1. The document discusses challenges in GIS research including issues with spatiotemporal analysis, the development of CyberGIS, and understanding fundamental spatial concepts.
2. It outlines seven topics related to representing and analyzing spatiotemporal data: tracking movement, snapshots, polygon coverages, cellular automata, agent-based models, events and transactions, and multidimensional data.
3. The document argues that realizing a fully interoperable CyberGIS requires addressing issues around the spatial join and developing a standardized set of functions at an appropriate level of granularity.
3. GIS research
• Since 1960s
• Changing agenda
– problems solved
– technology advancing
– social context evolving
• What can we not yet do?
– what remains to be discovered?
– what new developments need attention?
5. Time is of the essence
• Policy and public interest are driven by
change (Frank)
• E
Everything th t h
thi that happens h happens
somewhere in space and time (Wegener)
• Every major issue has a time scale
– climate change (decades)
– climate tipping points (years)
– economic meltdown (months)
– infectious diseases (weeks)
( )
– disasters (days)
6. How to design useful tools?
• The Waterfall process?
– define the application domain
– sample it with use cases
l ith
– define the necessary functionality
– design optimal data models
• Is the domain all of spatiotemporal analysis
and modeling?
– from social to environmental
• Or are there multiple domains?
p
– and what is driving them?
11. Functionality
• Hägerstrand’s conceptual framework
– new advances in theory
• T k interpolation
Track i t l ti
– between infrequent samples
• I f
Inferences about activity
b t ti it
• Track convergence
• Shih L
Shih-Lung Sh ’ A S
Shaw’s ArcScene extension
i
12.
13. 2. Snapshots
• Barry Smith’s SNAP ontology
• Time-series of remotely sensed images
• Video
• Change detection
17. 3. Polygon coverages
• Reporting zones, cadaster
• Gail Langran, Time in Geographic
Information Systems, 1992
I f ti S t
• National Historic GIS
– reconciling change i reporting zones
ili h in ti
• z(i,t) = f[z(i,t-1),z(j,t),…]
• S
Serge Rey’s STARS – S
R ’ Space-Time A l i
Ti Analysis
of Regional Systems
18. Comparative spatial analysis of the development of the Chinese and US
economies through time, 1978-1998
Xinyue Ye, Bowling Green State University
19. 4. Cellular automata
• A fixed raster of cells
• A set of states for each cell
• A set of rules that determine state transitions
through time
• PCRaster
20. Keith Clarke, UC Santa Barbara
CA model of development based on transition probabilities as functions
of slope, access to transportation zoning and states of neighboring
slope transportation, zoning,
cells
21. 5. Agent-based models
• Discrete agents as geographic features
• Moving, changing state
• Rules governing states, behavior
22.
23. 6. Events and transactions
• The domain of the historian
– events in space and time
– li k d spatially
linked ti ll
• campaigns of armies
– hierarchically related
e a c ca y e a ed
• the battle and the war
• the meeting and the election
– can GIS support historical scholarship?
t hi t i l h l hi ?
• and update the historical atlas
24. 7. Multidimensional data
• Environmental data intensively sampled in
time
– with fi ed spatial s pport
ith fixed support
– NetCDF
25. One domain or seven?
• All seven need the multidisciplinary tools of
GIS
– to interpret assess, and visualize res lts
interpret, assess is ali e results
– to package results for public consumption
• Are there more (or fewer)?
26. Tasks for the research community
• What are the research questions?
– what are the use cases?
– some ddomains are d i
i driven b d t availability
by data il bilit
rather than science questions
• What are the functions?
– at what level of granularity?
– standardized for discovery y
– elusive even for traditional GIS
• What are the data models?
– the focus of much of the research to date
27. CyberGIS
• GIS as a distributed enterprise
– server-based GIS
• S i
Service-oriented architecture
i t d hit t
• Fully interoperable
28. Progress to date
• Interoperable location referencing
– coordinate transformations
– geocoding addresses
di dd
– point-of-interest databases
34 deg 24 min 42.7 seconds north, 119 deg 52 min 14.4
sec west
236150m east, 3811560m north, UTM Zone 11 Northern
Hemisphere
US National Grid reference 11SKU36151156
909 West Campus Lane, Goleta, CA 93117, USA
Mike Goodchild’s house
33. So why the fuss?
• Why cyber geographic information system?
– why not cyber geriatric information system?
• T
Two points
i t
– represent impediments
– call for fundamental research
35. But in reality…
• Spatial databases are organized as layers
– horizontal integration not “vertical”
– property z about all places
t b t ll l
– rather than all properties about location x
• “tell me everything about location x”
tell x
– overlay must be invoked explicitly
• graphical overlay or topological overlay
– many mashups are merely graphical overlay
• a visual spatial join
36.
37.
38.
39. The spatial join
• Using location as a common key to link
tables
• All location references are subject t
l ti f bj t to
uncertainty
– measurement error
– vagueness in feature identification
– indeterminate limits
• The probabilistic join
40. Multiple attribution
p
Names
Shapes
Sh
D’aowaga
—— ESRI Lake Tahoe
~~~ USGS Sierra Lake
Types
+Water Body
- Lake
Plate carre
- Reservoir
41. The true spatial join is still elusive
• Much better techniques needed
– especially to deal with vague, vernacular
references
– in text, speech, human discourse generally
– beyond formally de ed coo d a es
beyo d o a y defined coordinates
– well-defined metrics of confidence
• We are a long way from realizing the fully
g y g y
interoperable vision
42. The functionality of cyberGIS
• CyberGIS requires a formally defined
functionality
• Wh t is the appropriate l
What i th i t level of granularity of
l f l it f
cyberGIS functions?
• How many functions are there?
– 542 in the ArcGIS 9.3.1 toolbox
• How to navigate among them?
– 18 top-level categories
• vaguely defined, overlapping
– “Analysis”, “Spatial Analyst”, “Spatial Statistics”,
“Geostatistical Analyst”
43. Requirements
• A standard set of functions
– interoperable across all servers
– d fi d granularity
defined l it
• an atomic level
– in reality functionality is de e
ea y u c o a y s determined in pa by
ed part
legacy
• and non-interoperable
– hidd f
hidden from th user where appropriate
the h i t
44. What is this really about?
• It used to be difficult to do
– senior undergraduate courses
– th GIS professional
the f i l
• In a world of Google Earth what does
everyone need to know?
– is spatial really special?
– do we SAPs think differently?
45. “1. Linguistic
Children with this kind of intelligence enjoy writing, reading, telling stories or doing
crossword puzzles.
p
2. Logical-Mathematical
Children with lots of logical intelligence are interested in patterns, categories and
relationships. They are drawn to arithmetic problems, strategy games and experiments.
3. Bodily-Kinesthetic
y
These kids process knowledge through bodily sensations. They are often athletic,
dancers or good at crafts such as sewing or woodworking.
4. Spatial
These children think in images and p
g pictures. They may be fascinated with mazes or
y y
jigsaw puzzles, or spend free time drawing, building with Lego or daydreaming.
5. Musical
Musical children are always singing or drumming to themselves. They are usually quite
aware of sounds others may miss. These kids are often discriminating listeners.
y g
6. Interpersonal
Children who are leaders among their peers, who are good at communicating and who
seem to understand others' feelings and motives possess interpersonal intelligence.
7. Intrapersonal
p
These children may be shy. They are very aware of their own feelings and are self-
motivated.”
Howard Gardner
http://www.professorlamp.com/ed/TAG/7_Intelligences.html
46. What is spatial thinking?
“Three aspects of spatial ability:
• Spatial knowledge
– symmetry, orientation, scale, distance decay,
etc.
• Spatial ways of thinking and acting
– using diagramming or graphing, recognizing
patterns in data, change over space f
tt i d t h from
change over time, etc.
• Spatial capabilities
– ability to use tools and technologies such as
spreadsheet, graphical, statistical, and GIS
software to analyze spatial data”
http://www.nap.edu/catalog/11019.html
47. Fundamental spatial concepts
• Some acquired in early childhood
– distance, direction
• S
Some acquired only i hi h education
i d l in higher d ti
– spatial dependence, spatial heterogeneity
– not intuitive
– can be taught
– serve to distinguish the SAP
51. 186 concepts
• Overarching structures
– alphabetical sort
– part-whole relationships
t h l l ti hi
– synonyms
– domain-specific meanings
– mapping to GIS functions
– level of conceptual complexity
p p y
– mapping to curriculum standards
52. Concluding comments
• Much still to be done
• Advancing technology creates a constant
supply of i t
l f interesting questions
ti ti
• Need for future vision
– what will a geospatially enabled world l k lik i
h t ill ti ll bl d ld look like in
2020? or 2015?
– how will society cope?