1. Design Stage
Evaluating storyboards
Design 1:

2. Test Name
Expected
Actual
Comments/improvements
Outcomes
Outcomes
needed?
Yes
Yes
clear Yes
Yes
Does the video have a title?
Does
it
give
description
percutaneous
a
of
the
coronary
intervention?
Does it contain at least 10 Yes
Should be
facts?
yes (have
not
written in
details)
Does it have a good control of Yes
Yes

3. the length of each scene?
Does it contain a combination Yes
Yes
of text, image and scene?
Does it have sound?
Yes
Yes
Does it have a background Yes
sound which lasts throughout
the video?
Do
the
texts
have
too No
No
Does it last longer than two Yes
Yes
large/small font size?
minutes?
Does it last longer than six No
No
minutes?
Is the information too difficult No
No
to understand?
Is it scientific enough?
Yes
Yes
It there only text on screen?
No
No
Do
you
think
background
that
sound
the No
is
uncoordinated to the scene?
Does
it
compare
percutaneous
the Yes
Yes
coronary
intervention with the other
similar technologies?
Does it talk about another No
No
technology in details?
Do you think the video is too No
No
serious?
Is the information in the Yes
video useful?
Yes

5. Design 2:

6. Test Name
Expected
Actual
Comments/improvements
Outcomes
Outcomes
needed?
Yes
Yes
clear Yes
Yes
Does the video have a title?
Does
it
give
description
a
of
percutaneous
the
coronary
intervention?
Does it contain at least 10 Yes
Yes
facts?
Does it have a good control of Yes
Yes
the length of each scene?
Does it contain a combination Yes
Yes
of text, image and scene?
Does it have sound?
Yes
Yes
Does it have a background Yes
sound which lasts throughout
the video?
Do
the
texts
have
too No
No
Does it last longer than two Yes
Yes
large/small font size?
minutes?
Does it last longer than six No
No
minutes?
Is the information too difficult No
No
to understand?
Is it scientific enough?
Yes
No
It might be a little bit confusing.
It is not a very good choice to
introduce PCI in chatting.
It there only text on screen?
Do
you
think
that
No
the No
No

7. background
sound
is
uncoordinated to the scene?
Does
it
compare
percutaneous
the Yes
No
coronary
intervention with the other
similar technologies?
Does it talk about another No
Yes
technology in details?
It does not compare PCI with
other
technologies,
but
it
explains in details about different
types of angioplasty which is
useless here.
Do you think the video is too No
No
serious?
Is the information in the Yes
video useful?
Yes

8. Design 3:
Test Name
Expected
Actual
Comments/improvements
Outcomes
Outcomes
needed?

9. Does the video have a title?
Does
it
give
description
a
Yes
Yes
clear Yes
Yes
of
percutaneous
the
coronary
intervention?
Does it contain at least 10 Yes
Yes
facts?
Does it have a good control of Yes
Yes
the length of each scene?
Does it contain a combination Yes
Yes
of text, image and scene?
Does it have sound?
Yes
Yes
Does it have a background Yes
sound which lasts throughout
the video?
Do
the
texts
have
too No
No
Does it last longer than two Yes
Yes
large/small font size?
minutes?
Does it last longer than six No
No
minutes?
Is the information too difficult No
No
to understand?
Is it scientific enough?
Yes
Yes
It there only text on screen?
No
No
Do
you
think
background
that
sound
the No
is
uncoordinated to the scene?
Does
it
percutaneous
compare
the Yes
coronary
Yes
It has compared PCI with the
other technologies very well

10. intervention with the other
because
similar technologies?
advantages of PCI.
Does it talk about another No
it
highlights
the
No
technology in details?
Do you think the video is too No
Maybe yes
serious?
Is the information in the Yes
video useful?
It is always talking about the
technology.
Yes

11. Design 4:

12. Test Name
Expected
Actual
Comments/improvements
Outcomes
Outcomes
needed?
Yes
Yes
clear Yes
Yes
Does the video have a title?
Does
it
give
description
percutaneous
a
of
the
coronary
intervention?
Does it contain at least 10 Yes
Yes
facts?
Does it have a good control of Yes
No
the length of each scene?
Does it contain a combination Yes
of text, image and scene?
The first scene is not very
important, but it is too long
Yes

13. Does it have sound?
Yes
Yes
Does it have a background Yes
sound which lasts throughout
the video?
Do
the
texts
have
too No
No
Does it last longer than two Yes
Yes
large/small font size?
minutes?
Does it last longer than six No
No
minutes?
Is the information too difficult No
No
to understand?
Is it scientific enough?
Yes
No
It there only text on screen?
No
No
Do
you
think
background
that
sound
the No
is
uncoordinated to the scene?
Does
it
compare
percutaneous
the Yes
No
coronary
intervention with the other
similar technologies?
Does it talk about another No
No
technology in details?
Do you think the video is too No
No
serious?
Is the information in the Yes
video useful?
Yes

14. Evaluating the chosen design
My chosen design is Design 1. I choose it because it is my favourite design, which has a
clear storyline and meets all the specifications. This design gives a clear description of the
percutaneous coronary intervention, showing its advantages by comparing it with the other
similar technologies, and it also remembers not to talk about another technology in details,
otherwise it will make the audience fell confused. Moreover, I think Design 1 is a good
choice for me to make my product, because it is introducing the technology through a story,
instead of just give scientific explanations of the use of the chosen technology. Furthermore,
this design includes a combination of text, images, and animation, which will make the
product much more interesting.
Aiming to create a better product, I also decide to put some elements from the other
three designs into Design 1. For example, I would like to use a rule of narrator in the story to
explain to the audience in a more direct way, just like what I did in Design 3. Furthermore, I
might use one person’s point of view to make the audience identify with the characters, as
the method I utilised in Design 4. According to me, all four of my designs could be improved
much more; nevertheless, I think Design 1 I the best one in these four, and perhaps I can still
keep the advantages of the other three, trying to put them into Design 1, if they will fit. I will
try to keep developing my chosen design till the day I start to film it.

15. Plan Stage
GANTT Chart
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
Prototype design 1
Prototype design 2
Prototype design 3
Prototype design 4
Evaluation of Designs
GANTT Chart
Step-by-step Plan
Create Product
Inviting the Actors
Preparation of Film
Create the Title Page
Filming scene 1
Filling the gap between scene 1 & 2
Filming scene 2
Filming secne 3
Making Short Animations
Filming scene 4
Filming scene 5
Put the Scenes Together
Add Sounds to the Film
Check the Finished Product
Process Journal
Test Plan
Evaluate
Contingency Time
Feedback
Improving the Product
This is a Gantt chart which aims to show how I will organise the time for my designs and
the product. In the left hand side of the Gantt Chart, I have listed 27 different tasks. Those

16. are the important tasks that I need to do in this section. Moreover, the small red bars are
showing the starting time, finishing time, and duration for each of the tasks. From the Gantt
Chart, it is easy to see that I plan to spend 12 hours on actually making the product; and it
will takes me about 25 hours to finish the whole section of work. The reason why I make this
Gantt Chart is that it presents the time which I should take to finish the product, reminding
me about every small sections in this stage, and it can help me to get myself organised. The
Gantt Chart reminds me about the process rate.

17. Step-by-step Plan
Date
Time
Task
taken
Tools/materials
used
11.7.2013 (lesson)
1
Make a GANTT Chart
Excel, Word
11.12.2013 (lesson)
1
Do a step-by-step plan
Word
11.12.2013
0.5
Invite the actors
Pen, paper, and the
Briefly introduce my story to the
storyboard design
actors, explaining what they need
to do
11.14.2013 (lesson)
1
Prepare for making the film
Write up a script of scene
Firefox,
Word/paper,
Windows
Movie
Open Windows Movie Maker, Maker, USB
starting to create a title page
Save it on the computer and USB
11.16.2013
(at 2
home)
Filming scene 1: a woman is Camera,
watering her flowers, and then Windows
she falls down immediately
Filming scene 2: the woman is
Maker,
PC,
Movie
Imaxthon
Explorer
brought to hospital, and her
daughter comes to see her
Filling the gap between scene 1
and scene 2 using Movie Maker
Find some sound effects
11.17.2013
home)
(at 2
Filming scene 3: the conversation Camera,
between the doctor and the Windows
woman’s daughter
PC,
Movie
Maker, Flash maker,

18. Add short animations to the video
Imaxthon Explorer
Find some similar products and try
to get suggestions from them
11.19.2013 (lesson)
1
On the internet, find some videos Firefox, YouTube
that introduce the procedure of
angioplasty or PCI
11.19.2013
(at 1
home)
Filming scene 4: the procedure of Camera,
percutaneous
coronary cover,
intervention
11.21.2013 (lesson)
1
white
Imaxthon
Explorer
Filming scene 5 in the school (try Camera,
to use the roof as a background Firefox,
scene
tripod,
Windows
Movie Maker
Add an ending page to the video
using Windows Movie Maker
11.23.2013
(at 1
home)
Put all the five scenes together in Windows
a video
Movie
Maker
Fill every gap between two scenes
and make them look smooth
11.26.2013 (lesson)
1
Add sounds to the film
Add a soft background sound
USB,
Windows
Movie Maker
Add different sound effects
11.28.2013 (lesson)
1
Check the product
Windows
Movie

19. Make sure it is finished
11.30.2013
(at 2
home)
Maker, Word
Check the finished product once Windows
again
Movie
Maker, Word
Use the test plan to examine it to
see whether it is a good product
or not
12.1.2013
home)
(at 2
Evaluate the product
Word
Justify what I have done for the
product, and how I did that
See if there is anything that I can
still improve
Think about how I can do even
better next time
In the Step-by-step plan, I have set the date for accomplishing the various tasks; and I
have again mentioned the durations. In the date column, I have also shown that whether the
task should be done in lessons or at home. Regarding the tasks, different from the one I had
in the Gantt Chart, here I have explained each of my tasks in more details, trying to write up
a procedure for them in which is aimed to help me have a better understanding of what I
need to do while I am actually creating the product. For the tools, I have listed all the
programme and software that I will need for that particular task; I also put the materials I
will going to use, such as camera, notebook and paper. I think my Step-by-step plan is clear
and precise; and I will be able to follow my plan to create a good product.
This is not my exactly original plan; I have made some changes after the lesson I started
to make my product, because I realised that my invited actors were my parents, who really
could not help me film it during lesson times. Therefore I had to rearrange my time plan and
move all the filming parts to my own time. And then I put some other works which would
last less time than filming into those days that I would have lessons. Therefore, my present
Step-by-step plan is the above one, which I am now very pleased with. If I could improve it
more, perhaps I will write more details about the tasks, and maybe give more time to film
Scene 4 and Scene 5, which I think that the time is a little bit pressing.