I want to highlight in this article, in relation to the rich history of homeopathy in Colombia, the following arguments: i) The problem of recognition of homeopathy has to do with a conflict of institutions, which has to be understood from a sociological perspective ii) The conflict about recognition of practitioners, what I call pure homeopaths, by society and the State, has anthropological roots that relate to healing potentials of individuals and societies. The extinction of homeopathic practitioners, desired by many, has not occurred yet, because of their tenacity and creative efforts to spread their knowledge, and also because homeopathy is an open code science accessible to scholars, wise men and women, who work to deepen the knowledge of homeopathy. This essay will combine historical facts from the beginning and relate those facts to contemporary issues in homeopathy in Colombia. An indispensable text about the history of homeopathy in Colombia is the research done by María del Pilar Guzmán Urrea and called: “”La alopatía y la homeopatía en el siglo XIX: conflicto entre dos prácticas médicas” (Allopathy and Homeopathy in the XIX century: conflict between two medical practices).

1. HPATHY.COM.webloc
The author, Felipe Cardenas Tamara1, writes about the history and current
status of homeopathy in Colombia and the difficulties homeopaths there had and
have to face.
Homoeopathy in Colombia, South America
June 14, 2010 by Felipe Cardenas Tamara
Homeopathy Around the World
Print This Page | 16 Comments
Homoeopathy in Colombia, South America
I
Introduction
I want to highlight in this article, in relation to the rich history of homeopathy in
Colombia, the following arguments: i) The problem of recognition of homeopathy
has to do with a conflict of institutions, which has to be understood from a
sociological perspective ii) The conflict about recognition of practitioners, what I
call pure homeopaths, by society and the State, has anthropological roots that
relate to healing potentials of individuals and societies.
The extinction of homeopathic practitioners, desired by many, has not occurred
yet, because of their tenacity and creative efforts to spread their knowledge, and
also because homeopathy is an open code science accessible to scholars, wise
men and women, who work to deepen the knowledge of homeopathy. This essay
will combine historical facts from the beginning and relate those facts to
contemporary issues in homeopathy in Colombia. An indispensable text about
the history of homeopathy in Colombia is the research done by María del Pilar
Guzmán Urrea and called: “”La alopatía y la homeopatía en el siglo XIX: conflicto
entre dos prácticas médicas” (Allopathy and Homeopathy in the XIX century:
conflict between two medical practices).2

2. Geographical contextColombia is located in Northern South America,
bordering the Caribbean Sea, between Panama and Venezuela, and bordering
the North Pacific Ocean, between Ecuador and Panama, in the timezone GMT -5.
The country has boundaries of 6,004 – Brazil 1,643, Ecuador 590, Panama 225,
Peru 1,496 (est.), Venezuela 2,050 (km), and a coastline of 3,208 (North Pacific
1,448 km, Caribbean Sea 1,760 km) (km). The presence of Colombia in the
Caribbean Sea, through its ownership of San Andrés Island and Providence
Island, amplifies its boundaries with Nicaragua, Costa Rica, República
Dominicana, Haití, Honduras and Jamaica. The major urban areas are: Bogota
(capital city of the country), Barranquilla, Cali, and Medellin. Colombia is the
second richest country in the world in biodiversity. From a homeopathic
perspective there has been almost no research done in terms of exploring the
medicinal potential of the territory and its relation to the rich vernacular
knowledge systems found among peasant societies and the more than 85
aboriginal groups that exist in the country. The country is considered to have
around 10% of all worlds biodiversity. This biodiversity results from Colombia’s
varied ecosystems—from the rich tropical rainforest, the Andean region, to the
coastal cloud forests, to the open savannas in the Orinoco and to ecosystems
found in the Amazon basin. More than 1,821 species of birds, 623 species of
amphibians, 467 species of mammals, 518 species of reptiles, and 3,200 species
of fish reside in Colombia. About 18 percent of these are endemic to the country.
Colombia has a mind-boggling 51,220 species of plants, of which nearly 30

3. percent are endemic. While on paper nearly 10 percent of Colombia is under
some form of protection, its rich biodiversity is increasingly threatened by
deforestation, livestock production and urbanization. Today, most of the
population (70%) is living in the major cities and in the Andean region. Around
65 % of the country is located in the Amazon and Orinoco basin with a very low
population density in those regions.
Homoeopathy in Colombia
In Colombia there is a long tradition of practitioners and Medical Doctors who
have practiced homeopathy, but as it happens in most of the world, homeopathy
has always been in a subordinate condition in comparison to the dominant
biomedical model. According to Fabian González Arias, Homeopathy arrived at
our country around 1825 and 1830 (1998). Some few doctors started to practice
in those early years, but most of the medical community was hostile to the new
medical doctrine. As in many countries, homeopathy in Colombia has lived
through hard times and many struggles. It was introduced by the doctors Juan
Pardo and José Arrubla whom began to bring the first books and materials to the
country. In those early days few libraries existed. Probably the coastal cities of
Barranquilla, Cartagena and Santa Marta, in the Caribbean Sea, were visited by
homeopaths of other countries, but there has not been any research to confirm
that assertion. Consequently the history of homeopathy in Colombia is basically
expressed in the records found at the capital city of Bogotá in the Andean region
of the country.
Doctor Arrubla gave some homeopathic books as a gift to Doctor José Felix
Merizalde, who in turn gave them to Doctor Vicente Sanmiguel, who had lost his
child in an epidemic. Doctor Sanmiguel started reading the Hahnemann’s
Organon of Medicine. He was exceptionally impressed by the ideas of
Hahnemann and decided to close his allopathic pharmacy and abandon the
practice of allopathy. It seems that he was the first Colombian practioner of
homeopathy. Doctor’s Sanmiguel son, an apothecary, who was called José
Peregrino Sanmiguel, was introduced by his father to the principles of
homeopathy. In the beginning he was especially skeptical. His father challenged
him to make a proving of a substance known only by him. His son carried out
the proving and felt the effects on his mind and body. The substance came to be
Colocynthis. Both father and son became ardent homeopaths and together with
Hipolito Villamil started to motivate other doctors of the period in the principles
and practice of homeopathy.
By around 1837, with the help of 30 practitioners, they decided to organize the
first teaching center called Homeopathic Institute Of The United States Of
Colombia, April 10, 1837. The first acting president was Doctor Luis Hernando
Alvarez. By 1840, the first journal, called La Homeopatía, began to be published.
The European doctors Roberto Bunch and David Castillo gave support by
bringing to Colombia books and other documents. A Cuban doctor, Salvador
Riera helped disseminate homeopathy in small towns near the capital city,
Bogotá, and in some northern provinces. A homeopathic hospital was
founded at the town of Socorro, Santander around 1860`s. There was
also a homeopathic hospital at Chiquinquira, Boyacá. Many priests by the end of
the XIX century practiced homeopathy and were members of the Instituto
Homeopático de Colombia. This Institute was the first scientific society and
was the entity in charge of the publication and the training of homeopaths and
medical doctors up to 1980. Unfortunately, unsteady management by its last
director in 1980’s ended with the unclear image of a serious institution. All the

4. journals, documentation, certificates that belong to the origins of homeopathy in
Colombia were lost or stolen. It is very difficult to find the complete numbers of
the journal La Homeopatía. Not even the National Library of Colombia has a
complete series of the almost 143 published volumes. For almost all of the XIX
and XX century, the Instituto Homeopático de Colombia was the main entity for
the training of homeopaths, both medical doctors and practitioners3.
The presence of practitioners has been important in the history of homeopathy
up to the present.4 In many isolated regions and even in the most important
cities, many practitioners were recognized by the State and gained their training
at the Instituto Homeopático de Colombia. For many of them, living on remote
places, their education was carried out through correspondence. Because of the
difficult sanitary conditions in a tropical country like Colombia, many doctors
understood the importance of practitioners. Others were hostile and ridiculed
them by calling them teguas, which was a word used to refer to the person
acting as a homeopath. When people in the city of Bogotá, went to a homeopath
and their friends or relatives knew who was treating them, people would say :
“You are being treated by a tegua, “el que aguitas te da”?(the one that gives
you water). Tegua, was the diminutive expression and linguistic turn of water
(agua). Over the years it came to express a deceiver. Some MD’s refer to
homeopaths as Teguas, forgetting that everyone who is a homeopath is a
Tegua, because from a classic chemistry knowledge, which we all know is
insufficient to explain homeopathic remedies, really we all are working with
water (teguas). In any case, the presence of practitioners has been active and
significant throughout the history of homeopathy in Colombia.By the year 1865,
the Institute of Homeopathy of Colombia had five persons performing as
teachers: José Peregrino Sanmiguel, Salvador María Alvarez, Saturnino del
Castillo, Marcelino Lievano and Ignacio Pereira. Other doctors participated as
honorary members of the Institute of Homeopathy.During the nineteenth
century, homeopathy was considered a very precious art and science by some of
the most recognized members of the Colombian society. General José Hilario
López (Popayán, february 18 of 1798 – Campoalegre, Huila, November 27 of
1869), serviceman, Colombian politician and president of the country
(1849-1853) was one of the presidents of the Colombian Institute of
Homeopathy (1866). This president was the one that promulgated Law 15 of
May 1850, which declared, under a liberal radical philosophy, freedom of
education and removed the requisite of a professional title. As a result, the
freedom of education opened a great space for the practice of homeopathy,
gaining social recognition. A couple of decades later, Rafael Pombo, a prestigious
poet from the aristocracy wrote a couple of poems honoring homeopathy.
Another prominent person in the history of Colombia and president of the
country, Rafael Nuñez, was a member of the Institute of Homeopathy and a
great promoter of homeopathy. After 1860-1870 the golden age of homeopathy,
or at least its opportunity to gain institutionalization was over. From then on, the
evolution of the allopathic Faculties of Medicine would work to label homeopathy
as a fraud. In that difficult situation, some homeopaths had relevant positions
attending leprosy. That was the case of the practitioner and patient of leprosy
named Luis Carlos Pradilla, who practiced homeopathy as a patient of leprosy
in the lazaretto, located at the town of Agua de Dios (Water of God) in the state
of Cundinamarca around 18005. This homeopath, who was a nephew of the
medical doctor Ricardo de la Parra, published with other patients, between 1879
and 1880, a newspaper initially called Hope, but later the name was changed to
The Voice of the Banned. The newspaper published local news, poetry and

5. articles written by the people from the lazaretto, along with issues that
contained religious, moral and philosophical topics6. The authors recommended
the catholic virtues of humility and resignation; and suggested reading and
cultivating the spirit in order to overcome adversity. There is no information
about the remedies used by this practitioner to treat leprosy. (For the testimony
of a contemporary homeopathic patient being treated for flu see:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=10DO8BQXdkA)
The Institute of Homeopathy of Colombia was very close in ties and relations
with European scientific societies and institutions. The directors of the Institute
traveled and participated in world and international congresses. The first
homeopathy courses taught in Colombia were copied from the Hahnemanian
School of Chicago. The subjects were: General Anatomy, Physiology, Botany,
Pharmacology, Practical and pathological anatomy, materia medica,
therapeutics, theoretical surgery, legal medicine, clinics, psychology, obstetrics,
chemistry and toxicology (1866).
Until 1864 the Institute had few members. Many of the new homeopaths
migrated to other countries. That was the case of Doctor José Peregrino
Sanmiguel who was the first to take the seeds of homeopathy to the country of
Ecuador. On June 8 of 1865, the Institute was reorganized as Homeopathic
Institute Of Colombia. The statutes were decided at a work session on the
seventh of October, 1865. On that same day the journal “Homeopathy” was
born. For almost 132 years this journal was published (143 issues). The last
issue was published in January 1998 with a complete compilation of the laws
written for homeopathy by the legislative branch of Colombia during the
twentieth century.In 1867, the National University of Colombia was
established and a professorship of homeopathy was created. During its history,
without a continuous line, homeopathy has occupied some space at that
campus. It has been, on some occasions, the institution that has regulated the
exercise of practitioners, giving them the opportunity to legalize their informal
status. Today, the main goal of the allopathic doctors who oversee homeopathy
at that university campus, is to exclude any practitioner from the exercise of
homeopathy on a legal basis; they do not care or take into account experience
or knowledge, but are aware that homeopaths like Doctor Gonzalo Moncada
knows more about homeopathy than all teachers of homeopathy at that
university campus. I have personally known practitioners that a couple of
decades ago were legalized in their status by assisting training programs at the
National University of Colombia. Today the environment at the Faculty of
Medicine is hostile to practitioners. Their purpose is to monopolize all alternative
medicine in their hands, going against the spirit of the Constitution of Colombia.
On the contrary, private universities like Universidad del Rosario have been
implementing non-formal training programs called ‘Diplomados’, this type of
program does not require permission from the National State. The program from
Universidad del Rosario is called Diplomat in Alternative Medicines:
Magnetotherapy, Homeopathy, Flower essences, Neural therapy and
acupuncture. This program is a step forward if we consider testimonies by
practicing homeopaths, that during the 1960’s, some deans of the medical
school at the Universidad del Rosario promoted lynching practitioners of
homeopathy who lived near Candelaria, just beside the University campus at the
capital city of Bogotá. Some homeopaths back then worked as tailors and in the
back of their tailor shops they worked as pure homeopaths.
In the year 1869, the sovereign state of Cundinamarca through a law, assigned
to the Homeopathic Institute Of Colombia, space for establishing a homeopathic

6. hospital. The idea was to treat the patients who were declared incurable by
allopaths. The hospital was never established because of economic problems.
The anterior law was derogated by a law of November 3 of 1870. Homeopathy
was practised by many priests. The founder of the first Colombian Religious
Congregation called Dominicas de Santa Catalina de Siena, was a Dominican
priest, Saturnino Gutiérrez (1835-1911) who gained his homeopathic training
from the Colombian Institute of Homeopathy.
Father Saturnino Gutiérrez O.P
The medical philosophy of both friar Buenaventura García O.P and friar
Saturnino O.P was based on homeopathy. They were introduced to homeopathy
by Doctor José Félix de Merizalde, who was in charge of medicine at the
University of Saint Thomas. It seems that Doctor Merizalde, introduced as part
of his classes, the Organon of Medicine. Between 1870 and 1880, the
comprehension of the realm of homeopathic philosophy by friar Buenaventura,
allowed him to receive the title of Doctor by the Instituto Homeopático de
Colombia. The homeopathic ‘principles’ served as well in the mission of friar
Saturnino. Homeopathy help to explain his key concepts about the importance of
the intersubjetive experience. The Dominican Order was probably the most
important religious order in Colombia since colonial times. Their clergy were very
active in the Departments of Cundinamarca and Boyacá, land of the prehispanic
Muiscas, the most advanced indigenous community at the arrival of Spaniards to
the Andean region in Colombia.
In 1869 there were 32 homeopaths, three journals (La Homeopatía, La Sociedad
Hahnemaniana in Bogotá, El Correo in the Department of Bolivar) and five
pharmacies in the capital city, which required a seal from the Instituto
Homeopático de Colombia on the bottles of the remedies they sold. In 1870, the
number of registered Medical Doctors for Colombia was of 675 for a population
of 2.9 million inhabitants; which means two doctors for every 10.000
inhabitants. As a matter of fact, most of the population was being attended by
the vernacular medical systems and by many practitioners of medicine and
homeopathy.By 1892, the Homeopathic Institute of Colombia had 497 medical
graduates in homeopathy; many of them living in different regions of Colombia.
In the twentieth century, another important homeopathic institute was founded
by a practitioner who was trained at the Homeopathic Institute Of Homeopathy:

7. This new Institution was called Fundación Instituto Homeopático de
Colombia Luis G. Paez. The founder was a philanthropist who donated his
entire fortune to the Institute. One of the donated lands was stolen by the
executor of the Foundation around 1920, after the death of Doctor Paez. These
lands are known today as the neighborhood of Meissen, birthplace of the master
Hahnemann in Germany. The neighborhood of Meissen, symbolizes the efforts of
homeopathy to gain recognition in Colombia; today none of the neighbors know
the origin and relation of the name of their district with homeopathy. The
neighborhood is a popular urbanized area located at the southern part of the city
of Bogotá. This foundation is a very serious institution and has been doing
rigorous provings in the last decade (C.XX). It is controlled only by MD’s and has
no recognition from the Colombian State. As a result everyone in Colombia,
practitioners and MD´s in a way are practicing homeopathy illegally. This
institute goes to a postgraduate level only for MDs and veterinary doctors. There
is no undergraduate program in Colombia in the present.
It is important to note that a recent law written under the government of
President Álvaro Uribe Vélez, (law 1164 of 2007) recognizes the legal basis of
the following alternative medicines: a)Traditional Chinese Medicine; b) Ayurvedic
Medicine; c) Naturopathic Medicine, and d) Homeopathic Medicine. Theoretically
all of these schools of medicine can be developed at a undergraduate level. Until
now there has been no proposal by any university to open academic programs to
an undergraduate level. As I have already mentioned, the tendency is to mix the
different approaches of alternative medicine in short courses, with no depth and
real understanding of similarities and differences among the so-called alternative
medicines. As it happens in the world, alternatives medicines are viewed, used
and marketed to patients and medical staff as quick healing practices.
Up to 1960, many eminent botanists and homeopaths travelled to our country to
visit the Institute of Homeopathy and meet its members. Some Colombian
homeopaths were active researchers and writers. For example, Doctor Ignacio
Pereira, since 1855 understood the presence of leprosy, tuberculosis and syphilis
as diseases related to parasites or microbes. He published his results fifteen
years before Louis Pasteur. Living in third world country meant that his work
never had the recognition that medicine bestowed on Pasteur, who lived in a
first world country.7
Over the years, some pure experimentation or provings had been carried out by
different persons without a rigorous scientific design, or even correct botanical
taxonomy. Unlike Mexico, we have never published a Colombian Materia Medica.
Below is the list of some of the provings done by homeopaths. The common and
scientific name is given. In most of the cases, I have registered the scientific
name according to the new standards in taxonomy: Croton lechleri M classified
erroneously by Leal Eulogio as Rhizophora mangle (1905); Sophia Regia,
popular name, amargoso, probably the same serval Silvestre sorbus aucuparia
(1905); Canchalagua, without a botanical classification when experimented by
Luís G Paez, 1897, today known as Erythrae chilensis Pers m, Gentiana
canchalagua,R, Gentianella magellanica, Scoparia montevidensis
(Scrophulariaceae), Schkuhria pinnata (Asteraceae); Curare, Strychnos toxifera
R.H. Schomb. ex Lindl; Mangle Colorado, Rhizophora mangle L, information
given by doctor Mauro Hernández Mesa, on July of 1976 being President of the

8. Institute of Homeopathy of Colombia; Guaco, Mikania laevigata Sch.Bip.ex
Bake; Coca, Erythoroxylum coca; Pacurú Niara according to Doctor Mauro
Hernández Mesa the specie is Ternstroemiflora de Mildbr.
The Pacurú Niara was shown at Paris in the Exposition Universelle (1889) by the
Colombian botanist José Jerónimo Triana who gave sufficient quantity to Doctor
Roulin for its chemical analysis; unfortunately this scientist mistook the sample
for curare; Guambi, Anthelmia of Linneo; Algarrobo, Courbaril of Linneo
(HYMENAEA COURBARIL);Yoco, PAULLINIA CLAVIGERA VAR BULLATA,
Caparrapi, Magnolia hernandezii (Lozano) Govaerts; a small poison frog
(Phyllobates) called by natives of Choco Chequeneaara, Basuniara, Fiu fiu and
Kokot. More plants: a poison plant called Mata negro (Glabra), a plant used by
Indians in Colombia and Guatemala. The Chicha, a traditional fermented
beverage, containing a mixture of flour and maize. Some pathosgenias have
been carried out with borracheros (datura arborea, solanaceas). Many
practitioners have carried their own pathogenesis, unfortunately there is no
standardized book or publication with any of the experiments conducted by
homeopaths in Colombia.
Currently the Foundation Institute of Homeopathy of Colombia Luís G. Paez has
being doing some research and pure experimentation. In Bogotá, nowadays,
there are some 90 Medical Doctors with specialization on homeopathy listed in
the yellow pages. Although regulations say that only MDs can treat patients with
homeopathy, many non-MDs are practicing homeopathy and they are tolerated.
There is an organization for homeopaths in Santa Fe de Bogotá, the Asociacion
Medica Homeopática de Colombia (ASMHOC) and also one consisting mainly of
practitioners, Asociación Colombiana de Homeópatas (Asocoldo). Universidad del
Bosque, a private University, has designed a non-formal diplomat with 240
hours of teaching, only for MDs. The National University of Colombia, the major
university of the country, recently opened a post-graduate program of
Alternative Medicines with emphasis in Homeopathy, Chinese medicine and
acupuncture, homotoxicology, Chiropractic, and Osteopathy. This program
pretends to teach the basics of the above arts of healing in only two years.
My personal training started with the long distances courses of Homeopathy
(1998-2001) offered by the British Institute of Homeopathy; my tutor was Joan
O’ Connor, who was living in Canada. Later I took probably the last Course of
Homeopathy imparted by the Instituto Homeopático de Colombia before its
actual President, Doctor Fabían González, went to live in Canada; he is working
in Montreal, Canada as a homeopath8.
Recently, there are two “official” schools, which only accept MDs: Escuela de
Medicina Juan N. Corpas and Instituto Homeopático Luis G. Paez. There are
other schools that teach homeopathy as a career (with no government
recognition) or as a postgraduate medical course: Fundación Homeopática de
Colombia, Fundación Colegio Nacional de Medicina Homeopática y Naturismo.
Fundación Hahnemann is directed by Doctor Carlos Santos. The last time I heard
him speak, he told us that his school was closed until the total regulation of law
1164 by a governmental decree. Some training of MDs is being carried out by
pure homeopaths in Cali, one of the major cities of the country. There are some
30 homeopathic pharmacies in Bogotá, 10 in Medellin. The training schools for
homeopaths were active for an important life span during the twentieth century.
I recall the Fundación Homeopática de Colombia directed by Doctor Vicente
Alvarez, with a six years curriculum; another school was Escuela de Medicina
Homeopática Leon Vannier. It seems they had only one program (1978) and
their courses in homeopathy lasted two years. Nowadays, some homeopaths,

9. like Doctor Jaime Pinilla are doing provings, in his case with the insect known as
PITO (Triatoma infestans), which is the transmitter of tripanosoma cruzi
(Chagas-Mazza disease). Personally, I have been promoting research with
solanaceas.9 Many of the provings carried out over a period a 173 years have
been lost. They were never published or some homeopaths died without
transmitting the findings of their provings. In the last three years, under the
guidance of the National Service of Learning (SENA), a state institution,
practitioners in homeopathy have been the main protagonists in the definition of
professional competence that theoretically will regulate the practice of
homeopathy in Colombia.
Paradoxically, it is the experience and knowledge of pure homeopaths, which will
define the practice of homeopathy in Colombia both for Medical Doctors and pure
homeopaths. This process has occurred with the participation of some Medical
Doctors. But when it comes to talking about homeopathy, during the different
sessions, the Medical Doctors must be silent and hear what the pure
homeopaths have to say.
In the year 2008, a homeopathic dispensary was established in the city of
Bogotá under the support of the Red Cross and the guidance of Felipe Cárdenas,
who acted as scientific director of the project. The project consisted in treating
street inhabitants. Every weekend, over a period of two months, from 8:00 a.m.
to 12:30 p.m, the indigent population of Bogotá had access to homeopathic
treatment. Using only some of the 80 major homeopathic remedies, the
dispensary became a clinic with excellent results. The treatment was completely
free of any cost. The doctors that participated in that project were the pure
homeopath Jaime Pinilla and the medical doctor Sandra Fandiño, under the
scientific guidance of Felipe Cárdenas D.I.Hom. With this dispensary, it was
proven that team work is possible between pure homeopaths and medical
doctors. Sandra Fandiño was studying homeopathy at Fundación Instituto
Homeopático de Colombia Luis G. Paez; she is a witness to the deep knowledge
that pure homeopaths may gain.

10. The Homeopathic Dispensary in Bogotá, and homeopathic practice by pure
homeopaths (2007).
Since around ten years ago, some private companies providing health care
Colombia, are offering the possibility for their clients to choose Medical Doctors
with alternative medicines; as one of the main choices, many patients are
looking into homeopathy as the principal alternative medicine. The problem is
that these medical doctors have to operate under the same temporal scales of
the allopathic model that constrains the consultation period to a maximum of 30
minutes per patient. One of these health care providers once started to offer in
its drugstore homeopathic remedies. The dilemma was that after a couple of
months nobody was demanding biochemical drugs; as a result of the poor sales,
the distributing companies intervened, forcing the health provider to stop selling
homeopathic remedies.
For practitioners subsistence is not easy. Most laws in the last 40 years are not
very favorable for what I call pure homeopaths. In the last years, the practice of
homeopathy has become very eclectic among doctors. One out of ten MDs, is a
pure homeopath. Many Medical Doctors are migrating to informational medicine,
synergetic medicine… Many MDs combine everything with homeopathy. There is
a small community of medical doctors who practice homeopathy according to
orthodox rules. I think that in recent years, most doctors are going to the
terrains of biomedicine, which has attractive technological paraphernalia that
gives them the idea of control and wisdom. Practitioners work illegally and are
not recognized by the State. Some estimates say that we have about 5,000 to
10,000 practitioners10. Nobody really knows the exact number. It’s dangerous for
practitioners to say that they practice homeopathy. Recently (2005), one of
them was expelled from a Jesuit University (Universidad Javeriana), because his
environmentalists “friends” considered him a dangerous person, for arguing from
a vitalistic perspective against the deterministic and materialistic models that
dominate some of the discussions and debates in the field of environmental
studies. Father Gerardo Remolina S.J, the Rector, preferred to condemn the

11. homeopath rather than accept the truths of homeopathy, which never were
argued on an academic basis. In his dismissal letter they wrote: “You were told
not to publish or write about homeopathy”. The letter was signed by a Jesuit
priest with a doctorate in theology and philosophy on June of 200511.
I know a couple of practitioners who earn their living and subsistence mainly
working with homeopathy. It is not easy for them. The State is looking, under a
recent law, to identify and regulate the practice of all alternative medicines. But
the spirit of the LAW is to give the monopoly of alternative medicines to the
allopathic community. Four years ago I was the Vice presidential candidate of
the Greens of Colombia (2006). We where censured by the press, but I used the
few spaces given by the media, to promote and defend homeopathy. I think,
hoping I am wrong, that the future of homeopathy will be stormy. This is
especially due to two main issues: i) eclecticism in the medical practices of
homeopathy and ii) a worldwide tendency by the allopathic community to
monopolize all alternative medicines, which in turn is directing their attention to
informational medicine. Therefore, for many of these alternative MDs,
homeopathy is a just a precious prehistoric legend in the field of alternative
medicine; they called themselves homeopaths, only because they use
homeopathic remedies, without applying their efforts in the search of the
simillimum of the patient. It is easier today, to connect patients to one of those
“wonderful” machines in the fields of radionics, biofeedback, or informational
medicine, which proclaim that in seconds they reach heaven and are able to
apply the remedies of all the known stars, hell and constellations in the search of
healing. The search for the simillimum in homeopathy has no short cuts; work is
hard, especially on chronic cases, but homeopaths know, and their patients too,
that real cures and healings are part of an endless story of divine landscapes,
where the earthly binds with dynamic energy, transforming maladies into
symphonies.

12. Pure Homeopaths from the Colombian Association of Homeopaths
Final remarksI have been emphasizing the importance of practitioners in
homeopathy. The problem and virtue of homeopathy is that its epistemology is
an open code system, which means that anyone who is willing to work hard and
study a lot can become a great homeopath. And this existential process can
occur within a medical faculty, outside of any school, through the teachings of a
friend, or from your own autodidact study. Anyway, the fact is that the presence
of pure homeopaths is denied by the majority of the medical community; most
of their historical documents tend to ignore that crucial fact in the history of
modern medicine. On most documents, they forget that many MD´s gained their
knowledge of homeopathy and were introduced into its principles by
practitioners. Medical doctors distort the history of homeopathy in Colombia,
ignoring the presence of practitioners from the very beginning of homeopathy in
Colombia.
Homeopathy has been part of the history of the world, together with medical
doctors. Thousands of homeopathic practitioners, with a degree or not, have
practiced the homeopathic profession, performing an invaluable service to
society. Finally, I want to share a political and symbolic act that we have been
carrying out as pure homeopaths in Colombia. It refers to a universal declaration
which states and declares that homeopathy is a legacy of humanity. The
declaration states:
“The homeopaths of the world desire to have the support of society and the
general public, seeking partnerships that will enable us to make visible
homeopathy as a heritage and legacy of all mankind. The history of homeopathy
has known numerous cases of individuals who were homeopaths, having
embraced first training in other fields of knowledge: agriculture, the military,
anthropology, law, priesthood, biology, bishops, and nuns. Homeopathic
remedies are effective and inexpensive in the treatment of acute and chronic
illnesses. The state of the art of the health-illness studies have clearly
demonstrated that the opposition of the pharmaceutical industry and certain
sectors of the medical profession can be understand more from their interest in
money than a real interest in the health of mankind. This has led many times,
with the complicity of states and governments, to the persecution or death of
many homeopaths. It reveals a time of deception and potential excesses of the
pharmaceutical biochemical model which is dominant and is aimed almost
exclusively at personal gain.”
“The imposition of a single medical model and the intention to appropriate
approaches such as Homeopathy, Ayurvedic medicine, Chinese medicine and
Herbology, can be understood only as part of a fundamentalist culture that is
said to be predominantly scientific, allegedly neutral and “universal”. Supported
by the pharmaceutical multinationals, the pronouncements of certain sectors of
society (Council of State, Secretary of Health, Government) do not reflect an
interest in promoting or protecting the health of peoples or nations, but rather
the interests of a mono-cultural scheme of thought.
Petition:
“Therefore, we request that homeopathy should be recognized as a heritage and
legacy of humankind, and the best exercise of this science is represented by
homeopaths, who fortunately are abundant in the world. We invite you to join
this petition, which requests that homeopathy should be declared a heritage and
legacy of humanity and of all peoples and nations of the world. It appeals to the
judges of the nations following the rule of law: Cuilibet in arte sua perito est
credendum [Credence should be given to one skilled in his particular art]. It is

13. sought to be heard as a homeopath and hoping to be understood, based on a
logical reasoning, that justifies the exercise of homeopathy in the world by
anyone who is willing to study its doctrine, materia medica, techniques, methods
and principles of this particular science”.
We invite everyone to support and sign this petition.
You can access the petition at:
http://www.gopetition.com/online/28003.html
Footnotes:1 He is a practitioner from the British Institute of Homeopathy and
Instituto Homeopático de Colombia. Advisor of the Social Medicine and
Homeopathy Department of Centir foundation, a major homeopathic center in
Colombia. He is the actual director of the Political Science and Human Rights
Department at Universidad de la Sabana. fundacioncentir@telmex.net.co
2
http://www.lablaa.org/blaavirtual/revistas/revanuario/ancolh22/articul/art3/art
3
3a.pdf
3
Based on: Instituto Homeopático de Colombia, “Reglamentación de la Medicina
Homeopática en Colombia”, La Homeopatía, no. 143, Year 132, January of 1998.
4
María del Pilar Guzmán Urrea. “La alopatía y la homeopatía en el siglo XIX:
conflicto entre dos prácticas médicas”. Anuario Colombiano de Historia Social y
de la Cultura. 1995. (22): 59-73.
5
Gutiérrez, Apuntamientos para la historia de Agua de Dios. pp.14-24, 126.
citado por Diana Obregón Torres, Batallas contra la lepra : estado, medicina y
ciencia en Colombia, Medellín: Banco de la República, Fondo Editorial
Universitario EAFIT, 2002.
6
Obregón,Ibid.http://www.lablaa.org/blaavirtual/sociologia/bat/bat3c.htm
h
7
Ignacio Pereira, Elefantiasis de los griegos: Carta dirigida al señor Ricardo de la
Parra (Bogotá: Imprenta de Foción Mantilla, 1866), ver especialmente pp.1-5.
8
http://horea.info/gonzales/formation.php9 Felipe Cárdenas. The Homeopathic
h
materia medica: the family of the solanaceas.http://www.homeoint.org/articles/
c
cardenas/solanaceas.htm
10
Videos about Pure homeopaths in Colombia:Doctor Gonzalo Moncada:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nDfw9d8ZqyIDoctor Vicente Alvares: http://
www.youtube.com/watch?v=HWVO65EAHCsDoctor Felipe Cárdenas:
h
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=10DO8BQXdkA
11
For the complete process against this homeopath the archives are found at:
http://centir.itgo.com/box_widget.htmlFolder: homeopatíaSubfolder: historia de
un linchamiento ( history of a lynching)