6. Staging liver steatosis and fibrosis
Steatosis severity:semi-quantitative
scale/ B mode
◦ S0 = no steatosis
◦ S1 = mild steatosis
◦ S2 = moderate steatosis
◦ S3 = severe steatosis
Stages of liver fibrosis (ARFI technique)
◦ F0 = 0.99 - 1.16 m/s
◦ F1 = 1.16 - 1.25 m/s
◦ F2 = 1.25 - 1.32 m/s
◦ F3 = 1.32 - 1.56 m/s
◦ F4 = 1.56 - 4.15 m/s
7. S1- mild steatosis (bright
liver with
discrete posterior
attenuation).
S2 - moderate steatosis
(bright liver with
obvious posterior
attenuation).
S3 - Severe steatosis
(bright liver with
intense posterior
attenuation that makes it
impossible to visualize
the diaphragm).
8.
9. Results
Nov 2016-Feb 2017.
80 type 2 diabetic patients (27 M, 53F).
Age=28-79.
Duration of acquired DM= first onset -
20years.
4 obese patients (5%), 23 overweight
patients (28.75%)
11. Discussion 1
4/80 obese +23/80 over weight #33.75%
Lower percentage of male DM patient
(27/80 #33.75%)
Liver steatosis :
◦ 67/80#83.75%
◦ Severe+moderate : 31/80 #38.75%
12. Discussion 2
Liver stiffness ≥ F2: ≥ 40% of DM patients,
not correspondence with steatosis
severity. Fibrosis seemed to depend on
acquired DM duration.
Severe steatosis (S3) → significant
/severe fibrosis.
ARFI technique: fast, useful, valuable,
comparable as transient elastography.
13. Discussion 3
ARFI TECHNIQUE:
The best accuracy: distinguish between
patients with fibrosis ≤ F2 and those with
severe fibrosis or cirrhosis (F3-F4).
Less interference from obesity, ascites or
narrow intercostal space .
14. Conclusions
1. Significant increase in liver stiffness:
≥ 40% of DM patients.
2. Systematically assess liver stiffness in
type 2 diabetic patients → identify liver
fibrosis.
3. ARFI technique is comparable with TE
and more convenient in liver stiffness
assessment.
15. References
1.Liver Stiffness Evaluation by Transient Elastography
in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Patients with Ultrasound-
proven Steatosis -Ioan Sporea1, Ruxandra Mare1,
Raluca Lupușoru1, Alexandra Sima2, Roxana Șirli1,
Alina Popescu1, Romulus Timar2, J Gastrointestin
Liver Dis, June 2016 Vol. 25 No 2: 167-174.
2.Liver Stiffness in Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver
Disease:A Comparison of Supersonic Shear
Imaging,FibroScan, and ARFI With Liver Biopsy.
HEPATOLOGY, Month 2015
3.Principles and clinical application of ultrasound
elastography for diffuse liver disease-Woo Kyoung
Jeong1, Hyo K. Lim1, Hyoung-Ki Lee2, Jae Moon Jo2,
Yongsoo Kim3. Ultrasonography 33(3), July 2014
The factors determining why some of the patients with liver steatosis progress to NASH, with further development of fibrosis and
cirrhosis, are not entirely known
A significant liver stiffness increase was found in more than 40% of DM patients and was not correspondence with steatosis severity. Fibrosis seemed to depend on acquired DM duration.
But severe steatosis (S3) was concerned with significant /severe fibrosis.
ARFI technique is a fast, useful and valuable tool, as comparable as transient elastography in diabetic liver stiffness assessment.
The best accuracy for ARFI in NAFLD patients occurred when distinguishing between patients with no or moderate fibrosis (F0 to F2) and those with severe fibrosis or cirrhosis (F3-F4).
The interference by obesity, ascite or narrow intercostal space on the ARFI technique was less conspicuous.
A significant liver stiffness increase was found in more than 40% of DM patients.
Liver stiffness assessment in type 2 diabetic patients should be performed systematically to identify those with significant liver fibrosis.
ARFI technique is comparable with TE and more convenient in liver stiffness assessment.