4. 4 |
Growing market
Digital Finance Summit – 30/11/2021
— Strongly growing demand from
investors for ‘sustainable’ or
‘ESG’ investment products
— Strongly growing market of ESG
products
Flows to SRI funds, in billion USD. Source: Morningstar
5. 5 |
What is (un)sustainable ?
Digital Finance Summit – 30/11/2021
— No clear definition of ‘sustainable’/’unsustainable’
— Sustainability is complex and diverse
— Legal framework not (yet) adequate
— Confusion & misalignment
— Loss of trust & integrity
— Market fragmentation
Legislative and private initiatives & solutions
6. 6 |
a) Client’s sustainability preferences
Digital Finance Summit – 30/11/2021
Suitabl
e
product
— MiFID update
Take sustainability preferences into account in the
advisory process and portfolio management
Avoid mis-selling practices and greenwashing
— What does client expect from its portfolio:
How green?
How much impact?
What to exclude?
Suitable product offering
Investor
profile
Knowledge
and
experience
Financial
situation
Investment
objectives
Sustainability
preferences
7. 7 |
b) Towards Sustainability label
Digital Finance Summit – 30/11/2021
— Label for ‘Sustainable’ financial products
— Mitigate confusion by retail and institutional investors
— Avoid greenwashing
— Move the whole market towards more sustainability
A minimal norm with rather strict conditions
Encouragement to go beyond
No niche, but a sustainable product for all investor profiles
— Independent governance, supervision & verification
8. 8 |
Broad market adoption of the label
Digital Finance Summit – 30/11/2021
Involved institutions
85+ financial institutions
Banks, asset managers,
insurance companies,
private bankers, etc
Indexproviders, rating
agencies
from many countries
Belgium
Luxembourg
France
The Netherlands
Germany
Ireland
Nordics
United Kingdom
Switzerland
US
Australia
9. 9 |
Labelled products
Digital Finance Summit – 30/11/2021
Product types Numbers
Most comprehensive label in Europe
See full list on: www.towardssustainability.be > Products
€500+
bill.
600+ products
labelled
As of
11/2020
11. 11 |
Objectives of EU Sustainable Finance
Digital Finance Summit – 30/11/2021
Reorienting capital to
sustainable economic activities
• EU Taxonomy
• EU Green Bonds Standard
• EU Climate Benchmarks
• MiFID Sustainability Preferences
Disclosure of the sustainability
of business & products
• Sustainable Finance Disclosures
• Corporate Sustainability Reporting
• Corporate Due Diligence and Corporate
Accountability
Management of sustainability
risks
• ECB Climate Stress Tests
• CRR Pillar 3 disclosures
• EBA guidelines on loan origination
Improved financing solutions for
sustainable projects & businesses
Transparency about positive &
negative sustainability impact
Account for riskiness of
unsustainable activities & businesses
Reporting ESG data needs
12. 12 |
Manifold ESG disclosure obligations
Timing
Scope
Data
Source: EBA
Digital Finance Summit – 30/11/2021
13. 13 |
ESG data flow
Digital Finance Summit – 30/11/2021
Central
ESG data
repository
Audit/Assurance
Geolocation
Energy Performance
Economic activities
GHG Emissions
Green Investments
Companies &
Households
Financial
Institutions
ESG Data
R
E
P
O
R
T
I
N
G
• ECB Climate Stress Test
• EU Taxonomy
• SFDR
• …
!?
!?
14. 14 |
ESG data challenges
Digital Finance Summit – 30/11/2021
Company ESG information
— How to obtain the data ?
— How to ensure quality of data ?
— How to store and share data ?
— How to uniformly process and report data ?
— How to organise this efficiently ?
Assets in sustainable funds have almost doubled in the last six months, reaching $3.9tn at the end of September, according to Morningstar’s Global Sustainable Fund Flows report.
In Europe, nearly half of overall fund flows in Q3 were into sustainable funds, with passive ESG funds seeing a 9% growth.
While inflows to sustainable funds declined by 15% in Q3, they still outpaced normal funds, which saw a 20% drop in inflows.
Meanwhile, data from the Investment Association shows that two thirds of inflows from UK retail investors in September were into responsible funds.
Different data, scope, timing
FIs are confronted with multiple ESG reporting requirements, resulting from legal obligations and voluntary commitments
To be able to comply with these requirements, FIs need ESG data and methodologies
These ESG data are often not available
There exist multiple methodologies to process the ESG data
This lack of harmonisation leads to increased costs and administrative burden for FIs (and their clients)
A solution that can mitigate these inefficiencies and uncertainties should be investigated. This is preferably done on a sectoral level.
Financial institutions are providers and users of ESG data
To be able to respond to own reporting requirements, FIs rely & depend on ESG reporting by the companies they finance