2. Small Talk 1/2
• Show openness or desire to enter into a
conversation
• Have been given several names
• Vary from culture to culture
• They are questions which require no thoughts
• Rhetorical questions
• May seem difficult to answer some question
• Might seem absurd
3. Small Talk 2/2
• Two other aspects of this function:
The length of time devoted to such functions
The frequency with which such expression are
exchanged
• May reveal considerable information
• Require so little thought
• Length of time taken varies across cultures
• Cultural patterns may differ in the frequency
5. This is the function we are referring to
when we speak of taking a phrase literally.
Usually, instructions or directions on
how to get somewhere is the kind of
information involved in this function.
This is the function most often associated
with the popular view of ‘communication’.
6. Information is often not to be taken literally,
but cross-culturally.
In a new situation we are likely to
perceive as information kinds of behaviour
which other members of the culture ignore.
Sometimes, we are also ignore or
be incapable of perceiving as information
what is intended as information.
7. When one gives information,
he may also be saying something about himself
("See what I know?")
and something about his attitude toward
the other person.
("I know more than you." or
"I want to help you.")
8. The problem is that a newcomer or
a stranger is never really sure
how significant his observations:
They may be different,
but that does not make them profound
or even accurate interpretations.
10. A ritual "is a stereotyped sequence of
activities involving gestures, words, and
objects, performed in a sequestered
place, and designed to influence
preternatural entities or forces on behalf of
the actors' goals and interests.“
Rituals may be prescribed by the traditions of
a community, including a religious
community.
11. Rituals are characterized by
formalism, traditionalism, invariance, rule-
governance, sacral symbolism and
performance.
Most rituals cannot be explained easily by those
participate in them, and the explanations are
rationales conjectured by participants first
confronted with the question, ‘Why do you
this?’.
While we may be able to collect
objective, detailed information on certain
rituals, our exclusion might make it impossible
to relate this information to our behaviour when
12. Nevertheless, visitors are often invited to
observe if not participate in directly. To attend
a wedding, funeral, feasts,Saint’s day,
national holidays or local festival is often
desired by visitors, since it is something
special and memorable. So some travellers
want to visit a country when they are in their
festival times.
13. HALLOWEEN
Halloween also known as All Hallows'
Eve,is a yearly celebration observed in a
number of countries on 31 October, the time
in the liturgical year dedicated to
remembering the dead.
It is also celebrated in the end of the harvest
time.
19. A ritual performed in honour of Murugan, the
Hindu God of war and victory, popular
amongst Tamils
20.
21. AFFECTIVE COMMUNICATION
• Affective communication is to express emotions
toward another person,
• and as such it suffers the cultural distinction
between ‘reason’ and ‘emotion’.
22. • Some small group research, conducted in the U.S, suggests
that every group discussion will produce a balance between
‘task-oriented’ comments and ‘socioemotional expressions’.
• Administrators warns against a too business-like attitude
which doesn't show enough concern for the personal feelings
of the staff.
23. • In popular American mythology today, the most affectively
typified people are the poor, the uneducated, the humble.
• Suburbanites even more than their urban neighbor have no
‘soul’.
24. • Anybody who is affluent is suspected of lacking human
affective qualities.
• In this country, success American-style either requires a lack
of feeling or destroys feeling.
25. • Affective communication is the communication of feelings,
of honest, heart-felt.
• Much of communication is based on the goals in which such
expressions are minimized, if not discouraged altogether.
26. • In business, in foreign study , in diplomatic negotiations, the
instrumental functions receive first priority.
• When a culture’s values and reasoning patterns distinguish
these, the affective qualities of communication may suffer.
27. • Category of affective communication includes insults as well
as compliments, dislike as well as love.
• Affective elements are expressed
nonverbally(hugs, kisses), and this accounts for additional
problems across cultures.
• If it were possible to line up cultures, those might seem to be
the most affective.
28.
29. When words or gestures are used as
instruments in helping to achieve
some result, we may identify them
as instrumental.
Some gestures and expressions are
more clearly instrumental than
others.
32. There is a status differential which
influences these two forms when the
same goal intended; that is, a person with
authority may legitimately express his
role through instrumental communication,
whereas a person who lacks power in any
situation must achieve goals through
indirection.
34. Cultural value differences also
complicate the problem.
Ascribed roles according to the sex
often are reflected in a female-
affective style and a male-
instrumental style.
Hinweis der Redaktion
Slide– 3 * Expressions that show an openness or a desire to enter into a conversation take many forms and have been given several names by communication theorist: Small talk, phatic communion(this one is coined by the anthropologist Malinowski. * Even though this function would seem to be universal, it differs from culture to culture in several aspects. Many of them are even odd grammatical constructions within their own language (E.G) ‘’How do you do?’’* And also many are questions and answers, but questions require no thought and answers which meet no test of accuracy. These kind of questions are sometimes referred as the rhetorical question. * Unless the person is familiar with the form and function of such patterns, it may seem difficult to answer some questions which are meant to serve this function. English speakers may be surprised to learn that some non-native speakers of English will pause and think about answering a question like “How are you?” or “How are things?”* Same thing applies for the Americans in Japan. It has taken them a long time to discover that in Japan the question “Where are you going?” functionally means the same thing as “How are you?” and requires neither thought nor honesty for a functionally appropriate answer, the standard answer is “Chotto soko made” – “Just over there”* A remark or question which might seem absurd if taken too seriously (“It looks like it’s raining, doesn’t it?” said when it is just starting to rain) might be perfectly appropriate, whereas a reply which is honest and accurate might be wrong because it is not what is expected.
Slide- 4* Two other aspects of this first function may also vary: (1) The length of time devoted to such functions before passing into a different level of communication; and (2) the frequency with which such expressions are exchanged between the same persons during a period of a day or week.* The first one reflects that even this function may be regarded as serving many additional functions, especially between strangers. Exchanging small talk may reveal a great deal of information ( about the character and personalities of the individuals, of their language abilities, of their desire to talk about other subjects, and may even provide some clues as to which other subject might be appropriate). * Also in a sense, because the forms are so predictable, easily interpreted, and therefore require so little thought as to content, the persons are able to take in a great deal of information about such traits as voice tones, rate, and volume, which is extremely important in preparing for further conversation.* The length of time taken in exchanging small talk varies across cultures. The reason is related to pace of living, many values concerning individuals and activity, and, of course, values associated with time itself. If people from The US seem to want to get down to business more quickly than most other people in the world, it is probably due in part to the American’s distinction between the individual and his role or job.*Similarly, cultural patterns may differ in the frequency of small talk exchanges between the same persons within a given period of time. In Us , if two friends happen to see each other four time within a day, the extent of their small talk is likely to decrease with each successive meeting, so that by the fourth time or even by the third, almost no comment need to be exchanged. *In much of Latin America, on the other hand, nearly the same pattern of greeting may be repeated each time. (E.g. How are you, how is your mother, how is your father? As they would say Como estas? Como estatumadre? Como estatu padre?)