Secure by design and secure software development

IINFOSECFORCENFOSECFORCE
1
Application SecurityApplication Security
BILL ROSS
Application Security
BILL ROSS
15 Sept 2008
““ Balancing security controls to business requirements “Balancing security controls to business requirements “

SecuritySecurity and Project Lifecycles
Security and Lifecycle Management Process
(SLCMP)
Said “slickum”
A “practitioner’s” view …..
Bill Ross

Slickum brief objectivesSlickum brief objectives
 Purpose:
- Discuss application security issues
- Describe web application information security
- To describe a process by which software is securely developed
 Expected outcome:
- An increased awareness of how to prevent web application attacks
- How to implement the SLCMP process into the SDLC
- More securely built applications and infrastructure

What You Need to KnowWhat You Need to Know
4
Symantec Internet Security Threat Report, Volume XIV

 Less rigor in Web programming, an increasing variety of software, and
restrictions on Web security testing have combined to make flaws in Web software
the most reported security issues, according to the Common Vulnerabilities
and Exposures (CVE) project.
 Web and business applications are increasingly compromised around the
world causing businesses to loose millions of dollars through data compromise
 Hacking is no longer for fun …… it is for profit …. Internal or external hackers
exploit weaknesses in application code to achieve their objectives.
 Symantec 2008 Cyber report indicates there are 1,656, 227 number of new
threats in the wild
Operational reportOperational report

1. Phishing. The use of e-mails that appear to originate from a trusted source to trick a user into entering
valid credentials at a fake website. Typically the e-mail and the web site looks like they are part of a bank the
user is doing business with.
2. Malicious Code Software (e.g., Trojan horse) that appears to perform a useful or desirable function, but
actually gains unauthorized access to system resources or tricks a user into executing other malicious logic.
Malware A generic term for a number of different types of malicious code.
3. Spam Electronic junk mail or junk newsgroup postings.
4. Worms. A computer program that can run independently, can propagate a complete working version of
itself onto other hosts on a network, and may consume computer resources destructively.
5. Trojan. A computer program that appears to have a useful function, but also has a hidden and potentially
malicious function that evades security mechanisms, sometimes by exploiting legitimate authorizations of a
system entity that invokes the program.
6. Virus. A hidden, self-replicating section of computer software, usually malicious logic, that propagates by
infecting - i.e., inserting a copy of itself into and becoming part of - another program. A virus cannot run by itself;
it requires that its host program be run to make the virus active.
8. Key stroke logger. Practice of tracking(or logging) the keys struck on a keyboard typically in a covert
manner so that the person using the keyboard is unaware that their actions are being monitored
9. Denial of service. The prevention of authorized access to a system resource or the delaying of system
operations and functions
10. Web application attacks
Common attack toolsCommon attack tools

““ the Cyber Battle Field”the Cyber Battle Field”
Computer attacks on Google that the search giant said originated in China
were part of a concerted political and corporate espionage effort that exploited
security flaws in e-mail attachments to sneak into the networks of major
financial, defense and technology companies and research institutions in the
United States, security experts said. (New York Times)
Google China cyber attack part of vast espionage campaign, experts say
Washington (DC) - Yesterday, the FBI announced it considers cyber
attacks to be the third greatest threat to the security of the United
States. The only two preceding it are nuclear war and weapons of mass
destruction (WMD). JAN 2009

• In 2008, Symantec blocked an average of more than 245 million
attempted malicious code attacks worldwide each month.
• Over 60% of Symantec’s malicious code signatures were created in
2008.
• Over 90% of threats discovered in 2008 are threats to confidential
information.
Malicious code is installedMalicious code is installed
Symantec Internet Security Threat Report

Cyber criminals
want YOUR
information
• Focus on exploits
targeting end-users
for financial gain
Web-based
malicious activity
has accelerated
• Primary vector for
malicious activity
• Target reputable,
high-traffic
websites
Increased
sophistication of the
Underground Economy
• Well-established
infrastructure for
monetizing stolen
information
Rapid adaptation to
security measures
• Relocating operations
to new geographic
areas
• Evade traditional
security protection
Symantec Internet Security Threat Report
“The attacks are more aggressive than ever and they’re more criminal than ever,” says Dave Cole, director of Symantec Security Response.
The bad guys are also more organized. The report says they are working together to create “global, cooperative networks” to support their criminal activity.
It’s not quite the Mafia, but there is an entire underground economy in place to deal with all the stolen information up for sale.”
Key trendsKey trends

Key Trends – Global ActivityKey Trends – Global Activity
• Data breaches can
lead to identity
theft
• Theft and loss top
cause of data
leakage for overall
data breaches and
identities exposed
• Threat activity
increases with
growth in
Internet/Broadband
usage
• Documented
vulnerabilities up
19% (5491)
• Top attacked
vulnerability:
Exploits by
Downadup
• 95% vulnerabilities
attacked were
client-side
• Trojans made up 68
percent of the
volume of the top
50 malicious code
• 66% of potential
malicious code
infections
propagated as
shared executable
files
• 76% phishing lures target
Financial services (up
24%)
• Detected 55,389 phishing
website hosts (up 66%)
• Detected 192% increase
in spam across the
Internet with 349.6
billion messages
• 90% spam email
distributed by Bot
networks
Internet Security Threat Report

11
Website compromiseWebsite compromise
• Attackers locate and compromise a high-traffic site through a vulnerability
specific to the site or in a Web application it hosts
• Once the site is compromised, attackers modify pages so malicious content is
served to visitors
Web application vulnerabilitiesSite-specific
vulnerabilities
11Internet Security Threat Report,

Impact of Security DefectsImpact of Security Defects
Bad Business
• On average, there are 5 to 15 defects in
every 1,000 lines of code
 US Dept. of Defense and the Software
Engineering Institute
Slow Business
• It takes 75 minutes on average to track
down one defect. Fixing one of these
defects takes 2 to 9 hours each
 5 Year Pentagon Study
• Researching each of the 4,200
vulnerabilities published by CERT last year
for 10 minutes would have required 1
staffer to research for 17.5 full workweeks
or 700 hours
 Intel White paper, CERT, ICSA Labs
Loss of Business
• A company with 1,000 servers can spend
$300,000 to test & deploy a patch; most
companies deploy several patches a week
 Gartner Group

The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) estimates that code fixes performed
after release can result in 30 times the cost of fixes performed during the design phase.
The SDL Reduces the Total CostThe SDL Reduces the Total Cost
of Developmentof Development

Broken access control
SUN
Top 10 Web Security ThreatsTop 10 Web Security Threats
Unvalidated input
Improper error handling
Insecure storage
Application denial-of-service
Insecure configuration management
Injection flaws
Buffer overflows
Cross-site scripting (XSS)Broken authentication

Web Application Security ThreatsWeb Application Security Threats
1. Unvalidated input (Mother of all Web Tiered Attacks)
Attacker can tamper any part of the HTTP request. SQL injection, Cross Site Scripting, buffer overflows(URL,
Cookies, Form Fields, Hidden Fields, Headers )
2. Broken Access Control
Insecured IDs, Poor file permissions, Service account exploit, Path Traversal
3. Broken Authentication and Session Management
Focus is in USER authentication and user active sessions. Example is if “cookies” not proper protected,
attacker can assume the identity of user
4. Cross site scripting
Malicious script sent to server which is then sent to user accessing same server (Chat server). User believes
script came from trusted source. (Can come in any form of active scripting (Java, Active X, Shockwave, Flash
and etc)

5. Buffer Overflow Errors
Attackers use buffer overflows to corrupt the execution stack of a web application By sending
carefully crafted input to a web application, an attacker can cause the web application to execute
arbitrary code. Present in both the web server or application server products or the web
application itself
6. Injection Flaws
Injection flaws allow attackers to relay malicious code through a web application to another
system. When a web application passes information from an HTTP request through as part of an external request,
the attacker can inject special (meta) characters, malicious commands, or command modifiers into the information
7 . Improper Error Handling
The most common problem is when detailed internal error messages such as stack traces,
database dumps, and error codes are displayed to a potential hacker . These messages reveal
implementation details that should never be revealed.
8. Application DOS
Types of resources Bandwidth, database connections, disk storage, CPU, memory, threads, or
application specific resources. Application level resources impacting
Web Application Security Threats 2Web Application Security Threats 2

Source: IBM
Hacker targetsHacker targets
• From observed hacker malicious activity statistics, we know that hackers are now seldom
interested in defeating the network or the infrastructure low-level defenses. The
adversaries today are well aware of the fact that applications are typically less defended
than the rest of the IT infrastructure.
Attack vector analysesAttack vector analyses
A Garner report states “
that over 75% of attacks
against websites and web-
based applications come at
the application layer and
not lower infrastructure and
network layers.”

Application security paradoxApplication security paradox
SOURCE: SPIDYNAMICS
Internet DMZ Trusted
Inside
Corporate
Inside
HTTP(S)
IMAP, FTP
SSH , TELNET
POP3, XML
Firewall only
allows PORT 80
(or 443 SSL)
traffic from the
Internet to the
web server.
Any – Web
Server: 80
Firewall only
allows
applications
on the web
server to talk to
application
server.
Firewall only allow
application server
to talk to
database server.
IIS
SunOne
Apache
ASP
.NET
WebSphere
Java
SQL
Oracle
DB2
Applications, data and business processes are
vulnerable even when a robust network and
infrastructure security program is in place.

Is nothing sacred anymore ???? 
Super Bowl exploits
“ At last week's RSA Conference in San Francisco, just days after
the Super Bowl attack, I sat down with Thompson. On his laptop,
he showed me the simple line of Javascript code that pointed
Super Bowl site visitors to a known criminal hacker exploit server.
Apparently, there was a cross-site scripting error on the official
Super Bowl Web site that allowed some criminal hackers to inject
a poisoned iFrame command. And it wasn't just the Super Bowl
site--it turns out there were several others, mostly healthcare
related, including the U.S. Centers for Disease Control “
Source
Robert Vamosi
Senior editor, CNET Reviews
Hacking the Super BowlHacking the Super Bowl

How did this happen ?How did this happen ?
Business engines fueled by multiple and powerful applications

Microsoft’s vision for secure
and
Easy
“ anywhere access ”
Bill Gates, 2007 RSA
Expanding “e-com” perimeterExpanding “e-com” perimeter

Microsoft’s vision for secure
and
Easy
“ anywhere access ”
Bill Gates, 2007 RSA
Expanding “e-com” perimeterExpanding “e-com” perimeter
Social networks, I-Pod, I-PAD as a network, peripheral-geddon
&
“THE CLOUD”

Security coding errorsSecurity coding errors

Prevent & fortifyPrevent & fortify

This ….. IBM believesThis ….. IBM believes
Application Security Strategies
Engineering security into application systems is a critical discipline
and should be a key component in multi-disciplinary, concurrent or
distributed development teams. This applies to the development,
integration, operation, administration, maintenance and evolution of
e-Business application systems as well as to the development,
delivery, and evolution of software-based products.
Source: IBM

 Frequent
• 3 out of 4 business websites are
vulnerable to attack (Gartner)
 Pervasive
• Majority of hacks occur at the Application
level (Gartner)
 Undetected
• QA testing tools not designed to detect
security defects in applications
Security Defects MatterSecurity Defects Matter
SOURCE: Seagate Technology
Security Business CaseSecurity Business Case
 Expensive
• Bugs and software defects costs the
national economy $60 billion annually …
delivering quality applications to the
market has become a mandatory requirement
… the cost of fixing defects after deployment
is almost 100 times greater than detecting and
eliminating them during development.
1000 application sample ‘Healthchecks’
with AppScan – 98% vulnerable: all had
firewalls and encryption solutions in
place…
=

Best practice solutionsBest practice solutions
 Application security requirements define the high level specifications for securely
developing and deploying applications
Application Planning
 Data Classification – Classify
data according to the sensitivity of
the data.
 Risk Assessment – Conduct
preliminary risk assessment before
development begins and after
planning is complete. Security
Requirements – Identify and
document the security requirements
of the application early in the
development lifecycle.
 Security Design – Use the Data
Classification process to determine
specific security services needed by
the application
 SDLC – Address security within
all stages of the SDLC.
Application Development
Minimal set of coding practices
 Input Validation – Validate input
from all sources.
 Default deny – Access control
should be based on specific
permission rather than exclusion.
 By default all access should be
denied.
 Principle of Least Privilege –
Perform all processes with the least
set of required privileges
 Quality Assurance – Quality
assurance identifies and eliminates
software vulnerabilities.
 Perform internal testing – Use
source code auditing, pen testing,
manual code review, or automated
source code review
Prod and Maintenance
 Applications shall be hosted on
servers compliant with the corporate
Security requirements for IT system
hardening
 Applications classified as
sensitive shall at a minimum have
annual vulnerability assessments,
when a significant change to the
application has occurred, or
depending on the data sensitivity
and risk.

TARGET THESE AREAS
 Minimize attack surface area
 Secure defaults
 Principle of least privilege
 Principle of defense in depth
 Fail securely
 External systems are insecure
 Separation of duties
 Do not trust security through obscurity
 Simplicity
 Fix security issues correctly
SUN
Principles of Secure ProgrammingPrinciples of Secure Programming

Application security risk analysesApplication security risk analyses
Hardened infrastructure (will not block port 80 attacks)Relevant
controls
HighRisk summary
HighOverall risk
rating
HighRisk Impact
rating
HighLikelihood
rating
Multiple avenues of attack on organizational vital information
assets
Risk
Numerous threats such as:
- SQL injection, cross site scripting, buffer overflow
Threat
Not having a dedicated security program that trains developers to
build secure applications, not embedding security into the SDLC,
not conducting security testing on applications during and after
development, and not having application firewalls
Vulnerability
Follow application security planning, development and production
best practices. Build security into all SDLC phases.
Risk mitigation

SLCMPSLCMP
Embed information security in the SDLCEmbed information security in the SDLC
and PLCMP by applying the practicesand PLCMP by applying the practices
and procedures defined in SLCMPand procedures defined in SLCMP

““ Building highly secure software is nothing less thanBuilding highly secure software is nothing less than
an eloquently choreographed dance that calls uponan eloquently choreographed dance that calls upon
the talent and skills of the developer, projectthe talent and skills of the developer, project
manager and information security teaming to ensuremanager and information security teaming to ensure
that an application securely glides with grace acrossthat an application securely glides with grace across
the technical stage ”the technical stage ”
An art form

SLCMPSLCMP and theand the SDLC …SDLC …“The Dance”“The Dance”
Statement of need
for new business
process,
application or
technology
Functional
requirements
document
designed
Design and
technical
architecture
developed
Code
development
1 st phase
prod testing
QA
Initiate Design/Develop Implement
Pre prod Prod Post Prod
Production
INFOSEC participation
in feasibility analyses,
no documentation
required
Build the System Security Plan
based on NIST 800-53 control
guidelines. Preliminary risk and
vulnerability assessment done.
Measures requirements against
policy and provides functional
adjustments. Security
requirements stated based on
preliminary risk and vulnerability
assessments. If necessary,
requirements document
adjusted
INFOSEC architecture
document created based
on data security
categorization, policy,
application functionality
and risk and vulnerability
assessments
Integrate controls
and create detailed
application security
test plan defining
testing tools,
timelines, remedial
action processes and
testers. Gain
approval from project
manager.
First phase
application security
testing. Once code
begins solidifying,
use soft tools such as
AppScan or Spi
Dynamics for high
level testing.
Feedback findings to
developers for code
correction
Second phase app security
testing using formalized
process to decompile code
as much as possible to
determine if code has
organic exposures violating
policy, security design, and
the security architecture.
Correct findings and provide
to developers to fix or define
mitigating controls. Aspect
security has expertise in
this area
Third phase app
security test which
follows phase one
testing process.
Used as final
verification that
code is stable
from INFOSEC
perspective
Create final
risk
acceptance
document
Application and
infrastructure
penetration testing
Server cert
2 nd phase
prod testing
Ongoing pen
tests,
vulnerability
assessments,
risk
management
* * Security certification
and accreditation should
be finalized

SLCMP DeliverablesSLCMP Deliverables
InitiateInitiate DevelopDevelop ImplementImplement ProductionProduction
- Data security categorization
- Preliminary risk assessment
- Security plan
- Risk assessment
- Functional requirements
analyses
- Assurance requirements
- Control selection
- Security control integration
- Second phase app security
testing
- Third phase app security testing
- Security certification
- Security accreditation
- Threat management
- Configuration
management and control
- Continuous monitoring
- Incident response plan
- Security architecture
- Functional and vulnerability
test plan
- First phase testing
- Additional planning
assignments

Control selection begins.
Defines high level technical
and security architecture.
Detailed technical and
security design
Validate designs, validate cost
estimates, and implement final
solutions and designs
Operations provide operational
support for all final solutions and
designs implemented as part of the
infrastructure.
Demand manger reviews the request
and categorizes project type as a
small, medium, or larger project.
• Architecture
Standards and
Convergence
• Project Review
• Scoping
• Solution Design
• Cost Estimation
• Security architecture
• Design and technical
architecture developed
• Architecture Review
• Detailed Design
• Level 4 Support design
• Implementation
• Change Management
Capacity Monitoring
• Day to Day Operations
planning
• Define Security requirements
• Preliminary risk assessment
• Patch management
• Monitoring
• Incident response
• Security administration
• KPI reporting on
security metrics
• Data and Infrastructure
Categorization
• Risk assessment
• Functional requirements analyses
• Assurance requirements analyses
• Control selection and standard
integration
• Security architecture
• Security test plan design
• Control selection and standard
integration
• Security control
integration
• Security penetration and
vulnerability testing
• Security certification
• Security accreditation
• Final risk assessment
• Design security controls
• Begin organizing security
plan development
• Threat management
• Ongoing pen and vulnerability
testing
• Determines validity of security
architecture
• Determines security process
shortfalls
• Determines product successful
functionality and shortfalls
• Security administration
• Security monitoring
INPUT
SECURITY PLAN
FEEDBACK
SLCMP and the PLCMPSLCMP and the PLCMP
Initiate Design/Develop Implement Production

SLCMP adopted guidelinesSLCMP adopted guidelines
In system security plan, provides a an
overview of the security requirements for
the information system and documents the
security controls planned or in place
SP 800-18
Security Control
Documentation
Defines category of information
system according to potential
impact of loss
FIPS 199 / SP 800-60
Security
Categorization
Selects minimum security controls (i.e.,
safeguards and countermeasures) planned or
in place to protect the information system
FIPS 200 / SP 800-53
Security Control
Selection
Determines extent to which the security
controls are implemented correctly, operating
as intended, and producing desired outcome
with respect to meeting security
requirements
SP 800-53A / SP 800-26 / SP 800-37
Security Control
Assessment
SP 800-53 / FIPS 200 / SP 800-30
Security Control
Refinement
Uses risk assessment to adjust minimum control
set based on local conditions, required threat
coverage, and specific agency requirements
SP 800-37
System
Authorization
Determines risk to agency operations, agency
assets, or individuals and, if acceptable,
authorizes information system processing
SP 800-37
Security Control
Monitoring
Continuously tracks changes to the
information system that may affect security
controls and assesses control effectiveness
Implements security controls in
new or legacy information
systems; implements security
configuration checklists
Security Control
Implementation
SP 800-70
Starting Point
SLCMPSLCMP
INPUTSINPUTS
Source: NIST

SLCMP BenefitsSLCMP Benefits
 Fortified applications or infrastructure projects
 Hardened against internal and external attack
 Meets regulatory compliance mandates
 Enhances IS staff knowledge and capability
 Reduces long term costs
SLCMP ROI

ConclusionsConclusions
• 80 % of all attacks on Information Security are directed to the
web application layer
• 2/3 of all web applications are vulnerable
• Infrastructure security doesn’t directly protect code
• The cost of fixing defects after deployment is almost one
hundred times greater than detecting and eliminating them during
design
• One of the most significant risk mitigations an organization can
implement is to create a consistent end-to-end process such as
the SLCMP to embed security and security testing and certification
in infrastructure and software development projects

38
QUESTIONS

BACK UP SLIDES

Initiate deliverablesInitiate deliverables
Data security Categorization Rate application importance as a low, medium, or high impact
application. This is a business impact analyses which defines impact on
an organization if security controls are breeched. Leads to proper
selection of security controls required.
Preliminary risk assessment Measures application/project requirements against policy and provides
functional adjustments. Security requirements stated based on
preliminary risk and vulnerability assessments. If necessary,
requirements document adjusted. Focuses on early assessment of the
application's requirements for confidentiality, integrity and availability
(CIA)

Develop and designDevelop and design
Risk assessment Conducted before the approval of the design specifications. Builds on the initial risk
assessment but more specific. Identifies possible threats/vulnerabilities. Determines
impact on organization if threat occurred. Identifies imposed risks on other assets.
Additional controls needed to prevent identified risks need to be fed back to the
development team
Security plan Foundation for entire SLCMP process. Ensures all controls, architectures, risk
assessments, test requirements, accreditation/assurance and personnel responsibilities
are documented.
Functional requirements
analyses
Ensure that enterprise security policy and standards are followed. Determine which laws
must be followed by the application.
Assurance requirements
analyses
Determine what level of certification application requires. For example, government
applications might require a FISMA C&A.

Develop …..continuedDevelop …..continued
Control selection Can refer to security control standards or use a NIST-like Information Security
Requirements List to define security environment that an application, service, or project
should meet.
Security architecture Multi faceted security product linking all controls, standards, policies, governance,
platform hooks, data base management, boundary rules and information security
science into a cohesive operational CIA security sphere. Likely section of the Security
plan.
Functional and vulnerability
test plan
Multi phase technical plan designed to ensure security controls work and that business
logic and software are impervious to corruption and manipulation. Will also include
penetration test plans. Feeds assurance models.
First phase testing Provides developers early high level look at code stability
Additional planning
components
RFPs, SOW, Funding, Test lab, software requirements, staff increases, and etc

Implement deliverablesImplement deliverables
Security control
integration
Security control settings and switches enabled IAW Security plan and architecture
Second phase app
security testing
Formalized process to decompile code as much as possible to determine if code has
organic exposures violating policy, security design, and the security architecture. Correct
findings and provide to developers to fix or define mitigating controls. Aspect security has
expertise in this area
Third phase app security
testing
Verifies second phase corrections. Use App security test tool following phase one testing
process. Used as final verification that code is stable from INFOSEC perspective
Security certification Pen testing, third party evaluation, test plan results approved, servers hardened and
certified , control effectiveness, governance attestation
RMP/Security
accreditation
End-to-end risk evaluation incorporating all findings in security certification, final
information security risk decisions, accreditation document signed

Production deliverablesProduction deliverables
Threat management TM preventive guidance found in security plan. Ongoing oversight of environment
entailing constant environmental and risk management vigilance surrounding operational
environment.
Configuration
management and control
Operational process and plan to ensure environment receives current security patches and
other software preventive updates ensuring application or environment integrity is
maintained
Continuous monitoring Implement vulnerability management program to regularly assess integrity and availability
of the operating environment. Use COSO testing and other vulnerability assessment and
control processes to ensure that security processes and procedures work.
Incident response plan Local Incident Response Plan will provide process and procedures to rapidly respond to all
security events and incidents.

SDLC/PLCMP DeliverablesSDLC/PLCMP Deliverables
- Security control integration
- Second phase app security testing
- Third phase app security testing
Implement
- Data security categorization - Security Plan
- Preliminary risk assessment
Initiate
- Threat management
- Configuration management and control
- Continuous monitoring
- Incident response plan
Production
- Risk assessment
- Functional requirements analyses
- Assurance requirements
- Control selection
Design and
develop
- Security architecture
- Functional and vulnerability
test plan
- First phase testing
- Additional planning
assignments
- Security certification
- Security accreditation
- Final risk acceptance
document
REF: NIST 800-53

Secure by design and secure software development

Empfohlen

Empfohlen

Weitere ähnliche Inhalte

Was ist angesagt?

Was ist angesagt? (20)

Ähnlich wie Secure by design and secure software development

Ähnlich wie Secure by design and secure software development (20)

Mehr von Bill Ross

Mehr von Bill Ross (10)

Kürzlich hochgeladen

Kürzlich hochgeladen (20)

Secure by design and secure software development

Hinweis der Redaktion