The Indian Dental Academy is the Leader in continuing dental education , training dentists in all aspects of dentistry and offering a wide range of dental certified courses in different formats.
Indian dental academy provides dental crown & Bridge,rotary endodontics,fixed orthodontics,
Dental implants courses.for details pls visit www.indiandentalacademy.com ,or call
0091-9248678078
social pharmacy d-pharm 1st year by Pragati K. Mahajan
Bonding in orthodontics /certified fixed orthodontic courses by Indian dental academy
1. 1
BONDING IN ORTHODONTICS– II
INDIAN DENTAL ACADEMY
Leader in continuing dental education
www.indiandentalacademy.com
www.indiandentalacademy.com
2. 2
CONTENTS
1. Evolution of bonding agents
2. Banding
3. Indirect bonding
4. Bonding to special surfaces
5. Bond strength
6. Debonding
7. Decalcification and
demineralization
www.indiandentalacademy.com
3. 3
EVOLUTION OF BONDING MATERIALS
“An appliance which
cannot be made
transparent or tooth-
colored should at least be
made smaller.”
www.indiandentalacademy.com
5. 5
Laborious, time-consuming, skill
Partially erupted teeth
Decalcification /discoloration
Gingival irritation
Unaesthetic
Need of separators
Closure of band spaces – “What you see is not
what you get”
www.indiandentalacademy.com
7. 7
3 major developments that made bonding of
attachments to teeth possible –
1. BUONOCORE 1955 – improved retention of
methyl methacrylate to enamel – 85% phosphoric
acid for 30 seconds
2. BOWEN 1962 – bis Glycidyl methacrylate –
more stable and greater strength
3. NEWMAN 1965 – first to acid etch and bond
orthodontic brackets with epoxy resin
www.indiandentalacademy.com
8. 8
Orthodontic attachments had to be cemented on
teeth instead of the intermediary bands-
Methylmethacrylate monomer –MMA – first
material to be used
Catalyst – Benzoyl peroxide –BPO
Powder-liquid system
In use in restorative dentistry
•Poor adhesion - Polymerization shrinkage
•Pulpal irritation
www.indiandentalacademy.com
9. 9
BUONOCORE (1955) –
Improved retention of methyl methacrylate to
enamel – 85% phosphoric acid for 30 seconds
Not successful for orthodontic purposes –
• Occlusal force
• Wide range of oral thermal change
• Wet environment
www.indiandentalacademy.com
10. 10
G. V. NEWMAN (1965)
Bonded plastic brackets with epoxy resins
Start of direct bonding procedure
For short-term treatment with anterior brackets
Did not replace ‘metal-band’ system
www.indiandentalacademy.com
11. 11
First commercially available orthodontic adhesives
1. OIS Adhesive system – OIS company in 1969
2. Bracket Bond – GAC in 1970
MMA -BPO-amine catalyst system
Weak Adhesion
Early 70s - all adhesives consisted of MMA - it
bonded chemically to plastic brackets – in vogue
www.indiandentalacademy.com
13. 13
Merits of MMA adhesives:
1. Plastic brackets
2. Good storage stability
3. Increased working time – brush-on / dip-in
4. Elimination of sealant - good penetration into
enamel surface
5. Less damage during debonding
www.indiandentalacademy.com
14. 14
Demerits of MMA adhesives:
1. Fluctuating proportion of powder-liquid
depending on operator
2. Poor mechanical interlocking to metal bracket
bases
www.indiandentalacademy.com
15. 15
Metal brackets enter the scene
Plastic – worry about enamel-adhesive
Enamel-adhesive & adhesive-bracket
Adhesive-bracket -Mesh, perforated pad , foil mesh
Enamel-adhesive –
•Increased hardness of adhesive
•MMA BisGMA
•Filler material - TEGDMA
www.indiandentalacademy.com
16. 16
Bisphenol Glycidyl Dimethacrylate (Bis-GMA)
BOWEN 1962
• Greater strength
• Lower water absorption
• Less polymerization shrinkage
2-paste system
Strongest adhesives for metal brackets
www.indiandentalacademy.com
17. 17
FILLERS:
Reduce viscosity of resin
Reduce polymerization shrinkage
Quartz, silica glass particles
3 - 20 microns - abrasion resistance
0.2 – 0.3 microns - smooth surface - less plaque
retention
Adhesives with large particle fillers recommended
for extra bond strength, but careful removal of
excess is mandatory
www.indiandentalacademy.com
19. 19
Merit and demerit of Bis-GMA – hardness
Poor penetration due to increased viscosity –
dilute with MMA
Plastic brackets could not be used – primer for
partially dissolving added
Active life less than powder liquid system
www.indiandentalacademy.com
20. 20
In 1974 – ORTHOMITE II – 20% more
HNPM –
hydroxynapthoxypropylmethacrylate
Eliminated silane
4 - META – methacryloxyethyl trimellitate
anhydride
ORTHOMITE SUPER BOND
www.indiandentalacademy.com
21. 21
4 - META
Plastic & metal
PRE-PRIMED brackets
Base was primed with adhesive
Bracket base covered with PMMA powder
Base dipped in monomer and pressed onto
etched surface.
Bond strength less than manual application
www.indiandentalacademy.com
22. 22
Orthodontic adhesives are variations of-
Adhesives
Direct-restorative materials used in
restorative dentistry
Late 20th
century –direct restorative biomaterials
1. Resin-matrix – originated in U.S.
2. Salt-matrix – U.K.
www.indiandentalacademy.com
23. 23
1. RESIN MATRIX:
Classification -
According to organic matrix components -
A. Acrylic resins – MMA Ex. ORTHOMITE, GENIE
B. Diacrylate resins- BisGMA Ex.CONCISE, PHASE II
According to polymerisation mechanism –
A. Chemically activated
B. Light-cured
C. Dual-cured
D. Thermocured
www.indiandentalacademy.com
24. 24
A. CHEMICALLY ACTIVATED:
Chemically-cured/ Auto-cured / Self-cured
Used since beginning of bonding
Most-widely used ortho adhesives
Two-paste / one-paste
Two-paste system:
Initiator- Benzyl peroxide in monomer
Activator- tertiary amine – dihydroxyethyl –p-
toluidine
www.indiandentalacademy.com
25. 25
Ex. Concise (3M)
Good bond strength
Laborious
Time-consuming
Increased air-exposure- oxygen inhibition
Defects – air entrapment, voids
www.indiandentalacademy.com
26. 26
One-paste system:
One adhesive component applied to bracket base
and other on tooth surface – catalyst gradient
No-mixing
Bracket positioned accurately - pressed firmly
into place
Curing occurs – 30-60 secs
Ex. Rely-a-bond, System 1+, Unite
www.indiandentalacademy.com
27. 27
Procedure simplified
Fast
Efficient
Little long term information available on bond
strength
Inhomogeneous polymerisation – sandwich
technique
Enamel and bracket side more polymerized
Liquid activators – toxic, allergic reactions
www.indiandentalacademy.com
28. 28
B. LIGHT-CURED:
Visible-light cured
Camphoroquinone
Cure from incisal and gingival areas
Increased working time
Ideal for educational purpose
DC same as Chemical-cure; same for metal
and ceramic brackets
Photocuring time-consuming
www.indiandentalacademy.com
29. 29
C. DUAL-CURED:
Intiation – exposure to light
Propagation – chemically cured
Advantages of light and chemically cured
Improved surface and bulk material properties
Highest DC, bond strength
Ideal for bonding molar tubes
Most time-consuming
Bulk defect due to mixing
www.indiandentalacademy.com
30. 30
D. THERMO-CURED:
Exposure to heat
Superior properties
Not for direct but only indirect bonding
www.indiandentalacademy.com
31. 31
Adhesives acting in the presence of water –
1. MOISTURE-RESISTANT –
- can bond in presence of water
- saliva, gingival fluid – contaminants
- ex. Transbond MIP
2. MOISTURE-ACTIVE –
- need water for bonding
- enamel surface intentionally made wet
- Cyanoacrylate – no liquid, only paste
- ex. Smartbond
www.indiandentalacademy.com
33. 33
Crabb and Wilson – 1971- compared with
polycarboxylate cement – poor
performance and bond strength,
unsuitable for clinical use
Howells and Jones – 1994 – poor
performance on storage in saline for a
week
Krishnan et al – 1994 –equal to Bis-GMA
when kept in 37o
C for 24 hours
www.indiandentalacademy.com
34. 34
THOMAS W. - JCO 2000 - Compared the shear
bond strength and debonding effects of Smart-
Bond & Rely-a-bond
•Smart-Bond’s strength was significantly
higher
•No danger of fracturing the enamel
•Polycarbonate bracket - work only if they
are pretreated with water
www.indiandentalacademy.com
35. 35
Ideal characteristics of Bonding medium:
1. Non-toxic
2. Adequate working and setting time
3. Moderate viscosity
4. Ability to wet etched surface
5. Sufficient tensile and compressive strength -
retain bracket & ease of debonding
6. Resist decomposition in the oral environment
7. Antimicrobial
www.indiandentalacademy.com
36. 36
Evaluation of antimicrobial properties of
orthodontic composite resin combined with
benzalkonium chloride
Othman et al,AJO Sep2002
The antimicrobial agent benzalkonium chloride
added to a chemically cured composite resin
Anti microbial benefits and bond strength of the
modified composite were evaluated.
www.indiandentalacademy.com
37. 37
Results:
No significant difference between the tensile
bond strength between modified composite and
the original product
The incorporated BAC added to anti microbial
properties of original composite without
altering it’s mechanical properties
www.indiandentalacademy.com
38. 38
2. SALT MATRIX:
CEMENTS IN ORTHODONTICS:
Desirable properties:
1. Adequate working and setting time
2. High tensile, compressive and shear stress
3. Resistant to dissolution
4. Clinically acceptable bond strength
5. Low Adhesive Remnant Index (ARI) on
debonding
6. Anticariogenic potential
www.indiandentalacademy.com
41. 41
ZINC PHOSPHATE:
Oldest of the luting cements
Powder and liquid system
Film thickness of 20 microns
Efficient mixing characteristics
Mechanical adhesion
Pulpal irritant - highly acidic
May cause decalcification of enamel resulting
in white spots
www.indiandentalacademy.com
42. 42
ZINC SILICOPHOSPHATE:
Addition of silicate glass
Superior strength and fluoride releasing property
Extremely acidic
High solubility
No longer used
www.indiandentalacademy.com
43. 43
ZINC POLYCARBOXYLATE CEMENT:
Introduced by Smith in 1968
First cement system that developed a chemical
bond to the tooth structure.
Early 70s –Durelon – poor bond strength
Combined desirable properties of Zn-
phosphate & ZOE
www.indiandentalacademy.com
44. 44
Acid-base reaction
Chemical bond to tooth
Fluoride release
Shorter setting time
Viscous liquid – less efficient mixing
characteristics - PSEUDOELASTIC
www.indiandentalacademy.com
45. 45
GLASS IONOMER CEMENTS:
Developed and introduced in 1974 byWilson, Kent
and Smith.
To combine strength and fluoride release of
silicophosphate and adhesive efficiency of
carboxylate
Group of materials that use silicate glass powder
and an aqueous solution of Polyalkeonic acids
www.indiandentalacademy.com
46. 46
Setting reaction:
Surface of glass particles is attacked by acid
Ca, Al, Na, Fl ions-leached into aqueous medium
Next 24 hours a new phase forms in which
aluminium ions become bound within the cement
matrix leading to a more rigid set cement
NaF uniformly dispersed in the set cement.
Unreacted portion of glass particles sheathed by
silica gel.
www.indiandentalacademy.com
47. 47
Unreacted powder particles surrounded by a
silica gel in an amorphous matrix of hydrated
Ca++ and Al+++ polysalts.
During initial reaction if mix contaminated by
additional water or ambient air - dissolution of
matrix - weak and more soluble cement
Adhesion- chelation of carboxyl groups of
polyacids with Ca in apatite of enamel & dentin
www.indiandentalacademy.com
48. 48
Biological properties :
Chemical adhesion
Bacteriostatic or bactericidal due to fluoride
release.
Acid - less irritating to the surrounding tissues
Enamel etching for luting bands not required
Reduces demineralization
Highest strength
Least solubility
Bonds to enamel and base metals
www.indiandentalacademy.com
50. 50
Drawbacks:
Moisture sensitivity
Low early strength
Polymerizable resin functional groups added
Impart additional curing process
Allow the bulk of the material to mature
through the acid-base reaction.
RESIN MODIFIED GLASS IONOMER CEMENT
www.indiandentalacademy.com
51. 51
Nicholson (Quint Int 1977)
“Resin modified GIC’s are those materials that
are modified by the inclusion of resin, generally
to make them partly photocurable”
W.M. Tay (Dental update 95)
“These are hybrid materials that retain
significant acid base reaction as a part of their
overall curing process”
www.indiandentalacademy.com
52. 52
Advantages of RMGIC’s over GIC’s:
1. Sufficiently long working time controlled in
command to a snap set by photocuring.
2. Improved setting characteristics.
3. Protect the acid base balance from problem of
water balance.
4. Rapid development of early strength.
5. Fluoride release greater.
6. Diametral strength high (20 Mpa compared to 6. 6
Mpa)
www.indiandentalacademy.com
53. 53
Disadvantages of RMGIC’s over GIC’s:
1. Biocompatibility is controversial.
2. Setting shrinkage is higher leading to
increased microleakage and poor marginal
adaptation
Brands
• Fuji Ortho LC
• Photacfil – ESPE
• Vitrebond – 3M
www.indiandentalacademy.com
54. 54
In 1986 – White described a method of bonding
orthodontic brackets to the enamel surfaces of
teeth, with a glass ionomer cement.
Poor strength
Isolation of newly bonded teeth
Light arch-wires immediately after bonding
www.indiandentalacademy.com
55. 55
Bond strength and durability of glass ionomer
cements used as bonding agents - AJO July 1989
-Klockowski, Davis, Joynt, Wieczkowski, and
MacDo
Compared GICs (Ketac-fil, Ketac-cem and
Chelon) with Rely-A-Bond (no-mix
autopolymerising) which served as a standard
in a clinical study.
www.indiandentalacademy.com
56. 56
Results:
Bond strength of GICs was significantly less
when compared to Rely-A-bond.
Less reduction of bond strength of GICs on
recycling – lesser than Rely-A-bond on recycling
Failures involved cohesion within cement or
adhesion involving the enamel - easily scraped
off from the enamel surface without causing
much damage.
www.indiandentalacademy.com
57. 57
Cook -1990 compared the in vivo bond
strength of a glass ionomer cement, Ketac
(ESPE Premier Denbol Products, Norristown,
Pa.), with a composite resin bonding agent –
12% failure rate
Fajen et al- 1990 evaluated the bond strength
of three glass ionomer cements against a
composite resin in vitro
www.indiandentalacademy.com
58. 58
Fricker - 1994, worked with Fuji II LC glass
ionomer cement (GC Corp., Kyoto, Japan) –
•Same rate of success bonding brackets to
enamel surfaces as he did with composite
cements.
•Dentine conditioner was utilized for ten
seconds
www.indiandentalacademy.com
59. 59
Kusy - discussed the damage to teeth on
debonding after using composite bonding resins.
•“When is stronger better?”
•Use of glass ionomer cements for
orthodontic bonding procedures - do not
need etching or damage the enamel during
debonding.
www.indiandentalacademy.com
60. 60
A new light-cured glass ionomer cement that bonds
brackets to teeth without etching in the presence of
saliva -AJO-DO SEP 1995
-Silverman, Cohen
Used a new Resin modified GIC
Fuji Ortho LC
Light-cured, resin-reinforced glass ionomer
cement
3 mechanisms of setting
www.indiandentalacademy.com
61. 61
Advantages:
Saves significant amount of chair time.
Eliminates working in a dry field.
Eliminates etching and priming enamel
surfaces.
Fluoride release protects teeth against
decalcification.
Repairs are quick and easy.
Increased patient and operator comfort.
www.indiandentalacademy.com
62. 62
Evaluation of fluoride release from an orthodontic
bonding system – AJO-DO Aug 1991
-Samir E. Bishara, Edward J. Swift, Jr., Daniel C.
N. Chan,
Light-activated fluoride-releasing - FluorEver
OBA
Tensile bond strength was significantly less – 1/3
– 1/2 of conventional (chan et al)
www.indiandentalacademy.com
63. 63
Fluoride ion release – 2.6ppm on day 1
0.42ppm on day 2
0.04ppm on day 43
However , decrease in enamel
decalcification was observed.
www.indiandentalacademy.com
65. 65
Advantagesof banding
Stronger
Protect against interproximal caries
Easier to recement and deband
1. CUSTOM-MADE
• Indirect
• Direct
1. PRE-FORMED
www.indiandentalacademy.com
66. 66
1. CUSTOM-MADE BANDS:
1. Band-pinching
2. Band-cementation
1. BAND-PINCHING:
‘Food-trap for cariogenic debris’
Exacting proximity between tooth and band
Poorly fitting band – ‘island in a sea of
cement’.
BANDING PROCEDURE
www.indiandentalacademy.com
68. 68
REQUIREMENTS:
1. Greatest strength and
durability with minimum of
bulk
2. Soft enough to permit close
adaptation
3. Strong enough to withstand
stresses
4. Polishable
5. Corrosion and tarnish resistant
6. Biocompatible www.indiandentalacademy.com
75. 75
2. PRE-FORMED BANDS:
Band selection:
Casts
Variations – anatomy, tapered crowns, extra
cusps, restorations
One size larger than the one that seems to fit
the tooth – prevents wasteful distortion of
bands
www.indiandentalacademy.com
76. 76
Band fitting:
First - finger pressure - only on mesial and distal
sides
Amalgam plugger / band pusher – 2/3rd
Bite pressure through biting stick – facial and
lingual
Final seating pressure –
•Maxillary – palatal side of tooth
•Mandibular – buccal side of tooth
www.indiandentalacademy.com
77. 77
Checklist:
All cusps on banded teeth equally visible
Band margin –
•Just below marginal ridge
•Above the contact point
Buccal attachment accurately positioned
Open occlusal margins crimped towards tooth
www.indiandentalacademy.com