1. Inuman ES (Leader School)
Binayoyo ES (Partner School)
School-To-School Partnership Monitoring Tool
Project TRUSTED (Total Review on Unmastered Skills towards EFAGoal Development)
Direction: Put check mark on the boxes adjacent to each item. Rate the project implementation at the scale of
4 as Very High Extent and 1 as the lowest with verbal interpretation of Very Low Extent.
SCALE RANGE VERBAL
INTERPRETATION
4 3.50-4.00 Very High Extent
3 2.50-3.49 High Extent
2 1.50-2.49 Low Extent
1 1.00-1.49 Very Low Extent
INDICATORS Very
High
Extent(4)
High
Extent
(3)
Low
Extent
(2)
Very Low
Extent
(1)
OBJECTIVES
1. The target is specific and attainable
2. The project is included in SIP
3. The objectives states the output or indicators
4. It is based on the root cause analysis
STRATEGIES/ ACTIVITIES
1. The activities are congruent to the objective of the
project.
2. Outputs were validated by a Master Teacher or an
Education Program Supervisor in Science
3. Crafting the Teacher-made module is done by key
teachers in science
4. Revision and finalization is done by a science
teacher
5. Orientation of pupils and teachers in the utilization
of the Teacher-made module was conducted.
RESOURCES
A. Persons/Human Involved
1. Persons involved are the members of CI Team
2. Focal persons were designated and ready for
coordination
3. Facilitators of the training workshop have sufficient
knowledge on the administration of the Teacher-
Made Module
4. Show enthusiasm in spite of overlapping activities
5. Have knowledge on how to conduct research
6. All participants are present in every meeting
6. Participants were given recognition
B. Materials
1. Materials listed in the plan are adequate.
2. Used contingency plan to cope with the absence of
electricity
3. Appropriate materials for the activity
4. Materials were well retrieved after the activity for
future use.
5. Printed materials are readable and clear.
C. Financial Resources
1. Sufficient funds for the materials
2. All purchases have complete documents for formal
auditing.
3. Food expenses are included in the expenditures
out of the grant.
2. Inuman ES (Leader School)
Binayoyo ES (Partner School)
4. Canteen fund or school funds augmented other
needs upon the conduct of the project.
TIME FRAME
1. Convenient time to all participants for the training
or workshop conducted.
2. Sufficient time to run the project
3. Regular meetings were conducted with regards on
the project implementation
4. The conduct of the program started on time and
ended based on the allotted time
5. Adequate time allotted for activities such as
preparation of Teacher-made Modules,
reproduction, validation and revision.
Problems encountered before conducting the project. Action Taken
Before:
During:
After :
Recommendations and Suggestions
Preparedby: RecommendingApproval:
LALAINE C. DAANG JUMAR T. CALIBUSO ANSELMO C. CELESTRE JR.
M&E LeaderSchool M&E PartnerSchool OIC- Chief SGOD
Approvedby:
DR. ROMMEL C. BAUTISTA, CESO V
SchoolsDivisionSuperintendent
3. Inuman ES (Leader School)
Binayoyo ES (Partner School)
School-To-School Partnership Monitoring Tool
Project READER (Rigid Enhancement Activities to Develop Excellent Reader)
Direction: Put check mark on the boxes adjacent to each item. Rate the project implementation at the scale of
4 as Very High Extent and 1 as the lowest with verbal interpretation of Very Low Extent.
SCALE RANGE VERBAL
INTERPRETATION
4 3.50-4.00 Very High Extent
3 2.50-3.49 High Extent
2 1.50-2.49 Low Extent
1 1.00-1.49 Very Low Extent
INDICATORS Very
High
Extent(4)
High
Extent
(3)
Low
Extent
(2)
Very Low
Extent
(1)
I. OBJECTIVE
1. The target is specific and attainable
2. The project is included in SIP
3. The objectives states the output or indicators
4. It is based on the root cause analysis
STRATEGIES/ ACTIVITIES
1. Conducted Pre-Assessment of Reading Level using
EGRA tool
2. Identification and profiling reading level were
conducted.
3. Orientation on the conduct of reading program was
carried out
4. Validation of the instruments produced were done
by a Master Teacher or English Supervisor
5. Preparation and reproduction of strategic
intervention materials in reading, differentiated
activities and localized learning materials done
ahead of time
6. Training workshop was carried out in the preparation
of strategic intervention materials in reading,
differentiated activities and localized learning
materials.
7. Post assessment was conducted
8. Results of the assessment were analyzed and
evaluated
RESOURCES
A. Persons/Human Involved
1. Persons involved are the members of CI Team
2. Focal persons were designated and ready for
coordination
3. Facilitators of the training workshop have sufficient
knowledge on the administration of the Teacher-
Made Module
4. Show enthusiasm in spite of overlapping activities
5. All participants are present in every meeting
B. Materials
1. Materials listed in the plan are adequate.
2. Used contingency plan to cope with the absence of
electricity
3. Appropriate materials for the activity
4. Materials were well-retrieved after the activity for
future use.
5. Printed materials are readable and clear.
C. Financial Resources
4. Inuman ES (Leader School)
Binayoyo ES (Partner School)
1. Sufficient funds for the materials
2. All purchases have complete documents for formal
auditing.
3. Food expenses are included in the expenditures
out of the grant.
4. Canteen fund or school funds augmented other
needs upon the conduct of the project.
TIME FRAME
1. Convenient time to all participants for the training
or workshop conducted.
2. Sufficient time to run the project
3. Regular meetings were conducted with regards on
the project implementation
4. The conduct of the program started on time and
ended based on the allotted time
TOTAL
Problems encountered before conducting the project. Action Taken
Before:
During:
After :
Recommendations and Suggestions
Preparedby: RecommendingApproval:
LALAINE C. DAANG JUMAR T. CALIBUSO ANSELMO C. CELESTRE JR.
M&E LeaderSchool M&E PartnerSchool OIC- Chief SGOD
Approvedby:
DR. ROMMEL C. BAUTISTA, CESO V
SchoolsDivisionSuperintendent
5. Inuman ES (Leader School)
Binayoyo ES (Partner School)
School-To-School Partnership Monitoring Tool
Project SAFE (Safe and Friendly)
Direction: Put check mark on the boxes adjacent to each item. Rate the project implementation at the scale of
4 as Very High Extent and 1 as the lowest with verbal interpretation of Very Low Extent.
SCALE RANGE VERBAL
INTERPRETATION
4 3.50-4.00 Very High Extent
3 2.50-3.49 High Extent
2 1.50-2.49 Low Extent
1 1.00-1.49 Very Low Extent
INDICATORS Very
High
Extent(4)
High
Extent
(3)
Low
Extent
(2)
Very Low
Extent
(1)
OBJECTIVES
1. The target is specific and attainable
2. The project is included in SIP
3. The objectives states the output or indicators
4. It is based on the root cause analysis
STRATEGIES/ ACTIVITIES
1. Conducted waste management symposium
2. Monitored proper housekeeping inside and outside
school premises
3. Posters related to proper waste management is
visible
4. Signages are visible and strategically placed
5. Waste bin/container is in the strategic places.
6. Processes in the conduct of the activity were
properly monitored
7. Post assessment was conducted
8. Results of the assessment were analyzed and
evaluated
RESOURCES
A. Persons/Human Involved
1. Persons involved are the members of CI Team
2. Focal persons were designated and ready for
coordination
3. Facilitators of the training workshop have sufficient
knowledge on the administration of the Teacher-
Made Module
4. Show enthusiasm in spite of overlapping activities
5. Have knowledge on how to conduct research
6. All participants are present in every meeting
7. Participants were given recognition
B. Materials
1. Materials listed in the plan are adequate.
2. Used contingency plan to cope with the absence of
electricity
3. Appropriate materials for the activity
4. Signages are large enough to be seen
C. Financial Resources
1. Sufficient funds for the materials
2. All purchases have complete documents for formal
auditing.
3. Food expenses are included in the expenditures
out of the grant.
6. Inuman ES (Leader School)
Binayoyo ES (Partner School)
4. Canteen fund, school funds or donations
augmented other needs upon the conduct of the
project.
TIME FRAME
1. Convenient time to all participants for the training
or workshop conducted.
2. Sufficient time to run the project
3. Regular meetings were conducted with regards on
the project implementation
4. The conduct of the program started on time and
ended based on the allotted time
TOTAL
Problems encountered before conducting the project. Action Taken
Before:
During:
After :
Recommendations and Suggestions
Preparedby: RecommendingApproval:
LALAINE C. DAANG JUMAR T. CALIBUSO ANSELMO C. CELESTRE JR.
M&E LeaderSchool M&E PartnerSchool OIC- Chief SGOD
Approvedby:
DR. ROMMEL C. BAUTISTA, CESO V
SchoolsDivisionSuperintendent
