Suche senden
Hochladen
Ellen eng 102 (6) being a writer
•
Als PPT, PDF herunterladen
•
2 gefällt mir
•
692 views
E
ewolterb
Folgen
Melden
Teilen
Melden
Teilen
1 von 11
Jetzt herunterladen
Empfohlen
Rhetorical analysis
Rhetorical analysis
alisaulferts1
Teaching evidence and reasons
Teaching evidence and reasons
krochalek
GCSE SHP Germany Opposition to the Nazis
GCSE SHP Germany Opposition to the Nazis
Malarvilie
Essay2 argument figrevrev
Essay2 argument figrevrev
rigolinr
test
Cole ppt
Cole ppt
rooo4
Chapter 4
Chapter 4
corrinespencer
An academic language development and oral language development interactive presentation on developing arguments.
What is an Argument: A Foundation for ELA in the Common Core Era
What is an Argument: A Foundation for ELA in the Common Core Era
Joseph Espinosa, M.Ed., NBCT
Informative, provides facts Argumentative, provides the author's point of view
Informative vs argumentative
Informative vs argumentative
trmrefugio
Empfohlen
Rhetorical analysis
Rhetorical analysis
alisaulferts1
Teaching evidence and reasons
Teaching evidence and reasons
krochalek
GCSE SHP Germany Opposition to the Nazis
GCSE SHP Germany Opposition to the Nazis
Malarvilie
Essay2 argument figrevrev
Essay2 argument figrevrev
rigolinr
test
Cole ppt
Cole ppt
rooo4
Chapter 4
Chapter 4
corrinespencer
An academic language development and oral language development interactive presentation on developing arguments.
What is an Argument: A Foundation for ELA in the Common Core Era
What is an Argument: A Foundation for ELA in the Common Core Era
Joseph Espinosa, M.Ed., NBCT
Informative, provides facts Argumentative, provides the author's point of view
Informative vs argumentative
Informative vs argumentative
trmrefugio
TSL022 Argumentative Essay
Argumentative Essay
Argumentative Essay
fatimahraus
Persuasive/Argumentative Essay Topic………….. Why the Legalization of Marijuana is Inevitable Assignment: Write a paper formatted in MLA style of seven pages in length (use Times New Roman 12) that addresses the topic below. You must include a Works Cited page. Following the directions given in lecture and the examples and instructions in Chapter Fourteen of Writing Arguments , write a persuasive essay. You must take a position on a subject of your choosing that involves some issue that a person might dispute. As with the definition essay, you should explain what your subject is. You must also present your arguments in favor of your side of the argument, and you must have some discussion of counter-arguments. Where it is appropriate, you may anticipate counter-arguments both from audience members who disagree with your position and with those who agree with your position but desire a different solution. Writing to Persuade Writing Argument Persuasion is a broad term. When we persuade, we try to influence people to think in a certain way or to do something. Argument is persuasion on a topic about which reasonable people disagree. Argument involves controversy. Whereas exercising appropriately is probably not controversial because reasonable people do not dispute the idea, an issue such as gun control is. In this chapter, we will be concerned mainly with the kind of persuasion that involves argument. Techniques for Developing Argument Statements of argument are informal or formal. An opinion column in a newspaper is likely to have little set structure, whereas an argument in college writing is likely to be tightly organized. Nervertheless, the opinion column and the college paper have much in common. Both provide a proposition, which is the main point of the argument, and both provide pupport, which is the evidence of the reasons that back up the proposition. For a well – structured college paragraph or essay, an organizing plan is desirable. Consider these elements when you write an argument, and ask yourself the following question as you develop your ideas: Background: What is the historical or social context for this controversial issue? Proposition (the thesis of the essay): What do I want my audience to believe or to do? Qualification of proposition: Can I limit my proposition so that those who disagree cannot easily challenge me with exceptions? If, for example, I am in favor of using animals for scientific experimentation, am I concerned only with medical experiments or with any use, including experiments for the cosmetic industry? Refutation (taking the opposing view into account, mainly to point out its fundamental weakness): What is the view on the other side, and why is it flawed in reasoning or evidence? Support: In addition to sound reasoning, can I use appropriate facts, examples, statistics, and opinions of authorities? Your Audience Your audience may be uninformed, informed, biase.
PersuasiveArgumentative Essay Topic…………...docx
PersuasiveArgumentative Essay Topic…………...docx
rowthechang
In this assignment, you will compose three original examples of informal fallacy arguments. This assignment allows you to examine common fallacies in everyday reasoning. Using the types of arguments listed in the textbook chapter “Flimsy Structures,” respond to the following: Draft two original fallacies. Do not identify the fallacies, allow your peers to determine what fallacy your example represents. Next, using the Internet, respond to the following: Research a third informal fallacy not already covered in the text. Identify and define the fallacy. For example, appeal to tradition, false dichotomy, etc. Provide a citation for your source. Construct an original fallacy argument of that type. Support your statements with examples and scholarly references. Write your initial response in 1–2 paragraphs. Apply APA standards to citation of sources. By Sunday, October 7, 2012 , post your response to the appropriate Discussion Area . Through Wednesday, October 10, 2012 , review and comment on at least two peers’ responses. Identify their fallacies and suggest ways in which they can refine their arguments. Grading Criteria and Rubric Assignment 2 Grading Criteria Maximum Points Initial Discussion Response 16 Discussion Participation 16 Writing Craftsmanship and Ethical Scholarship 8 Total: 40 CHAPTER 12 Flimsy Structures This chapter could have been titled “ Un warranted Inferences.” The following are certain infamous reasons given to support arguments—infamous because they mimic real support. There are two basic replies to these inferences: “So what?” or “What else?” Abusing arguments may be among the world’s older professions. Proper names for many types of abuse are in Latin. I’ll deal only with the seven deadliest: inconsistency, ad hominem attacks, appeal to pity, begging the questions, post hoc ergo propter hoc , appeal (only) to the many, and straw man. INCONSISTENCY Two main ways of being inconsistent come to mind: 1. Offering reasons that are contradictory . For example, arguing that most people who strive for success do so out of hunger for love and admiration they didn’t get when growing up; and in the same book arguing that most people strive for success because they can afford to take the risk of failure, having been given a lot of encouragement and attention as children. Since encouragement and attention are tantamount to love and admiration, this argument is foundering on inconsistency unless the arguer makes a careful distinction between the pairs of terms love-admiration and encouragement-attention to explain this disparity. 2. Offering reasons that contradict the conclusion . For example, we should conserve on fuel because many of the elderly poor are dying from lack of heat in the winter. Given that reason, the conclusion would appear to be the opposite: that we should expend more fuel, at least on the elderly poor (unless some fiend is advocating killing off the elderly poor). Enjoy Being on the Lookout You can .
In this assignment, you will compose three original examples of info.docx
In this assignment, you will compose three original examples of info.docx
migdalialyle
Eng 83 r toulmin's method of argumentationr
Eng 83 r toulmin's method of argumentationr
Elizabeth Buchanan
Lecture for Module
Chapter 9 Bedford Guide
Chapter 9 Bedford Guide
jruffin73
ENG 112 lecture notes for module 7
Chapter 9 Bedford Guide
Chapter 9 Bedford Guide
jruffin73
hyjurhr
1-Arguments-and-Manifestos.pptx ahhhahhhhh
1-Arguments-and-Manifestos.pptx ahhhahhhhh
OliviaManabat1
English 101 Argument/Persuasive Element Concession/Rebuttal Paragraph A concession/rebuttal (counterargument) paragraph needs to be composed of a concession point that looks at an opposing viewpoint and your rebuttal of that point. It is important to maintain a professional and empathetic voice throughout this section. Remember it will be the strength of ideas that will sway your audience, not the snippiness in your voice. Here are some things to remember when creating and completing this element of your research essay. 1. Transitions – Remember that you are changing tasks when you begin to look at an opposing viewpoint. The previous section was filled with support points that clarified your stance. You need to alert your audience to the change of purpose as you enter your concession. A proper transition should only be a sentence or two, but it will clearly signal to your audience that you are doing something different. Keep in mind that you are not only transitioning out of support and into the concession, but also out of the rebuttal and into another support paragraph or conclusion. 2. Concession – For a strong concession/rebuttal section, it is important that you identify an opposition view point that you can empathize with or at least find validity in. This is important because a strong concession will spend time clarifying, in an even handed manner, what this point is and why it is compelling. Keep in mind that a good concession point convinces your audience that you have looked at all perspectives on the issue, and that you have done so with care and diligence. This strengthens your position in the audiences’ mind and makes them more likely to agree with you in the end. It is important to avoid a list of concession points and focus in on one specific point the opposition may have to your argument. 3. Rebuttal – This section should take your opposition to task. Analyze why this opposition point is weak and is ultimately not strong enough to sway your opinion. Try to be specific in this section and not fall into expressing grand generalities. In the same way that your concession point is narrow and specific, you want to be sure that your refutation is aimed at picking apart this specific point. Be careful of the rebuttal sounding too much like a conclusion or recap of your major support points. Continue to be mindful of your tone and don’t go overboard cutting the opposition down, but you do want to be on the offensive. Example Concession/Rebuttal Paragraph: Though the problems with doctor-assisted suicide are many, there are proponents of legalization of assisted suicide. Those in favor of legalizing doctor assisted suicide will point to medical cases where a patient has been deemed terminally ill, and argue that these patients should have the ability to end their suffering on their terms. It is true that many patients who are terminally ill suffer for lengths of time while their body holds onto life. It can be very painful for l.
English 101ArgumentPersuasive ElementConcessionRebuttal Pa.docx
English 101ArgumentPersuasive ElementConcessionRebuttal Pa.docx
khanpaulita
English 101 Argument/Persuasive Element Concession/Rebuttal Paragraph A concession/rebuttal (counterargument) paragraph needs to be composed of a concession point that looks at an opposing viewpoint and your rebuttal of that point. It is important to maintain a professional and empathetic voice throughout this section. Remember it will be the strength of ideas that will sway your audience, not the snippiness in your voice. Here are some things to remember when creating and completing this element of your research essay. 1. Transitions – Remember that you are changing tasks when you begin to look at an opposing viewpoint. The previous section was filled with support points that clarified your stance. You need to alert your audience to the change of purpose as you enter your concession. A proper transition should only be a sentence or two, but it will clearly signal to your audience that you are doing something different. Keep in mind that you are not only transitioning out of support and into the concession, but also out of the rebuttal and into another support paragraph or conclusion. 2. Concession – For a strong concession/rebuttal section, it is important that you identify an opposition view point that you can empathize with or at least find validity in. This is important because a strong concession will spend time clarifying, in an even handed manner, what this point is and why it is compelling. Keep in mind that a good concession point convinces your audience that you have looked at all perspectives on the issue, and that you have done so with care and diligence. This strengthens your position in the audiences’ mind and makes them more likely to agree with you in the end. It is important to avoid a list of concession points and focus in on one specific point the opposition may have to your argument. 3. Rebuttal – This section should take your opposition to task. Analyze why this opposition point is weak and is ultimately not strong enough to sway your opinion. Try to be specific in this section and not fall into expressing grand generalities. In the same way that your concession point is narrow and specific, you want to be sure that your refutation is aimed at picking apart this specific point. Be careful of the rebuttal sounding too much like a conclusion or recap of your major support points. Continue to be mindful of your tone and don’t go overboard cutting the opposition down, but you do want to be on the offensive. Example Concession/Rebuttal Paragraph: Though the problems with doctor-assisted suicide are many, there are proponents of legalization of assisted suicide. Those in favor of legalizing doctor assisted suicide will point to medical cases where a patient has been deemed terminally ill, and argue that these patients should have the ability to end their suffering on their terms. It is true that many patients who are terminally ill suffer for lengths of time while their body holds onto life. It can be very painful for l ...
English 101ArgumentPersuasive ElementConcessionRebuttal Pa.docx
English 101ArgumentPersuasive ElementConcessionRebuttal Pa.docx
gidmanmary
Argumentation-Persuasion papers
Argumentation 111312
Argumentation 111312
professorreyes
Enc 1102 prompt and format for the argument essay s 2021.docx
Enc 1102 prompt and format for the argument essay s 2021.docx
Enc 1102 prompt and format for the argument essay s 2021.docx
aman39650
English 104 Argument Analysis The Assignment: Due: No later than October 10, 2016 Must be MLA format only!! Select an online editorial article about a current issue. (i.e.: Presidential Candidates, Labor Union Influence on Government, The Affordable Health Care Act, Illegal Immigration, Entitlement programs, etc.) You may choose ANY issue; the list above is NOT exhaustive. The article MUST be an op-ed (editorial) piece, as it must present an argument of some type. You may not use a straight news story. Read the article and decide what perspective the writer is taking on a particular issue. Submit a Minimum 3-page analysis of the writer’s argument. And works cited, make sure to follow the Don’t’s of writing and include Parenthetical refrencing. Paper must include: · A discussion of the author’s thesis · Whether he/she employs faulty reasoning (see fallacy assignment below) in the discussion. · What he/she could have done to present a more thorough argument (may include more consideration of the opposing viewpoint) · A thorough discussion of the main points of the article and whether or not he/she has provided adequate support to prove his/her thesis. · A conclusion that discusses the effectiveness of the chosen article in regards to the author’s intent. Include a link to the article on the Works Cited page. You may choose whomever you wish; he/she DOES NOT have to appear on the list below. Some commentators to consider when looking for an article: Larry Elder Star Parker Sean Hannity Alan Colmes Michelle Malkin John Ziegler Bill O’Reilly Chris Matthews Leslie Marshall The following link provides a list of controversial commentators (some listed above) you may wish to choose from. http://www.usnews.com/news/washington-whispers/slideshows/top-10-most-hated-news-commentators Fallacies: Look over the fallacy discussion and familiarize yourself with some common every day fallacies (i.e.: Post Hoc, False Analogy, Hasty Generalization, Slippery Slope, Straw Man, Begging the Question, Red Herring, Poisoning the Well, Ad Hominem). Logical Fallacies Handlist: Fallacies are statements that might sound reasonable or superficially true but are actually flawed or dishonest. When readers detect them, these logical fallacies backfire by making the audience think the writer is (a) unintelligent or (b) deceptive. It is important to avoid them in your own arguments, and it is also important to be able to spot them in others' arguments so a false line of reasoning won't fool you. Think of this as intellectual kung-fu: the art of self-defense in a debate. In general, one useful way to organize fallacies is by category. Below are fallacies of relevance, component fallacies, fallacies of ambiguity, and fallacies of omission. FALLACIES OF RELEVANCE: These fallacies appeal to evidence or examples that are not relevant to the argument at hand. Appeal to Force (Argumentum Ad Baculum or the "Might-Makes-Right" Fallacy): Th ...
English 104Argument AnalysisThe AssignmentDue No l.docx
English 104Argument AnalysisThe AssignmentDue No l.docx
SALU18
Fallacies in advertisement
Fallacies in advertisement
ljohnson16
Constructing Reasonable Academic Arguments with logical fallacy
Constructing Reasonable Academic Arguments
Constructing Reasonable Academic Arguments
vlequire
no specific no specific no specific no specific no specific no specific
Week 4 & 5 Critical-Evaluating Information Sources.pptx
Week 4 & 5 Critical-Evaluating Information Sources.pptx
moonandsun7787
course material
health care professionals.docx
health care professionals.docx
write4
This is a lecture materials for essay writing subject. This is the argumentative essay materials for students, it contains how to write argumentative essay step by step so that students can write it as one of the assignments.
ARGUMENTATIVE ESSAY Material for Collage Students.ppt
ARGUMENTATIVE ESSAY Material for Collage Students.ppt
RismaZahrotusSholiha
Writing an Argument
Writing an argument
Writing an argument
Christina McCleanhan
Ewrt 1 b class 9
Ewrt 1 b class 9
jordanlachance
Ewrt 1 b class 9
Ewrt 1 b class 9
jordanlachance
Utopia05
Utopia05
ewolterb
Kant power point
Kant power point
ewolterb
Weitere ähnliche Inhalte
Ähnlich wie Ellen eng 102 (6) being a writer
TSL022 Argumentative Essay
Argumentative Essay
Argumentative Essay
fatimahraus
Persuasive/Argumentative Essay Topic………….. Why the Legalization of Marijuana is Inevitable Assignment: Write a paper formatted in MLA style of seven pages in length (use Times New Roman 12) that addresses the topic below. You must include a Works Cited page. Following the directions given in lecture and the examples and instructions in Chapter Fourteen of Writing Arguments , write a persuasive essay. You must take a position on a subject of your choosing that involves some issue that a person might dispute. As with the definition essay, you should explain what your subject is. You must also present your arguments in favor of your side of the argument, and you must have some discussion of counter-arguments. Where it is appropriate, you may anticipate counter-arguments both from audience members who disagree with your position and with those who agree with your position but desire a different solution. Writing to Persuade Writing Argument Persuasion is a broad term. When we persuade, we try to influence people to think in a certain way or to do something. Argument is persuasion on a topic about which reasonable people disagree. Argument involves controversy. Whereas exercising appropriately is probably not controversial because reasonable people do not dispute the idea, an issue such as gun control is. In this chapter, we will be concerned mainly with the kind of persuasion that involves argument. Techniques for Developing Argument Statements of argument are informal or formal. An opinion column in a newspaper is likely to have little set structure, whereas an argument in college writing is likely to be tightly organized. Nervertheless, the opinion column and the college paper have much in common. Both provide a proposition, which is the main point of the argument, and both provide pupport, which is the evidence of the reasons that back up the proposition. For a well – structured college paragraph or essay, an organizing plan is desirable. Consider these elements when you write an argument, and ask yourself the following question as you develop your ideas: Background: What is the historical or social context for this controversial issue? Proposition (the thesis of the essay): What do I want my audience to believe or to do? Qualification of proposition: Can I limit my proposition so that those who disagree cannot easily challenge me with exceptions? If, for example, I am in favor of using animals for scientific experimentation, am I concerned only with medical experiments or with any use, including experiments for the cosmetic industry? Refutation (taking the opposing view into account, mainly to point out its fundamental weakness): What is the view on the other side, and why is it flawed in reasoning or evidence? Support: In addition to sound reasoning, can I use appropriate facts, examples, statistics, and opinions of authorities? Your Audience Your audience may be uninformed, informed, biase.
PersuasiveArgumentative Essay Topic…………...docx
PersuasiveArgumentative Essay Topic…………...docx
rowthechang
In this assignment, you will compose three original examples of informal fallacy arguments. This assignment allows you to examine common fallacies in everyday reasoning. Using the types of arguments listed in the textbook chapter “Flimsy Structures,” respond to the following: Draft two original fallacies. Do not identify the fallacies, allow your peers to determine what fallacy your example represents. Next, using the Internet, respond to the following: Research a third informal fallacy not already covered in the text. Identify and define the fallacy. For example, appeal to tradition, false dichotomy, etc. Provide a citation for your source. Construct an original fallacy argument of that type. Support your statements with examples and scholarly references. Write your initial response in 1–2 paragraphs. Apply APA standards to citation of sources. By Sunday, October 7, 2012 , post your response to the appropriate Discussion Area . Through Wednesday, October 10, 2012 , review and comment on at least two peers’ responses. Identify their fallacies and suggest ways in which they can refine their arguments. Grading Criteria and Rubric Assignment 2 Grading Criteria Maximum Points Initial Discussion Response 16 Discussion Participation 16 Writing Craftsmanship and Ethical Scholarship 8 Total: 40 CHAPTER 12 Flimsy Structures This chapter could have been titled “ Un warranted Inferences.” The following are certain infamous reasons given to support arguments—infamous because they mimic real support. There are two basic replies to these inferences: “So what?” or “What else?” Abusing arguments may be among the world’s older professions. Proper names for many types of abuse are in Latin. I’ll deal only with the seven deadliest: inconsistency, ad hominem attacks, appeal to pity, begging the questions, post hoc ergo propter hoc , appeal (only) to the many, and straw man. INCONSISTENCY Two main ways of being inconsistent come to mind: 1. Offering reasons that are contradictory . For example, arguing that most people who strive for success do so out of hunger for love and admiration they didn’t get when growing up; and in the same book arguing that most people strive for success because they can afford to take the risk of failure, having been given a lot of encouragement and attention as children. Since encouragement and attention are tantamount to love and admiration, this argument is foundering on inconsistency unless the arguer makes a careful distinction between the pairs of terms love-admiration and encouragement-attention to explain this disparity. 2. Offering reasons that contradict the conclusion . For example, we should conserve on fuel because many of the elderly poor are dying from lack of heat in the winter. Given that reason, the conclusion would appear to be the opposite: that we should expend more fuel, at least on the elderly poor (unless some fiend is advocating killing off the elderly poor). Enjoy Being on the Lookout You can .
In this assignment, you will compose three original examples of info.docx
In this assignment, you will compose three original examples of info.docx
migdalialyle
Eng 83 r toulmin's method of argumentationr
Eng 83 r toulmin's method of argumentationr
Elizabeth Buchanan
Lecture for Module
Chapter 9 Bedford Guide
Chapter 9 Bedford Guide
jruffin73
ENG 112 lecture notes for module 7
Chapter 9 Bedford Guide
Chapter 9 Bedford Guide
jruffin73
hyjurhr
1-Arguments-and-Manifestos.pptx ahhhahhhhh
1-Arguments-and-Manifestos.pptx ahhhahhhhh
OliviaManabat1
English 101 Argument/Persuasive Element Concession/Rebuttal Paragraph A concession/rebuttal (counterargument) paragraph needs to be composed of a concession point that looks at an opposing viewpoint and your rebuttal of that point. It is important to maintain a professional and empathetic voice throughout this section. Remember it will be the strength of ideas that will sway your audience, not the snippiness in your voice. Here are some things to remember when creating and completing this element of your research essay. 1. Transitions – Remember that you are changing tasks when you begin to look at an opposing viewpoint. The previous section was filled with support points that clarified your stance. You need to alert your audience to the change of purpose as you enter your concession. A proper transition should only be a sentence or two, but it will clearly signal to your audience that you are doing something different. Keep in mind that you are not only transitioning out of support and into the concession, but also out of the rebuttal and into another support paragraph or conclusion. 2. Concession – For a strong concession/rebuttal section, it is important that you identify an opposition view point that you can empathize with or at least find validity in. This is important because a strong concession will spend time clarifying, in an even handed manner, what this point is and why it is compelling. Keep in mind that a good concession point convinces your audience that you have looked at all perspectives on the issue, and that you have done so with care and diligence. This strengthens your position in the audiences’ mind and makes them more likely to agree with you in the end. It is important to avoid a list of concession points and focus in on one specific point the opposition may have to your argument. 3. Rebuttal – This section should take your opposition to task. Analyze why this opposition point is weak and is ultimately not strong enough to sway your opinion. Try to be specific in this section and not fall into expressing grand generalities. In the same way that your concession point is narrow and specific, you want to be sure that your refutation is aimed at picking apart this specific point. Be careful of the rebuttal sounding too much like a conclusion or recap of your major support points. Continue to be mindful of your tone and don’t go overboard cutting the opposition down, but you do want to be on the offensive. Example Concession/Rebuttal Paragraph: Though the problems with doctor-assisted suicide are many, there are proponents of legalization of assisted suicide. Those in favor of legalizing doctor assisted suicide will point to medical cases where a patient has been deemed terminally ill, and argue that these patients should have the ability to end their suffering on their terms. It is true that many patients who are terminally ill suffer for lengths of time while their body holds onto life. It can be very painful for l.
English 101ArgumentPersuasive ElementConcessionRebuttal Pa.docx
English 101ArgumentPersuasive ElementConcessionRebuttal Pa.docx
khanpaulita
English 101 Argument/Persuasive Element Concession/Rebuttal Paragraph A concession/rebuttal (counterargument) paragraph needs to be composed of a concession point that looks at an opposing viewpoint and your rebuttal of that point. It is important to maintain a professional and empathetic voice throughout this section. Remember it will be the strength of ideas that will sway your audience, not the snippiness in your voice. Here are some things to remember when creating and completing this element of your research essay. 1. Transitions – Remember that you are changing tasks when you begin to look at an opposing viewpoint. The previous section was filled with support points that clarified your stance. You need to alert your audience to the change of purpose as you enter your concession. A proper transition should only be a sentence or two, but it will clearly signal to your audience that you are doing something different. Keep in mind that you are not only transitioning out of support and into the concession, but also out of the rebuttal and into another support paragraph or conclusion. 2. Concession – For a strong concession/rebuttal section, it is important that you identify an opposition view point that you can empathize with or at least find validity in. This is important because a strong concession will spend time clarifying, in an even handed manner, what this point is and why it is compelling. Keep in mind that a good concession point convinces your audience that you have looked at all perspectives on the issue, and that you have done so with care and diligence. This strengthens your position in the audiences’ mind and makes them more likely to agree with you in the end. It is important to avoid a list of concession points and focus in on one specific point the opposition may have to your argument. 3. Rebuttal – This section should take your opposition to task. Analyze why this opposition point is weak and is ultimately not strong enough to sway your opinion. Try to be specific in this section and not fall into expressing grand generalities. In the same way that your concession point is narrow and specific, you want to be sure that your refutation is aimed at picking apart this specific point. Be careful of the rebuttal sounding too much like a conclusion or recap of your major support points. Continue to be mindful of your tone and don’t go overboard cutting the opposition down, but you do want to be on the offensive. Example Concession/Rebuttal Paragraph: Though the problems with doctor-assisted suicide are many, there are proponents of legalization of assisted suicide. Those in favor of legalizing doctor assisted suicide will point to medical cases where a patient has been deemed terminally ill, and argue that these patients should have the ability to end their suffering on their terms. It is true that many patients who are terminally ill suffer for lengths of time while their body holds onto life. It can be very painful for l ...
English 101ArgumentPersuasive ElementConcessionRebuttal Pa.docx
English 101ArgumentPersuasive ElementConcessionRebuttal Pa.docx
gidmanmary
Argumentation-Persuasion papers
Argumentation 111312
Argumentation 111312
professorreyes
Enc 1102 prompt and format for the argument essay s 2021.docx
Enc 1102 prompt and format for the argument essay s 2021.docx
Enc 1102 prompt and format for the argument essay s 2021.docx
aman39650
English 104 Argument Analysis The Assignment: Due: No later than October 10, 2016 Must be MLA format only!! Select an online editorial article about a current issue. (i.e.: Presidential Candidates, Labor Union Influence on Government, The Affordable Health Care Act, Illegal Immigration, Entitlement programs, etc.) You may choose ANY issue; the list above is NOT exhaustive. The article MUST be an op-ed (editorial) piece, as it must present an argument of some type. You may not use a straight news story. Read the article and decide what perspective the writer is taking on a particular issue. Submit a Minimum 3-page analysis of the writer’s argument. And works cited, make sure to follow the Don’t’s of writing and include Parenthetical refrencing. Paper must include: · A discussion of the author’s thesis · Whether he/she employs faulty reasoning (see fallacy assignment below) in the discussion. · What he/she could have done to present a more thorough argument (may include more consideration of the opposing viewpoint) · A thorough discussion of the main points of the article and whether or not he/she has provided adequate support to prove his/her thesis. · A conclusion that discusses the effectiveness of the chosen article in regards to the author’s intent. Include a link to the article on the Works Cited page. You may choose whomever you wish; he/she DOES NOT have to appear on the list below. Some commentators to consider when looking for an article: Larry Elder Star Parker Sean Hannity Alan Colmes Michelle Malkin John Ziegler Bill O’Reilly Chris Matthews Leslie Marshall The following link provides a list of controversial commentators (some listed above) you may wish to choose from. http://www.usnews.com/news/washington-whispers/slideshows/top-10-most-hated-news-commentators Fallacies: Look over the fallacy discussion and familiarize yourself with some common every day fallacies (i.e.: Post Hoc, False Analogy, Hasty Generalization, Slippery Slope, Straw Man, Begging the Question, Red Herring, Poisoning the Well, Ad Hominem). Logical Fallacies Handlist: Fallacies are statements that might sound reasonable or superficially true but are actually flawed or dishonest. When readers detect them, these logical fallacies backfire by making the audience think the writer is (a) unintelligent or (b) deceptive. It is important to avoid them in your own arguments, and it is also important to be able to spot them in others' arguments so a false line of reasoning won't fool you. Think of this as intellectual kung-fu: the art of self-defense in a debate. In general, one useful way to organize fallacies is by category. Below are fallacies of relevance, component fallacies, fallacies of ambiguity, and fallacies of omission. FALLACIES OF RELEVANCE: These fallacies appeal to evidence or examples that are not relevant to the argument at hand. Appeal to Force (Argumentum Ad Baculum or the "Might-Makes-Right" Fallacy): Th ...
English 104Argument AnalysisThe AssignmentDue No l.docx
English 104Argument AnalysisThe AssignmentDue No l.docx
SALU18
Fallacies in advertisement
Fallacies in advertisement
ljohnson16
Constructing Reasonable Academic Arguments with logical fallacy
Constructing Reasonable Academic Arguments
Constructing Reasonable Academic Arguments
vlequire
no specific no specific no specific no specific no specific no specific
Week 4 & 5 Critical-Evaluating Information Sources.pptx
Week 4 & 5 Critical-Evaluating Information Sources.pptx
moonandsun7787
course material
health care professionals.docx
health care professionals.docx
write4
This is a lecture materials for essay writing subject. This is the argumentative essay materials for students, it contains how to write argumentative essay step by step so that students can write it as one of the assignments.
ARGUMENTATIVE ESSAY Material for Collage Students.ppt
ARGUMENTATIVE ESSAY Material for Collage Students.ppt
RismaZahrotusSholiha
Writing an Argument
Writing an argument
Writing an argument
Christina McCleanhan
Ewrt 1 b class 9
Ewrt 1 b class 9
jordanlachance
Ewrt 1 b class 9
Ewrt 1 b class 9
jordanlachance
Ähnlich wie Ellen eng 102 (6) being a writer
(20)
Argumentative Essay
Argumentative Essay
PersuasiveArgumentative Essay Topic…………...docx
PersuasiveArgumentative Essay Topic…………...docx
In this assignment, you will compose three original examples of info.docx
In this assignment, you will compose three original examples of info.docx
Eng 83 r toulmin's method of argumentationr
Eng 83 r toulmin's method of argumentationr
Chapter 9 Bedford Guide
Chapter 9 Bedford Guide
Chapter 9 Bedford Guide
Chapter 9 Bedford Guide
1-Arguments-and-Manifestos.pptx ahhhahhhhh
1-Arguments-and-Manifestos.pptx ahhhahhhhh
English 101ArgumentPersuasive ElementConcessionRebuttal Pa.docx
English 101ArgumentPersuasive ElementConcessionRebuttal Pa.docx
English 101ArgumentPersuasive ElementConcessionRebuttal Pa.docx
English 101ArgumentPersuasive ElementConcessionRebuttal Pa.docx
Argumentation 111312
Argumentation 111312
Enc 1102 prompt and format for the argument essay s 2021.docx
Enc 1102 prompt and format for the argument essay s 2021.docx
English 104Argument AnalysisThe AssignmentDue No l.docx
English 104Argument AnalysisThe AssignmentDue No l.docx
Fallacies in advertisement
Fallacies in advertisement
Constructing Reasonable Academic Arguments
Constructing Reasonable Academic Arguments
Week 4 & 5 Critical-Evaluating Information Sources.pptx
Week 4 & 5 Critical-Evaluating Information Sources.pptx
health care professionals.docx
health care professionals.docx
ARGUMENTATIVE ESSAY Material for Collage Students.ppt
ARGUMENTATIVE ESSAY Material for Collage Students.ppt
Writing an argument
Writing an argument
Ewrt 1 b class 9
Ewrt 1 b class 9
Ewrt 1 b class 9
Ewrt 1 b class 9
Mehr von ewolterb
Utopia05
Utopia05
ewolterb
Kant power point
Kant power point
ewolterb
Existentialism
Existentialism
ewolterb
Classism
Classism
ewolterb
Ss388 utopianism presentation
Ss388 utopianism presentation
ewolterb
Who stole feminism
Who stole feminism
ewolterb
Socrates
Socrates
ewolterb
Simpsons and parody
Simpsons and parody
ewolterb
Nihilism
Nihilism
ewolterb
Msmorality
Msmorality
ewolterb
Intrinsic good and instrumental good
Intrinsic good and instrumental good
ewolterb
Blaise pascal
Blaise pascal
ewolterb
Anti intellectualism 2
Anti intellectualism 2
ewolterb
Anti intellectualism
Anti intellectualism
ewolterb
What is creative nonfiction
What is creative nonfiction
ewolterb
Essay as art
Essay as art
ewolterb
Eng interpretation ppt
Eng interpretation ppt
ewolterb
Voices and you[1]
Voices and you[1]
ewolterb
Vernor vinge by evan
Vernor vinge by evan
ewolterb
Figurative language
Figurative language
ewolterb
Mehr von ewolterb
(20)
Utopia05
Utopia05
Kant power point
Kant power point
Existentialism
Existentialism
Classism
Classism
Ss388 utopianism presentation
Ss388 utopianism presentation
Who stole feminism
Who stole feminism
Socrates
Socrates
Simpsons and parody
Simpsons and parody
Nihilism
Nihilism
Msmorality
Msmorality
Intrinsic good and instrumental good
Intrinsic good and instrumental good
Blaise pascal
Blaise pascal
Anti intellectualism 2
Anti intellectualism 2
Anti intellectualism
Anti intellectualism
What is creative nonfiction
What is creative nonfiction
Essay as art
Essay as art
Eng interpretation ppt
Eng interpretation ppt
Voices and you[1]
Voices and you[1]
Vernor vinge by evan
Vernor vinge by evan
Figurative language
Figurative language
Ellen eng 102 (6) being a writer
1.
Persuasion and Argumentation
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Break! Where do
you focus to stop the moving wave?
8.
9.
10.
11.
Jetzt herunterladen