SlideShare ist ein Scribd-Unternehmen logo
1 von 24
Downloaden Sie, um offline zu lesen
Food Borne Pathogen Analysis by
   Surface-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy
          Atanu Sengupta, Chetan Shende, Hermes Huang,
               Stuart Farquharson and Frank Inscore




www.rta.biz                                      Visit our Booth
2

                         Outline

The Need - Detection of Foodborne Pathogens

The Solution - Surface-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy
   •   Basic Theory and Instrumentation
   •   Proposed Assay Concept
   •   Proposed Field Analysis
   •   Previous (Relevant) RTA Successes

The Results
3


          The Need/Problem
Detection of Foodborne Pathogens

  •   76 million foodborne illnesses in the US/Year
  •   325,000 hospitalization in the US/Year
  •   > 5000 deaths in the US/Year
  •   Cost US economy $4 Billion/Year

Examples

  •   2010: Salmonella contaminated eggs
  •   2009: Salmonella in peanut butter
  •   2008: Salmonella in peppers
  •   2007: E. coli in meat (Topps Meat Co. closes)
4


                     The Goal
Detect Foodborne pathogens (Listeria and Salmonella)
on equipment surfaces and on/in food.

        The device must provide the following:
• Sensitivity:       Detect 1 cell (colony forming units)
                     per mg sample
• Speed:             Within 2-3.5 hours

• Specificity:       Identify and discriminate pathogens
                        (No False Positives!)

• Reproducibility:   Accurate and Repeatable
                       (No False Negatives!)
5


        The Goal: Feasibility
SERS?       Culture Growth


                             Culture Growth /PCR is measured
                             after the stationary phase is reached.




                             Goal, can SERS be used to detect
                             cells long before the stationary
    Salmonella               phase. . . within 2 to 8 hours if
                             possible.
        Listeria
6

                 How it works: Raman

Light          Chemical
                                                                        virt
                H     H       Transmitted
hνo
           H              H             hνvib
                                 Absorbed (IR)           hνo   hνscat
                H     H
                                 Raman
                                 Raman
                     Scattered
                                      hνscat                            vib1
                    Rayleigh                     hνvib
                                                                        vib0

        Laser light directed at a chemical generates Raman light.
7

                 How it Works: SERS




                                    30-80 nm diameter



             When a molecule is within a plasmon field,
the efficiency of Raman scattering can increase by 1 million times!
            Part-per billion detection becomes possible.

                    Single Molecule Detection:
                        requires 1012 - 1014
8

                How it Works: Instrument
        Sample
                    Grating
                                                               Phenylalanine                      O
                                                                                                           _
                                                                                                  C    O




                                             Raman Intensity
                                                                                      +
   Filter                                                                                 H3N     CH

                                                                                                  CH 2



         Laser

            CCD
                                                      500           750        1000        1250          1500   1750
                            Bin Columns                                Raman Shift (cm-1)

Grating acts like a prism separating light into component colors
CCD is just like a digital camera
9

How it Works: RTA’s SERS-ID Analyzer
        A Portable, Field Usable Analyzer




              3.4x5x10”, 5 pounds
10

                      The Solution: SERS
Specificity: Every chemical produces a unique Raman spectrum
allowing unequivocal identification.

Sensitivity: Silver and gold nanoparticles increase Raman signals
by 1 million times or more allowing < ppm detection.

                               SERS:               Dipicolinic Acid
                        1 ppm Dipicolinic Acid




      Raman:
        Pure                                          Farquharson,
   Dipicolinic Acid                                    Maksymiuk
                                                        & Inscore
                                                 Appl Spec, 58, 351 (2004)
11

SERS-Active Substrates: Benzenthiol
                      Concentration   Enhancement
                                         Factor
                          10-3M            102




                          10-5M          104




                           10-8M
                        (~10 ppb)
                                         107
12

How it Works: RTA SERS Sampling Systems
                      2001: Simple SERS Sample Vials
                             Molecules     Sol-Gel Matrix
                                                                   Raman
                             in Solution
                                                                  Scattering
                                                                               2001
                                                                     Laser


                             Adsorbed
                             Molecules           Metal Particle

                                                                     2007: SERS LOCs
        2004: SERS-Active Capillary



    1            10


RTA Patents: 6,623,977; 6,943,031&2, 7,312,088, 7,393,691&2, 7,462,492&3, 7,713,914
13

        The Proposal: The Analysis
       The proposed SERS-FBPD will extract and identify
the presence of ~1-10 cells of Salmonella and Listeria on surfaces
    in 2.5 and 3.5 hours from sample collection, respectively.
14
                The Proposal: Feasibility


Task 1 – Develop Pathogen Capture.
 Attach molecular recognition elements (MREs) to gold and silver nanoparticles.

Task 2 – Demonstrate Pathogen Capture
 Measure SERS of both Listeria monocytogenes and Salmonella typhimurium.

Task 3 – Determine Sensitivity & Selectivity
 Measure 105 cfu/mL if possible.
 Show selective and discriminative binding.
15

The Proposal: SERS-Active Capture Assay
                                Pathogens




              Target Specific
                Molecular
               Recognition
                Elements

             Ag Nanoparticles


              Sol-Gel Layer
              Glass Surface
16
       The Results: Task 1 – Develop Pathogen Capture.

1. Identify best SERS-active sol-gel for Pathogens.
   Both silver-doped and gold-doped sol-gels produced surface-enhanced Raman spectra
   for Listeria monocytogenes (G+) and Salmonella typhimurium (G-).




                                                             Gold

  SERS of and 109 cfu/mL L. monocytogenes
  using gold-doped and silver-doped sol-gels.
  Spectral Conditions: 80 mW of 785 nm                       Silver
  laser excitation, 1 minute acquisition.
                                                          L. monocytogenes
17
       The Results: Task 1 – Develop Pathogen Capture.
2. Functionalize best SERS-active sol-gels with Molecular Recognition Elements (MREs).
   Two types of MREs were investigated for both pathogens. Initially, both MREs worked
   better on gold. However, slight modifications improved the silver measurements.

3: Go/No Go: Do the MREs produce a signal?
   Yes, weak, but unique spectral signatures
   proved successful functionalization.



                                                   Listeria

            SERS of MRE2 functionalized
                                                   Salmonella
            gold for Listeria and Salmonella.
                                                                 MRE2 on Gold
18
   The Results: Task 2 – Demonstrate Pathogen Capture.
4. Measure SERS of L. monocytogenes using MRE1 & 2 functionalized gold-doped sol-gels.
   SERS were obtained for 107 and 109 cfu/mL L. monocytogenes using MRE1 & 2,
   respectively.

5. Measure SERS of S. typhimurium using MRE1 & 2 functionalized gold-doped sol-gels.
   SERS was obtained for 107 cfu/mL S. typhimurium using MRE1 only.

6: Go/No Go: Do L. monocytogenes and S. typhimurium produce SERS signals on their
   respective assays at nominal concentrations? Yes, very good spectra were obtained for
   both pathogens at 107 cfu/mL using MRE1.

                                                    Listeria
                                                               Listeria
   SERS of 109 cfu/mL L. monocytogenes and
   S. typhimurium using MRE1 functionalized         Salmonella
                                                             Salmonella
   gold.
                                                                   MRE2 on Gold
19
 The Results: Task 3 – Determine Sensitivity & Selectivity.
7. Demonstrate selectivity by measuring both pathogens on each others assays.
   Selective discrimination is at least 3-orders of magnitude. SERS was not obtained at 108
   cfu/mL pathogen using the wrong assay, and only modest signals were obtained for 109
   cfu/mL pathogen.

             105 cfu/mL Listeria                              105 cfu/mL Salmonella



             109 cfu/mL Salmonella

                                                              109 cfu/mL Listeria



     SERS of L. monocytogenes and                    SERS of S. typhimurium and
     S. typhimurium measured on                      L. monocytogenes measured on
     Listeria assay using MRE1                       Salmonella assay using MRE1
     functionalized silver.                          functionalized silver.
20
 The Results: Task 3 – Determine Sensitivity & Selectivity.
8. Measure SERS of L. monocytogenes and S. typhimurium to lowest concentration.
   Exceptional surface-enhanced Raman spectra were obtained for both pathogens at
   105 cfu/mL using MRE1 functionalized gold-doped and silver-doped sol-gels. This
   concentration represents detection of ~ 103 cells in the measured 10 microL sample
   volume (~300 cells within the focus of the laser). SERS using MRE2 were 2-3 orders of
   magnitude less sensitive.

9: Go/No Go: Do L. monocytogenes and S. typhimurium produce SERS signals on their
   respective assays at least as low as 105 cells/mL Yes, in fact both pathogens were
   detected at 103 cells in the measured 10 microL sample volume.

                                                        Listeria

  SERS of and 105 cfu/mL (300 cells) L.
  monocytogenes and S. typhimurium using
  MRE1 functionalized gold.
                                                                        Salmonella
21
                  The Results: Feasibility

Task 1 – Develop Pathogen Capture.
 Two types of molecular recognition elements (MREs) for both the Listeria and
 Salmonella genus were successfully attached to gold and silver nanoparticles.

Task 2 – Demonstrate Pathogen Capture
 Surface-enhanced Raman spectra were obtained for both Listeria monocytogenes and
 Salmonella typhimurium. The 109 cfu/mL samples were incubated in the sol-gel
 capillaries for 45 minutes, washed, then measured in 1 minute.

Task 3 – Determine Sensitivity & Selectivity
 Both pathogens could be detected at 105 cfu/mL, the equivalent of 300 cells within the
 focus of the laser. This included a 2 minute centrifugation to concentrate the cells.
 Discrimination was at least 3-orders of magnitude at this concentration (the non-
 specific pathogen had to have a concentration of >108 cfu/mL to be detected).
22


The Results: Technology Comparison
  RTA-2012       Culture Growth


                                  Culture Growth /PCR is measured after
                                  the stationary phase is reached.




                                  The SERS-FBPD will be measured after
                                  1.5 and 2.5 hours of lag and log phase
         Salmonella               growth for Salmonella and Listeria,
                                  respectively.
             Listeria
23

               Future Work



Task 4 – Achieve Required Cell Detection.

Task 5 – Design and Build Lab-on-Chips.

Task 6 – Test Lab-on-Chips.


                Visit our Booth
24




                          Providing Chemical Information When & Where You Need It



Mission:
   To provide superior chemical analyzers
       (faster, portable, easy to use, rugged, more sensitive, less expensive)
    To meet specific needs of
       Department of Defense (Fuel Analysis, IED Identification)
       Homeland Security (CWA, BWA, IED Identification)
       Chemical Manufacturing Industry (Process Control)
       Medical (Drugs, HIV, TB)

General Information:
   Launched: September 1, 2001
   Experience: >75 years of Raman, >40 years SERS, >40 years analyzer design
   Products: RamanPro, RamanID, Portable Fuel Analyzer, Chemical Residue
    Analyzer, Simple SERS Sample Vials, SERS Capillaries, SERS Microplates

Weitere ähnliche Inhalte

Mehr von inscore

1e fei short support appendix 2015
1e fei short support appendix 20151e fei short support appendix 2015
1e fei short support appendix 2015inscore
 
1d1 fei resume r&d sr chemist 2015
1d1 fei resume r&d sr chemist 20151d1 fei resume r&d sr chemist 2015
1d1 fei resume r&d sr chemist 2015inscore
 
1c1 fei resume r&d sr scientist 2015
1c1 fei resume r&d sr scientist 20151c1 fei resume r&d sr scientist 2015
1c1 fei resume r&d sr scientist 2015inscore
 
1b1 fei resume r&d sr manager 2015
1b1 fei resume r&d sr  manager 20151b1 fei resume r&d sr  manager 2015
1b1 fei resume r&d sr manager 2015inscore
 
1a1 fei resume r&d sr director 2015
1a1 fei resume r&d sr director 20151a1 fei resume r&d sr director 2015
1a1 fei resume r&d sr director 2015inscore
 
Nasa Nnc05 Ca90 C Final Report
Nasa Nnc05 Ca90 C Final ReportNasa Nnc05 Ca90 C Final Report
Nasa Nnc05 Ca90 C Final Reportinscore
 
Final Report Daad13 02 C 0015 Part5 App L P
Final Report Daad13 02 C 0015 Part5 App L PFinal Report Daad13 02 C 0015 Part5 App L P
Final Report Daad13 02 C 0015 Part5 App L Pinscore
 
Final Report Daad13 02 C 0015 Part5 App A F
Final Report Daad13 02 C 0015 Part5 App A FFinal Report Daad13 02 C 0015 Part5 App A F
Final Report Daad13 02 C 0015 Part5 App A Finscore
 
Final Report Daad13 02 C 0015 Part5 App G K
Final Report Daad13 02 C 0015 Part5 App G KFinal Report Daad13 02 C 0015 Part5 App G K
Final Report Daad13 02 C 0015 Part5 App G Kinscore
 
Epa Epd06084 Final Report
Epa Epd06084 Final ReportEpa Epd06084 Final Report
Epa Epd06084 Final Reportinscore
 
Pittcon 2012 Cs Fi Invited Sers Talks Drugs In Saliva
Pittcon 2012 Cs Fi Invited Sers Talks Drugs In SalivaPittcon 2012 Cs Fi Invited Sers Talks Drugs In Saliva
Pittcon 2012 Cs Fi Invited Sers Talks Drugs In Salivainscore
 
Pitt Conn 2012 Fi Cs As Invited Sers Talks Ba Assay
Pitt Conn 2012 Fi Cs As Invited Sers Talks Ba AssayPitt Conn 2012 Fi Cs As Invited Sers Talks Ba Assay
Pitt Conn 2012 Fi Cs As Invited Sers Talks Ba Assayinscore
 
Rta Ifpac 2012 Melamine Pesticides Sers
Rta Ifpac 2012 Melamine Pesticides SersRta Ifpac 2012 Melamine Pesticides Sers
Rta Ifpac 2012 Melamine Pesticides Sersinscore
 
Pfa 2012
Pfa 2012Pfa 2012
Pfa 2012inscore
 
Rta Eas &amp; Pittcon 2010 Sers Featured Talks
Rta Eas &amp; Pittcon 2010 Sers Featured TalksRta Eas &amp; Pittcon 2010 Sers Featured Talks
Rta Eas &amp; Pittcon 2010 Sers Featured Talksinscore
 
Summary Of Post Doc Synthetic Procedures 2003
Summary Of Post Doc Synthetic Procedures 2003Summary Of Post Doc Synthetic Procedures 2003
Summary Of Post Doc Synthetic Procedures 2003inscore
 
Postdoc Ph D Research Fei 2002
Postdoc Ph D Research Fei 2002Postdoc Ph D Research Fei 2002
Postdoc Ph D Research Fei 2002inscore
 
Sdarticle3
Sdarticle3Sdarticle3
Sdarticle3inscore
 
Ja0265557
Ja0265557Ja0265557
Ja0265557inscore
 

Mehr von inscore (20)

1e fei short support appendix 2015
1e fei short support appendix 20151e fei short support appendix 2015
1e fei short support appendix 2015
 
1d1 fei resume r&d sr chemist 2015
1d1 fei resume r&d sr chemist 20151d1 fei resume r&d sr chemist 2015
1d1 fei resume r&d sr chemist 2015
 
1c1 fei resume r&d sr scientist 2015
1c1 fei resume r&d sr scientist 20151c1 fei resume r&d sr scientist 2015
1c1 fei resume r&d sr scientist 2015
 
1b1 fei resume r&d sr manager 2015
1b1 fei resume r&d sr  manager 20151b1 fei resume r&d sr  manager 2015
1b1 fei resume r&d sr manager 2015
 
1a1 fei resume r&d sr director 2015
1a1 fei resume r&d sr director 20151a1 fei resume r&d sr director 2015
1a1 fei resume r&d sr director 2015
 
Nasa Nnc05 Ca90 C Final Report
Nasa Nnc05 Ca90 C Final ReportNasa Nnc05 Ca90 C Final Report
Nasa Nnc05 Ca90 C Final Report
 
Final Report Daad13 02 C 0015 Part5 App L P
Final Report Daad13 02 C 0015 Part5 App L PFinal Report Daad13 02 C 0015 Part5 App L P
Final Report Daad13 02 C 0015 Part5 App L P
 
Final Report Daad13 02 C 0015 Part5 App A F
Final Report Daad13 02 C 0015 Part5 App A FFinal Report Daad13 02 C 0015 Part5 App A F
Final Report Daad13 02 C 0015 Part5 App A F
 
Final Report Daad13 02 C 0015 Part5 App G K
Final Report Daad13 02 C 0015 Part5 App G KFinal Report Daad13 02 C 0015 Part5 App G K
Final Report Daad13 02 C 0015 Part5 App G K
 
Epa Epd06084 Final Report
Epa Epd06084 Final ReportEpa Epd06084 Final Report
Epa Epd06084 Final Report
 
Pittcon 2012 Cs Fi Invited Sers Talks Drugs In Saliva
Pittcon 2012 Cs Fi Invited Sers Talks Drugs In SalivaPittcon 2012 Cs Fi Invited Sers Talks Drugs In Saliva
Pittcon 2012 Cs Fi Invited Sers Talks Drugs In Saliva
 
Pitt Conn 2012 Fi Cs As Invited Sers Talks Ba Assay
Pitt Conn 2012 Fi Cs As Invited Sers Talks Ba AssayPitt Conn 2012 Fi Cs As Invited Sers Talks Ba Assay
Pitt Conn 2012 Fi Cs As Invited Sers Talks Ba Assay
 
Feipnas
FeipnasFeipnas
Feipnas
 
Rta Ifpac 2012 Melamine Pesticides Sers
Rta Ifpac 2012 Melamine Pesticides SersRta Ifpac 2012 Melamine Pesticides Sers
Rta Ifpac 2012 Melamine Pesticides Sers
 
Pfa 2012
Pfa 2012Pfa 2012
Pfa 2012
 
Rta Eas &amp; Pittcon 2010 Sers Featured Talks
Rta Eas &amp; Pittcon 2010 Sers Featured TalksRta Eas &amp; Pittcon 2010 Sers Featured Talks
Rta Eas &amp; Pittcon 2010 Sers Featured Talks
 
Summary Of Post Doc Synthetic Procedures 2003
Summary Of Post Doc Synthetic Procedures 2003Summary Of Post Doc Synthetic Procedures 2003
Summary Of Post Doc Synthetic Procedures 2003
 
Postdoc Ph D Research Fei 2002
Postdoc Ph D Research Fei 2002Postdoc Ph D Research Fei 2002
Postdoc Ph D Research Fei 2002
 
Sdarticle3
Sdarticle3Sdarticle3
Sdarticle3
 
Ja0265557
Ja0265557Ja0265557
Ja0265557
 

Pittconn 2012 As Cs Fi Sers Talks Food Pathogens

  • 1. Food Borne Pathogen Analysis by Surface-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy Atanu Sengupta, Chetan Shende, Hermes Huang, Stuart Farquharson and Frank Inscore www.rta.biz Visit our Booth
  • 2. 2 Outline The Need - Detection of Foodborne Pathogens The Solution - Surface-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy • Basic Theory and Instrumentation • Proposed Assay Concept • Proposed Field Analysis • Previous (Relevant) RTA Successes The Results
  • 3. 3 The Need/Problem Detection of Foodborne Pathogens • 76 million foodborne illnesses in the US/Year • 325,000 hospitalization in the US/Year • > 5000 deaths in the US/Year • Cost US economy $4 Billion/Year Examples • 2010: Salmonella contaminated eggs • 2009: Salmonella in peanut butter • 2008: Salmonella in peppers • 2007: E. coli in meat (Topps Meat Co. closes)
  • 4. 4 The Goal Detect Foodborne pathogens (Listeria and Salmonella) on equipment surfaces and on/in food. The device must provide the following: • Sensitivity: Detect 1 cell (colony forming units) per mg sample • Speed: Within 2-3.5 hours • Specificity: Identify and discriminate pathogens (No False Positives!) • Reproducibility: Accurate and Repeatable (No False Negatives!)
  • 5. 5 The Goal: Feasibility SERS? Culture Growth Culture Growth /PCR is measured after the stationary phase is reached. Goal, can SERS be used to detect cells long before the stationary Salmonella phase. . . within 2 to 8 hours if possible. Listeria
  • 6. 6 How it works: Raman Light Chemical virt H H Transmitted hνo H H hνvib Absorbed (IR) hνo hνscat H H Raman Raman Scattered hνscat vib1 Rayleigh hνvib vib0 Laser light directed at a chemical generates Raman light.
  • 7. 7 How it Works: SERS 30-80 nm diameter When a molecule is within a plasmon field, the efficiency of Raman scattering can increase by 1 million times! Part-per billion detection becomes possible. Single Molecule Detection: requires 1012 - 1014
  • 8. 8 How it Works: Instrument Sample Grating Phenylalanine O _ C O Raman Intensity + Filter H3N CH CH 2 Laser CCD 500 750 1000 1250 1500 1750 Bin Columns Raman Shift (cm-1) Grating acts like a prism separating light into component colors CCD is just like a digital camera
  • 9. 9 How it Works: RTA’s SERS-ID Analyzer A Portable, Field Usable Analyzer 3.4x5x10”, 5 pounds
  • 10. 10 The Solution: SERS Specificity: Every chemical produces a unique Raman spectrum allowing unequivocal identification. Sensitivity: Silver and gold nanoparticles increase Raman signals by 1 million times or more allowing < ppm detection. SERS: Dipicolinic Acid 1 ppm Dipicolinic Acid Raman: Pure Farquharson, Dipicolinic Acid Maksymiuk & Inscore Appl Spec, 58, 351 (2004)
  • 11. 11 SERS-Active Substrates: Benzenthiol Concentration Enhancement Factor 10-3M 102 10-5M 104 10-8M (~10 ppb) 107
  • 12. 12 How it Works: RTA SERS Sampling Systems 2001: Simple SERS Sample Vials Molecules Sol-Gel Matrix Raman in Solution Scattering 2001 Laser Adsorbed Molecules Metal Particle 2007: SERS LOCs 2004: SERS-Active Capillary 1 10 RTA Patents: 6,623,977; 6,943,031&2, 7,312,088, 7,393,691&2, 7,462,492&3, 7,713,914
  • 13. 13 The Proposal: The Analysis The proposed SERS-FBPD will extract and identify the presence of ~1-10 cells of Salmonella and Listeria on surfaces in 2.5 and 3.5 hours from sample collection, respectively.
  • 14. 14 The Proposal: Feasibility Task 1 – Develop Pathogen Capture. Attach molecular recognition elements (MREs) to gold and silver nanoparticles. Task 2 – Demonstrate Pathogen Capture Measure SERS of both Listeria monocytogenes and Salmonella typhimurium. Task 3 – Determine Sensitivity & Selectivity Measure 105 cfu/mL if possible. Show selective and discriminative binding.
  • 15. 15 The Proposal: SERS-Active Capture Assay Pathogens Target Specific Molecular Recognition Elements Ag Nanoparticles Sol-Gel Layer Glass Surface
  • 16. 16 The Results: Task 1 – Develop Pathogen Capture. 1. Identify best SERS-active sol-gel for Pathogens. Both silver-doped and gold-doped sol-gels produced surface-enhanced Raman spectra for Listeria monocytogenes (G+) and Salmonella typhimurium (G-). Gold SERS of and 109 cfu/mL L. monocytogenes using gold-doped and silver-doped sol-gels. Spectral Conditions: 80 mW of 785 nm Silver laser excitation, 1 minute acquisition. L. monocytogenes
  • 17. 17 The Results: Task 1 – Develop Pathogen Capture. 2. Functionalize best SERS-active sol-gels with Molecular Recognition Elements (MREs). Two types of MREs were investigated for both pathogens. Initially, both MREs worked better on gold. However, slight modifications improved the silver measurements. 3: Go/No Go: Do the MREs produce a signal? Yes, weak, but unique spectral signatures proved successful functionalization. Listeria SERS of MRE2 functionalized Salmonella gold for Listeria and Salmonella. MRE2 on Gold
  • 18. 18 The Results: Task 2 – Demonstrate Pathogen Capture. 4. Measure SERS of L. monocytogenes using MRE1 & 2 functionalized gold-doped sol-gels. SERS were obtained for 107 and 109 cfu/mL L. monocytogenes using MRE1 & 2, respectively. 5. Measure SERS of S. typhimurium using MRE1 & 2 functionalized gold-doped sol-gels. SERS was obtained for 107 cfu/mL S. typhimurium using MRE1 only. 6: Go/No Go: Do L. monocytogenes and S. typhimurium produce SERS signals on their respective assays at nominal concentrations? Yes, very good spectra were obtained for both pathogens at 107 cfu/mL using MRE1. Listeria Listeria SERS of 109 cfu/mL L. monocytogenes and S. typhimurium using MRE1 functionalized Salmonella Salmonella gold. MRE2 on Gold
  • 19. 19 The Results: Task 3 – Determine Sensitivity & Selectivity. 7. Demonstrate selectivity by measuring both pathogens on each others assays. Selective discrimination is at least 3-orders of magnitude. SERS was not obtained at 108 cfu/mL pathogen using the wrong assay, and only modest signals were obtained for 109 cfu/mL pathogen. 105 cfu/mL Listeria 105 cfu/mL Salmonella 109 cfu/mL Salmonella 109 cfu/mL Listeria SERS of L. monocytogenes and SERS of S. typhimurium and S. typhimurium measured on L. monocytogenes measured on Listeria assay using MRE1 Salmonella assay using MRE1 functionalized silver. functionalized silver.
  • 20. 20 The Results: Task 3 – Determine Sensitivity & Selectivity. 8. Measure SERS of L. monocytogenes and S. typhimurium to lowest concentration. Exceptional surface-enhanced Raman spectra were obtained for both pathogens at 105 cfu/mL using MRE1 functionalized gold-doped and silver-doped sol-gels. This concentration represents detection of ~ 103 cells in the measured 10 microL sample volume (~300 cells within the focus of the laser). SERS using MRE2 were 2-3 orders of magnitude less sensitive. 9: Go/No Go: Do L. monocytogenes and S. typhimurium produce SERS signals on their respective assays at least as low as 105 cells/mL Yes, in fact both pathogens were detected at 103 cells in the measured 10 microL sample volume. Listeria SERS of and 105 cfu/mL (300 cells) L. monocytogenes and S. typhimurium using MRE1 functionalized gold. Salmonella
  • 21. 21 The Results: Feasibility Task 1 – Develop Pathogen Capture. Two types of molecular recognition elements (MREs) for both the Listeria and Salmonella genus were successfully attached to gold and silver nanoparticles. Task 2 – Demonstrate Pathogen Capture Surface-enhanced Raman spectra were obtained for both Listeria monocytogenes and Salmonella typhimurium. The 109 cfu/mL samples were incubated in the sol-gel capillaries for 45 minutes, washed, then measured in 1 minute. Task 3 – Determine Sensitivity & Selectivity Both pathogens could be detected at 105 cfu/mL, the equivalent of 300 cells within the focus of the laser. This included a 2 minute centrifugation to concentrate the cells. Discrimination was at least 3-orders of magnitude at this concentration (the non- specific pathogen had to have a concentration of >108 cfu/mL to be detected).
  • 22. 22 The Results: Technology Comparison RTA-2012 Culture Growth Culture Growth /PCR is measured after the stationary phase is reached. The SERS-FBPD will be measured after 1.5 and 2.5 hours of lag and log phase Salmonella growth for Salmonella and Listeria, respectively. Listeria
  • 23. 23 Future Work Task 4 – Achieve Required Cell Detection. Task 5 – Design and Build Lab-on-Chips. Task 6 – Test Lab-on-Chips. Visit our Booth
  • 24. 24 Providing Chemical Information When & Where You Need It Mission: To provide superior chemical analyzers (faster, portable, easy to use, rugged, more sensitive, less expensive) To meet specific needs of Department of Defense (Fuel Analysis, IED Identification) Homeland Security (CWA, BWA, IED Identification) Chemical Manufacturing Industry (Process Control) Medical (Drugs, HIV, TB) General Information: Launched: September 1, 2001 Experience: >75 years of Raman, >40 years SERS, >40 years analyzer design Products: RamanPro, RamanID, Portable Fuel Analyzer, Chemical Residue Analyzer, Simple SERS Sample Vials, SERS Capillaries, SERS Microplates