Questionnaire to project team to gauge general state of project as a leading indicator

1. ELEMENT SCORE
1% 5% 50% 75% 100%
20 16 12 8 4 0
crystal clear little uncertainty
some
uncertainty
significant
uncertainty
substantial
uncertainty
undefined
20 16 12 8 4 0
job packages
defined
job packages
listed
detailed wbs hi level wbs
project elements
outlined
undefined
10 8 6 4 2 0
daily contact bi weekly contact weekly contact
fortnightly
contact
monthly contact who?
10 8 6 4 2 0
all job packages
assigned
major job
packages
assigned
major project
elements
assigned
staff identified
some staff
identified
who?
10 8 6 4 2 0
quantified on
reference classes
quantified on
recent similar
globally
quantified by
rote
standard
alllowance
unquantified
guess
none
5 4 3 2 1 0
up to date with
project schedule
laging project
schedule by 1
period
laging schedule
by 2 periods
not updated
from initial
incomplete none
10 8 6 4 2 0
thorough
understanding of
requirement and
project context
thorough
understanding of
requirement
aware of project
context
thorough
understanding of
requirement
vague on project
context
requirements
unclear
requirements
undocumented
requirements
not stated
5 4 3 2 1 0
questions/comm
ents facilitated
questions/comm
ents encouraged
questions/comm
ents mostly
encouraged
questions/comm
ents sometimes
encouraged
questions/comm
ents discouraged
questions/comm
ents not
accepted
10 8 6 4 2 0
high level of trust
most people can
be trusted
some people can
be trusted
very careful who
to trust
trust betrayed not able to trust
TOTAL SCORE 65 79 90 95 100
8 10 10 10
Based on work by Fergus O'Connell
CRITERIA Benchmark Scores over Project Life
Goal Definition
Definintive Job
List
Project Direction
(getting job
done)
12 14 16 18 20
8 14 16 18 20
8
Team Trust
Available People
for Jobs
Contingency
Allowance Made
Risk Analysis
Individual's Job
Awareness
Team
Communication
5 5
6 8 10 10 10
5 5 5 5
8 8 8 9 10
individual's psi survey
0
6 8 10 10 10
5
8 10 10 10 10
4 4 5