Call Girls Kolkata Kalikapur 💯Call Us 🔝 8005736733 🔝 💃 Top Class Call Girl Se...
Prostate Imrt
1. Acute Toxicity for
Prostatectomy Patients receiving
y g
Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy
V. Kong, T. Craig, A. Bayley, R. Bristow, C. Catton,
P. Chung, M. Gospodarowicz, M. Milosevic, P. Warde, C. Ménard
2. Introduction
Radical Prostatectomy
y
Effective treatment for patients with favorable
prognostic factors
Intent of Post-Operative Radiotherapy
Reduces local recurrence rate for high risk patients
Used as either adjuvant or salvage therapy
V. Kong, PMH Conference
3. Post-
Post-Operative Radiotherapy
Treatment Volume & Technique
q
Defined using bony landmark
4 Field Box
V. Kong, PMH Conference
4. Side effects from Radiotherapy
Gastrointestinal (GI)
Proctitis
Loose bowel movement
or diarrhea
Genitourinary ( )
y (GU)
Urinary incontinence
Increased frequency
Pain/Burning senation
V. Kong, PMH Conference
5. Advancement of Technology
New consensus guideline for prostate bed
g p
Clinical Target Volume (CTV) definition
Increase volume? -> Increase toxicity?
V. Kong, PMH Conference
6. The need to change
Treatment technique
q
Conformal 4 field box
62.7 Gy
55.0 Gy
V. Kong, PMH Conference
7. Objectives
To describe the development of an Intensity
p y
Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT) technique for
the Prostate Bed
To
T report th clinical dosimetric characteristics of
t the li i l d i t i h t i ti f
the new technique
To report acute GI and GU toxicity outcomes
To compare results with a historical cohort
treated by 4 field box technique (4FB)
V. Kong, PMH Conference
8. Method
50 patients accrued to prospective trial
p p p
V. Kong, PMH Conference
9. Process Flowchart
Patient Education Sess o
at e t ducat o Session
CT Simulation
Delineation of Regions of Interest (ROI)
Generation of IMRT Distribution
Treatment
V. Kong, PMH Conference
10. Process Flowchart
Patient Education Sess o
at e t ducat o Session
CT Simulation
Delineation of Regions of Interest (ROI)
Generation of IMRT Distribution
Treatment
V. Kong, PMH Conference
11. CT Simulation
Full bladder and empty rectum
py
Pelvic vacuum immobilization device
V. Kong, PMH Conference
12. Process Flowchart
Patient Education Sess o
at e t ducat o Session
CT Simulation
Delineation of Regions of Interest (ROI)
Generation of IMRT Distribution
Treatment
V. Kong, PMH Conference
13. Clinical Target Volume
Inferior CTV (ICTV) Superior CTV (SCTV)
Wiltshire et al. IJROBP 2007 69(4); 1090-1099
V. Kong, PMH Conference
14. Planning Target Volume
Planning Target Volume (PTV) Margin (mm)
g g ( ) g ( )
Online guidance using soft tissue/surgical clip
Chu, 2007
AP SI RL
SCTV 14 13 7
ICTV 10 11 5
V. Kong, PMH Conference
15. Organ at Risk (OAR)
Rectal Wall (RW)
( )
Bladder Wall (BW)
Penile Bulb (PB)
Femur
V. Kong, PMH Conference
16. Process Flowchart
Patient Education Sess o
at e t ducat o Session
CT Simulation
Delineation of Regions of Interest (ROI)
Generation of IMRT Distribution
Treatment
V. Kong, PMH Conference
17. IMRT
7 field step-and-shoot distribution
p
Dose fractionation
66Gy in 33 fractions
y
V. Kong, PMH Conference
18. IMRT
Treatment planning objectives
p g j
1. Avoid irradiating rectum circumferentially to
55 Gy
V. Kong, PMH Conference
20. IMRT
Treatment planning objectives
p g j
1. Avoid irradiating rectum circumferentially to
55 Gy
2. PTV D99 ≥ 54 Gy
V. Kong, PMH Conference
21. IMRT
Treatment planning objectives
p g j
1. Avoid irradiating rectum circumferentially to
55 Gy
2. PTV D99 ≥ 54 Gy
3. Maximize % of PTV receiving 95% of
prescription dose – V95
i ti d
V. Kong, PMH Conference
25. Monitoring Side Effect
Acute Toxicity Scoring
y g
Common Terminology Criteria Adverse Events
(CTCAE) v3.0
GI GU
Diarrhea Frequency
Proctitis Haematuria
Cystitis
Spasm
V. Kong, PMH Conference
26. Is IMRT better?
Comparison with 4FB technique
p q
23 patients with acute toxicity scored using
CTCAE v3.0
Dose to Rectal Wall and Bladder Wall
Acute GI/GU toxicity
V. Kong, PMH Conference
27. Result
Mean PTV V95 = 95.2% (SD = 2.1)
( )
20
18
16
14
Number 12
of 10
Patients 8
6
4
2
0
90 92 94 96 98 100
PTV V95 (%)
V. Kong, PMH Conference
28. Result
64.0
Patient A
62.0
60.0
PTV D99
58.0
(Gy)
56.0
54.0
2
R = 0.8514
Patient B 52.0
90.0 92.0 94.0 96.0 98.0 100.0
PTV V95 (%)
Mean PTV D99 = 57.8 Gy (
y (Range: 53.4 – 62.9 Gy)
g y)
V. Kong, PMH Conference
29. Result
Patient A Patient B
62.7 Gy
55.0 Gy
V. Kong, PMH Conference
30. Result
Acute GI Toxicity
y
Score Diarrhea Proctitis GI
0 19 (38%) 17 (34%) 10 (20%)
1 25 (50%) 23 (46%) 27 (54%)
2 6 (12%) 13 (20%) 13 (26%)
3 0 0 0
V. Kong, PMH Conference
31. Result
Acute GI Toxicity
y
Score Diarrhea Proctitis GI
0 19 (38%) 17 (34%) 10 (20%)
1 25 (50%) 23 (46%) 27 (54%)
2 6 (12%) 13 (20%) 13 (26%)
3 0 0 0
V. Kong, PMH Conference
34. Result
Comparison of Dose to Rectal Wall
p
100
4FB
IMRT
80
Normalized 60
Volume
(%) 40
20
0
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000
Dose (cGy)
V. Kong, PMH Conference
35. Result
Comparison of Dose to Bladder Wall
p
100
4FB
IMRT
80
Normalized 60
Volume
(%) 40
20
0
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000
Dose (Gy)
V. Kong, PMH Conference
36. Result
Comparison of Acute GI/GU Toxicity Score ≥ 2
p y
50 IMRT
4FB
40
Number 30
of
Patient
20
(%)
10
0
GI GU
G and
GI a d GU C Square value = 5
Chi Squa e a ue 5.21 & 9 , d = 1, p < 0 05
9.77, df , 0.05
V. Kong, PMH Conference
37. Conclusion
Avoidance of circumferential irradiation of rectum
to 55Gy with minimal compromise of PTV coverage
is achievable with IMRT
The use of IMRT reduces acute GI/GU toxicity rate
when compared with the 4FB technique
Ongoing investigation to determine if improved
dosimetry to OARs translates to improved late
toxicity and biochemical control
V. Kong, PMH Conference
38. Acknowledgment
Dr. Kirsty Wiltshire
y
Dr. William Chu
Clinical Trial Co ordinators
Co-ordinators
Debbie Tsuji
Bernadeth Lao
V. Kong, PMH Conference