Web 2.0 allows users to generate and share their own content on sites like blogs and social networks. It is characterized by user participation, openness, and network effects that increase value as more people use the tools. Key aspects of Web 2.0 include user-generated content, data on a massive scale that can be easily shared, and an "architecture of participation" that encourages community and collaboration. The transition to Web 2.0 has important implications for education by moving students from passive content consumers to active producers and participants in online learning.

1. WEB 2.0

2. OBJECTIVE OF LEARNING
WEB 2.0
TO INFORM THE STUDENTS WHAT IS WEB 2.0 IS AND HOW WAS THE WEB 2.0
CREATED,
THE KEY IDEAS ON IT, THE TEHNOLOGY AND ALSO THE RELATION OF IT
WITH EDUCATION.

3. INTRODUCTION
WEB 2.0 was first term
coined in 2005 by Tim
O’Reilly and it was a
different thing for
different people.
Before the web was usually
one way and no feedback
was given by the users.
There was also a difference
between the publishers and
the customers.
Tools were limited in
features and interactivity.

4. KEY IDEAS
OF WEB
2.0
User
contents
Openness
Network
Effects
Architecture
of
Participation
Data on
epic scale
Power of
the crowd

5. USER CONTENTS
IT ALLOWS USER TO CREATE THEIR OWN CONTENTS FOR
PUBLICATIONS SUCH AS BLOGS AND SOCIAL NETWORKING
SITES.
MOST USERS GO FOR MUSIC AND MEDIA.
EVERY USERS HAVE THEIR OWN RIGHTS ‘TO SAY’ AND ‘TO
KNOW’ ABOUT THE WEB.
WHAT MOTIVATES THE USER TO PUBLISH WHATEVER ON
THE WEB ARE MONEY AND REPUTATION.

6. POWER OF THE CROWD
• MORE HEADS ARE BETTER THAN ONE DEFINE AS THE CROWD CAN DECIDE
WHAT IS THE BEST FOR THEM.
• THIS IDEA IS SUPPORTED OR REFINED BY CONCEPTS SUCH AS :
 CROWD SOURCING
 SETI
 FOLKSONOMY
* FOLKSONOMY IS A USER GENERATED OF CLASSIFYING AND ORGANIZING
ONLINE CONTENT INTO DIFFERENT CATEGORIES WITH THE USE OF META DATA.

7. DATA ON EPIC SCALE
-DATA PUBLISHED IS HUGE, CAN BE SHARED AND
‘MASH’EDABLE.
-TO THIS REGARD, GOOGLE HAS CORE COMPETENCIES IN
AREA OF DATA MANAGEMENT AND NETWORKING
TRANSFERRING AT HIGH SPEED.
-DATA CAN BE SHARED VIA API (APPLICATION
PROGRAMMING INTERFACES)

8. ARCHITECTURE OF PARTICIPATION
 COMMUNITY, COLLABORATION AND SHARING ARE
ENCOURAGED IN WEB 2.0
‘ARCHITECTURE’ AND ‘PARTICIPATION’ ARE EQUALLY
EMPHASIZED TO SUPPORT EACH OTHER.

9. OPENNESS
• RELATED TO EPIC DATA AND PARTICIPATION.
• EVEN THE DATA IS OPEN, BUT FOR ITS VALUE,
INTELLIGENCE HA STO BE BUILD TO MAKE SENSE OF
THE DATA.
• TO DO THAT, TURN THE DATA TO INFORMATION,
INFORMATION TO KNOWLEDGE.

10.  WEB 2.0 MAY INCREASE ITS VALUE WHEN MORE USERS USE IT.
 AS AN EXAMPLE, WHEN A USER SHARE ANY BLOG CONTENTS, THE VALUE OF THE
CONTENTS WILL INCREASE.
 SCALES AND TOPOLOGY ARE CONSIDERED BY MANY BECAUSE THEY ARE THE KEY
FACTORS IN THE SUCCESS OF THE INTERNET.
 THIS ARCHITECTURE CONNECTS PEOPLE TO CONTENT ; PEOPLE TO PEOPLE ;
CONTENT TO CONTENT ALL THE TIME.
 AS AN EXAMPLE, USERS ARE CONNECTED TO CONTENTS IN THE WAY OF CLOUD
STORAGE IN THEIR DEVICES.

11. CONCLUSION
 WEB 2.0 CAN BE CATEGORIZED AS A QUIET REVOLUTION TOWARDS OPEN
SOURCE AND INDEPENDENT METHODOLOGIES AND TOOLS.
 PUBLISHERS MAY NOT SURVIVE IF THEIR SOFTWARES ARE NEEDED TO BE PAID
BECAUSE USERS PREFER IT TO BE FREE.
 WORDS THAT ARE ASSOCIATED WITH WEB 2.0 ARE : AJAX, REST,
LIGHTWEIGHT PROGRAMMING AND APIS.
TO REALTE IT TO EDUCATION, THERE IS A TRANSITION FROM ONLINE CONSUMER TO
CONSUMER/PRODUCER/PARTICIPANT. ONLINE LEARNING IS ONE OF THE HELPERS FOR
THE STUDENTS WHO STUDY LANGUAGE BY THEMSELVES. THE STUDENTS WILL NO
LONGER RELY 100% ON TEACHERS SINCE THEY CAN FIND IT WITHIN A CLICK. APART
FROM THAT, THEY MAY SHARE THEIR INFORMATION WITH THEIR PEERS AND FRIENDS.
THIS WILL RESULTS IN LEARNING TOGETHER AND HELPING EACH OTHER.