SlideShare ist ein Scribd-Unternehmen logo
1 von 37
1
ABSTRACT
This experiment is conducted to carry out manual conversion determination on
experiment samples to verify the conductivity measurement values ,to carry out a
saponification reaction between NaOH and Et(Ac) in CSTR and determine the effect of
residence time onto the reaction extent of conversion also determine the reaction rate
constant .In order to accomplish the objective, the unit being used to perform this
experiment is CSTR 40L. The design of the reactor is very important to the success of the
production. In this experiment sodium hydroxide and ethyl acetate react in continuous
stirred tank reactor. Both of reactants feed to the reactor at equimolar flow rate for a
certain time.From Graph 1 it show that conductivity is decrease proportionally with
conversion.The result show that, when residence time is increase, conversion also
increase by lowering the flow rate. The higher conversion is 98.8% at 45 min residence
time and 0.2 mL/min total flow rate of solution.It can be conclude that the higher the flow
rate , the smaller the reaction rate constant and rate of reaction become highest. From the
calculation , it was obtained that the value of conversion is increase when the volumetric
flow rate decrease.This prove the theory from calibration curve.The rate of reaction is
higher which is ra=2.63x10-3
at the lower rate constant which is k = 68.35. The entire
objectives have been achieved and related to the theory of study .Therefore the
experiment is success.
2
INTRODUCTION
In the industrial chemical processes,mostly a reactor is the key item of equipment in
which raw materials undergo a chemical change to form desired products. The design and
operation of chemical reactors is thus crucial to the whole success of the industrial
operation. There are many types of reactor depending on the nature of the feed materials
and products. Understanding non-steady behavior of process equipment is necessary for
the design and operation of automatic control systems. The rate of reaction is most
important thing will be consider in the reactor because it showed the effectiveness of the
processing of the reactor. One particular type of process equipment is continuous stirred
tank reactor (CSTR).
In a continuous-flow stirred-tank reactor (CSTR), reactants and products are
continuously added and withdrawn from the reactor. In practice, mechanical or hydraulic
agitation is required to achieve uniform composition and temperature, a choice strongly
influenced by process considerations. The CSTR is idealized opposite of the weel - stirred batch
and tubular plug flow reactor. Analysis of selected combination of these reactor types can be
useful in quantitatively evaluating more complex gas , liquid and solid-flow behaviour.
In this experiment , the CSTR (model :BP143 ) unit is suitable for student experiment on
chemical reaction in liquid phase which is under adiabatic and isothermal condition. The unit
consist of jacketed reaction fitted in the agitator and condenser. The unit comes complete with
vessels for raw material and product,feed pumps and thermostat . (www.labequip.com) The
reactor is modeled in order to perform the saponification reaction where the reaction is occur
between the sodium hydroxide , NaOH and ethyl acetate , Et(Ac) . The saponification process
between this compounds produced sodium acetate in a batch and the continuos stirred tank
3
reactor evaluate the rate data needed to design a production scale reactor.
AIMS
In this experiment, there are a few objectives to achieve:
1. To carry out manual conversion determination on experiment samples to verify the
conductivity measurement values
2. To carry out a saponification reaction between NaOH and Et(Ac) in CSTR
3. To determine the effect of residence time onto the reaction extent of conversion
4. To determine the reaction rate constant
THEORY
Saponification is a process by which triglycerides are reacted with sodium or potassium
4
hydroxide (NaOH or KOH) to produce glycerol and fatty acid salt called “soap”. Lipid
that contain fatty acid ester linkages can undergo hydrolysis. (Helmenstine,2001) . The
equation below shows the saponification process between sodium hydroxide and ethyl
acetate ( irreversible reaction) to produce sodium acetate and by product ethanol.
C2H5O2CCH3 + NaOH → CH3CO2Na + H3CCH2OH
Ethyl acetate sodium hydroxide sodium acetate ethanol
Continuous Stirred Tank Reactor(CSTR)
Figure 1
stirred tank
CSTR is used
primarily for
liquid phase reaction. It is normally operated at steady state with continuos flow and is
assumed to be perfectly mixed;consequently, there is no time dependence or position
dependence of the temperature , the concentration or the reaction rate inside the CSTR
(Fogler,2006). The feed assumes a uniform composition throughout the reactor , exit
stream has the same composition as in the tank.
General Mole Balance Equation
FAO – FA + 0
V
∫ rA dv = dNa/dT
5
Assumptions:
For steady state dNA / dt = 0.
Well mixed, therefore rA is the same throughout the reactor.
Rearranging the generation,
vrdvrdvr
v
aa
v
a ∫∫ ==
00
aaao rFFv −−= /)(
6
In terms of conversion,
Preparation of Calibration Curve for Conversion vs Conductivity
A calibration curve is a method used in analytical chemistry to determine the
concentrations an unknown sample solution. It is a graph generated by experimental
means,with the concentration of solution plotted on the x-axis and the observable variable
.
The reaction to be studied is the saponification reaction of ethyl acetate Et(Ac) and
sodium hydroxide (NaOH) . Since this is a second order reaction , the rate of reaction
depends on both concentration of Et (Ac) and NaOH . However for analysis purposes ,
the reaction will be carried out using equimolar feeds of Et(Ac) and NaOH solutions with
aoaao FFFx /)( −=
aao rxFv −= /)(
7
the same initial concentration . This ensures that both concentration are similar
throughout the reaction .
NaOH + Et(Ac) → Na(Ac) + EtOH
In this experiment , it is required to calibrate the conductivity measurement of conversion
values for the reaction between 0.1M ethyl acetate and 0.1M sodium hydroxide.
Residence Time
The reactor`s residence time is defined as the reactor volume divided by the total feed
flow rated
8
Residence time, τ
There are some assumption have been made in order to using residence time
equation, in this experiment to reduce the complexity of the system being modeled. These
O
CSTR
F
v
=
9
assumption include , but are not limited to :steady state in flow and out flow, constant
volume constant temperature and uniform distribution of the substance throughtout the
volume of the system. It also assume that chemical degradation does not occur in the
system in question and the particles do not attach to surfaces that would hinder the flow.
If there are chemical degradation occur in a system, the substances that originally entered
the system may react with other existing compounds and causing the residence time to be
significantly shorter since substance would be chemically consumed and effectively be
removed from the system before it was able to naturally flow out of the system.
(http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/residence_time)
Rate of Equation and Rate Law
The rate of reaction for a reactant and products in a particular reaction can be defined as
how fast or slow the reaction takes place .
Consider the chemical reaction as below:
aA + bB → cC + dD ............(eq 1)
The lowercase letter which a,b, c and d refer to the stoichiometric coefficient while the
capital letter which A,B,C,D refer to the reactant and product.
According to the IUPAC`s Gold Book definition the rate of reaction , r in the
chemical reaction is occur in a closed system which is under a constant - volume
conditions, without build up of reaction intermediates,is defined as :
10
Where [A],[B],[C],[D] are referred to the molarity of the substances . Based on IUPAC
the times must be in second and the rate of reaction in a positive sign.
The mass balance for a system in general is:
IN -OUT + GENERATION- CONSUMPTION = ACCUMULATION
Mass is conservative entity , hence given a control volume V the sum of mass flows
entering the system will be equal to the sum exiting minus (plus) the consumed
(generated) or accumulated fractions.
dt
Dd
ddt
Cd
cdt
Bd
bdt
Ad
a
r
][1][1][1][1
==−=−=
11
APPARATUS
Continuos stirred tank reactor: Model BP143
50ml burrete
200ml beaker
Conical flask
100ml measuring cylinder
Conductivity probe
Solution:
-sodium hydroxide , NaOH (0.1M)
-Ethyl acetate , Et (Ac) (0.1M)
-Deionised water
12
-Phenolphtalein
Figure 1: CSTR (model:BP
143)
PROCEDURES
General Start-Up
Procedures
1. The following solution were prepared
a) 40 L of sodium hydroxide , NaOH (0.1M)
b) 40 L of ethyl acetate , Et (Ac) (0.1M)
c) 1 L of hydrochloric acid , HCL (0.25M) , for quenching
2. All valves were ensure initially closed.
3. The feed vessels were charged as follows:
a) The charge port caps for vessels B1 and B2 were opened.
b) The NaOH solution was carefully poured into vessel B1 and Et (Ac) solution was
poured into vessel B2
c) The charge port caps for both vessels were closed.
4. The power for the control panel was turned on.
5. Sufficient water in thermostat T1 tank was checked. Refill as necessary.
6. The overflow tube was adjusted to give a working volume of 10 L in the reactor R1.
13
7. Valves V2, V3 , V7, V8 and V11
8. The unit was ready for experiment.
General Shut- Down Procedures
1. The cooling water valve V13 was kept open to allow the cooling water to continue
flowing.
2. Both pumps P1 and P2 were switched off. Stirrer M1 was switched off.
3. The thermostat T1 was switched off. T he liquid in the reaction vessel R1 was let to
cool down to room temperature.
4. The cooling water valve V13 was closed.
5. Valves V2, V3 , V7, V8, were closed. Valves V4 , V9 and V12 were opened to drain
any liquid from the unit.
6. The power for the control panel was turned off.
14
Preparation of Calibration Curve for Conversion vs. Conductivity
1. The following solution were prepared:
a) 1 L of sodium hydroxide , NaOH (0.1M)
b) 1 L of sodium acetate , Et (Ac) (0.1M)
c) 1 L of deionised water , H2O
2. The conductivity and NaOH concentration for each conversion value were determined
by mixing the following solution into 100ml of deionised water.
a) 0% conversion :100ml NaOH
b)25% conversion:75ml NaOH + 25 ml Et(Ac)
c)50% conversion: 50ml NaOH + 50ml Et(Ac)
d)75% conversion: 25ml NaOH + 75ml Et(Ac)
e)100% conversion: 100ml Et(Ac)
Back Titration Procedures for Manual Conversion Determination
1. A burette was filled up with 0.1 M NaOH solution
2. 10ml of 0.25 M HCl was measured in a flask
15
3. A 50ml sample was obtained from the experiment and immediate the sample was
added to the HCl in the flask to quench the saponification reaction.
4. A few drops of pH indicator were added into a mixture
5. The mixture was titrated with NaOH solution from the burrete until the mixture was
neutralized. The amount of NaOH titrated was recorded.
Effect of Residence Time of the Reaction in a CSTR
1. The general start up procedures was performed.
2. Both pumps P1 and P2 were switched on simultaneously and valves V5 and V10 were
opened to obtain the highest possible flow rate into the reactor.
3. The reactor was filled up with both of the solution until it is just about to overflow.
4. The valves V5 and V10 were readjusted to give a flow rate of about 0.1L/min . Both
flow rate must be same. The flow rate was recorded.
5. The stirrer M1 was switched on and the speed was set about 200rpm.
6. The conductivity value at Ql-401 was started monitoring until it does not change over
time. This is to ensure that the reactor has reached steady state.
7. The steady state conductivity value was recorded and the concentration of NaOH
extent of conversion in the reactor was found out from the calibration curve.
8. Sampling Valve V12 was opened and a 5oml sample was collected. A back titration
procedure was carry out to determine the concentration of NaOH in the reactor and the
16
extent os conversion .
9. The experiment (steps 5 to 9) was repeated for different residence times by adjusting
the feed flow rates of NaOH and Et(Ac) to about 0.15, 0.20. 0.25, 0.30. Both flow rates
must be same.
RESULTS:
Table 1: Preparation of calibration curve
17
Graph 1:Calibration curve (conductivity vs conversion )
Table of experiment 1
Reactor Volume = 9L
Concentration of NaOH in feed vessel= 0.1M
Concentration of Et(Ac) in feed vessel = 0.1M
Table 2: Result effect residence time of reaction in CSTR
Temperature
(o
C)
27.6 27.6 27.8 27.9 27.9
Flow rate of
NaOH
(mL/min) 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30
Flow rate of
Et (Ac)
(mL/min) 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30
Total flowrate
, Fo (mL/min)
0.20 0.30 0.40 0.50 0.60
Conductivity 2.53 2.43 2.23 2.11 1.99
Volume of
NaOH titrated,
V1(mL)
24.7 23.8 23.0 22.5 21.9
Residence
time, τ (min)
50.00 33.33 25.00 20.00 16.67
Volume of
unreacted
quenching
HCl, V2 (mL)
9.88 9.52 9.20 9.00 8.76
Volume of
HCl reacted
with NaOH ,
V3 (mL)
9.88
‘
0.48 0.8 1.0 1.24
Conservation
, X (%)
98.8 95.2 92.0 90.0 87.6
Rate Constant
,k
(M-1
s-1
)
2744.44 247.94 115.00 90.00 68.35
Rate of
reaction , -ra
(M/s) 9.9x10-4
1.43x10-3
1.84x10-3
2.25x10-3
2.63x10-3
18
Graph 2: graph conversion X vs residence time
19
CALCULATION
Sample Calculation
Known quantities:
Volume of sample , Vs = 50 ml
Concentration of NaOH in the feed vessel, CNaOH,f =0.1mol/L
Volume of HCl for quenching , VHCl,s = 10mL
Concentration of HCl in standard solution, CHCl,s = 0.25mol/L
Concentration of NaOH used for titration, CNaOH,s = 0.1 mol/L
Volume of titrated NaOH , V1 =24.7 mL
Total flow rate of solution , Fo = 0.1 mL/min
A) Concentration of NaOH entering the reactor , CNaOH,o
20
CNaOH,O=
fNaOHC ,
2
1
21
=
= 0.05 mol/L
)1.0(
2
1
22
B) Volume of unreacted quenching HCl, V2
V2 =
1
,
,
V
C
C
sHCl
sNaOH
23
= 24.7mL
= 9.88 mL
x
25.0
1.0
24
C) Volume of HCl reacted with NaOH in sample , V3
V3 =
= 10 – 9.88
= 0.12 ml
D) Moles of HCl reacted with NaOH in sample, n1
2, VV sHCl −
25
n1 =
=
(0.25x0.12)/1000
=
0.00003 mol
E) Moles of unreacted
NaOH in sample , n2
n2 = n1
= 0.00003 mol
1000
)( 3, xVC sHCl
26
F) Concentration of unreacted NaOH in the reactor , CNaOH
CNaOH =
=(0.00003/ 50)x1000
= 0.0006 mol/L
G)Conversion of NaOH in the reactor , X
10002
x
V
n
s
27
X =
= (1- 0.0006/0.05) x 100%
= 98.8%
H)Residence time ,τ
%1001
0,
x
C
C
NaOH
NaOH








−
28
O
CSTR
F
V
29
τ =
= 10/0.2
= 50min
I) Reaction rate constant , k
30
k =
= ( 0.05 - 0.0006) / (50 x 0.00062)
= 2744.44 M-1
min-1
J) Rate of reaction , -rA
-rA = kCA
2
=2744.44 x 0.00062







 −
2
A
AAo
C
CC
τ
31
= 9.9x 10-4
mol/L.min
DISCUSSION
In this experiment we are investigate about saponification reaction by using
Continuos Stirred Tank Reactors (CSTR) 40L (model:BP 143). This experiment has been
conducted to carry out saponification reaction between NaOH and Et(Ac) to determine
the effect of residence time onto the reaction extent of conversion and the reaction rate
constant , beside to compare with manually conversion. The CSTR model is used to
predict the behaviour of chemical reactors, so the key reactor variables such as the
dimensions of the reactor, can be estimated. Saponification process, it is one kind of
process to make a soap and it is continuos reaction . In this experiment , the reaction of
32
saponification is quenching with hydrochloric acid to stop the reaction. The reaction
rapidly reacts and back titration is done to investigate the volume reacted.
From the data collected , two graph had been plotted which are conductivity versus
conversion for manually conversion experiment and conversion X versus residence time
for reaction in CSTR. The calibration curve is plotted to determine the conductivity of the
reaction between NaOH and Et (Ac) at certain percentage of conversion. From graph 1,
we can conclude that the conductivity is decrease proportionally with conversion. It show
that the conductivity is decreased when the volume of NaOH is decreased. When both
reactant with different moles was used, it will give a significant difference of
conductivity .Because of ethyl acetate as reactant and ethanol as product are not electric
conductor , the conductivity of the mixture measurement can be used to measure the
concentration of unreacted NaOH that remains solution that relate to conversion.
Volumetric flow rate is related to the residence time therefore an experiment is
conduct in varies flow rate which is 0.1, 0.15, 0.20, 0.25 and 0.30 L/min. .From the data
collected , we can conclude that the conversion is increase as the volumetric flow rate is
decrease. Fluid entering the reactor at time t and will exit at time t + τ . Residence time , τ
is time that the fluid elements spend within reactor. At high flow rate, the velocity of
fluid moving inside the reactor is high means the reactant spend less time within the
reactor.From graph 2, we can conclude that conversion is linearly increase with residence
time. It can be conclude that the longer the residence time , the more conversion of the
reactant . The higher conversion is 98.8 % at higher residence time which is 45min.
The equimolar reaction between NaOH and Et(Ac) with the same initial reactant`s
33
concentration is the second order reaction. The rate law is -rA=kCACB .The rate of reaction
is L/mol.s. Relate to the rate constant for this order of reaction ,when the `k` value is
increase means more volume of NaOH require to convert a mole of NaOH in 1 second.
From the calculated result, the reaction rate constant is increase as the volumetric flow
rate is decrease.And when the reaction rate constant decrease , the rate of reaction will
increase. The rate of reaction is higher which is ra=2.63x10-3
at the lower rate constant
which is k = 68.35 . There is more moles of NaOH converted for a less volume of NaOH
solution require. This is very important key design to have a high conversion for large
scale production.
In this experiment , there are some zero error and parallax error occur while taking
the measurement of each data.When taking the reading, the position of eye must be
perpendicular to the reading scale of burette and measuring cylinder. Besides, we have to
rinse all the apparatus before we use it to ensure that all apparatus is clean so that any
chemical put into it does not react with any others chemicals. And the most important is ,
need to immediately added to the HCl in the flask that contain the sample to quench the
saponification reaction also to make sure , the sample does not react with others
chemical.By doing all precaution , we can get better results.
From the all calculation , it was obtained that the value of conversion is increase
when the volumetric flow rate decrease. This proved , the theory from the calibration
curve from the first experiment . Therefore the experiment is success.
34
CONCLUSION
As for the conclusion,the purpose of this experiment to determine the reaction rate
constant and as well as the effect of residence time on the conversion of sodium
hydroxide. CSTR is used in order to achieve the objective of this experiment. By done
this experiment , all purposes are met and the result are collected . From the result it show
the conversion is decrease from 98.8% to 87.6% when the flow rate is increase from 0.20
mL/min to 0.60 mL/min.From the graph conversion versus residence time , it can be
conclude that conversion is increase proportionally with residence time. This proved , the
theory from the calibration curve from the first experiment .When increasing the flow
35
rate , the reaction rate constant become smaller and the rate of reaction become
higher.The experiment is successful because the entire objectives have been achieved and
related to the theory of study .
RECOMMENDATIONS
1. Divide into two teams which is the first team in charge of the CSTR 40L machine
while the second team would carry out the back titration procedures.
2. Make sure all of the valves closed and open as needed and there is no leaks from the
reactor in order to make sure CSTR 40L machine is running appropriately to prevent
harm to the machine and individual that used the machine.
3. Controlled the valve carefully and slowly when adjusting the flow rate to make sure
flow rate will stabilize and the experiment will run smoothly.
36
4. During titration , use the suitable apparatus with appropriate size and scale to the
amount to be measured.
5. Make sure all the error is avoided to get more accurate result.To avoid parallax error ,
make sure the position of eye must be parallel to reading scale.
6. Hydrochloric acid for quenching should be prepared early and added to the samples as
soon as possible so that the reaction between NaOH and Et(Ac) cannot proceed because
the NaOH that`s not reacted will neutralized by HCl.
7. The samples that already mix with HCl should be titrated as soon as possible.
8. Take conductivity reading when the conductivity not changes in time because it change
rapidly in short time.
REFERENCE
1.Fogler, Scott H.Elements of Chemical Reaction Engineering , 4th
ed. Englewood Cliffs,
NJ:Prentice hall,2006. Page 12,40
2.Levenspiel,O,Chemical Reaction Engineering , 3rd
ed, John Wiley and Sons , New
York , 1999.page 35
3.Thomas, Charles E.Process Technology Equipment and System 3rd
edition .Clifton
Park, NY: Delmarcangage Learning , 2011.
37
4.Gilbert F.Froment and Kenneth B.Bischoff.,`Chemical Reactor Analysis and Design,
John wiley &sons , 2th ed ,1990
5.Molarities and dilutions access on 21/03/2015 at [ www.microbiologybytes.com]
6.Mass-mole concentration access on 21/03/2015 at [www.ausetute.com.au]
7.Saponification Definition access on 20/03/2015 at [ chemistry.about.com]
8.Continuos Stirred Tank Reactor access on 20/03/2015 at [www.labequip.co.za]
9.CSTR 40L -CPE554 access on 20/03/2015 at [www.coursehero.com]
10.CSTR 40L access on 19/03/2015 at [www.scribd.com]
11.Residence time access on 19/03/2015 at http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/residence_time
APPENDICES

Weitere ähnliche Inhalte

Was ist angesagt?

Differential method of analysis of data
Differential method of analysis of dataDifferential method of analysis of data
Differential method of analysis of dataUsman Shah
 
Design of packed columns
Design of packed columnsDesign of packed columns
Design of packed columnsalsyourih
 
Conductivity measurement in CSTR water-base(according to temperature)
Conductivity measurement in CSTR water-base(according to temperature)Conductivity measurement in CSTR water-base(according to temperature)
Conductivity measurement in CSTR water-base(according to temperature)sarkawtn
 
Design of Methanol Water Distillation Column
Design of Methanol Water Distillation Column  Design of Methanol Water Distillation Column
Design of Methanol Water Distillation Column Rita EL Khoury
 
Cooling tower full report
Cooling tower full reportCooling tower full report
Cooling tower full reportAzlan Skool
 
Difference between batch,mixed flow & plug-flow reactor
Difference between  batch,mixed flow & plug-flow reactorDifference between  batch,mixed flow & plug-flow reactor
Difference between batch,mixed flow & plug-flow reactorUsman Shah
 
Plate and Frame Filter Press Lab 1 Report
Plate and Frame Filter Press Lab 1 ReportPlate and Frame Filter Press Lab 1 Report
Plate and Frame Filter Press Lab 1 ReportNicely Jane Eleccion
 
Episode 43 : DESIGN of Rotary Vacuum Drum Filter
Episode 43 :  DESIGN of Rotary Vacuum Drum Filter Episode 43 :  DESIGN of Rotary Vacuum Drum Filter
Episode 43 : DESIGN of Rotary Vacuum Drum Filter SAJJAD KHUDHUR ABBAS
 
Reactive distillation
Reactive distillationReactive distillation
Reactive distillationKarnav Rana
 
Flooding of a distillation column
Flooding of a distillation columnFlooding of a distillation column
Flooding of a distillation columnKarnav Rana
 
Gas Absorption & Stripping in Chemical Engineering (Part 3/4)
Gas Absorption & Stripping in Chemical Engineering (Part 3/4)Gas Absorption & Stripping in Chemical Engineering (Part 3/4)
Gas Absorption & Stripping in Chemical Engineering (Part 3/4)Chemical Engineering Guy
 
Chemical Design of Extraction Column
Chemical Design of Extraction ColumnChemical Design of Extraction Column
Chemical Design of Extraction ColumnAmirul Izan
 

Was ist angesagt? (20)

Differential method of analysis of data
Differential method of analysis of dataDifferential method of analysis of data
Differential method of analysis of data
 
Design of packed columns
Design of packed columnsDesign of packed columns
Design of packed columns
 
Distillation
DistillationDistillation
Distillation
 
Conductivity measurement in CSTR water-base(according to temperature)
Conductivity measurement in CSTR water-base(according to temperature)Conductivity measurement in CSTR water-base(according to temperature)
Conductivity measurement in CSTR water-base(according to temperature)
 
Design of Methanol Water Distillation Column
Design of Methanol Water Distillation Column  Design of Methanol Water Distillation Column
Design of Methanol Water Distillation Column
 
Cooling tower full report
Cooling tower full reportCooling tower full report
Cooling tower full report
 
Difference between batch,mixed flow & plug-flow reactor
Difference between  batch,mixed flow & plug-flow reactorDifference between  batch,mixed flow & plug-flow reactor
Difference between batch,mixed flow & plug-flow reactor
 
Che 412 cre 1 notes
Che 412 cre 1 notesChe 412 cre 1 notes
Che 412 cre 1 notes
 
Plate and Frame Filter Press Lab 1 Report
Plate and Frame Filter Press Lab 1 ReportPlate and Frame Filter Press Lab 1 Report
Plate and Frame Filter Press Lab 1 Report
 
Episode 43 : DESIGN of Rotary Vacuum Drum Filter
Episode 43 :  DESIGN of Rotary Vacuum Drum Filter Episode 43 :  DESIGN of Rotary Vacuum Drum Filter
Episode 43 : DESIGN of Rotary Vacuum Drum Filter
 
Reactive distillation
Reactive distillationReactive distillation
Reactive distillation
 
Flooding of a distillation column
Flooding of a distillation columnFlooding of a distillation column
Flooding of a distillation column
 
Rtd
RtdRtd
Rtd
 
Acetic Acid Process Plant Design
Acetic Acid Process Plant DesignAcetic Acid Process Plant Design
Acetic Acid Process Plant Design
 
Reactor Design 9
Reactor Design 9Reactor Design 9
Reactor Design 9
 
gas absorption
gas absorptiongas absorption
gas absorption
 
cre ppt
 cre ppt cre ppt
cre ppt
 
Group 2
Group 2Group 2
Group 2
 
Gas Absorption & Stripping in Chemical Engineering (Part 3/4)
Gas Absorption & Stripping in Chemical Engineering (Part 3/4)Gas Absorption & Stripping in Chemical Engineering (Part 3/4)
Gas Absorption & Stripping in Chemical Engineering (Part 3/4)
 
Chemical Design of Extraction Column
Chemical Design of Extraction ColumnChemical Design of Extraction Column
Chemical Design of Extraction Column
 

Ähnlich wie experiment Cstr 40l

Effect of Operating Conditions on CSTR performance: an Experimental Study
Effect of Operating Conditions on CSTR performance: an Experimental StudyEffect of Operating Conditions on CSTR performance: an Experimental Study
Effect of Operating Conditions on CSTR performance: an Experimental StudyIJERA Editor
 
Chemical Reaction Engineering Lab v3.0
Chemical Reaction Engineering Lab v3.0Chemical Reaction Engineering Lab v3.0
Chemical Reaction Engineering Lab v3.0Michael Garibaldi
 
IRJET- Estimation of Parameters of Kinetic Study and Arrhenius Equation for t...
IRJET- Estimation of Parameters of Kinetic Study and Arrhenius Equation for t...IRJET- Estimation of Parameters of Kinetic Study and Arrhenius Equation for t...
IRJET- Estimation of Parameters of Kinetic Study and Arrhenius Equation for t...IRJET Journal
 
Saponification Presentation
Saponification PresentationSaponification Presentation
Saponification PresentationJennifer Kellogg
 
Chemical Kinetics in Unit Processes
Chemical Kinetics in Unit ProcessesChemical Kinetics in Unit Processes
Chemical Kinetics in Unit ProcessesRahul Gaur
 
ReactIR as a Diagnostic Tool for Developing Robust, Scalable Synthetic Processes
ReactIR as a Diagnostic Tool for Developing Robust, Scalable Synthetic ProcessesReactIR as a Diagnostic Tool for Developing Robust, Scalable Synthetic Processes
ReactIR as a Diagnostic Tool for Developing Robust, Scalable Synthetic Processesplaced1
 
Iaetsd design and implementation of intelligent
Iaetsd design and implementation of intelligentIaetsd design and implementation of intelligent
Iaetsd design and implementation of intelligentIaetsd Iaetsd
 
Development of Dynamic Models for a Reactive Packed Distillation Column
Development of Dynamic Models for a Reactive Packed Distillation ColumnDevelopment of Dynamic Models for a Reactive Packed Distillation Column
Development of Dynamic Models for a Reactive Packed Distillation ColumnCSCJournals
 
IIT_Chemistry_manual_B_TEChemistry for engineering
IIT_Chemistry_manual_B_TEChemistry for engineeringIIT_Chemistry_manual_B_TEChemistry for engineering
IIT_Chemistry_manual_B_TEChemistry for engineeringREVA University
 
B van Woezik_Runaway and thermally safe operation of a nitric acid oxidation ...
B van Woezik_Runaway and thermally safe operation of a nitric acid oxidation ...B van Woezik_Runaway and thermally safe operation of a nitric acid oxidation ...
B van Woezik_Runaway and thermally safe operation of a nitric acid oxidation ...Bob van Woezik
 
DESIGN OF CATALYST REACTOR WITH DEACTIVATION
DESIGN OF CATALYST REACTOR WITH DEACTIVATIONDESIGN OF CATALYST REACTOR WITH DEACTIVATION
DESIGN OF CATALYST REACTOR WITH DEACTIVATIONKishan Kasundra
 
R e a c t o r s & its kinetics
R e a c t o r s & its kineticsR e a c t o r s & its kinetics
R e a c t o r s & its kineticsArvind Kumar
 
An insight into spray pulsed reactor through mathematical modeling of catalyt...
An insight into spray pulsed reactor through mathematical modeling of catalyt...An insight into spray pulsed reactor through mathematical modeling of catalyt...
An insight into spray pulsed reactor through mathematical modeling of catalyt...Siluvai Antony Praveen
 
Tecniques determine Rate of Reaction pdf.pdf
Tecniques  determine Rate of Reaction pdf.pdfTecniques  determine Rate of Reaction pdf.pdf
Tecniques determine Rate of Reaction pdf.pdfVikasThakur896480
 
What is the Rate Law for the Crystal Violet Reaction327-43.docx
What is the Rate Law for the Crystal Violet Reaction327-43.docxWhat is the Rate Law for the Crystal Violet Reaction327-43.docx
What is the Rate Law for the Crystal Violet Reaction327-43.docxalanfhall8953
 

Ähnlich wie experiment Cstr 40l (20)

Effect of Operating Conditions on CSTR performance: an Experimental Study
Effect of Operating Conditions on CSTR performance: an Experimental StudyEffect of Operating Conditions on CSTR performance: an Experimental Study
Effect of Operating Conditions on CSTR performance: an Experimental Study
 
Chemical Reaction Engineering Lab v3.0
Chemical Reaction Engineering Lab v3.0Chemical Reaction Engineering Lab v3.0
Chemical Reaction Engineering Lab v3.0
 
IRJET- Estimation of Parameters of Kinetic Study and Arrhenius Equation for t...
IRJET- Estimation of Parameters of Kinetic Study and Arrhenius Equation for t...IRJET- Estimation of Parameters of Kinetic Study and Arrhenius Equation for t...
IRJET- Estimation of Parameters of Kinetic Study and Arrhenius Equation for t...
 
GroupW _Kinetics
GroupW _KineticsGroupW _Kinetics
GroupW _Kinetics
 
Saponification Presentation
Saponification PresentationSaponification Presentation
Saponification Presentation
 
Rea 2.ppt
Rea 2.pptRea 2.ppt
Rea 2.ppt
 
RD Lab - Exp-12 - G-A1.pdf
RD Lab - Exp-12 - G-A1.pdfRD Lab - Exp-12 - G-A1.pdf
RD Lab - Exp-12 - G-A1.pdf
 
Chemical Kinetics in Unit Processes
Chemical Kinetics in Unit ProcessesChemical Kinetics in Unit Processes
Chemical Kinetics in Unit Processes
 
ReactIR as a Diagnostic Tool for Developing Robust, Scalable Synthetic Processes
ReactIR as a Diagnostic Tool for Developing Robust, Scalable Synthetic ProcessesReactIR as a Diagnostic Tool for Developing Robust, Scalable Synthetic Processes
ReactIR as a Diagnostic Tool for Developing Robust, Scalable Synthetic Processes
 
RD Lab - Exp-05 - G-A1.pdf
RD Lab - Exp-05 - G-A1.pdfRD Lab - Exp-05 - G-A1.pdf
RD Lab - Exp-05 - G-A1.pdf
 
Iaetsd design and implementation of intelligent
Iaetsd design and implementation of intelligentIaetsd design and implementation of intelligent
Iaetsd design and implementation of intelligent
 
Development of Dynamic Models for a Reactive Packed Distillation Column
Development of Dynamic Models for a Reactive Packed Distillation ColumnDevelopment of Dynamic Models for a Reactive Packed Distillation Column
Development of Dynamic Models for a Reactive Packed Distillation Column
 
IIT_Chemistry_manual_B_TEChemistry for engineering
IIT_Chemistry_manual_B_TEChemistry for engineeringIIT_Chemistry_manual_B_TEChemistry for engineering
IIT_Chemistry_manual_B_TEChemistry for engineering
 
B van Woezik_Runaway and thermally safe operation of a nitric acid oxidation ...
B van Woezik_Runaway and thermally safe operation of a nitric acid oxidation ...B van Woezik_Runaway and thermally safe operation of a nitric acid oxidation ...
B van Woezik_Runaway and thermally safe operation of a nitric acid oxidation ...
 
DESIGN OF CATALYST REACTOR WITH DEACTIVATION
DESIGN OF CATALYST REACTOR WITH DEACTIVATIONDESIGN OF CATALYST REACTOR WITH DEACTIVATION
DESIGN OF CATALYST REACTOR WITH DEACTIVATION
 
R e a c t o r s & its kinetics
R e a c t o r s & its kineticsR e a c t o r s & its kinetics
R e a c t o r s & its kinetics
 
An insight into spray pulsed reactor through mathematical modeling of catalyt...
An insight into spray pulsed reactor through mathematical modeling of catalyt...An insight into spray pulsed reactor through mathematical modeling of catalyt...
An insight into spray pulsed reactor through mathematical modeling of catalyt...
 
Tecniques determine Rate of Reaction pdf.pdf
Tecniques  determine Rate of Reaction pdf.pdfTecniques  determine Rate of Reaction pdf.pdf
Tecniques determine Rate of Reaction pdf.pdf
 
What is the Rate Law for the Crystal Violet Reaction327-43.docx
What is the Rate Law for the Crystal Violet Reaction327-43.docxWhat is the Rate Law for the Crystal Violet Reaction327-43.docx
What is the Rate Law for the Crystal Violet Reaction327-43.docx
 
O0126291100
O0126291100O0126291100
O0126291100
 

experiment Cstr 40l

  • 1. 1 ABSTRACT This experiment is conducted to carry out manual conversion determination on experiment samples to verify the conductivity measurement values ,to carry out a saponification reaction between NaOH and Et(Ac) in CSTR and determine the effect of residence time onto the reaction extent of conversion also determine the reaction rate constant .In order to accomplish the objective, the unit being used to perform this experiment is CSTR 40L. The design of the reactor is very important to the success of the production. In this experiment sodium hydroxide and ethyl acetate react in continuous stirred tank reactor. Both of reactants feed to the reactor at equimolar flow rate for a certain time.From Graph 1 it show that conductivity is decrease proportionally with conversion.The result show that, when residence time is increase, conversion also increase by lowering the flow rate. The higher conversion is 98.8% at 45 min residence time and 0.2 mL/min total flow rate of solution.It can be conclude that the higher the flow rate , the smaller the reaction rate constant and rate of reaction become highest. From the calculation , it was obtained that the value of conversion is increase when the volumetric flow rate decrease.This prove the theory from calibration curve.The rate of reaction is higher which is ra=2.63x10-3 at the lower rate constant which is k = 68.35. The entire objectives have been achieved and related to the theory of study .Therefore the experiment is success.
  • 2. 2 INTRODUCTION In the industrial chemical processes,mostly a reactor is the key item of equipment in which raw materials undergo a chemical change to form desired products. The design and operation of chemical reactors is thus crucial to the whole success of the industrial operation. There are many types of reactor depending on the nature of the feed materials and products. Understanding non-steady behavior of process equipment is necessary for the design and operation of automatic control systems. The rate of reaction is most important thing will be consider in the reactor because it showed the effectiveness of the processing of the reactor. One particular type of process equipment is continuous stirred tank reactor (CSTR). In a continuous-flow stirred-tank reactor (CSTR), reactants and products are continuously added and withdrawn from the reactor. In practice, mechanical or hydraulic agitation is required to achieve uniform composition and temperature, a choice strongly influenced by process considerations. The CSTR is idealized opposite of the weel - stirred batch and tubular plug flow reactor. Analysis of selected combination of these reactor types can be useful in quantitatively evaluating more complex gas , liquid and solid-flow behaviour. In this experiment , the CSTR (model :BP143 ) unit is suitable for student experiment on chemical reaction in liquid phase which is under adiabatic and isothermal condition. The unit consist of jacketed reaction fitted in the agitator and condenser. The unit comes complete with vessels for raw material and product,feed pumps and thermostat . (www.labequip.com) The reactor is modeled in order to perform the saponification reaction where the reaction is occur between the sodium hydroxide , NaOH and ethyl acetate , Et(Ac) . The saponification process between this compounds produced sodium acetate in a batch and the continuos stirred tank
  • 3. 3 reactor evaluate the rate data needed to design a production scale reactor. AIMS In this experiment, there are a few objectives to achieve: 1. To carry out manual conversion determination on experiment samples to verify the conductivity measurement values 2. To carry out a saponification reaction between NaOH and Et(Ac) in CSTR 3. To determine the effect of residence time onto the reaction extent of conversion 4. To determine the reaction rate constant THEORY Saponification is a process by which triglycerides are reacted with sodium or potassium
  • 4. 4 hydroxide (NaOH or KOH) to produce glycerol and fatty acid salt called “soap”. Lipid that contain fatty acid ester linkages can undergo hydrolysis. (Helmenstine,2001) . The equation below shows the saponification process between sodium hydroxide and ethyl acetate ( irreversible reaction) to produce sodium acetate and by product ethanol. C2H5O2CCH3 + NaOH → CH3CO2Na + H3CCH2OH Ethyl acetate sodium hydroxide sodium acetate ethanol Continuous Stirred Tank Reactor(CSTR) Figure 1 stirred tank CSTR is used primarily for liquid phase reaction. It is normally operated at steady state with continuos flow and is assumed to be perfectly mixed;consequently, there is no time dependence or position dependence of the temperature , the concentration or the reaction rate inside the CSTR (Fogler,2006). The feed assumes a uniform composition throughout the reactor , exit stream has the same composition as in the tank. General Mole Balance Equation FAO – FA + 0 V ∫ rA dv = dNa/dT
  • 5. 5 Assumptions: For steady state dNA / dt = 0. Well mixed, therefore rA is the same throughout the reactor. Rearranging the generation, vrdvrdvr v aa v a ∫∫ == 00 aaao rFFv −−= /)(
  • 6. 6 In terms of conversion, Preparation of Calibration Curve for Conversion vs Conductivity A calibration curve is a method used in analytical chemistry to determine the concentrations an unknown sample solution. It is a graph generated by experimental means,with the concentration of solution plotted on the x-axis and the observable variable . The reaction to be studied is the saponification reaction of ethyl acetate Et(Ac) and sodium hydroxide (NaOH) . Since this is a second order reaction , the rate of reaction depends on both concentration of Et (Ac) and NaOH . However for analysis purposes , the reaction will be carried out using equimolar feeds of Et(Ac) and NaOH solutions with aoaao FFFx /)( −= aao rxFv −= /)(
  • 7. 7 the same initial concentration . This ensures that both concentration are similar throughout the reaction . NaOH + Et(Ac) → Na(Ac) + EtOH In this experiment , it is required to calibrate the conductivity measurement of conversion values for the reaction between 0.1M ethyl acetate and 0.1M sodium hydroxide. Residence Time The reactor`s residence time is defined as the reactor volume divided by the total feed flow rated
  • 8. 8 Residence time, τ There are some assumption have been made in order to using residence time equation, in this experiment to reduce the complexity of the system being modeled. These O CSTR F v =
  • 9. 9 assumption include , but are not limited to :steady state in flow and out flow, constant volume constant temperature and uniform distribution of the substance throughtout the volume of the system. It also assume that chemical degradation does not occur in the system in question and the particles do not attach to surfaces that would hinder the flow. If there are chemical degradation occur in a system, the substances that originally entered the system may react with other existing compounds and causing the residence time to be significantly shorter since substance would be chemically consumed and effectively be removed from the system before it was able to naturally flow out of the system. (http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/residence_time) Rate of Equation and Rate Law The rate of reaction for a reactant and products in a particular reaction can be defined as how fast or slow the reaction takes place . Consider the chemical reaction as below: aA + bB → cC + dD ............(eq 1) The lowercase letter which a,b, c and d refer to the stoichiometric coefficient while the capital letter which A,B,C,D refer to the reactant and product. According to the IUPAC`s Gold Book definition the rate of reaction , r in the chemical reaction is occur in a closed system which is under a constant - volume conditions, without build up of reaction intermediates,is defined as :
  • 10. 10 Where [A],[B],[C],[D] are referred to the molarity of the substances . Based on IUPAC the times must be in second and the rate of reaction in a positive sign. The mass balance for a system in general is: IN -OUT + GENERATION- CONSUMPTION = ACCUMULATION Mass is conservative entity , hence given a control volume V the sum of mass flows entering the system will be equal to the sum exiting minus (plus) the consumed (generated) or accumulated fractions. dt Dd ddt Cd cdt Bd bdt Ad a r ][1][1][1][1 ==−=−=
  • 11. 11 APPARATUS Continuos stirred tank reactor: Model BP143 50ml burrete 200ml beaker Conical flask 100ml measuring cylinder Conductivity probe Solution: -sodium hydroxide , NaOH (0.1M) -Ethyl acetate , Et (Ac) (0.1M) -Deionised water
  • 12. 12 -Phenolphtalein Figure 1: CSTR (model:BP 143) PROCEDURES General Start-Up Procedures 1. The following solution were prepared a) 40 L of sodium hydroxide , NaOH (0.1M) b) 40 L of ethyl acetate , Et (Ac) (0.1M) c) 1 L of hydrochloric acid , HCL (0.25M) , for quenching 2. All valves were ensure initially closed. 3. The feed vessels were charged as follows: a) The charge port caps for vessels B1 and B2 were opened. b) The NaOH solution was carefully poured into vessel B1 and Et (Ac) solution was poured into vessel B2 c) The charge port caps for both vessels were closed. 4. The power for the control panel was turned on. 5. Sufficient water in thermostat T1 tank was checked. Refill as necessary. 6. The overflow tube was adjusted to give a working volume of 10 L in the reactor R1.
  • 13. 13 7. Valves V2, V3 , V7, V8 and V11 8. The unit was ready for experiment. General Shut- Down Procedures 1. The cooling water valve V13 was kept open to allow the cooling water to continue flowing. 2. Both pumps P1 and P2 were switched off. Stirrer M1 was switched off. 3. The thermostat T1 was switched off. T he liquid in the reaction vessel R1 was let to cool down to room temperature. 4. The cooling water valve V13 was closed. 5. Valves V2, V3 , V7, V8, were closed. Valves V4 , V9 and V12 were opened to drain any liquid from the unit. 6. The power for the control panel was turned off.
  • 14. 14 Preparation of Calibration Curve for Conversion vs. Conductivity 1. The following solution were prepared: a) 1 L of sodium hydroxide , NaOH (0.1M) b) 1 L of sodium acetate , Et (Ac) (0.1M) c) 1 L of deionised water , H2O 2. The conductivity and NaOH concentration for each conversion value were determined by mixing the following solution into 100ml of deionised water. a) 0% conversion :100ml NaOH b)25% conversion:75ml NaOH + 25 ml Et(Ac) c)50% conversion: 50ml NaOH + 50ml Et(Ac) d)75% conversion: 25ml NaOH + 75ml Et(Ac) e)100% conversion: 100ml Et(Ac) Back Titration Procedures for Manual Conversion Determination 1. A burette was filled up with 0.1 M NaOH solution 2. 10ml of 0.25 M HCl was measured in a flask
  • 15. 15 3. A 50ml sample was obtained from the experiment and immediate the sample was added to the HCl in the flask to quench the saponification reaction. 4. A few drops of pH indicator were added into a mixture 5. The mixture was titrated with NaOH solution from the burrete until the mixture was neutralized. The amount of NaOH titrated was recorded. Effect of Residence Time of the Reaction in a CSTR 1. The general start up procedures was performed. 2. Both pumps P1 and P2 were switched on simultaneously and valves V5 and V10 were opened to obtain the highest possible flow rate into the reactor. 3. The reactor was filled up with both of the solution until it is just about to overflow. 4. The valves V5 and V10 were readjusted to give a flow rate of about 0.1L/min . Both flow rate must be same. The flow rate was recorded. 5. The stirrer M1 was switched on and the speed was set about 200rpm. 6. The conductivity value at Ql-401 was started monitoring until it does not change over time. This is to ensure that the reactor has reached steady state. 7. The steady state conductivity value was recorded and the concentration of NaOH extent of conversion in the reactor was found out from the calibration curve. 8. Sampling Valve V12 was opened and a 5oml sample was collected. A back titration procedure was carry out to determine the concentration of NaOH in the reactor and the
  • 16. 16 extent os conversion . 9. The experiment (steps 5 to 9) was repeated for different residence times by adjusting the feed flow rates of NaOH and Et(Ac) to about 0.15, 0.20. 0.25, 0.30. Both flow rates must be same. RESULTS: Table 1: Preparation of calibration curve
  • 17. 17 Graph 1:Calibration curve (conductivity vs conversion ) Table of experiment 1 Reactor Volume = 9L Concentration of NaOH in feed vessel= 0.1M Concentration of Et(Ac) in feed vessel = 0.1M Table 2: Result effect residence time of reaction in CSTR Temperature (o C) 27.6 27.6 27.8 27.9 27.9 Flow rate of NaOH (mL/min) 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 Flow rate of Et (Ac) (mL/min) 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 Total flowrate , Fo (mL/min) 0.20 0.30 0.40 0.50 0.60 Conductivity 2.53 2.43 2.23 2.11 1.99 Volume of NaOH titrated, V1(mL) 24.7 23.8 23.0 22.5 21.9 Residence time, τ (min) 50.00 33.33 25.00 20.00 16.67 Volume of unreacted quenching HCl, V2 (mL) 9.88 9.52 9.20 9.00 8.76 Volume of HCl reacted with NaOH , V3 (mL) 9.88 ‘ 0.48 0.8 1.0 1.24 Conservation , X (%) 98.8 95.2 92.0 90.0 87.6 Rate Constant ,k (M-1 s-1 ) 2744.44 247.94 115.00 90.00 68.35 Rate of reaction , -ra (M/s) 9.9x10-4 1.43x10-3 1.84x10-3 2.25x10-3 2.63x10-3
  • 18. 18 Graph 2: graph conversion X vs residence time
  • 19. 19 CALCULATION Sample Calculation Known quantities: Volume of sample , Vs = 50 ml Concentration of NaOH in the feed vessel, CNaOH,f =0.1mol/L Volume of HCl for quenching , VHCl,s = 10mL Concentration of HCl in standard solution, CHCl,s = 0.25mol/L Concentration of NaOH used for titration, CNaOH,s = 0.1 mol/L Volume of titrated NaOH , V1 =24.7 mL Total flow rate of solution , Fo = 0.1 mL/min A) Concentration of NaOH entering the reactor , CNaOH,o
  • 22. 22 B) Volume of unreacted quenching HCl, V2 V2 = 1 , , V C C sHCl sNaOH
  • 23. 23 = 24.7mL = 9.88 mL x 25.0 1.0
  • 24. 24 C) Volume of HCl reacted with NaOH in sample , V3 V3 = = 10 – 9.88 = 0.12 ml D) Moles of HCl reacted with NaOH in sample, n1 2, VV sHCl −
  • 25. 25 n1 = = (0.25x0.12)/1000 = 0.00003 mol E) Moles of unreacted NaOH in sample , n2 n2 = n1 = 0.00003 mol 1000 )( 3, xVC sHCl
  • 26. 26 F) Concentration of unreacted NaOH in the reactor , CNaOH CNaOH = =(0.00003/ 50)x1000 = 0.0006 mol/L G)Conversion of NaOH in the reactor , X 10002 x V n s
  • 27. 27 X = = (1- 0.0006/0.05) x 100% = 98.8% H)Residence time ,τ %1001 0, x C C NaOH NaOH         −
  • 29. 29 τ = = 10/0.2 = 50min I) Reaction rate constant , k
  • 30. 30 k = = ( 0.05 - 0.0006) / (50 x 0.00062) = 2744.44 M-1 min-1 J) Rate of reaction , -rA -rA = kCA 2 =2744.44 x 0.00062         − 2 A AAo C CC τ
  • 31. 31 = 9.9x 10-4 mol/L.min DISCUSSION In this experiment we are investigate about saponification reaction by using Continuos Stirred Tank Reactors (CSTR) 40L (model:BP 143). This experiment has been conducted to carry out saponification reaction between NaOH and Et(Ac) to determine the effect of residence time onto the reaction extent of conversion and the reaction rate constant , beside to compare with manually conversion. The CSTR model is used to predict the behaviour of chemical reactors, so the key reactor variables such as the dimensions of the reactor, can be estimated. Saponification process, it is one kind of process to make a soap and it is continuos reaction . In this experiment , the reaction of
  • 32. 32 saponification is quenching with hydrochloric acid to stop the reaction. The reaction rapidly reacts and back titration is done to investigate the volume reacted. From the data collected , two graph had been plotted which are conductivity versus conversion for manually conversion experiment and conversion X versus residence time for reaction in CSTR. The calibration curve is plotted to determine the conductivity of the reaction between NaOH and Et (Ac) at certain percentage of conversion. From graph 1, we can conclude that the conductivity is decrease proportionally with conversion. It show that the conductivity is decreased when the volume of NaOH is decreased. When both reactant with different moles was used, it will give a significant difference of conductivity .Because of ethyl acetate as reactant and ethanol as product are not electric conductor , the conductivity of the mixture measurement can be used to measure the concentration of unreacted NaOH that remains solution that relate to conversion. Volumetric flow rate is related to the residence time therefore an experiment is conduct in varies flow rate which is 0.1, 0.15, 0.20, 0.25 and 0.30 L/min. .From the data collected , we can conclude that the conversion is increase as the volumetric flow rate is decrease. Fluid entering the reactor at time t and will exit at time t + τ . Residence time , τ is time that the fluid elements spend within reactor. At high flow rate, the velocity of fluid moving inside the reactor is high means the reactant spend less time within the reactor.From graph 2, we can conclude that conversion is linearly increase with residence time. It can be conclude that the longer the residence time , the more conversion of the reactant . The higher conversion is 98.8 % at higher residence time which is 45min. The equimolar reaction between NaOH and Et(Ac) with the same initial reactant`s
  • 33. 33 concentration is the second order reaction. The rate law is -rA=kCACB .The rate of reaction is L/mol.s. Relate to the rate constant for this order of reaction ,when the `k` value is increase means more volume of NaOH require to convert a mole of NaOH in 1 second. From the calculated result, the reaction rate constant is increase as the volumetric flow rate is decrease.And when the reaction rate constant decrease , the rate of reaction will increase. The rate of reaction is higher which is ra=2.63x10-3 at the lower rate constant which is k = 68.35 . There is more moles of NaOH converted for a less volume of NaOH solution require. This is very important key design to have a high conversion for large scale production. In this experiment , there are some zero error and parallax error occur while taking the measurement of each data.When taking the reading, the position of eye must be perpendicular to the reading scale of burette and measuring cylinder. Besides, we have to rinse all the apparatus before we use it to ensure that all apparatus is clean so that any chemical put into it does not react with any others chemicals. And the most important is , need to immediately added to the HCl in the flask that contain the sample to quench the saponification reaction also to make sure , the sample does not react with others chemical.By doing all precaution , we can get better results. From the all calculation , it was obtained that the value of conversion is increase when the volumetric flow rate decrease. This proved , the theory from the calibration curve from the first experiment . Therefore the experiment is success.
  • 34. 34 CONCLUSION As for the conclusion,the purpose of this experiment to determine the reaction rate constant and as well as the effect of residence time on the conversion of sodium hydroxide. CSTR is used in order to achieve the objective of this experiment. By done this experiment , all purposes are met and the result are collected . From the result it show the conversion is decrease from 98.8% to 87.6% when the flow rate is increase from 0.20 mL/min to 0.60 mL/min.From the graph conversion versus residence time , it can be conclude that conversion is increase proportionally with residence time. This proved , the theory from the calibration curve from the first experiment .When increasing the flow
  • 35. 35 rate , the reaction rate constant become smaller and the rate of reaction become higher.The experiment is successful because the entire objectives have been achieved and related to the theory of study . RECOMMENDATIONS 1. Divide into two teams which is the first team in charge of the CSTR 40L machine while the second team would carry out the back titration procedures. 2. Make sure all of the valves closed and open as needed and there is no leaks from the reactor in order to make sure CSTR 40L machine is running appropriately to prevent harm to the machine and individual that used the machine. 3. Controlled the valve carefully and slowly when adjusting the flow rate to make sure flow rate will stabilize and the experiment will run smoothly.
  • 36. 36 4. During titration , use the suitable apparatus with appropriate size and scale to the amount to be measured. 5. Make sure all the error is avoided to get more accurate result.To avoid parallax error , make sure the position of eye must be parallel to reading scale. 6. Hydrochloric acid for quenching should be prepared early and added to the samples as soon as possible so that the reaction between NaOH and Et(Ac) cannot proceed because the NaOH that`s not reacted will neutralized by HCl. 7. The samples that already mix with HCl should be titrated as soon as possible. 8. Take conductivity reading when the conductivity not changes in time because it change rapidly in short time. REFERENCE 1.Fogler, Scott H.Elements of Chemical Reaction Engineering , 4th ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice hall,2006. Page 12,40 2.Levenspiel,O,Chemical Reaction Engineering , 3rd ed, John Wiley and Sons , New York , 1999.page 35 3.Thomas, Charles E.Process Technology Equipment and System 3rd edition .Clifton Park, NY: Delmarcangage Learning , 2011.
  • 37. 37 4.Gilbert F.Froment and Kenneth B.Bischoff.,`Chemical Reactor Analysis and Design, John wiley &sons , 2th ed ,1990 5.Molarities and dilutions access on 21/03/2015 at [ www.microbiologybytes.com] 6.Mass-mole concentration access on 21/03/2015 at [www.ausetute.com.au] 7.Saponification Definition access on 20/03/2015 at [ chemistry.about.com] 8.Continuos Stirred Tank Reactor access on 20/03/2015 at [www.labequip.co.za] 9.CSTR 40L -CPE554 access on 20/03/2015 at [www.coursehero.com] 10.CSTR 40L access on 19/03/2015 at [www.scribd.com] 11.Residence time access on 19/03/2015 at http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/residence_time APPENDICES