FellowBuddy.com is an innovative platform that brings students together to share notes, exam papers, study guides, project reports and presentation for upcoming exams.
We connect Students who have an understanding of course material with Students who need help.
Benefits:-
# Students can catch up on notes they missed because of an absence.
# Underachievers can find peer developed notes that break down lecture and study material in a way that they can understand
# Students can earn better grades, save time and study effectively
Our Vision & Mission – Simplifying Students Life
Our Belief – “The great breakthrough in your life comes when you realize it, that you can learn anything you need to learn; to accomplish any goal that you have set for yourself. This means there are no limits on what you can be, have or do.”
Like Us - https://www.facebook.com/FellowBuddycom
The byproduct of sericulture in different industries.pptx
Measuring Performance {Lecture Notes}
1. Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver
Defining Performance and Choosing aDefining Performance and Choosing a
Measurement Approach: OverviewMeasurement Approach: Overview
Defining Performance
Determinants of Performance
Performance Dimensions
Approaches to Measuring Performance
2. Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver
Defining PerformanceDefining Performance
Performance is:
• Behavior
• What employees do
3. Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver
Defining PerformanceDefining Performance
Performance is NOT:
• Results or Outcomes
• What employees produce
4. Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver
Behaviors labeled as Performance are:Behaviors labeled as Performance are:
1. Evaluative
– Negative
– Neutral
– Positive
2. Multidimensional
– Many different kinds of behaviors
– Advance or hinder organizational goals
5. Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver
Behaviors are Not alwaysBehaviors are Not always
– Observable
– Measurable
6. Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver
Results/Consequences may be usedResults/Consequences may be used
– To infer behavior
– As proxy for behavioral measure
7. Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver
Determinants of PerformanceDeterminants of Performance
Performance =
Declarative Knowledge
X
Procedural Knowledge
X
Motivation
8. Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver
A. Declarative KnowledgeA. Declarative Knowledge
• Information about
– Facts
– Labels
– Principles
– Goals
• Understanding of task requirements
9. Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver
B. Procedural KnowledgeB. Procedural Knowledge
• Knowing
– What to do
– How to do it
• Skills
– Cognitive
– Physical
– Perceptual
– Motor
– Interpersonal
10. Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver
C. MotivationC. Motivation
• Choices
– Expenditure of effort
– Level of effort
– Persistence of effort
11. Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver
Implications for AddressingImplications for Addressing
Performance ProblemsPerformance Problems
• Managers need information to accurately identify
source(s) of performance problems
• Performance management systems must
– Measure performance
AND
– Provide information on SOURCE(s) of problems
12. Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver
Factors Influencing Determinants ofFactors Influencing Determinants of
Performance:Performance:
• Individual characteristics
– Procedural knowledge
– Declarative knowledge
– Motivation
• HR practices
• Work environment
13. Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver
Performance Dimensions:Performance Dimensions:
Types of multi-dimensional behaviors:Types of multi-dimensional behaviors:
• Task performance
• Contextual performance
– Pro-social behaviors
– Organizational citizenship
14. Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver
Task performanceTask performance
Activities that
• transform raw materials
• help with the transformation process
– Replenishing
– Distributing
– Supporting
15. Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver
Contextual performanceContextual performance
Behaviors that
• contribute to organization’s effectiveness
and
• provide a good environment in which task
performance can occur
16. Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver
Differences BetweenDifferences Between
Task and Contextual PerformanceTask and Contextual Performance
• Task Performance
• Varies across jobs
• Likely to be role
prescribed
• Influenced by
• Abilities
• Skills
• Contextual Performance
• Fairly similar across jobs
• Not likely to be role
prescribed
• Influenced by
• Personality
17. Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver
Why Include Task & ContextualWhy Include Task & Contextual
Performance Dimensions in PM system?Performance Dimensions in PM system?
1. Global competition
2. Teamwork
3. Customer service
4. Supervisor views
18. Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver
Job Performance in ContextJob Performance in Context
A performer
(individual or
team)
In a given
situation
Engages in
certain
behaviors
That
produce
various
results
TRAIT BEHAVIOR RESULTS
19. Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver
Approaches to Measuring PerformanceApproaches to Measuring Performance
• Trait Approach
– Emphasizes individual traits of employees
• Behavior Approach
– Emphasizes how employees do the job
• Results Approach
– Emphasizes what employees produce
20. Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver
Trait ApproachTrait Approach
• Emphasis on individual
• Evaluate stable traits
• Cognitive abilities
• Personality
• Based on relationship between
traits & performance
21. Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver
Trait Approach (continued)Trait Approach (continued)
• Appropriate if
• Structural changes planned for organization
• Disadvantages
• Improvement not under individual’s control
• Trait may not lead to
• Desired behaviors or
• Desired results
22. Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver
Behavior ApproachBehavior Approach
Appropriate if
• Employees take a long time to achieve
desired outcomes
• Link between behaviors and results is not
obvious
• Outcomes occur in the distant future
• Poor results are due to causes beyond the
performer’s control
Not appropriate if
• above conditions are not present
23. Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver
Results ApproachResults Approach
Advantages:
• Less time
• Lower cost
• Data appear objective
24. Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver
Results Approach (continued)Results Approach (continued)
Most appropriate when:
• Workers skilled in necessary behaviors
• Behaviors and results obviously related
• Consistent improvement in results over time
• Many ways to do the job right