FellowBuddy.com is an innovative platform that brings students together to share notes, exam papers, study guides, project reports and presentation for upcoming exams.
We connect Students who have an understanding of course material with Students who need help.
Benefits:-
# Students can catch up on notes they missed because of an absence.
# Underachievers can find peer developed notes that break down lecture and study material in a way that they can understand
# Students can earn better grades, save time and study effectively
Our Vision & Mission – Simplifying Students Life
Our Belief – “The great breakthrough in your life comes when you realize it, that you can learn anything you need to learn; to accomplish any goal that you have set for yourself. This means there are no limits on what you can be, have or do.”
Like Us - https://www.facebook.com/FellowBuddycom
1. Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver
Measuring Results and Behaviors:Measuring Results and Behaviors:
OverviewOverview
Measuring Results
Measuring Behaviors
2. Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver
Measuring Results: OverviewMeasuring Results: Overview
• Accountabilities
• Objectives
• Performance Standards
3. Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver
Key questionsKey questions
• Where should each individual focus efforts?
• What are the expected objectives?
• How do we know how well the results were
achieved?
4. Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver
AccountabilitiesAccountabilities
Broad areas of a job for which employee
is responsible for producing results
5. Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver
ObjectivesObjectives
Statements of important and
measurable outcomes
6. Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver
Performance StandardsPerformance Standards
Yardstick used to evaluate how well
employees have achieved objectives
7. Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver
Determining AccountabilitiesDetermining Accountabilities
Collect information about job (Job Description)
Determine importance of task or cluster of
tasks
• % of employee’s time spent performing task
• Impact on unit’s mission if performed inadequately
• Consequences of error
8. Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver
Determining ObjectivesDetermining Objectives
• Purpose: to identify
– Outcomes
• Limited number
• Highly important
– When achieved
• dramatic impact on overall organization success
9. Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver
Characteristics of Good ObjectivesCharacteristics of Good Objectives
• Specific and Clear
• Challenging
• Agreed Upon
• Significant
• Prioritized
• Bound by Time
• Achievable
• Fully Communicated
• Flexible
• Limited in Number
10. Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver
Determining Performance StandardsDetermining Performance Standards
Standards refer to aspects of performance objectives,
such as:
• Quality
– How well the objective is achieved
• Quantity
– How much, how many, how often, at what cost
• Time
– Due dates, schedule, cycle times, how quickly
11. Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver
Standards must include:Standards must include:
• A verb
• The desired result
• A due date
• Some type of indicator
– Quality and/or
– Quantity
12. Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver
Characteristics ofCharacteristics of
Good Performance StandardsGood Performance Standards
• Related to Position
• Concrete, Specific, Measurable
• Practical to Measure
• Meaningful
• Realistic and Achievable
• Reviewed Regularly
13. Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver
Measuring Behaviors: OverviewMeasuring Behaviors: Overview
• Identify competencies
• Identify indicators
• Choose measurement system
14. Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver
Identify CompetenciesIdentify Competencies
Measurable clusters of KSAs
– Knowledges
– Skills
– Abilities
That are critical in determining how results will
be achieved
15. Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver
Types of CompetenciesTypes of Competencies
• Differentiating
– Distinguish between superior and average
performance
• Threshold
– Needed to perform to minimum standard
16. Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver
Identify IndicatorsIdentify Indicators
Observable behaviors
Used to measure extent to which
competencies are present – or not
17. Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver
Necessary Components forNecessary Components for
Describing CompetenciesDescribing Competencies
• Definition
• Description of specific behaviors
– When competency demonstrated
– When competency not demonstrated
• Suggestions for developing the competency
18. Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver
Choose Measurement SystemChoose Measurement System
• Comparative system
– Compares employees with each other
• Absolute system
– Compares employees with pre-specified
performance standard
19. Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver
Comparative SystemsComparative Systems
• Simple rank order
• Alternation rank order
• Paired comparisons
• Forced distribution
20. Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver
Advantages of Comparative SystemsAdvantages of Comparative Systems
• Easy to explain
• Straightforward
• Better control for biases and errors found in
absolute systems
– Leniency
– Severity
– Central tendency
21. Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver
Disadvantages of Comparative SystemsDisadvantages of Comparative Systems
• Rankings may not be specific enough for
– Useful feedback
– Protection from legal challenge
• No information on relative distance between
employees
• Specific issues with forced distribution method
22. Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver
Absolute SystemsAbsolute Systems
• Essays
• Behavior checklists
• Critical incidents
• Graphic rating scales
23. Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver
EssaysEssays
• Advantage:
– Potential to provide detailed feedback
• Disadvantages:
– Unstructured and may lack detail
– Depends on supervisor writing skill
– Lack of quantitative information; difficult to use in
personnel decisions
24. Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver
Behavior checklistsBehavior checklists
• Advantage:
– Easy to use and understand
• Disadvantage:
– Scale points used are often arbitrary
– Difficult to get detailed and useful feedback
25. Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver
Critical incidentsCritical incidents
Two kinds of measurement
– Report of specific employee behavior
• Allows focus on specific behavior
• Very time-consuming
– Examples of behavior illustrative of core
competencies
• Easier to use
• Describes behavior desired
26. Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver
Graphic rating scalesGraphic rating scales
• Clear meaning for each response
category
• Consistent interpretation by outside
readers
• Supervisor and employee should
have same understanding of rating
27. Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver
Graphic rating scales:Graphic rating scales:
BARS improvementBARS improvement
• Behaviorally Anchored Rating Scales (BARS)
– Use critical incidents as anchors
– Involves multiple groups of employees in
development
• Identify important job elements
• Describe critical incidents at various levels of performance
• Check for inter-rater reliability
28. Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver
Measuring PerformanceMeasuring Performance
• Several types of methods
• Differ in terms of:
– Practicality (time and effort)
– Usefulness (quantifiable)
29. Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver
SummarySummary
• Measuring Results
– Identify accountabilities
– Set objectives
– Determine standards of performance
• Measuring Behaviors
– Identify competencies
– Identify indicators
– Choose measurement system