cell death.
 The generated curve has a shoulder and decreases linearly with increasing
dose.
Multi-Target Model
20
Dose, Gy
100
10-1
10-4
0 123 6 9
Survival
10-3
10-2
Initial slope measure, D1,
due to single-event killing
Final slope measure, D0,
due to multiple-event killing
Dq
n
n or Dq represents the size
or width of the shoulder
Quantified in terms of
 measure of initial
slope due to single-
event killing, D1
 measure of final
slope due to
multiple-event
killing, D0
 width of the
shoulder, Dq or n
Multi-target Model
21
 Shoulder-width measures:
 the quasi-threshold dose (Dq)
 the dose at which the extrapolated line
from the straight portion of the survival
curve (final slope) crosses the axis at
100% survival
 the extrapolation number (n)
 This value is obtained by extrapolating
the exponential portion of the curve to
the vertical line.
 “broad shoulder” results in larger value
of n
 “narrow shoulder” results in small value
of n
 n = exp[Dq / D0]
Single-target, single hit/multi-target,
single hit model
 Major problem with this model is that
there are too many parameters D1;D0;Dq
 Need a mathematically simpler model
with fewer “unknown” parameters
 The linear-quadratic (L-Q) model
meets these needs
Linear-quadratic model
The linear quadratic model uses a polynomial equation (αD+βD2).
The probability of survival is equal to the exponential of this –
ie:S = e−(αD+βD)2.
The generated curve is perhaps the best approximation of the actual cell
kill seen after radiation exposure.
It has the added benefit of two constants (α and β) which can be
determined for specific tissues and cancers to predict dose response
L-Q Model
Linear Quadratic Model
25
 S = e-(aD + bD
2
)
 where:
 S represents the fraction of cells surviving
 D represents dose
 a and b are constants that characterize the slopes of the
two l portions of the semi-log survival curve
 biological endpoint is cell death
Linear Quadratic Model
26
 Linear and quadratic contributions to cell
killing are equal when the dose is equal to the
ratio of a to b
 D = a/b or
 aD = b D2
 a component is representative of damage caused
by a single event (hit, double-strand break,
“initiation / promotion” etc.)
 b component is representative of damage caused
by multiple events (hit/hit, 2 strand breaks, initiation
then promotion, etc.)
Comparison of the L-Q and target
theory models
Comparison of the L-Q and target theory models
 Neither the L-Q not the M-T model has any established
biological basis.
 L-Q curves retain curvature even at very high doses
 Target Theory curves become linear at high doses
 With high-LET radiations, both theories result in straight
lines ( irreparable damage dominates)
Linear –quadratic model Multi-target model
 At high doses the LQ model predicts a survival curve
that bends continuosly, whereas the M-T model become
linear.
 At low doses the LQ model describes a curve that bends
more than a M-T curve.
Factors affecting cell survival curve
1. Mechanism of cell death
2. LET
3. Fractionation
4. Dose rate effect
5. Intrinsic radio sesitivity
6. Cell cycle stage
7. Oxygen presence
Mitotic death results (principally) from exchange-type chromosomal
aberration.
 survival is linear quadratic function of dose
Survival curve is og-linear plot with broad shoulder
 Characterized by dose-rate effect
Apoptotic death result from programmed death.
 straight line on log-linear plot.
 Characterized by exponential function of dose.
Survival curve is straigh & shoulderless
 little or no dose-rate effect.
1:SURVIVAL-CURVE SHAPE AND
MECHANISM OF CELL DEATH
Survival-curve shape and mechanism of cell death
mitotic
death
Most cells fall between apopototic & mitotic death
Note! Shoulder
2:LINEAR ENERGY TRANSFER
33
 Rate at which energy is transferred to cell during
irradiation
 Low-LET radiations:
 At low dose region
 shoulder region appears
 At high dose region
 survival curve becomes linear and surviving fraction to an
exponential function of dose
 surviving fraction is a dual exponential
S = e-(aD+bD2)
34
 High-LET radiations:
 survival curve is linear
 surviving fraction is a pure exponential function of dose
S = e-(aD)
Survival Curves and LET
35
 Increasing LET:
 increases the
steepness of the
survival curve
 results in a more
linear curve
 shoulder disappears
due to increase of
killing by single-
events
3:Fractionation
 If the dose is delivered as
equal fractions with sufficient
time ,repair of sub-lethal
damage ocurs
 Elkind’ s Recovery takes place
between radiation exposure ,
cell act as fresh target.
 Elkind & Sutton showed that
when two exposure were given
few hours apart ,the shoulder
reappeared.
Dq
Dq
Dose (Gy)
5 10 15 20 25
104
103
102
101
100
10-1
10-2
D0
n = exp[Dq / D0]
The Effective Survival Curve: Fractionation
37
 If the dose is delivered as
equal fractions with sufficient
time between for repair of the
sub-lethal (non-killing)
damage, the shoulder of the
survival curve is repeated
many times.
 The effective survival curve
becomes a composite of all
the shoulder repetitions.
 Dose required to produce the
same reduction in surviving
fraction increases.
Showing ~28 Gy
in 14 fractions.
4 :Dose-rate effect
Dose rate determines biological impact
At low dose rates, DNA repair processes are able to repair sub lethal damage
during the radiation treatment.
At very low dose rates other radiobiological effects (re-oxygenation,
redistribution and repopulation) may also begin to play a role. This lessens
the effect of a particular dose of radiation.
Low dose rates tend to negate the β component of the linear quadratic
equation, and the line becomes straighter on a logarithmic scale.
reduction in dose rate generally reduces survival-curve slope (D0 increases)
.
Dose-Rate Effect in CHO Cells
Composite survival curves for 40 Human Cell Lines
Survival Curves show
greater variation,
Greater range of repair
Less variation
in cell survival
curve due to
less repair
5:Intrinsic radiosensitivity
 Due to the differences in
DNA content
 represents bigger target
for radiation damage
 Sterilizing radiation
dose for bacteria is
20,000 Gy wheras for
mammalian cell is 1-2
Gy
Mammalian cells are significantly more radio-sensitive than
microorganisms:
6:survival curve: effect of cell cycle stage
Late S:
least senstive.
M>G2>G1>early S>late S
for sensitivity
Difference caused by
cell cycle are similar to
difference caused by
Oxygen effect
The range of senstivity
between the most
senstive (m) & most
resistant (s) phase is of
the same order as
oxygen effect
The broken line is cell survival curve for
mitotic cell plotted under hypoxia
Slope is 2.5 times shallower than
aerated cell
 Cells are most sensitive to radiation at or close to M
 Cells are most resistant to radiation in late S
 For prolonged G1phase  a resistant period is evident in early
G1 followed be a sensitive period in late G1
 Cells are usually sensitive to radiation in G2 (almost as
sensitive as in M)
 Oxygen modifies the biological effects of ionizing radiation
 OER – oxygen enhancement ratio: ratio of hypoxic doses :
aerated doses needed to achieve the same biological effect
 OER is absent for high LET radiations like alpha-particles and
is intermediate for fast neutron.
 Low LET radiation (eg. photons, electrons) are highly
dependent on the presence of oxygen to ‘fix’ damage
caused by radicalised DNA.
 The oxygen effect shows more cell killing in oxic
conditions. This is seen in cell survival curves as a shift in
the steepness of the curve
 For low LET X-Rays/γ-Rays  at high doses OER is 2.5-3.5
at lower doses OER is ~2.5
7: The Oxygen Effect
OER – oxygen enhancement ratio: ratio of hypoxic doses : aerated
doses needed to achieve the same biological effect
Summary
 A cell survival curve is the relationship between the fraction of
cells retaining their reproductive integrity and absorbed dose.
 Conventionally, surviving fraction on a logarithmic scale is
plotted on the Y-axis, the dose is on the X-axis . The shape of
the survival curve is important.
 The cell-survival curve for densely ionizing radiations (α-
particles and low-energy neutrons) is a straight line on a log-
linear plot, that is survival is an exponential function of dose.
 The cell-survival curve for sparsely ionizing radiations (X-rays,
gamma-rays has an initial slope, followed by a shoulder after
which it tends to straighten again at higher doses.
 Survival data are fitted by many models. Some of them are:
multitarget hypothesis, linear-quadratic hypothesis etc
 At low doses and for single fraction regimen most cell killing
results from “α-type” (single-hit, non-repairable) injury, but that as
the dose increases, the“β –type” (multi-hit, repairable) injury
becomes predominant, increasing as the square of the dose.
 Initial slope of cell survival curve determined by α.
 causes the curve to bend at higher doses.
 The survival curve for a multifraction regimen is also an
exponential function of dose.
 The D10, the dose resulting in one decade of cell killing, is related
to the Do by the expression D10 = 2.3 x Do
Summary
Cell survival curve depends
Factors that make cells less radiosensitive are:
Cell survival curve is used to calculate
1. on nature of radiation (LET);
2. Type of cell death
3. dose;
4. dose rate
5. cell type;
6. cell cycle stage
7. oxygen presence
1. removal of oxygen to create a hypoxic state,
2. the addition of chemical radical scavengers,
3. the use of low dose rates or multif ractionated irradiation,
4. cells synchronized in the late S phase of the cell cycle.
1. no.of tumor cell killed/ survived
2. tumor control probability
3. calculation of time dose and fractions
4. calculating Biologically effective dose
Thank You

Weitere ähnliche Inhalte

Was ist angesagt?

Time, dose and fractionation
Time, dose and fractionationTime, dose and fractionation
Time, dose and fractionationDr. Ankita Pandey
 
Cell survival curves- Radiobiology
Cell survival curves- RadiobiologyCell survival curves- Radiobiology
Cell survival curves- RadiobiologyVeda Varshne
 
TIME DOSE & FRACTIONATION
TIME DOSE & FRACTIONATIONTIME DOSE & FRACTIONATION
TIME DOSE & FRACTIONATIONIsha Jaiswal
 
Time, dose & fractionation,
Time, dose & fractionation,Time, dose & fractionation,
Time, dose & fractionation,Swarnita Sahu
 
Linear quadratic model ppt
Linear quadratic model pptLinear quadratic model ppt
Linear quadratic model pptNilesh Kucha
 
RADIOBIOLOGY: oxygen effect & reoxygenation
RADIOBIOLOGY: oxygen effect & reoxygenationRADIOBIOLOGY: oxygen effect & reoxygenation
RADIOBIOLOGY: oxygen effect & reoxygenationIsha Jaiswal
 
Basics And Physics of Brachytherapy
Basics And Physics of BrachytherapyBasics And Physics of Brachytherapy
Basics And Physics of BrachytherapySreekanth Nallam
 
ICRU reports 50 and 62
ICRU reports 50 and 62ICRU reports 50 and 62
ICRU reports 50 and 62Bharti Devnani
 
Time dose & fractionation relationship
Time dose & fractionation relationship Time dose & fractionation relationship
Time dose & fractionation relationship Amin Amin
 
Radioisotopes and dose rates used for brachytherapy
Radioisotopes and dose rates used for brachytherapyRadioisotopes and dose rates used for brachytherapy
Radioisotopes and dose rates used for brachytherapySubhash Thakur
 
Beam modification devices
Beam modification devicesBeam modification devices
Beam modification devicesVibhay Pareek
 

Was ist angesagt? (20)

cell survival curve
cell survival curvecell survival curve
cell survival curve
 
Time, dose and fractionation
Time, dose and fractionationTime, dose and fractionation
Time, dose and fractionation
 
TSET
TSETTSET
TSET
 
Treatment plannings i kiran
Treatment plannings i   kiranTreatment plannings i   kiran
Treatment plannings i kiran
 
Cell survival curves- Radiobiology
Cell survival curves- RadiobiologyCell survival curves- Radiobiology
Cell survival curves- Radiobiology
 
CELL SURVIVAL CURVES
CELL SURVIVAL CURVESCELL SURVIVAL CURVES
CELL SURVIVAL CURVES
 
TIME DOSE & FRACTIONATION
TIME DOSE & FRACTIONATIONTIME DOSE & FRACTIONATION
TIME DOSE & FRACTIONATION
 
Gap correction
Gap correctionGap correction
Gap correction
 
Beam modification
Beam modification Beam modification
Beam modification
 
Icru 38
Icru   38Icru   38
Icru 38
 
Time, dose & fractionation,
Time, dose & fractionation,Time, dose & fractionation,
Time, dose & fractionation,
 
Linear quadratic model ppt
Linear quadratic model pptLinear quadratic model ppt
Linear quadratic model ppt
 
RADIOBIOLOGY: oxygen effect & reoxygenation
RADIOBIOLOGY: oxygen effect & reoxygenationRADIOBIOLOGY: oxygen effect & reoxygenation
RADIOBIOLOGY: oxygen effect & reoxygenation
 
BASICS RADIOBIOLOGY FOR RADIOTHERAPY
BASICS RADIOBIOLOGY FOR RADIOTHERAPYBASICS RADIOBIOLOGY FOR RADIOTHERAPY
BASICS RADIOBIOLOGY FOR RADIOTHERAPY
 
Basics And Physics of Brachytherapy
Basics And Physics of BrachytherapyBasics And Physics of Brachytherapy
Basics And Physics of Brachytherapy
 
ICRU reports 50 and 62
ICRU reports 50 and 62ICRU reports 50 and 62
ICRU reports 50 and 62
 
Electron beam therapy
Electron beam therapyElectron beam therapy
Electron beam therapy
 
Time dose & fractionation relationship
Time dose & fractionation relationship Time dose & fractionation relationship
Time dose & fractionation relationship
 
Radioisotopes and dose rates used for brachytherapy
Radioisotopes and dose rates used for brachytherapyRadioisotopes and dose rates used for brachytherapy
Radioisotopes and dose rates used for brachytherapy
 
Beam modification devices
Beam modification devicesBeam modification devices
Beam modification devices
 

Ähnlich wie Cell survival curve

Cell survival curve
Cell survival curveCell survival curve
Cell survival curveNilesh Kucha
 
CELL SURVIVAL CURVE.pptx
CELL SURVIVAL CURVE.pptxCELL SURVIVAL CURVE.pptx
CELL SURVIVAL CURVE.pptxmasthan basha
 
Cell survival curves
Cell survival curvesCell survival curves
Cell survival curvesSavioJames4
 
Cell Survival Curves by Dr.Abhilash.pptx
Cell Survival Curves by Dr.Abhilash.pptxCell Survival Curves by Dr.Abhilash.pptx
Cell Survival Curves by Dr.Abhilash.pptxAbhilashBanerjee3
 
The Radiobiology Behind Dose Fractionation.pdf
The Radiobiology Behind Dose Fractionation.pdfThe Radiobiology Behind Dose Fractionation.pdf
The Radiobiology Behind Dose Fractionation.pdfministry of health
 
6th radiobiology- cell survival curves
6th  radiobiology- cell survival curves6th  radiobiology- cell survival curves
6th radiobiology- cell survival curvesGowtham Manimaran
 
Glimpse of clinical radiobiology course
Glimpse of clinical radiobiology courseGlimpse of clinical radiobiology course
Glimpse of clinical radiobiology courseManoj Gupta
 
Radiobiology behind dose fractionation
Radiobiology behind dose fractionationRadiobiology behind dose fractionation
Radiobiology behind dose fractionationfondas vakalis
 
2012-michael joiner-hypofractionation
2012-michael joiner-hypofractionation2012-michael joiner-hypofractionation
2012-michael joiner-hypofractionationfondas vakalis
 
Fluence vs. dose approach waligorski
Fluence vs. dose approach waligorskiFluence vs. dose approach waligorski
Fluence vs. dose approach waligorskiLeishman Associates
 
Dynamic Fractionation in Radiotherapy
Dynamic Fractionation in RadiotherapyDynamic Fractionation in Radiotherapy
Dynamic Fractionation in Radiotherapyajjitchandran
 
Μοντέλα διάχυσης καρκινικών όγκων εγκεφάλου
Μοντέλα διάχυσης καρκινικών όγκων εγκεφάλουΜοντέλα διάχυσης καρκινικών όγκων εγκεφάλου
Μοντέλα διάχυσης καρκινικών όγκων εγκεφάλουManolis Vavalis
 
Basics of linear quadratic model
Basics of linear quadratic modelBasics of linear quadratic model
Basics of linear quadratic modelAjeet Gandhi
 
To use or not to use the LQ model at “high” radiation doses
To use or not to use the LQ model at “high” radiation doses To use or not to use the LQ model at “high” radiation doses
To use or not to use the LQ model at “high” radiation doses Santam Chakraborty
 
7. Radiobiology behind Dose Fractionation.ppt
7. Radiobiology behind Dose Fractionation.ppt7. Radiobiology behind Dose Fractionation.ppt
7. Radiobiology behind Dose Fractionation.pptSusana Branco
 

Ähnlich wie Cell survival curve (20)

Cell survival curve
Cell survival curveCell survival curve
Cell survival curve
 
Cell survival curves
Cell survival curves Cell survival curves
Cell survival curves
 
CELL SURVIVAL CURVE.pptx
CELL SURVIVAL CURVE.pptxCELL SURVIVAL CURVE.pptx
CELL SURVIVAL CURVE.pptx
 
Cell survival curves
Cell survival curvesCell survival curves
Cell survival curves
 
Cell Survival Curves by Dr.Abhilash.pptx
Cell Survival Curves by Dr.Abhilash.pptxCell Survival Curves by Dr.Abhilash.pptx
Cell Survival Curves by Dr.Abhilash.pptx
 
The Radiobiology Behind Dose Fractionation.pdf
The Radiobiology Behind Dose Fractionation.pdfThe Radiobiology Behind Dose Fractionation.pdf
The Radiobiology Behind Dose Fractionation.pdf
 
Cell survival curve
Cell survival curveCell survival curve
Cell survival curve
 
6th radiobiology- cell survival curves
6th  radiobiology- cell survival curves6th  radiobiology- cell survival curves
6th radiobiology- cell survival curves
 
Chapter3 cell survival curve
Chapter3 cell survival curveChapter3 cell survival curve
Chapter3 cell survival curve
 
Cell survival curve
Cell survival curveCell survival curve
Cell survival curve
 
Glimpse of clinical radiobiology course
Glimpse of clinical radiobiology courseGlimpse of clinical radiobiology course
Glimpse of clinical radiobiology course
 
Radiobiology behind dose fractionation
Radiobiology behind dose fractionationRadiobiology behind dose fractionation
Radiobiology behind dose fractionation
 
2012-michael joiner-hypofractionation
2012-michael joiner-hypofractionation2012-michael joiner-hypofractionation
2012-michael joiner-hypofractionation
 
Fluence vs. dose approach waligorski
Fluence vs. dose approach waligorskiFluence vs. dose approach waligorski
Fluence vs. dose approach waligorski
 
Chapter 004
Chapter 004Chapter 004
Chapter 004
 
Dynamic Fractionation in Radiotherapy
Dynamic Fractionation in RadiotherapyDynamic Fractionation in Radiotherapy
Dynamic Fractionation in Radiotherapy
 
Μοντέλα διάχυσης καρκινικών όγκων εγκεφάλου
Μοντέλα διάχυσης καρκινικών όγκων εγκεφάλουΜοντέλα διάχυσης καρκινικών όγκων εγκεφάλου
Μοντέλα διάχυσης καρκινικών όγκων εγκεφάλου
 
Basics of linear quadratic model
Basics of linear quadratic modelBasics of linear quadratic model
Basics of linear quadratic model
 
To use or not to use the LQ model at “high” radiation doses
To use or not to use the LQ model at “high” radiation doses To use or not to use the LQ model at “high” radiation doses
To use or not to use the LQ model at “high” radiation doses
 
7. Radiobiology behind Dose Fractionation.ppt
7. Radiobiology behind Dose Fractionation.ppt7. Radiobiology behind Dose Fractionation.ppt
7. Radiobiology behind Dose Fractionation.ppt
 

Mehr von Isha Jaiswal

Physical Models For Time Dose & Fractionation
Physical Models For Time Dose & FractionationPhysical Models For Time Dose & Fractionation
Physical Models For Time Dose & FractionationIsha Jaiswal
 
Preoperative versus postoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer
Preoperative versus postoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancerPreoperative versus postoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer
Preoperative versus postoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancerIsha Jaiswal
 
Radiotherapy in ca esophagus
Radiotherapy in ca esophagusRadiotherapy in ca esophagus
Radiotherapy in ca esophagusIsha Jaiswal
 
RADIO LOGICAL ANATOMY OF HEAD AND NECK CANCERS
RADIO LOGICAL ANATOMY OF HEAD AND NECK CANCERSRADIO LOGICAL ANATOMY OF HEAD AND NECK CANCERS
RADIO LOGICAL ANATOMY OF HEAD AND NECK CANCERSIsha Jaiswal
 
IMAGING & ITS ROLE IN FEMALE GENITAL CANCER
IMAGING & ITS ROLE IN FEMALE GENITAL CANCERIMAGING & ITS ROLE IN FEMALE GENITAL CANCER
IMAGING & ITS ROLE IN FEMALE GENITAL CANCERIsha Jaiswal
 
Radiological anatomy of lymph node
Radiological anatomy of lymph nodeRadiological anatomy of lymph node
Radiological anatomy of lymph nodeIsha Jaiswal
 
EVOLUTION OF CHEMOTHERAPY IN BREAST CANCER
EVOLUTION OF CHEMOTHERAPY IN BREAST CANCEREVOLUTION OF CHEMOTHERAPY IN BREAST CANCER
EVOLUTION OF CHEMOTHERAPY IN BREAST CANCERIsha Jaiswal
 
Management of carcinoma hypopharynx
 Management  of carcinoma hypopharynx  Management  of carcinoma hypopharynx
Management of carcinoma hypopharynx Isha Jaiswal
 
MANAGEMENT OF GLIOMAS
MANAGEMENT OF GLIOMASMANAGEMENT OF GLIOMAS
MANAGEMENT OF GLIOMASIsha Jaiswal
 
MANAGEMENT OF EARLY STAGE NON SMALL CELL LUNG CARCINOMA
MANAGEMENT OF EARLY STAGE NON SMALL CELL LUNG CARCINOMAMANAGEMENT OF EARLY STAGE NON SMALL CELL LUNG CARCINOMA
MANAGEMENT OF EARLY STAGE NON SMALL CELL LUNG CARCINOMAIsha Jaiswal
 
radiation therapy in ca breast
radiation therapy in ca breast   radiation therapy in ca breast
radiation therapy in ca breast Isha Jaiswal
 
carcinoma urinary bladder management
carcinoma urinary bladder management carcinoma urinary bladder management
carcinoma urinary bladder management Isha Jaiswal
 
MANAGEMENT OF CA COLON
MANAGEMENT OF CA COLONMANAGEMENT OF CA COLON
MANAGEMENT OF CA COLONIsha Jaiswal
 
MANAGEMENT OF HEPATOCELLULAR CARCINOMA
MANAGEMENT OF HEPATOCELLULAR CARCINOMAMANAGEMENT OF HEPATOCELLULAR CARCINOMA
MANAGEMENT OF HEPATOCELLULAR CARCINOMAIsha Jaiswal
 
EBRT IN CARCINOMA CERVIX
EBRT IN CARCINOMA CERVIXEBRT IN CARCINOMA CERVIX
EBRT IN CARCINOMA CERVIXIsha Jaiswal
 
Conventional Brachytherapy in carcinoma cervix
Conventional Brachytherapy in carcinoma cervixConventional Brachytherapy in carcinoma cervix
Conventional Brachytherapy in carcinoma cervixIsha Jaiswal
 
image guided brachytherapy carcinoma cervix
image guided brachytherapy carcinoma cerviximage guided brachytherapy carcinoma cervix
image guided brachytherapy carcinoma cervixIsha Jaiswal
 
Breast: Carcinoma in situ management
Breast: Carcinoma in situ management Breast: Carcinoma in situ management
Breast: Carcinoma in situ management Isha Jaiswal
 
Managememt of Carcinoma Nasopharynx
Managememt  of Carcinoma NasopharynxManagememt  of Carcinoma Nasopharynx
Managememt of Carcinoma NasopharynxIsha Jaiswal
 
management of carcinoma hypopharynx
management of carcinoma hypopharynxmanagement of carcinoma hypopharynx
management of carcinoma hypopharynxIsha Jaiswal
 

Mehr von Isha Jaiswal (20)

Physical Models For Time Dose & Fractionation
Physical Models For Time Dose & FractionationPhysical Models For Time Dose & Fractionation
Physical Models For Time Dose & Fractionation
 
Preoperative versus postoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer
Preoperative versus postoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancerPreoperative versus postoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer
Preoperative versus postoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer
 
Radiotherapy in ca esophagus
Radiotherapy in ca esophagusRadiotherapy in ca esophagus
Radiotherapy in ca esophagus
 
RADIO LOGICAL ANATOMY OF HEAD AND NECK CANCERS
RADIO LOGICAL ANATOMY OF HEAD AND NECK CANCERSRADIO LOGICAL ANATOMY OF HEAD AND NECK CANCERS
RADIO LOGICAL ANATOMY OF HEAD AND NECK CANCERS
 
IMAGING & ITS ROLE IN FEMALE GENITAL CANCER
IMAGING & ITS ROLE IN FEMALE GENITAL CANCERIMAGING & ITS ROLE IN FEMALE GENITAL CANCER
IMAGING & ITS ROLE IN FEMALE GENITAL CANCER
 
Radiological anatomy of lymph node
Radiological anatomy of lymph nodeRadiological anatomy of lymph node
Radiological anatomy of lymph node
 
EVOLUTION OF CHEMOTHERAPY IN BREAST CANCER
EVOLUTION OF CHEMOTHERAPY IN BREAST CANCEREVOLUTION OF CHEMOTHERAPY IN BREAST CANCER
EVOLUTION OF CHEMOTHERAPY IN BREAST CANCER
 
Management of carcinoma hypopharynx
 Management  of carcinoma hypopharynx  Management  of carcinoma hypopharynx
Management of carcinoma hypopharynx
 
MANAGEMENT OF GLIOMAS
MANAGEMENT OF GLIOMASMANAGEMENT OF GLIOMAS
MANAGEMENT OF GLIOMAS
 
MANAGEMENT OF EARLY STAGE NON SMALL CELL LUNG CARCINOMA
MANAGEMENT OF EARLY STAGE NON SMALL CELL LUNG CARCINOMAMANAGEMENT OF EARLY STAGE NON SMALL CELL LUNG CARCINOMA
MANAGEMENT OF EARLY STAGE NON SMALL CELL LUNG CARCINOMA
 
radiation therapy in ca breast
radiation therapy in ca breast   radiation therapy in ca breast
radiation therapy in ca breast
 
carcinoma urinary bladder management
carcinoma urinary bladder management carcinoma urinary bladder management
carcinoma urinary bladder management
 
MANAGEMENT OF CA COLON
MANAGEMENT OF CA COLONMANAGEMENT OF CA COLON
MANAGEMENT OF CA COLON
 
MANAGEMENT OF HEPATOCELLULAR CARCINOMA
MANAGEMENT OF HEPATOCELLULAR CARCINOMAMANAGEMENT OF HEPATOCELLULAR CARCINOMA
MANAGEMENT OF HEPATOCELLULAR CARCINOMA
 
EBRT IN CARCINOMA CERVIX
EBRT IN CARCINOMA CERVIXEBRT IN CARCINOMA CERVIX
EBRT IN CARCINOMA CERVIX
 
Conventional Brachytherapy in carcinoma cervix
Conventional Brachytherapy in carcinoma cervixConventional Brachytherapy in carcinoma cervix
Conventional Brachytherapy in carcinoma cervix
 
image guided brachytherapy carcinoma cervix
image guided brachytherapy carcinoma cerviximage guided brachytherapy carcinoma cervix
image guided brachytherapy carcinoma cervix
 
Breast: Carcinoma in situ management
Breast: Carcinoma in situ management Breast: Carcinoma in situ management
Breast: Carcinoma in situ management
 
Managememt of Carcinoma Nasopharynx
Managememt  of Carcinoma NasopharynxManagememt  of Carcinoma Nasopharynx
Managememt of Carcinoma Nasopharynx
 
management of carcinoma hypopharynx
management of carcinoma hypopharynxmanagement of carcinoma hypopharynx
management of carcinoma hypopharynx
 

Kürzlich hochgeladen

HMCS Vancouver Pre-Deployment Brief - May 2024 (Web Version).pptx
HMCS Vancouver Pre-Deployment Brief - May 2024 (Web Version).pptxHMCS Vancouver Pre-Deployment Brief - May 2024 (Web Version).pptx
HMCS Vancouver Pre-Deployment Brief - May 2024 (Web Version).pptxmarlenawright1
 
On National Teacher Day, meet the 2024-25 Kenan Fellows
On National Teacher Day, meet the 2024-25 Kenan FellowsOn National Teacher Day, meet the 2024-25 Kenan Fellows
On National Teacher Day, meet the 2024-25 Kenan FellowsMebane Rash
 
2024-NATIONAL-LEARNING-CAMP-AND-OTHER.pptx
2024-NATIONAL-LEARNING-CAMP-AND-OTHER.pptx2024-NATIONAL-LEARNING-CAMP-AND-OTHER.pptx
2024-NATIONAL-LEARNING-CAMP-AND-OTHER.pptxMaritesTamaniVerdade
 
Understanding Accommodations and Modifications
Understanding  Accommodations and ModificationsUnderstanding  Accommodations and Modifications
Understanding Accommodations and ModificationsMJDuyan
 
Fostering Friendships - Enhancing Social Bonds in the Classroom
Fostering Friendships - Enhancing Social Bonds  in the ClassroomFostering Friendships - Enhancing Social Bonds  in the Classroom
Fostering Friendships - Enhancing Social Bonds in the ClassroomPooky Knightsmith
 
Unit 3 Emotional Intelligence and Spiritual Intelligence.pdf
Unit 3 Emotional Intelligence and Spiritual Intelligence.pdfUnit 3 Emotional Intelligence and Spiritual Intelligence.pdf
Unit 3 Emotional Intelligence and Spiritual Intelligence.pdfDr Vijay Vishwakarma
 
Micro-Scholarship, What it is, How can it help me.pdf
Micro-Scholarship, What it is, How can it help me.pdfMicro-Scholarship, What it is, How can it help me.pdf
Micro-Scholarship, What it is, How can it help me.pdfPoh-Sun Goh
 
COMMUNICATING NEGATIVE NEWS - APPROACHES .pptx
COMMUNICATING NEGATIVE NEWS - APPROACHES .pptxCOMMUNICATING NEGATIVE NEWS - APPROACHES .pptx
COMMUNICATING NEGATIVE NEWS - APPROACHES .pptxannathomasp01
 
Basic Civil Engineering first year Notes- Chapter 4 Building.pptx
Basic Civil Engineering first year Notes- Chapter 4 Building.pptxBasic Civil Engineering first year Notes- Chapter 4 Building.pptx
Basic Civil Engineering first year Notes- Chapter 4 Building.pptxDenish Jangid
 
How to Give a Domain for a Field in Odoo 17
How to Give a Domain for a Field in Odoo 17How to Give a Domain for a Field in Odoo 17
How to Give a Domain for a Field in Odoo 17Celine George
 
Graduate Outcomes Presentation Slides - English
Graduate Outcomes Presentation Slides - EnglishGraduate Outcomes Presentation Slides - English
Graduate Outcomes Presentation Slides - Englishneillewis46
 
General Principles of Intellectual Property: Concepts of Intellectual Proper...
General Principles of Intellectual Property: Concepts of Intellectual  Proper...General Principles of Intellectual Property: Concepts of Intellectual  Proper...
General Principles of Intellectual Property: Concepts of Intellectual Proper...Poonam Aher Patil
 
How to setup Pycharm environment for Odoo 17.pptx
How to setup Pycharm environment for Odoo 17.pptxHow to setup Pycharm environment for Odoo 17.pptx
How to setup Pycharm environment for Odoo 17.pptxCeline George
 
Sociology 101 Demonstration of Learning Exhibit
Sociology 101 Demonstration of Learning ExhibitSociology 101 Demonstration of Learning Exhibit
Sociology 101 Demonstration of Learning Exhibitjbellavia9
 
ICT Role in 21st Century Education & its Challenges.pptx
ICT Role in 21st Century Education & its Challenges.pptxICT Role in 21st Century Education & its Challenges.pptx
ICT Role in 21st Century Education & its Challenges.pptxAreebaZafar22
 
Single or Multiple melodic lines structure
Single or Multiple melodic lines structureSingle or Multiple melodic lines structure
Single or Multiple melodic lines structuredhanjurrannsibayan2
 
Beyond_Borders_Understanding_Anime_and_Manga_Fandom_A_Comprehensive_Audience_...
Beyond_Borders_Understanding_Anime_and_Manga_Fandom_A_Comprehensive_Audience_...Beyond_Borders_Understanding_Anime_and_Manga_Fandom_A_Comprehensive_Audience_...
Beyond_Borders_Understanding_Anime_and_Manga_Fandom_A_Comprehensive_Audience_...Pooja Bhuva
 
How to Add New Custom Addons Path in Odoo 17
How to Add New Custom Addons Path in Odoo 17How to Add New Custom Addons Path in Odoo 17
How to Add New Custom Addons Path in Odoo 17Celine George
 
On_Translating_a_Tamil_Poem_by_A_K_Ramanujan.pptx
On_Translating_a_Tamil_Poem_by_A_K_Ramanujan.pptxOn_Translating_a_Tamil_Poem_by_A_K_Ramanujan.pptx
On_Translating_a_Tamil_Poem_by_A_K_Ramanujan.pptxPooja Bhuva
 
80 ĐỀ THI THỬ TUYỂN SINH TIẾNG ANH VÀO 10 SỞ GD – ĐT THÀNH PHỐ HỒ CHÍ MINH NĂ...
80 ĐỀ THI THỬ TUYỂN SINH TIẾNG ANH VÀO 10 SỞ GD – ĐT THÀNH PHỐ HỒ CHÍ MINH NĂ...80 ĐỀ THI THỬ TUYỂN SINH TIẾNG ANH VÀO 10 SỞ GD – ĐT THÀNH PHỐ HỒ CHÍ MINH NĂ...
80 ĐỀ THI THỬ TUYỂN SINH TIẾNG ANH VÀO 10 SỞ GD – ĐT THÀNH PHỐ HỒ CHÍ MINH NĂ...Nguyen Thanh Tu Collection
 

Kürzlich hochgeladen (20)

HMCS Vancouver Pre-Deployment Brief - May 2024 (Web Version).pptx
HMCS Vancouver Pre-Deployment Brief - May 2024 (Web Version).pptxHMCS Vancouver Pre-Deployment Brief - May 2024 (Web Version).pptx
HMCS Vancouver Pre-Deployment Brief - May 2024 (Web Version).pptx
 
On National Teacher Day, meet the 2024-25 Kenan Fellows
On National Teacher Day, meet the 2024-25 Kenan FellowsOn National Teacher Day, meet the 2024-25 Kenan Fellows
On National Teacher Day, meet the 2024-25 Kenan Fellows
 
2024-NATIONAL-LEARNING-CAMP-AND-OTHER.pptx
2024-NATIONAL-LEARNING-CAMP-AND-OTHER.pptx2024-NATIONAL-LEARNING-CAMP-AND-OTHER.pptx
2024-NATIONAL-LEARNING-CAMP-AND-OTHER.pptx
 
Understanding Accommodations and Modifications
Understanding  Accommodations and ModificationsUnderstanding  Accommodations and Modifications
Understanding Accommodations and Modifications
 
Fostering Friendships - Enhancing Social Bonds in the Classroom
Fostering Friendships - Enhancing Social Bonds  in the ClassroomFostering Friendships - Enhancing Social Bonds  in the Classroom
Fostering Friendships - Enhancing Social Bonds in the Classroom
 
Unit 3 Emotional Intelligence and Spiritual Intelligence.pdf
Unit 3 Emotional Intelligence and Spiritual Intelligence.pdfUnit 3 Emotional Intelligence and Spiritual Intelligence.pdf
Unit 3 Emotional Intelligence and Spiritual Intelligence.pdf
 
Micro-Scholarship, What it is, How can it help me.pdf
Micro-Scholarship, What it is, How can it help me.pdfMicro-Scholarship, What it is, How can it help me.pdf
Micro-Scholarship, What it is, How can it help me.pdf
 
COMMUNICATING NEGATIVE NEWS - APPROACHES .pptx
COMMUNICATING NEGATIVE NEWS - APPROACHES .pptxCOMMUNICATING NEGATIVE NEWS - APPROACHES .pptx
COMMUNICATING NEGATIVE NEWS - APPROACHES .pptx
 
Basic Civil Engineering first year Notes- Chapter 4 Building.pptx
Basic Civil Engineering first year Notes- Chapter 4 Building.pptxBasic Civil Engineering first year Notes- Chapter 4 Building.pptx
Basic Civil Engineering first year Notes- Chapter 4 Building.pptx
 
How to Give a Domain for a Field in Odoo 17
How to Give a Domain for a Field in Odoo 17How to Give a Domain for a Field in Odoo 17
How to Give a Domain for a Field in Odoo 17
 
Graduate Outcomes Presentation Slides - English
Graduate Outcomes Presentation Slides - EnglishGraduate Outcomes Presentation Slides - English
Graduate Outcomes Presentation Slides - English
 
General Principles of Intellectual Property: Concepts of Intellectual Proper...
General Principles of Intellectual Property: Concepts of Intellectual  Proper...General Principles of Intellectual Property: Concepts of Intellectual  Proper...
General Principles of Intellectual Property: Concepts of Intellectual Proper...
 
How to setup Pycharm environment for Odoo 17.pptx
How to setup Pycharm environment for Odoo 17.pptxHow to setup Pycharm environment for Odoo 17.pptx
How to setup Pycharm environment for Odoo 17.pptx
 
Sociology 101 Demonstration of Learning Exhibit
Sociology 101 Demonstration of Learning ExhibitSociology 101 Demonstration of Learning Exhibit
Sociology 101 Demonstration of Learning Exhibit
 
ICT Role in 21st Century Education & its Challenges.pptx
ICT Role in 21st Century Education & its Challenges.pptxICT Role in 21st Century Education & its Challenges.pptx
ICT Role in 21st Century Education & its Challenges.pptx
 
Single or Multiple melodic lines structure
Single or Multiple melodic lines structureSingle or Multiple melodic lines structure
Single or Multiple melodic lines structure
 
Beyond_Borders_Understanding_Anime_and_Manga_Fandom_A_Comprehensive_Audience_...
Beyond_Borders_Understanding_Anime_and_Manga_Fandom_A_Comprehensive_Audience_...Beyond_Borders_Understanding_Anime_and_Manga_Fandom_A_Comprehensive_Audience_...
Beyond_Borders_Understanding_Anime_and_Manga_Fandom_A_Comprehensive_Audience_...
 
How to Add New Custom Addons Path in Odoo 17
How to Add New Custom Addons Path in Odoo 17How to Add New Custom Addons Path in Odoo 17
How to Add New Custom Addons Path in Odoo 17
 
On_Translating_a_Tamil_Poem_by_A_K_Ramanujan.pptx
On_Translating_a_Tamil_Poem_by_A_K_Ramanujan.pptxOn_Translating_a_Tamil_Poem_by_A_K_Ramanujan.pptx
On_Translating_a_Tamil_Poem_by_A_K_Ramanujan.pptx
 
80 ĐỀ THI THỬ TUYỂN SINH TIẾNG ANH VÀO 10 SỞ GD – ĐT THÀNH PHỐ HỒ CHÍ MINH NĂ...
80 ĐỀ THI THỬ TUYỂN SINH TIẾNG ANH VÀO 10 SỞ GD – ĐT THÀNH PHỐ HỒ CHÍ MINH NĂ...80 ĐỀ THI THỬ TUYỂN SINH TIẾNG ANH VÀO 10 SỞ GD – ĐT THÀNH PHỐ HỒ CHÍ MINH NĂ...
80 ĐỀ THI THỬ TUYỂN SINH TIẾNG ANH VÀO 10 SỞ GD – ĐT THÀNH PHỐ HỒ CHÍ MINH NĂ...
 

Cell survival curve

  • 1.  Made by: Dr. Isha Jaiswal  Moderator: Dr. Madhup Rastogi  Date: 4th August 2014 Cell survival curves
  • 2. Cell Survival Curve  It describes relationship between radiation dose and the fraction of cells that “survive” that dose.  This is mainly used to assess biological effectiveness of radiation.  To understand it better, we need to know about a few basic things e.g.  Meaning of Cell Death and cell survival  Estimation of Survival fraction / Plating Efficiency  Nature of Cell killing etc.
  • 3. Cell Death 3 Cell death can have different meanings:  loss of a specific function - differentiated cells (nerve, muscle) Lethal dose:100 Gy  loss of the ability to divide - proliferating cells such as stem cells in hematopoietic system or intestinal epithelium loss of reproductive integrity - “reproductive death” Lethal dose: 2 Gy
  • 4. Survival 4  “Survival” means retention of reproductive integrity  ie. the capacity for sustained proliferation  Can grow into macroscopic colonies  A SURVIVOR that has retained its reproductive integrity and is able to proliferate indefinitely is said to be CLONOGENIC
  • 5. Estimating Survival 5  In order to determine the surviving fraction, we must know the PLATING EFFICIENCY  PE is the percentage of cells that grow into colonies  in other words, those cells that survive the plating process  may be close to 100% in some established cell lines but 1% or less for fresh explants of human cell
  • 6. Derivation of Survival Curves 6  Cells have been taken from stock culture and placed in seed dishes  Then irradiated (0 Gy to 6 Gy)and allowed to grow into colonies for 1-2 weeks  Colonies have been counted for survival data Always will have a control batch to determine PE.
  • 7. Surviving Fraction  Equal to the fraction of cells that plate successfully and survive irradiation (without losing their reproductive integrity) to grow into colonies  A cell survival curve is graph plotted between surviving fraction on Y axis & absorbed dose on X axis  PE/100seededcells countedColonies fractionSurviving   7
  • 8. 8 Dose (Gy) Surviving Fraction 2 64 0.01 0.1 1 0.001 SF = = 0.2 72 colonies 400 seeded x 0.9 plated
  • 9. Modes of Radiation Injury • Primarily by ionization (direct) and free radicals(indirect) mechanism • Low LET (X- and gamma-rays) damage by free radicals • High LET (protons and a particles) damage by ionization
  • 10.
  • 11.  The Poisson model was proposed in 1961 (Munro & Gilbert)  It states“the object of treating a tumour by radiotherapy is to damage every single potentially malignant cell to such an extent that it cannot continue to proliferate.”  Poisson statistics are used to determine the probability of an event occurring in relation to the known average number of events occurring.(λ)  When enough radiation is delivered to the tumour mass such that 1 lethal hit would be expected per cell,…  the likely percentage of cells receiving one lethal hits is 63%. Therefore, 37% of cells would receive no lethal hits and therefore the tumour would most likely not be cured.  The probability of zero surviving tumor cell is given by the tumour control probability (TCP)  Poisson Model of probability of cell death
  • 12.  As no of lethal hits increases the probability of survival decreasing geometrically with dose.  For example, if 100 clonagens were present within the tumour, an average of 37 clonagens would survive. Therefore the TCP would be e-37  As the lethal hits per clonagen increases, the TCP also increases.  The increase occurs rapidly once the lethal hits per clonagen exceeds 3 – 4 (likelihood of surviving clonagens begins to approach zero at this point).
  • 13. Quantization of cell killing  A dose of radiation that introduces an average of one lethal event per cell leaves 37% still viable is called D0 dose.  Cell killing follows exponential relationship. A dose which reduces cell survival to 50% will, if repeated, reduce survival to 25%, and similarly to 12.5% from a third exposure.  This means Surviving fraction never becomes zero.
  • 14. Log-linear scale: straight line in invitro cell culture  A straight line results when cell survival (from a series of equal dose fractions) is plotted on a logarithmic scale as a function of dose on linear scale.  The slope of such a semi- logarithmic dose curve could be described by the D0, the dose to reduce survival to 37%,  D0 usually lies between 1 and 2 Gy  D50, the dose to reduce survival to 50%,  D10, the dose to reduce survival to 10%. D10= 2.3 x D0
  • 15. Mammalian cell Survival Curve Shape  Two Component: shoulder and exponential curve  Initial portion has a shoulder and terminal portion become straight line.  In low dose region ,some dose of radiation goes waste to overcome some threshold  Terminal portion follow exponential relationship means same dose increment result into equal reduction in surviving fraction.
  • 16. Mammalian Cell Survival Curve  Shoulder Region  Shows accumulation of SUB- LETHAL DAMAGE.  The larger the shoulder region, the more dose will initially be needed to kill the same proportion of cells, so less radiosensitive  Beyond shoulder region  The D0 dose, or the inverse of the slop of the curve, indicates the relative radio sensitivity. The smaller the D0 dose, the greater the radio sensitivity.
  • 17. Models of Description of the Curve  Target theory: Single-target Model Multi-target Model  Linear Quadratics Model
  • 18. Single Target Single Hit Inactivation Model  single hit on a single target within the cell leads to cell death.  This generates an exponential cell survival curve which appears as a straight line on a semi- logarithmic scale.  This model is useful for highly sensitive human tissues, if high LET radiation is used,  Mammalian cells usually have a shoulder on their cell survival curves, which is not seen in this model. If, at dose D0 there is an average of one lethal event/cell, then S = e-D/D0 where D0 is called the mean lethal dose Simple Target Theory: ln S = -D/D0
  • 19. Multi-target Model  in an attempt to explain the shoulder of the cell survival curve, this model was generated.  It proposes that a single hit to each of n sensitive targets within the cell is sufficient to cause cell death.  The generated curve has a shoulder and decreases linearly with increasing dose.
  • 20. Multi-Target Model 20 Dose, Gy 100 10-1 10-4 0 123 6 9 Survival 10-3 10-2 Initial slope measure, D1, due to single-event killing Final slope measure, D0, due to multiple-event killing Dq n n or Dq represents the size or width of the shoulder Quantified in terms of  measure of initial slope due to single- event killing, D1  measure of final slope due to multiple-event killing, D0  width of the shoulder, Dq or n
  • 21. Multi-target Model 21  Shoulder-width measures:  the quasi-threshold dose (Dq)  the dose at which the extrapolated line from the straight portion of the survival curve (final slope) crosses the axis at 100% survival  the extrapolation number (n)  This value is obtained by extrapolating the exponential portion of the curve to the vertical line.  “broad shoulder” results in larger value of n  “narrow shoulder” results in small value of n  n = exp[Dq / D0]
  • 22. Single-target, single hit/multi-target, single hit model  Major problem with this model is that there are too many parameters D1;D0;Dq  Need a mathematically simpler model with fewer “unknown” parameters  The linear-quadratic (L-Q) model meets these needs
  • 23. Linear-quadratic model The linear quadratic model uses a polynomial equation (αD+βD2). The probability of survival is equal to the exponential of this – ie:S = e−(αD+βD)2. The generated curve is perhaps the best approximation of the actual cell kill seen after radiation exposure. It has the added benefit of two constants (α and β) which can be determined for specific tissues and cancers to predict dose response
  • 25. Linear Quadratic Model 25  S = e-(aD + bD 2 )  where:  S represents the fraction of cells surviving  D represents dose  a and b are constants that characterize the slopes of the two l portions of the semi-log survival curve  biological endpoint is cell death
  • 26. Linear Quadratic Model 26  Linear and quadratic contributions to cell killing are equal when the dose is equal to the ratio of a to b  D = a/b or  aD = b D2  a component is representative of damage caused by a single event (hit, double-strand break, “initiation / promotion” etc.)  b component is representative of damage caused by multiple events (hit/hit, 2 strand breaks, initiation then promotion, etc.)
  • 27. Comparison of the L-Q and target theory models
  • 28. Comparison of the L-Q and target theory models  Neither the L-Q not the M-T model has any established biological basis.  L-Q curves retain curvature even at very high doses  Target Theory curves become linear at high doses  With high-LET radiations, both theories result in straight lines ( irreparable damage dominates)
  • 29. Linear –quadratic model Multi-target model  At high doses the LQ model predicts a survival curve that bends continuosly, whereas the M-T model become linear.  At low doses the LQ model describes a curve that bends more than a M-T curve.
  • 30. Factors affecting cell survival curve 1. Mechanism of cell death 2. LET 3. Fractionation 4. Dose rate effect 5. Intrinsic radio sesitivity 6. Cell cycle stage 7. Oxygen presence
  • 31. Mitotic death results (principally) from exchange-type chromosomal aberration.  survival is linear quadratic function of dose Survival curve is og-linear plot with broad shoulder  Characterized by dose-rate effect Apoptotic death result from programmed death.  straight line on log-linear plot.  Characterized by exponential function of dose. Survival curve is straigh & shoulderless  little or no dose-rate effect. 1:SURVIVAL-CURVE SHAPE AND MECHANISM OF CELL DEATH
  • 32. Survival-curve shape and mechanism of cell death mitotic death Most cells fall between apopototic & mitotic death Note! Shoulder
  • 33. 2:LINEAR ENERGY TRANSFER 33  Rate at which energy is transferred to cell during irradiation  Low-LET radiations:  At low dose region  shoulder region appears  At high dose region  survival curve becomes linear and surviving fraction to an exponential function of dose  surviving fraction is a dual exponential S = e-(aD+bD2)
  • 34. 34  High-LET radiations:  survival curve is linear  surviving fraction is a pure exponential function of dose S = e-(aD)
  • 35. Survival Curves and LET 35  Increasing LET:  increases the steepness of the survival curve  results in a more linear curve  shoulder disappears due to increase of killing by single- events
  • 36. 3:Fractionation  If the dose is delivered as equal fractions with sufficient time ,repair of sub-lethal damage ocurs  Elkind’ s Recovery takes place between radiation exposure , cell act as fresh target.  Elkind & Sutton showed that when two exposure were given few hours apart ,the shoulder reappeared. Dq Dq Dose (Gy) 5 10 15 20 25 104 103 102 101 100 10-1 10-2 D0 n = exp[Dq / D0]
  • 37. The Effective Survival Curve: Fractionation 37  If the dose is delivered as equal fractions with sufficient time between for repair of the sub-lethal (non-killing) damage, the shoulder of the survival curve is repeated many times.  The effective survival curve becomes a composite of all the shoulder repetitions.  Dose required to produce the same reduction in surviving fraction increases. Showing ~28 Gy in 14 fractions.
  • 38. 4 :Dose-rate effect Dose rate determines biological impact At low dose rates, DNA repair processes are able to repair sub lethal damage during the radiation treatment. At very low dose rates other radiobiological effects (re-oxygenation, redistribution and repopulation) may also begin to play a role. This lessens the effect of a particular dose of radiation. Low dose rates tend to negate the β component of the linear quadratic equation, and the line becomes straighter on a logarithmic scale. reduction in dose rate generally reduces survival-curve slope (D0 increases) .
  • 39. Dose-Rate Effect in CHO Cells
  • 40. Composite survival curves for 40 Human Cell Lines Survival Curves show greater variation, Greater range of repair Less variation in cell survival curve due to less repair
  • 41. 5:Intrinsic radiosensitivity  Due to the differences in DNA content  represents bigger target for radiation damage  Sterilizing radiation dose for bacteria is 20,000 Gy wheras for mammalian cell is 1-2 Gy Mammalian cells are significantly more radio-sensitive than microorganisms:
  • 42. 6:survival curve: effect of cell cycle stage Late S: least senstive. M>G2>G1>early S>late S for sensitivity Difference caused by cell cycle are similar to difference caused by Oxygen effect The range of senstivity between the most senstive (m) & most resistant (s) phase is of the same order as oxygen effect The broken line is cell survival curve for mitotic cell plotted under hypoxia Slope is 2.5 times shallower than aerated cell
  • 43.  Cells are most sensitive to radiation at or close to M  Cells are most resistant to radiation in late S  For prolonged G1phase  a resistant period is evident in early G1 followed be a sensitive period in late G1  Cells are usually sensitive to radiation in G2 (almost as sensitive as in M)
  • 44.  Oxygen modifies the biological effects of ionizing radiation  OER – oxygen enhancement ratio: ratio of hypoxic doses : aerated doses needed to achieve the same biological effect  OER is absent for high LET radiations like alpha-particles and is intermediate for fast neutron.  Low LET radiation (eg. photons, electrons) are highly dependent on the presence of oxygen to ‘fix’ damage caused by radicalised DNA.  The oxygen effect shows more cell killing in oxic conditions. This is seen in cell survival curves as a shift in the steepness of the curve  For low LET X-Rays/γ-Rays  at high doses OER is 2.5-3.5 at lower doses OER is ~2.5 7: The Oxygen Effect
  • 45. OER – oxygen enhancement ratio: ratio of hypoxic doses : aerated doses needed to achieve the same biological effect
  • 46. Summary  A cell survival curve is the relationship between the fraction of cells retaining their reproductive integrity and absorbed dose.  Conventionally, surviving fraction on a logarithmic scale is plotted on the Y-axis, the dose is on the X-axis . The shape of the survival curve is important.  The cell-survival curve for densely ionizing radiations (α- particles and low-energy neutrons) is a straight line on a log- linear plot, that is survival is an exponential function of dose.  The cell-survival curve for sparsely ionizing radiations (X-rays, gamma-rays has an initial slope, followed by a shoulder after which it tends to straighten again at higher doses.
  • 47.  Survival data are fitted by many models. Some of them are: multitarget hypothesis, linear-quadratic hypothesis etc  At low doses and for single fraction regimen most cell killing results from “α-type” (single-hit, non-repairable) injury, but that as the dose increases, the“β –type” (multi-hit, repairable) injury becomes predominant, increasing as the square of the dose.  Initial slope of cell survival curve determined by α.  causes the curve to bend at higher doses.  The survival curve for a multifraction regimen is also an exponential function of dose.  The D10, the dose resulting in one decade of cell killing, is related to the Do by the expression D10 = 2.3 x Do Summary
  • 48. Cell survival curve depends Factors that make cells less radiosensitive are: Cell survival curve is used to calculate 1. on nature of radiation (LET); 2. Type of cell death 3. dose; 4. dose rate 5. cell type; 6. cell cycle stage 7. oxygen presence 1. removal of oxygen to create a hypoxic state, 2. the addition of chemical radical scavengers, 3. the use of low dose rates or multif ractionated irradiation, 4. cells synchronized in the late S phase of the cell cycle. 1. no.of tumor cell killed/ survived 2. tumor control probability 3. calculation of time dose and fractions 4. calculating Biologically effective dose