5. Relevant Terms
⢠Reservoir â the species or location where the disease
organism is typically found, often asymptomatic
⢠Zoonotic â A disease with an animal reservoir that can be
passed to humans
⢠Contagious â Disease or agent that can be passed from
one person to another
Levels of contagiousness: high, moderate, low, none
Indirect transmission (insect or animal vector)
Specific activity (venereal, blood borne)
⢠FAD â Foreign Animal Disease
â Diseases that are not naturally in the U.S. or were eliminated from
the U.S. after an eradication effort
â Trade as well as health issues
⢠Quarantine - To stop the movement of animals into or out
of an area. To isolate an individual, herd, area, state,
nation, etc.
6. Biological WarfareBiological Warfare
The intentional use of micro-organisms orThe intentional use of micro-organisms or
toxins derived from living organisms totoxins derived from living organisms to
produce death or disease in humans,produce death or disease in humans,
animals and plantsanimals and plants
Bio-terrorism isBio-terrorism is
the random use ofthe random use of
these weaponsthese weapons
against the publicagainst the public
With the purpose ofWith the purpose of
demoralizing ademoralizing a
country, exactingcountry, exacting
revenge, and/orrevenge, and/or
affecting policyaffecting policy
8. Potential Bioterrorism Agents
(CDC categories)
⢠Easily transmitted from person-to-person
⢠High mortality rates
⢠Potential for major public health impact
⢠Can cause panic and social disruption
⢠Requires special action for public health
preparedness
⢠Anthrax, Botulism, Plague, Smallpox ,
Tularemia, Viral hemorrhagic fevers (Ebola,
Marburg, Lassa, Machupo)
Category A
9. Potential Bioterrorism Agents
(CDC categories)
⢠Moderately easy to disseminate
⢠Moderate morbidity and low mortality rates,
⢠Brucellosis, Glanders, Meliodosis, Psittacosis,
Q Fever, Typhus fever, Viral encephalitis
Toxins (bacterial and plant), Food Safety,
Water Safety
Category BCategory B
10. Potential Bioterrorism Agents
(CDC categories)
⢠Emerging pathogens
⢠Could be engineered for mass dissemination
⢠Available, easy production and dissemination
⢠Potentially high morbidity and mortality
⢠Major health impact
⢠Nipah (Nipah virus), Hantavirus (Hantavirus)
Category CCategory C
11. Biological Agents asBiological Agents as WeaponsWeapons..
⢠Sythian arrows dipped in blood of decomposing bodies (400 BC)Sythian arrows dipped in blood of decomposing bodies (400 BC)
⢠Diseased bodies in water suppliesDiseased bodies in water supplies
⢠Saliva from rabid dogs in artillery shells (Poland, 1650)Saliva from rabid dogs in artillery shells (Poland, 1650)
⢠Smallpox infected clothing or blanketsSmallpox infected clothing or blankets
⢠Nomadic Mongols catapult bubonic plague-infested bodies into theNomadic Mongols catapult bubonic plague-infested bodies into the
Genoese trading post in the Crimea.Genoese trading post in the Crimea.
⢠German Glanders effortsGerman Glanders efforts
⢠Japanese Imperial Units 731 and 100Japanese Imperial Units 731 and 100
Excludes âBiocrimesâExcludes âBiocrimesâ
⢠Anthrax mailingsAnthrax mailings
⢠Ricin mailingsRicin mailings
12. Food and Water Borne BiocrimesFood and Water Borne Biocrimes
(1932 - Present)(1932 - Present)
ââ96 - Diane Thompson--Dallas hospitalâŚ.96 - Diane Thompson--Dallas hospitalâŚ.ShigellaShigella in pastries (12 ill)in pastries (12 ill)
ââ95 - Debora Green---Kansas CityâŚ.Ricin in meals (1 ill)95 - Debora Green---Kansas CityâŚ.Ricin in meals (1 ill)
ââ84 - Rajneeshees---Oregon...84 - Rajneeshees---Oregon...SalmonellaSalmonella on salad bar (751 ill)on salad bar (751 ill)
ââ70 - Eric Kranz---MontrealâŚ70 - Eric Kranz---Montreal⌠Ascriis suumAscriis suum in food (4-5 ill)in food (4-5 ill)
------------
ââ66 - Dr. Mitsuru Suzuki---JapanâŚ66 - Dr. Mitsuru Suzuki---JapanâŚS. typhiS. typhi in food (ca.412 ill / 12 dead)in food (ca.412 ill / 12 dead)
ââ39 - Kikuko Hirose---JapanâŚ39 - Kikuko Hirose---JapanâŚSalmonellaSalmonella in pastries (12 ill)in pastries (12 ill)
ââ36 - Tei-Sabro Takahashi---JapanâŚ36 - Tei-Sabro Takahashi---JapanâŚSal.Sal. in pastries (10 ill / 4 dead)in pastries (10 ill / 4 dead)
ââ32 - Prince Mikasa---JapanâŚCholera in fruit (0 ill)32 - Prince Mikasa---JapanâŚCholera in fruit (0 ill)
<1200 ill & 16 dead<1200 ill & 16 dead
13. ⢠Must be presented as aMust be presented as a respirable aerosolrespirable aerosol
ThereforeTherefore
⢠Preparation and weaponization mayPreparation and weaponization may jeopardize viabilityjeopardize viability
⢠Aerosols are dependant onAerosols are dependant on meteorological conditionsmeteorological conditions
However...However...
⢠Contagious agentsContagious agents can be delivered without weaponizationcan be delivered without weaponization
⢠Some agents can be spread bySome agents can be spread by vectorsvectors
Implications and Constraints for the Bioweaponeer
MagicMagic
InvolvedInvolved
Little or No Magic InvolvedLittle or No Magic Involved
14. Possible Indicators of a BW/BT AttackPossible Indicators of a BW/BT Attack
⢠Disease entity not naturally-occurring in the areaDisease entity not naturally-occurring in the area
⢠Multiple disease entities in same patients (mixed agent attack)Multiple disease entities in same patients (mixed agent attack)
⢠Large # of military and civilian casualties (inhabit same area)Large # of military and civilian casualties (inhabit same area)
⢠Data suggestive of a massive point source outbreakData suggestive of a massive point source outbreak
⢠Apparent aerosol or cutaneous route of invasionApparent aerosol or cutaneous route of invasion
⢠High morbidity and mortality relative to # at riskHigh morbidity and mortality relative to # at risk
⢠Localized or circumspect area for illnessLocalized or circumspect area for illness
⢠Low attack rates for personnel working with filtered air or closedLow attack rates for personnel working with filtered air or closed
ventilation systemsventilation systems
⢠Dead sentinel animals of multiple speciesDead sentinel animals of multiple species
⢠Absence of a competent natural vector in area of outbreakAbsence of a competent natural vector in area of outbreak
⢠Severe disease in previously healthy populationSevere disease in previously healthy population
16. The Silent EnemyThe Silent Enemy
BW AttackBW Attack
Incubation PeriodIncubation Period
Clinical SignsClinical Signs
Mass CasualtiesMass Casualties
The longer a BWThe longer a BW
attack goesattack goes
undetected orundetected or
unrecognized, theunrecognized, the
more serious itmore serious it
becomes.becomes.
PreventionPrevention
Impact
Early detectionEarly detection
and effectiveand effective
intervention isintervention is
criticalcritical
17. An economic assault on ourAn economic assault on our
national security andnational security and
infrastructureinfrastructure
WhyWhy Agricultural TargetsAgricultural Targets ????
18. Agroterrorism is defined as the intentional introduction
of animal or plant pests or the cultivation or production
of pathogenic bacteria, fungi, parasites, protozoans,
viruses, or their toxic products for the purposes of
causing poultry, livestock, crop, soil, or human disease,
poisoning, or death. This could occur through
introducing pests intended to kill food crops, spreading a
virulent disease among confined feedlots where animals
are given high protein rations to prepare them for
slaughter, poisoning civil or agricultural water sources or
food supplies, or using food-borne pathogens to cause
human disease (Foxell 2001).
DEFINEDâŚ..DEFINEDâŚ..
19. AGROTERRORAGROTERROR
ďľ The purpose of agroterror is to causeThe purpose of agroterror is to cause
economic destructioneconomic destruction
ďľ Decrease the faith in the safety ofDecrease the faith in the safety of
the food supplythe food supply
ďľ Decrease the availability of foodDecrease the availability of food
ďľ A vehicle for the dissemination of aA vehicle for the dissemination of a
chemical or biologic agentchemical or biologic agent
23. An Agroterrorism Event
Estimated Losses (Intentional or not)
⢠$1.8 billion for slaughter of animals
⢠$1.0 billion to disinfect farms
⢠$658 million for livestock disposal
⢠$78 million for business recovery
⢠$21 million for marketing support
⢠$4 billion loss for agriculture industry
⢠A 20% loss to the stateâs $107 billion
tourism industry
24. A unique sectors lossesA unique sectors lossesâŚâŚ.âŚâŚ.
Farms are geographically disbursedFarms are geographically disbursed
â˘â˘Routine transportation and commingling in productionRoutine transportation and commingling in production
and processing systemand processing system
â˘â˘International trade is often tied to disease-free statusInternational trade is often tied to disease-free status
â˘â˘U.S. vets and scientists lack experienceU.S. vets and scientists lack experience
Possible Agroterrorism ScenariosPossible Agroterrorism Scenarios
ď§Chemical-use of a crop duster for aerial distributionChemical-use of a crop duster for aerial distribution
of an irritating agent.of an irritating agent.
ď§Biological âintroduction of a pathogen to contaminateBiological âintroduction of a pathogen to contaminate
livestocklivestock
ď§Explosiveâdestruction of a anhydrous plant withExplosiveâdestruction of a anhydrous plant with
intent to propel chemical gases into the airintent to propel chemical gases into the air
25. Possible Delivery Source
⢠Point Source Delivery
â Letter or Package
â Sprayer
⢠Vectors
â United States experiments with Yellow Fever
spread by infected mosquitoes
â Japanese use plague infected fleas in China
⢠Upwind Line Delivery
â Highly modified crop duster or rooftop dispersion
â Issues of inversion and dilution
⢠Human Carrier
â âPerson-to-personâ â Suicidal Delivery
â Only certain agents are transmissible
(Pneumonic Plague, Smallpox)
26. Floridaâs Agroterrorism Experience
Florida has had no known intentional case of
agroterrorism to date. The potential is huge,
however. Most cases of invasive, destructive
plants, animals and insects have either been
accidental or âacts of God.â
Water hyacinth: introduced in 1800s.Water hyacinth: introduced in 1800s.
Soybean rust - probably blown to the US fromSoybean rust - probably blown to the US from
Venezuela by Hurricane Ivan in 2004.Venezuela by Hurricane Ivan in 2004.
27. At cattle farms:
(i) animal quarantine procedures,
(ii) blood testing of new arrivals,
(iii)control of human movement onto the farm,
(iv) Control of vermin,
(v) farm locations, and
(vi) movement of vehicles onto the farm.
28. SELECTION CRITERIA FOR ANTILIVESTOCK AND
ANTIPOULTRY BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS
Selection criteria for the most dangerous antilivestock and antipoultry biologic
agents. The selected animal agent should have the following characteristics:
1. Highly infectious and contagious
2. Good ability to survive in the environment
3. Predictable clinical disease pattern, including morbidity
and mortality
4. Pathogenic for livestock or poultry
5. Available and easy to acquire or produce
6. Attributable to a natural outbreak, ensuring plausible
deniability
7. Not harmful to perpetrator
8. Easily disseminated
The selection of the animal virus and means of dissemination are key factors
in antilivestock biological weapons.
30. ď§ Colletotrichum coffeanum var. virulans
ď§ Dothistroma pini
ď§ Erwinia amylovora
ď§ Ralstonia solanacearum
ď§ Puccinia graminis
ď§ Sugarcane Fiji disease virus
ď§ Tilletia indica
ď§ Xanthomonas albilineans
ď§ Xanthomonas campestris pv. citri
ď§ Sclerotinia sclerotiorum
ď§ Peronospora hyoscyami de Bary f. sp. Tabacina
(Adam) skalicky
ď§ Claviceps purpurea
Animal and plant pathogens currently being
Considered as BAâŚâŚâŚâŚ
31. INDIA
(A)Bacterial and Fungal Pathogens
i) Bacterial wilt and ring rot in potato (Clavibacter michiganensis sub sp.
sepedonicus).
ii) Fire blight in apple and pear (Erwinia amylovora).
iii) Black pod in cocoa (Phytophthora megakarya).
iv) Powdery rust in coffee (Hemelia coffeicola).
v) Sudden death in oak (Phytophthora ramorum).
vi) South American leaf blight in rubber (Microcyclus ulei).
vii) Vascular wilt in oil palm (Fusarium oxysporum f sp. elaedis).
viii) Soybean downy mildew (Peronospora manshurica).
ix) Blue mold in tobacco (P. hyocyami sub sp. tabacina).
x) Tropical rust in maize (Physopella zeae).
32. INDIA
(B) Virus, Viroid and Phytoplasma
i) Barley stripe mosaic virus.
ii) Coconut cadang-cadang (Viroid).
iii) Palm lethal yellowing (Phytoplasma).
(C) Plant Parasitic Nematodes
i) Pine wood nematode (Bursaphelenchus xylophilus).
ii) Red ring nematode in coconut (Rhadinaphelenchus cocophilus).
(D) Insect Pests
i) Mediterranean fruit fly (Ceratitis capitata).
ii) Cotton boll weevil (Anthonomus grandis).
iii) Russian wheat aphid (Diuraphis noxia).
33. ď§ USDA APHIS (Animal and Plant Health Inspection
Service), Riverdale.
ď§ Regional Emergency Animal Disease Eradication
Organization (READEO)
ď§ Plant Protection and Quarantine (PPQ) stations
34. LEGAL PROHIBITION OFLEGAL PROHIBITION OF
AGROTERRORISMAGROTERRORISM
Punishment for Committing an Act ofPunishment for Committing an Act of
AgroterrorismAgroterrorism
Possessing Animal PathogensPossessing Animal Pathogens
Detecting Terrorist ConspiraciesDetecting Terrorist Conspiracies
37. (B) International
1. Agreement on the Application of Sanitary and
Phyto-sanitary Measures. This Agreement, commonly
known as SPS Agreement of WTO.
2. Global Developments in the wake of SPS
Agreement of WTO. Recently, the Department of
Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry of the Commonwealth of
Australia established Biosecurity Australia
3. Biological and Toxin Weapons Convention
4. Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD)
38. National Organisation
Indian Council of Agricultural Research ICAR
International Organisations
(A)World Trade Organization (WTO)
(B) Food and Agricultural Organization (FAO)
39. Guidelines for Biological Disaster Managementâ
Agroterrorism
1. Legislative and Regulatory Framework
2. Risk and Vulnerability Assessment
(A) Integrated Pest Surveillance System
(B) Intelligence Gathering and Secured
Dissemination of Information
3. Prevention and Early Detection
4. Preparedness
5. Capacity Development
6. Documentation
7. Research and Development
40. Biosecurity......Biosecurity......
ââA set of management practices which when followedA set of management practices which when followed
correctly reduce the potential for the introduction andcorrectly reduce the potential for the introduction and
spread of disease causing organisms onto, and betweenspread of disease causing organisms onto, and between
sites.âsites.â
Three Key Levels of BiosecurityThree Key Levels of Biosecurity
Conceptual BiosecurityConceptual Biosecurity
Structural BiosecurityStructural Biosecurity
Operational BiosecurityOperational Biosecurity
41. Conceptual BiosecurityConceptual Biosecurity
Involves Site planningInvolves Site planning
Location e.g proximity to other farms, transport etc.Location e.g proximity to other farms, transport etc.
Almost impossible to change once committed without very highAlmost impossible to change once committed without very high
costcost
Structural BiosecurityStructural Biosecurity
Concerns the design of the farm and buildings.Concerns the design of the farm and buildings.
Includes house design (easy to clean), site layout and security.Includes house design (easy to clean), site layout and security.
Expensive to change once built.Expensive to change once built.
Operational BiosecurityOperational Biosecurity
The points involved with day to day running of the site.The points involved with day to day running of the site.
Includes routine disinfection, control of visitors, source of stock etc.Includes routine disinfection, control of visitors, source of stock etc.
Can be modified at low cost according to requirementsCan be modified at low cost according to requirements
42. Control areas foe peoples...Control areas foe peoples...
ď§ limit staff movementslimit staff movements
ď§ avoid visitorsavoid visitors
ď§ control site trafficcontrol site traffic
ď§ spray vehiclesspray vehicles
ď§ adequate protective clothingadequate protective clothing
ď§ BOOTSBOOTS
ď§ hand washinghand washing
ď§ showersshowers For site.....For site.....
ď§ Effective cleaning andEffective cleaning and
disinfectiondisinfection
ď§ adequate turnaround timeadequate turnaround time
ď§ include houses, aprons,include houses, aprons,
equipmentequipment
ď§ use a closed water systemuse a closed water system
ď§ carry out water sanitisationcarry out water sanitisation
Hinweis der Redaktion
Biological weapons have four targets: humans, animals, plants and materiel.
Agriculture has a role in Homeland Security by protecting animals and plants as targets in their own rights and also has a public health responsibility by protecting the integrity of the human food supply, and partnering in the control of zoonotic diseases (those that infect both humans and animals) and vector-borne diseases, such as Rift valley fever, a dangerous viral infection of humans, cattle, sheep and goats that is spread by mosquitoes.
I donât have time today to cover all these issues and given the venue I will concentrate on animal biological weapons threats.
Indiana added two important considerations. Theoretically a person could walk into a farm, spread a disease, and, if caught, maybe only be charged with trespassing. In addition, adding agroterrorism to the list of weapons of mass destruction puts it in a category with warfare and adds a new dimension to the discussion.