UNITED STATES OF NORTH AMERICA QUO WARRANTO NINTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS

1. Case No. __________
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
IN RE THE UNITED STATES OF NORTH AMERICA
IN RE THE UNITED STATES OF NORTH AMERICA, THE REPUBLIC OF
NORTH AMERICA, IN THE FAMILY OF NATIONS, Petitioner,
- v. -
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF
WASHINGTON, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH
CIRCUIT, STATE OF WASHINGTON, COUNTY OF KING, CITY OF
SEATTLE, WASHINGTON STATE BAR ASSOCIATION, Respondents.
CIVILACTION FOR:
OFFENCES AGAINST LAW OF NATIONS, GENOCIDE, SLAVERY, WAR CRIMES, CRIMES
AGAINST HUMANITY, TREASON, DISCRIMINATION, RACKETEERING INFLUENCE
CORRUPTION ORGANIZED CRIME, BREECH OF TRUST, BREECH OF CONTRACT AND
FRAUD AGAINST THE ANCIENT BLACK ABORIGINALS OF NORTH AMERICA.
WRIT OF QUO WARRANTO, WRIT OF MANDAMUS & WRIT OF PROHIBITION
Mr. Ernest Rauthschild
1701 Pennsylvania Avenue North West, Suite 300
Washington, Nation of Columbia 20006
Phone: 01.202.417.8328
Email: ErnestRauthschild@gmail.com
Petitioner proceeding Jus Personam, Jus In re, Amicus Curia, Prior Tempore Potior Jure, Priori
Petenti, Dominus Litis and Common-Law Attorney in the Truth/HaKh of the law, et al.
1

2. DEFINITIONS:
1. Municipal. … the term comes from the Latin (org. Latimore's) words: Muni/ Moenio-Capio (a)
Capio> to entrap, allure, entice, to hunt for legacies, a fallacy, cheat, deception, harm, lay hold of, catch
at, capture and Seize. (b) Moenia/ munus/ Munia> a public office that taxes and charges: a wall city of
fortification or castle (of the federal lords). (c) Municipalis> Provincial> Administration/ IVE
government under the control of a Magistrate, or military control [Cassell’s New Latin Dictionary
(C.N.L.D.)].
2. Natural born. [>Aboriginal Preamble and Posterity] Sovereign, of the Government of The
United States of North America/The Republic of North America: “Original 1787 Constitution” [> Art.2,
§ 2, Clause 5> Title 8, U.S.C. § 1503(a)} Privileges and Immunities of the Original 1787 Constitution
[>Art. 4, § 1], Sovereignty or Lordship, including the Petitioner's Government Protections and
Allegiance.
3. HaKhdar. Holder of a Right of the Qualified Elector and Common-Law Citizens of the United
States of North America, in the Family of Nations.
4. Allegiance Citizen [>a Prior-entitled Qualified Aboriginal Common Law Free Inhabitant] of
the United States, e.g., "Poster-Master".
5. United States. This term has several meanings. It may be merely the name of a sovereign
occupying the position analogous to that of other sovereigns in the family of nations, it may designate
territory over which sovereignty of United States extends, or it may be collective name of the states
which are united by and under the Constitution. Black Law's Dictionary 4th
Edition, p. 1703.
6. Family of Nations. An aggregate of Nations which PREDATE (historical antecedents) colonial
history and record keeping, having an inherited common [law] civilization, and ARE at a similar level
of moral and political opinion. The Ancient nations who ordained and established the "Law of
Nations", so written, in Art. 1, § 8, Clause 10 of ''this Constitution" and are bound thereby. State v.
Dixon, 213 P. 227, 230 66 Mont. 76: Yankee Atomic Electric Co. v. U.S., 112 F3d 1569: Lore
Silkman, 84 NY. 1025, 1030, 88 App. Div 102, citing Scott v. Stanford, 19 How. (60 U.S.) 404, L.Ed
691. "Family of Nations". The family of nations means just that, a family or relative and no
natural person calling themselves a "color", i.e., Black, Brown, Red, Yellow or White, according to
the ancient Law of Nations, is legally or contractually considered a Human Being in the United
States of North America, et al.
7. Nation. A people, or aggregation of men existing in the form of an organized jural society,
usually inhabiting a distinct portion of the earth, speaking the same language, using the same
culture, possessing HISTORIC CONTINUITY (> Continuation or Continental); and distinguished
from other like groups by the RACIAL ORIGIN (aboriginal people who are not "Native
Americans", that is, "Wards of the State") and characteristic, and generally, but not necessarily,
2

3. living under the same government and Sovereignty". Black’s Law Dictionary, vol. 6, p. 1024.
8. Republican States. Republican Nations Indigenous to the United States of [North] America and
the Pre-colonial entry into The Americas; and now identified as the 13 [48, 50] original States whose
Representatives constructed and signed "A Declaration" of July 4th, 1776, by the Representatives of the
United States of America, in General Congress Assembled in 1776, who Announced "The Declaration
of Independence" for the 12 United Colonies August 2nd, 1776 and ordained and established the
General National Constitution(s) of and for the 'original' United States..
9. Femme Couleur Libre and Las Negras De-‘Terre’. "Femme Couleur Libre" meaning free
(Libre) Colored Nation (femme) or people. Black’s Law 6th Edition, p. 618: "Femme Couleur Libre up
to the time of the Civil War, this term applied to all persons NOT of the White Race, including
“Indians.” Again the word Indian originally did not mean “NATIVE AMERICAN” or “American” the
way it is used today, however, it did mean Ethiopians, Negro da Terra (Native of America). See, e.g.,
Indi, Cassell’s New Latin Dictionary (C.L.D.) by D.P. Simpson, 1960, p. 299.
10. Indian. The term Indian is a latter Latin word coming from Hindi and Sindu, meaning dark
hued and transferring from the Older Latin word “Ethiopian”. The term Ethiopian is not of African
origin and it transfers back to the Greek word Athiopian meaning dark hued. INDIANS. The aboriginal
inhabitants of North America. Frazee v. Spokane County, 29 Wash. 278, 69 P. 782.
11. Free White Person/ Moorish. “... European Jews … intermixed ... Celtic … Iberians … mixed
Latin Celtic-Iberians, and Moorish inhabitants of Spain and Portugal, the Mixed Greeks ... Phoenicians,
and North African inhabitants of Sicily. IT DOES NOT MEAN CAUCASIAN RACE …” Black’s
Law Dictionary, 4th Ed. P. 792. Also see, 1 Stat 103, 1 C3.
12. USNA “… the Sovereign Posterity Preamble Government of The United States of North
America/ The Republic of North America, in the Family of Nations, e.g., “Original United States”.
13. Government De Facto: A Government of fact. A government actually exercising power and
control, as opposed to the true and lawful government, a government not established according to the
constitution of the nation, or not lawfully entitled to recognition or supremacy, but which has
nevertheless supplanted or displaced the government dejure. A government deemed unlawful, or
deemed wrongful or unjust, which, nevertheless, receives presently habitual obedience from the bulk of
the community. See, e.g., Black’s law Dictionary, Six Edition.
14. Government De Jure: A government of right; the true and lawful government established
according to the constitution of the nation, and lawfully entitled to recognition and supremacy and the
administration of the nation, but which is actually cut off from power or control. A government
deemed lawful, or deemed rightful or just, which, nevertheless has been supplanted or displaced; that
is to say, which receives not presently [although it received formerly] habitual obedience from the
bulk of the community. See, e.g., Black’s Law Dictionary, Six Edition.
3

4. 15. Plantation “… A COLONY”… “e state” [> COLONIAL STATES OPPOSED TO
REPUBLICAN States]. Plantation. "In English Law. A colony... In American law. A farm; a
large cultivated estate".
16. Province …. Proxincia> Government administrated by a Magistrate and / or Military
Commander [Origins … Eymological Dictionary by Eric Partridge (O.E.D.) p. 531].
17. Agency of the United States. “A department, division, or ADMINISTRATION within the
FEDERAL government": Black’s Law Dictionary, 6th Ed. p. 63.
18. Agency. "Properly speaking, agency relates to commercial or business transaction", i.e.,
seizures, bankruptcies, etc.: Black's Law Dictionary 4th Ed. p.84, paragraph 2.
19. Federal Governor. "The system of government administrated in a nation formed by the union
or confederation of several independent States" [Const. Art. 6, Clause. 1> Lat. Foederis] and “A
league or compact between two or more States to become united under one central [General]
government. See Federation": Black’s Law Dictionary, Ed. 6, p. 610-11.
20 Federation. “A joining together of … nations in a league or Association … An unincorporated
association of persons for a common purpose": Black’s Law Dictionary, 6th Ed. p. 614.
21. Association. “Unincorporated association. A confederation of individuals …, which is NOT
chartered as a Corporation”. “... a Voluntary confederacy”: Black’s Law Dictionary, 4th
and 6th
Ed's.
22. Public. "In another sense the word does not mean all the people, nor most of the people,
nor very many of the people of a place but so many of them as distinguishes them from the few".
Black’s Law Dictionary, 4-6 Ed. When today's governmental official declare that they are doing so
and so, whether it is increasing taxes, public restriction> licenses or abridging and denying
Constitutional rights, in the name of public safety, welfare, etc. they are doing it for the
government, i.e., themselves.
23. Nation. A people, or aggregation of men existing in the form of an organized jural society,
usually inhabiting a distinct portion of the earth, speaking the same language, using the same
culture, possessing HISTORIC CONTINUITY (> Continuation or Continental); and distinguished
from other like groups by the RACIAL ORIGIN (aboriginal people who are not "Native
Americans", that is, "Wards of the State") and characteristic, and generally, but not necessarily,
living under the same government and Sovereignty". Black’s Law Dictionary, vol. 6, p. 1024
24 People. “... In a more restricted sense and as generally used in Constitutional law, the
entire body of those citizens of a state or nation who are invested with political power for
political purposes, that is, the QUALIFIED voters or Electors...the people as the repository of
sovereignty, or as a source of government power, or to popular government, we are in fact
4

5. speaking of the selected and limited class of citizens to who the constitution accords the
elective franchise and the right of participation in the offices of government". See, e.g.,
Black’s Law Dictionary, 4th Ed., p. 1292.
25. "We the people”... of the United States, in Order [(Analogous order): in a logical
order> from the top> Aboriginal to the bottom> indigenous]...promote the general welfare, and
secure the Blessing of Liberty to (1) ourselves and (2) our Posterity, [> all the blood relatives]
do ordain and establish THIS Constitution for the United States of America"
26. Cabal … term means Anglo-Saxon Nazi Khazairan Jews overthrowing “original United
States” > USNA.
National Constitution.
Free National Constitution includes, in part:
a. The Constitution of the United States of North America
b. The Constitution of the United States.
c. The Constitution for the United States of America
d. The "Preamble" to and Article one though seven of the Constitution of/for the
United States> including Article 6, Sec. I thereof,
e. The Articles of Confederation > “The Constitution"
f. The Articles of Association
g. The Constitution of the Five>Union Nations.
h. Posterity. Issue. Beneficiaries of "the people" and the United States Government
i. The Divine and National title-Deed or will-trust to the Land-Property belonging
to the United States of America, in the Family of Nations
Movant in, Jus Personam and in Jus In re, inter alia., for United States of North America, in/of
the Family of Nations, officially including the former and official names, (a) “the people of the United
States”, (b) The United States in Congress assembled (c) “The Congress of the United States”, (d) “The
Congress”, (e) “The United States of America in General Congress Assembled”, (f) “The Congress of
the United States assembled”, (g) “The United States Government”, (h) “Prior entitled Association”, (i)
“Priori Petenti” Confederation of America, (j) the United States Republican form of State Government
of America, i.e., “The Constitutional States of the United States of [North] America.”1
1 JUDICIAL NOTICE: This Court is put on notice that the Petitioner is the “original people” of North America
and of We, the People of The United States of North America Government and the Posterity thereof, is merely
the Heirs of "We the people" of Old America, that is to say, Elin a Bey mispronounced "Leni Lenape". Petitioner
has Complete and Perfect claim to Elin a Bey who are the Posterity Consanguity of the DGR or De'eGRas of
Celestial Times and the DRG or The Dragons(s) [>Seraphim or Cherubim] in the Hebrew Old Testament Stories.
As the North American Phoenix Dragons Tail, he Know that it is fair and correct to alert all Justices, Judges,
Magistrates, Employees, etc., Whether Masons-Shriners or otherwise, who he is and what he is claiming so there
is no doubt. By HaKh the Heavens so Rule, Selah.
5

6. INTRODUCTION
HEAR HE HEAR ALL, the Sovereign-Posterity General Government of The United States of
North America/ The Republic of North America [in Congress assembled] an Association-Confederation
and member of The Family of Nations, The Grand Council, The Supreme Council and The Dragon
Court, who pronounced to the world the Authentic “A Declaration” of July 4th
, 1776, authored and
endorsed the “Original 1787 Constitution/Contract”, and holds the Certificate of Authenticity of the
following: Secret 1781 1st
American Company, Secret 1783 Trilateral Tripartite Agreement (The United
States of North America, THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, United States & Great Britain),
Secret Puerto Rican Agreement, Secret 1664 Titulo Torrens of North America, Secret 1772 Treaty of
Versailles, 1773 Secret Treaty of Paris, Federal Pacem Terris Covenant & Concordant, Five Books,
Sixteen Copies, Black Book of Exchequer, Blue Book; and holds the Secret 1919 Treaty of Versailles,
Secret 1950 Bilateral Minefield Agreement, Secret 1950 Trilateral Tripartite Agreement and Secret
1963 Green Hilton Agreement (which were never renewed by Sovereign Ancient Royal Families).
2. The Petitioner's Sovereign Preamble Bank of North America (PBNA), holds both Federal
United States and United States of America Corporation's global debts, and control the 8216, 8217,
8254 and 8278 Global Master Accounts, which the entire (Artificial Intelligence) global monetary
system is underwritten and financed; therefore, USNA has the sole lawful control and authority of the
Ancient Black Asiatic Royal Families' Sovereign Royal Portfolio (> 13,413,500 MT of Gold), which is
financially backing both U.S./U.S.A. and the BIG FOUR Nations, all of which can be verified by the
Inter-Bank Screens with proper security clearances and codes (>Classified, Top Secret & Clocked For
Secrecy).
3. Accordingly, The United States of North America/ The Republic of North America, in the
Family of Nations, appearing Amicus Curia and brings forth this Writ of Quo Warranto, Writ of
6

7. Mandamus and Writ of Prohibition Against the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, United States District
Court For The Western District of Washington, Federal State of Washington, Federal City of Seattle,
Federal County of King and Washington State Bar Association (>quasi-government corporate agency),
each of them, acting under “Color – of – Authority”; “Color – of – Law” and “Color – of –
Office”,committed clear Treason, Genocide, Slavery, War Crimes, Crimes Against Humanity, Offences
Against Law of Nations, Domestic Terrorism, Economic Terrorism, Fraud, Discrimination,
Racketeering Influence Corruption Organized Crime, Breech of Trust and Breach of Contract, against
the Ancient “natural born” Black Aborigines > Nahua-Negris Da Terra of North America, by and
through, impersonation and mirroring the dejure sovereign posterity government of The United States
of North America/The Republic of North America, in the Family of Nations (hereinafter referred to as
“USNA”); and through a sophisticated foreign judicial star chamber's statutory scheme in
manufacturing diversity of citizenship, for the sole purpose, to overthrow the government of The
United States of North America and to deprive the original people > “We the people” of North
America of their nationality, birthrights, inheritance, trust accounts, land, property, rights, privileges,
immunities and rights to self-govern.
4. The mirroring of governments started with the Authentic “A Declaration” of July 4th,
, 1776,
vs. August 2nd
, 1776, 12 United Colonies Declaration of Independence (plagiarized from the Authentic
“A Declaration”) and mirroring the “Original 1787 Constitution” and dejure Nation-States's
Constitutions vs. Federal Colony State Constitutions {> Title 5, U.S.C.S. § 1501(2)].
5. However, the Respondents are not of the “People” (Nation) of the United States, in the
Family of Nations, nor of the “People” Republican Form of Government. The term "people" means a
"Nation in its collective and political capacity". Nation. "A People...an organized jural
society...speaking the same language...and distinguished from other like groups by their racial origins
and characteristics… The nation is the moral body, independent of political revolution, because it is
7

8. constituted by INBORN qualities, which render it INDISSOLUBLE (in/unalienable) a.k.a. Indivisible.
6. Further, the Respondent's Courts are for profit corporations and not sovereign government
judicial tribunals. These courts commit fraud by charging a pro se the filing fee without disclosing that
it is a burial fee to dump the case especially if the merits of the complaint was filed by Black
Aboriginals of North America regarding usurping exercise of jurisdiction in extra-constitutional
geographic area and Citizenship. Every year, the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts publishes
the Annual Report of the Director. It contains those courts’ official statistics on their caseload and their
management of it by the judges and staff. A return on investment analysis report points to whether a
rational human being, a homo economicus, should file in the court or gamble in Las Vegas.
7. In the FY15, 52,698 cases were filed in the 12 regional federal courts of appeals. Of them
only 65% (34,244) were disposed of on the merits rather than on procedural grounds. Only 7.2%
(3,794) of all appeals were disposed of in opinions of quality high enough for the judges to dare sign
and publish them. The rest 92.8% was so intrinsically defective that they wanted to negate even the
implication that they knew anything about it. You have 1 chance in 14 of getting a written opinion that
means anything so that none of the three circuit judges on the appellate panel would be embarrassed by
giving the public access to it with her name as the author or as one who joined in it.
8. The courts of appeals knew that before you filed your appeal you had spent $10,000s in legal
fees or the equivalent in the effort and time that you invested in writing your brief and the pain and
suffering that you had to endure to figure out whatever it was that you had to do to represent yourself.
The courts offered appellate services, that implicitly were to be rendered honestly, if you pay their $505
filing fee. Your payment of the fee was your acceptance. A contract was formed, even if it was one of
adhesion, much like the Federal 14th
Amendment Adhesion citizenship through acceptance of
governmental services.
9. But they failed to perform. What they delivered to dispose of your appeal and that of the rest
8

9. 93% of appellants was “unsigned, unpublished, without comment, by consolidation opinions”, which
were so defective or wrongful that they overwhelmingly deprived them of any precedential value. By
so doing, the courts made it all go to waste. They defrauded the 'original people' of the filing fee. They
frustrated their reasonable expectation for disposition of appeal in a written and reasoned opinion that
recognized that “Justice should not only be done, but should manifestly and undoubtedly be seen to be
done”. And they did all of it knowingly and intentionally, for a settled principle of torts provides that “a
person is deemed to intend the reasonable consequences of his or her acts”. They intended a fraud and a
breach of contract.
10. Obtaining justice from the judges of the Federal Judiciary, the model for their state
counterparts, is not only illusory, with worse odds than gambling and near certain waste; it is
wrongdoing so coordinated as to be a scheme. Judges know that they are unaccountable and that in the
end they will wield their power to dispose of their caseload so as to advance their interests, without
regard for due process, equal protection of the law, reasonable expectations, and their end of the
bargain of a contract in fact. On their way to final disposition, they engage risklessly in wrongdoing so
widespread, routine, and grave that wrongdoing has become their institutionalized modus operandi.
Throughout it all, they fail to abide by their own injunction to “avoid even the appearance of
impropriety.
11. A pro se brief reaches the judge tainted by the presumption of irrelevancy, inadmissibility,
and incompetence. She will give it the perfunctory attention that the official weighting of the case
enables her to give it. The weighting works as a self-fulfilling expectation: Because the pro se case is
weighted as merely a third of a case, the judge will presume it to be worthless and do a quick job of
disposing of it, a chore most likely relegated to her law clerk. So it is highly probable that the judge
will not even read the brief. Of the 18,969 appeals terminated in FY15 on procedural grounds, 73%
(13,814) were terminated by the staff. It follows that as a pro se, they do not stand a chance of getting a
9

10. due process fair hearing or reading. Its DoA.
12. But you are treated “equal” to a represented party in that you had to pay the same $505
filing fee in the district court. The court failed to disclose on the Case Information Sheet before
demanding and receiving from you that fee that by you checking the “pro se” box, the court would
unduly process your case into a coffin and send it to the potter’s field for those who had committed pro
se status. Instead, it put up the pretense that if you paid the fee, a judge would be assigned to your case
who would fairly and impartially handle it on the merits according to law. Since the district courts
knew that they would handle a pro se case, not as equal, but rather as inferior, to a represented case,
those courts commit fraud on the original people of North America, in general, and the district court
where you filed your case defrauded you, in particular violation of their own RICO statute.
13. Most importantly, the people, the Ancient people> “original people”> We the people
Government of The United States of North America/ The Republic of North America, in the Family of
Nations, never endorsed, the Federal United States Constitution nor the 50 Colony Federal State
Constitutions, thereof. These Colonial Federal States, Federal Cities and Federal Counties [> Title 5,
U.S.C.S. § 1501(2)] overlap the “Original 1787 Constitutional” Republic Nation-states [>Title 5,
U.S.C.S. § 1501(1), Article IV § IV of the “Original 1787 Constitution] and remain bankrupt since
2005, and operating as an “outlaw nation” within the NGO, United Nations.
14. This criminal treasonous scheme to overthrow the de jure Sovereign Posterity Government
of The United States of North America/The Republic of North America (> "Femme Couleur Libre”), in
the Family of Nations, can be found in a classified report written to the late U.S. Senator Ted Kennedy
by the Federal Bureau of Investigation regarding Five Star Trust, a registered Isle of Man, West Indies
Trust, which operates as a front for the U.S. Department of Defense and Central Intelligence Agency,
also known for their 820+ Quadrillion global off-ledger bank accounts earned from the so-called war
on drugs to implement their “New World Order”. However, one must overthrow an 'existing
10

11. government' to implement a New World Order Government, Treason.
ISSUE PRESENTED
15. First and Foremost, Petitioner's Sovereign Posterity Government never endorsed the 1791
British Colony's Federal United States Constitution, nor the Colony's Federal States [> Title 5, U.S.C.S.
§ 1501(2)] Constitutions, thereof. Further, the 1791-Present Colony Federal United States and Federal
States never endorsed the “Original 1787 Constitution/Contract”. Most importantly, the British colonies
were never granted Independence nor Sovereignty, therefore, never freed from Great Britain.
16. However, since these British subjects were never freed nor granted Independence and
Sovereignty, they remain “natural-born subjects” employed by the foreign colonial corporation and
known as "United States Citizens" or "individual franchises" known as "citizens of the United States"
provide governmental services. i.e., foreign copyright statutory citizenry.2
Simply put, the colonial
2 For Courts who adjudicate pursuant to Title 26 shall recognize IMF, which means Individual Master File, all
taxpayers have one. However, to read one you have to be able to break their codes: using files 6209, which is
about 467 pages. On your IMF you will find a blocking series, which tells you what type of tax you are paying.
You will probably find a 300-399 blocking series, which 6209 says is reserved. You then look up the BMF 300-
399, which is the Business Master File in 6209. You would have seen prior to 1991, this was U.S.-U.K. Tax
Claims, non-refile DLN. Meaning everyone is considered a business and involved in commerce and you are
being held liable for a tax via a treaty between the U.S. and the U.K., payable to the U.K. The form that is
supposed to be used for this is form 8288, FIRPTA - Foreign Investment Real Property Tax Account, you won't
find many people using this form however, just the 1040 form.
The 8288 forms can be found in the Law Enforcement Manual of the IRS, chapter 3. If you check the OMB's
paper - Office of Management and Budget, in the Department of Treasury, List of Active Information
Collections, Approved Under Paperwork Reduction Act, you will find this form under OMB number 1545-
0902, which says U.S. withholding tax-return for dispositions by foreign persons of U.S. real property interests-
statement of withholding on dispositions, by foreign persons, of U.S. Form #8288 #8288a. These codes have
since been changed to read as follows:
IMF 300-309, Barred Assessment, CP 55 generated valid for MFT-30, which is the code for 1040 form.
IMF 310-399 reserved, the BMF 300-309 reads the same as IMF 300-309. BMF 390-399 reads U.S./U.K. Tax
Treaty Claims. The long and short of it is nothing changed, the “administrative government” just made it
plainer, the 1040 is the payment of a foreign tax to the king/queen of England. Also see, Jay’s Treaty of 1774
between England and United States and Paris Treaty of 1774. Further, it is my understanding that Queen
Elizabeth of England amended U.S. Social Security, as follows: S.1. 1997 No. 1778 The Social Security Order
1997-made 22nd
day of July, 1997, coming into force 1st
September 1997. At the Court of Buckingham Palace
11

12. Brutish/British Moors (disguised as African-Americans) and their colonial Caucasian/White and
African Nativity serfs, collectively, are not equal rank nor status of the posterity Ancient people, “We
the people” > “original people” > natural born > Aboriginal Las Negras De-‘Terre’ of North America,
they are aliens, moreover, each of them, have engaged in a private war against the Aboriginals of North
America. Accordingly, an Alien has not right of Revolution Against the Petitioner: Kjar v. Doak,
C.C.A. Ill 61 F.2d at 569.
17. The Respondents, each of them, usurping judicial jurisdictional power and authority, by
and through, impersonation and mirroring of Petitioner's sovereign de jure government in the Family of
Nations. The Respondents' setup offshore foreign corporations in the same name as or resembling
Petitioner's sovereign de jure governments, to wit: UNITED STATES, INC., United States, Inc., The
United States, Inc., UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, INC., THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
United States of America, Inc., The United States of America, Inc., STATE OF WASHINGTON, INC.,
Washington States, Inc., COUNTY OF KING, INC., King County, Inc., CITY OF SEATTLE, INC.,
Seattle City, Inc.. These colonial foreign owned corporations mirroring de jure governments are
subsidiary of the Municipal “District of Columbia” (>Cayman Island Corporation), parent company of
the City of London, located in London. The Respondent's foreign colonial corporate Constitutions are
mirroring the de jure Nation-States [> Title 5, U.S.C.S. § 1501(1)].
18. Further, Blacks are not monolithic, however, since the 1868 enactment of the British
Colonial 13th
/14th
Amendment “Federal Constitution” following the 1856 Federal Corporate U.S.
Supreme Court's Dred Scott vs. Sanford decision, the Respondents, each of them, re-categorized and
converted the Black Aborigines of North America's sovereign “natural born” National/[C]itizenship
“IN” The United States of North America/The Republic of North America, in the Family of Nations, to
foreign “natural-born subjects” and Federal 13th
/14th
Amendment persons/[c]itizens of the United States
the 22 day of July, 1997.
12

13. and United States of America Corporations (> formally The Virginia Colony Company & 1781 1st
American Company), therefore stripping the 'original people' from the “Original 1787
Constitution/Contract” and “Original United States” thereafter listed them as natural resources
(>chattel property/ Slaves) for foreign debts (Citizen = servant of government, National = those the
government serves).
19. The Petitioner's “natural born” (>Aboriginal) National [C]itizenship lawfully included
“Jus Soli” and “Jus Sanguinis, i.e., (a) the law of the place of ones birth rights or Preamble Citizens of
The United States [of North America], and (b) the right of blood or the Posterity of We, the people of
the United States Respectively. The Petitioner is not (a) natural-born citizens nor (b) natural-born
subject, however, the Preamble-natural born Citizens of the United States [of North America (General
Republican form of Government) in the Family of Nations] are Liegeman only to Petitioner's
Government and not bound or subject to the jurisdiction of the (a) British Colonial Federal Corporation
United States, in the United Nations [>Title 28, U.S.C.S. § 3002(15)(A)(B)(C)] (b) Federal State of
Washington [> Title 5, U.S.C.S., § 1501(2)], (c) Administrative-State Government in the United States
of America nor the (d) 13th
/14th
Amendment citizenship thereof.
20. The “original people” of The United States of North America did not knowingly,
intentionally, willfully give up his/her “natural born” > Ancient Aboriginal Nahua-Negris da Terra rank
and status, and Preamble Sovereign-Posterity National/Citizenship thereof, to be “natural born
subjects” and Federal 13th
/14th
Amendment Corporation franchise persons/[c]itizens of the United
States, “United States [c]itizens” and United States of America persons/ [c]itizens, moreover, the
original people are “Strangers” to any other citizenship that attempts to (de)mismcre our Hakhdar Place
of birth, i.e., 13th, 14th, 16th, et seq.. Further, the Preamble Posterity Black Aboriginals of North
America are not colonial serfs > “natural-born subjects”, “African-Americans” nor Black/British
Moorish subjects nor are they the same rank and status of Petitioner's “National” citizenry.
13

14. 21. Additionally, under Franklin D. Roosevelt’s tenure, as CEO of the United States of
America, Inc. he setup millions of foreign situs trusts named after each colonial British “natural-born
subjects” thereafter claimed them all as "foreign vessels in commerce" and sureties backing the debts of
the already bankrupt United States of America, Inc. ----- which was just another foreign-owned
governmental services corporation operated by the "Federal Reserve System". Unfortunately, the
Nahua-Negris Da Terra of North America > “original people” > We the people” of the “Original United
States” (>USNA) were also inserted into the Cestui Que Vie Trust, making them “foreign subjects”
operated via the Puerto Rican Agreement. This foreign 'transmitting utilities' Federal “14th
Amendment”
“PERSON” is a Cestui Que Trust via changing his/her birth name from “Prince Rogers Nelson” to
“PRINCE ROGERS NELSON” & “PRINCE R. NELSON”. This blatant Fraud, had its roots stretched
back to the Civil War and other acts of fraud that occurred then, and the tentacles of it have stretched
forward to today. Ironically, the cabal Federal State of Washington, Federal City of Seattle and Federal
County of King Respondents, hijacked and illegally used the Black Aboriginals of North America's
gold assets and collateral accounts, for themselves, under the economic disparities banner of “White
Privilege”.
22. The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, United States District Court, Federal State of
Washington Courts (> State, County & City), are foreign for profit corporations, enforcing 'public
policy' legislated and enacted by 13th
/ 14th
Amendment [c]itizens > “natural-born subjects” of the
colonial Federal United States. The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, United States District Court and
the Federal State of Washington Courts are in violation of Offences Against Law of Nations, Treason,
Slavery, Genocide, Breech of Trust, Breech of Contract, by and through, manufacturing diversity of
citizenship, converting the Black Aboriginals > “original people” > “We the people” of North America
> Ancient “natural born” > Nahua-Negris Da Terra > Aztec Preamble Sovereign-Posterity National/
[C]itizens of the Preamble Sovereign-Posterity Government of The United States of North
14

15. America/The Republic of North America, in the Family of Nations, to become persons/citizens of the
bankrupt British colonial Federal Corporational United States and Conterminous/Coterie Federal State
of Washington [>Title 5, U.S.C.S. § 1501(2)], i.e., Corporational Partisan-Political Campaign
Municipal Coterie States; and the Federal Corporation> United States [Title 28, U.S.C.S. § 3002(15)],
a.k.a. “Providence Plantation”, thereof.
23. Petitioner as “Creditor” so written in Article VI § I, of the “Original 1787 Constitution”
have “original jurisdiction”, therefore, the right to demand its property, debt and taxes from the
Respondents, pursuant Title 31, U.S.C.S. §§ 3544, 3545, et seq. Further, the “Law of Property Act of
1922,” which convert “Federal” Land into “Copyhold” and “Lease,” is illegal, unlawful and null void
as Petitioner's government never approved nor endorsed such agreement. USNA/The Republic of North
America, Family of Nations, is not under the Federal Government [> Title 4, U.S.C.S. § 107(a)] and
has "exclusive jurisdiction over any Federal -area" [> Title 4, U.S.C.S., § 108].
RELIEF SOUGHT
24. The fact of the matter that I have called the debts owed on the Education, Food Stamps,
Medicare and Social Security Bonds (Artificial Intelligence) due 2017, which you have no means of
paying such debts, is beside the point. The Respondents are guilty of manufacturing citizenship, fraud,
Treason, Slavery, Genocide, Domestic Terrorism, Economic Terrorism, Breech of Trust and Breech of
Contract in blatant violation of Offences Against Law of Nations, therefore, an order directing
Respondents' to cease and desist, from further impersonating and mirroring of Petitioner's de jure
governments, is appropriate. If not, we shall zero balance your accounts, causing an International and
Domestic financial crisis in accord with Article VI § I, similar to what was done that your so-called
Federal Government shut down (0 the SPR accounts).
25. Petitioner as “Creditor” so written in Article VI § I, of the “Original 1787 Constitution”
15

16. have “original jurisdiction”, therefore, the right to demand its property, debt and taxes from the
Respondents, pursuant Title 31, U.S.C.S. §§ 3544, 3545, et seq. Further, the “Law of Property Act of
1922,” which convert “Federal” Land into “Copyhold” and “Lease,” is illegal, unlawful and null void
as Petitioner's government never approved nor endorsed such agreement. USNA/The Republic of North
America, Family of Nations, is not under the Federal Government [> Title 4, U.S.C.S. § 107(a)] and
have "exclusive jurisdiction over any Federal -area" [> Title 4, U.S.C.S., § 108]. Most importantly, we
never endorsed the Federal Constitution, therefore, 14th
Amendment § IV, don’t apply to the Testator
Grantors, Beneficiary and owners of the assets.
LEGAL STANDARD
26. This Court weighs five factors in determining whether to grant a writ of mandamus
under the All Writs Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1651:
(1) The party seeking the writ has no other adequate means, such as a direct appeal, to attain the
relief he or she desires.
(2) The petitioner will be damaged or prejudiced in a way not correctable on appeal.
(3) The district court’s order is clearly erroneous as a matter of law.
(4) The district court’s order is an oft-repeated error, or manifests a persistent disregard of the
federal rules.
(5) The district court’s order raises new and important problems, or issues of law of first
impression.
Douglas v. U.S. Dist. Court, 495 F.3d 1062, 1065-66 (9th Cir. 2007) (quoting Bauman v. U.S. Dist.
Court, 557 F.2d 650, 654-55 (9th Cir. 1977)) (internal quotation marks omitted). Not every element of
the mandamus standard must be satisfied in order to warrant a writ. Valenzuela–Gonzalez v. U.S. Dist.
Court, 915 F.2d 1276, 1279 (9th Cir. 1990) (“all five factors need not be satisfied at once”). “Exercise
16

17. of [the Court’s] supervisory mandamus authority is particularly appropriate when an important question
of law would repeatedly evade review because of the collateral nature of the issue.” In re Cement
Antitrust Litig., 688 F.2d 1297, 1304 (9th Cir. 1982).
HISTORICAL FACTS
27. The fact of the matter that both White American and Black History are distorted, and the
Colonial United States Colonies were never granted Independence nor Sovereignty, is beside the point.
The Preamble and Constitutional Sovereign-Posterity General Government of The United States of
North America/ The Republic of North America, in the Family of Nations, is far more ancient than the
Historic arrival of the European explorers, or Proprietors and their White-Caucasian "Famulus" or
Plantation Colonial Serfs. The word aMaRuKa (hăMooRica) is the origin of the modern term America
that has absolutely nothing to do with the made up person historically called Amerigo Vespucci [nor did
Christobal Colon>Christopher Columbus discover America or actually exist]. The term aMeR- ica is
far older than the 15th Century.
28. The phrase "We the people" [of the United States of North America is far older than the
Preamble Clause]; and is not referring to the American Citizens. In pre-historic America a people of the
Aboriginal Ancestry called Lenape or the people and Lenni Lenape which translates to Grandfather, the
Old Ones, Original People and We, the people.
29. The Lenape are now called Delaware Indians, but they never called themselves this. All
other so called Native Americans referred to the Lenappy [The Nappy Head Ones] as the very ancient
ones with Magic [Nanticoke]. William Penn by his own account written in his own hand said:
"The Natives shall consider in their person... with my sense of
Original. For their Person, they are generally tall, straight, well built,
singular Proportioned; they tread strong and clever, and mostly walk
with lofty chin: of complexion, BLACK, but by design, as the Gypsies
in England...”. William Penn's 1683 account of the Delaware- Indians.
17

18. 30. Jack D. Forbes in his book entitled Africans and Native Americans, p. 69 states, "in 1524
the people of the Carolina coast were said to be of dark color not much unlike the Ethiopians". The
Charlotte Observer dated Sunday August 15, 1993, stated that North Carolina in 1690 reported the
presence of Blacks and that they are the ancestors of a people erroneously called Melungeons.
31. Mr. Forbes also states on p. 64 that "When Africans are referred to in the Jesuit letters
they are always called NEGRO DA GUINE> blacks of Guinea to distinguish them from NEGRO DA
TERRA> "blacks of the land of America". And on pages 67 & 71 he states “... French noir [black] and
negre [black or dark person]... French More [Moor} as equivalent to Negro from Guinea".“... Thus
Negro is used for Indian, and not for someone from Africa...In any case it is clear that many Iberians
and Italians, whether in Europe or America, were comfortable using NEGRO, NEGRI, etc. for
American."
32. The Negro da Terra are classified in Black's Law Dictionary 4th
and 6th
Edition as
"Femme Couleur Libre" meaning free (Libre) Colored Nation (femme) or people. Black’s Law 6th
Edition, p. 618: "Femme Couleur Libre up to the time of the Civil War, this term applied to all persons
NOT of the White Race, including “Indians.” Again the word Indian originally did not mean “NATIVE
AMERICAN” or “American” the way it is used today, however, it did mean Ethiopians, Negro da Terra
(Native of America). See, e.g., Indi, Cassell’s New Latin Dictionary (C.L.D.) by D.P. Simpson, 1960, p.
299. The term “Native-American” refers to the Second Group of Americans. The first group
esoterically the Nahua-Negris Indians known as the Aborigine Americans. The third group is the term
Indigenous Americans.
33. The term Indian is a latter Latin word coming from Hindi or Sindu, meaning dark hued
and transferring from the Older Latin word “Ethiopian”. The term Ethiopian is not of African origin
and it transfers back to the Greek word Athiopian meaning Moorish and Mauros>dark hued), 1 Stat.
18

19. 103, 1 C3. Needless to say, words like Native American, American and many more are "Words of Art"
(see, e.g., Black’s Law Dictionary, 4th Ed., p. 1779) or idiomatic [> “an accepted phrase or expression
having a meaning different from the literal"]. The Old Moorish Latin, originally called Latimer/Latimor
or Latiner (see Black’s Law Dictionary, 4th Ed. P. 1027), consisted of three/3 sorts of Law Latin. The
third or esoteric sort was and is only known to a select few called "Sages" which consist of idioms>
words of art and also called "Lawyers Latin or Law Latin":
“Law Latin” The corrupt form of the Latin language employed
in the old English law books and legal proceedings". See, e.g.,
Black’s Law Dictionary 4th Ed., p. 1030.
34. The Monocan Empire (>Lenni Lenape) of the United States was a Union of three
Confederacies: (I) AlgonKuian, (2) Iroquoian and (3) Siouan Linguistic groups with 13 zones, [the
basis for the 13 original States] 16 National States and numerous Tribal-City Units> Small towns. The
Monocan Empire domain was North into Canada, South to the Gulf of Mexico, East to the Atlantic
Ocean and West to the Ohio Valley; and law and order was maintained by their supreme Law of the
Land, i.e., The Constitution of the Five [Five symbolized complete unity and not individual states]
Nations a.k.a. the Great Law of Peace [>Islam]; and Originally called GayanashaGowa.3
3 Although this explains why the History of Los Angeles County Superior Court was founded off of the Islamic
“Moorish Al-Quadi Judicial System”, the Petitioner shall direct the court's attention to Time Magazine #ISBN 0-
8129-0847-3 who produced a copy of the oldest known map of North America. The article stated that this
ancient Libyan- Arabic script … ca., the first century B.C. and in the center of the Continent, i.e., Nevada is the
word MR [>MooR] and being the origin of the word America.
Barry Fell, Emeritus Professor at Harvard University and author of Saga America (Time Book), states that
"America" probably has nothing to do with Amerigo Vespucci [also see Isis Unveiled for more info on this
subject]. "Dr. Fell indicates several Pre-Colombian cultures in the (United States) west, finding rich evidence of
an early Arabic presence, including many instances of decorative signatures of the PROPHET
MOHAMMAD...He suggest important correspondence between Pueblo [>City] Indian culture and North
African cultures. He infers a major Carthaginian (Canaanites>MooRTu=Moors) trade with North and South
America".
In an article entitled "Secret Societies in the Ancient Americas" it states: “Ancient Masonic Lodges have been
discovered among the American Indians … what he called an ancient Indian Masonic Lodge at an Anasazi
Indian archeological site … eighty percent identical to the Masonic Lodges in America now.
In the ancient lodge … there were fifty rock and clay tablets, which he dates 1000 and 1200 A.D., written in
19

20. 35. The MonoKhan/MoRoKhan Confeoderati was primarily, principally and predominately
Mauros complexioned and Copper/Coffee hues. The legendary founders of the Great Law of Peace
were DeKanawidah (an Angel of the Lord) and Hiawatha (the man who wrestled with the Angel of the
Lord> Jacob). The pine or White Pine was the National Symbol of the United People and this same
Pine symbol' transferred to the Official Flag of the United States of America centralized in the United
States in Congress Assembled: and historically called the Continental Congress Flag of 1775.
what appears to be Arabic... Even the name America may be the product of ancient American secret Society. In
an 1895 edition of a magazine called Lucifer, published the occult promoting Theosophical Society, … the
word America … He said that the Supreme God of the Mayan culture of Central America, Known as
Quetzalcoatl elsewhere, was known in Peru as Amaru, Amaru's territory was Known as Amaruca...".
The Olmecean Civilization of Central America is considered by most Scholars to be the oldest high culture in
America. The word Mexico comes from the word Olmec and the coded Moorish word Amexem [this word is a
verb: "place of the mixing": and not a noun> name]. Most scholars deduce this word from "Olli" or "rubber
people", however, it would be better translated Oli> Ali=Exalted Ones and the people who bounce back> The
Phoenix=Phoenicians> Canaanites> MRTW=MooTu> The Moors > Blacks. The term Ol-Mec when
esoterically understood means Al-Mac> son of or belonging to Alh (Allah) or el-MeK> those from Mecca> The
MeKKans. One of the Oldest meanings of Mecca [a/k/a BaKKa (Ba>soul&Ka>spirit)] is veteran or belonging
to Egypt or TMR> T’ Moors.
The original Meccan (Olmeccans) was of the Family Imran. In the Quran by A. Yusuf Ali, Sura/Chpt. 3,
Iyat/Verse 32-33-it states:
"Allah did choose Adam, Noah, the family of Abraham, and the family of IMRAN above
(exalted>Ali=Oli>Olli) all people, - Offspring, one of the other: And God heareth and knoweth all things".
Who was and is Imran, the last of the chosen family of God? Imran is a word of art term that can be fully
comprehended when one applies the ancient Moorish Arabic three/3 radical roots. In A Concordance of the
Quran (C.O.Q.) by Hanna E. Kassis, p. 266 & 267 the idiom term I-MRaN becomes MR> MooR. The Ayn>
is silent and the letter 'N' is a terminal plural that becomes the modern 'S', therefore, I> ayn> silent and
MRN=MRS> Moors > Blacks > Negro Da Terra > Nativity/Native of aMaRuKa (hăMooRica > America.
Also the letter *’N’> Nun meaning water, sea and ocean adding to the meaning of the word Imran, i.e.,
Moors> Merman or Moorman=Navigators, helmsmen and governors. Remember the first governors or
presidents of the United States where Moors > Blacks > Negro Da Terra > Nativity/Native of aMaRuKa
(hăMooRica > America, with the titles of Bey.
In "The Ancient History of the Distinguished Surname Bey", by The Historical Research Society in
Orlando FL, state’s that "These (Beys) pioneers became the nucleus of the first settlements from Maine to
the Cumberland Gap. They provided much of the STOCK that produced the early Presidents and
Governors of the United States of North America. In Canada they settled Nova Scotia, the St. Lawrence
and Ottawa Valley.
20

21. 36. Every, so-called, civilized nation has a Patron Saint. The name of the North America
Patron Saint is St. Tammany whose birthday is celebrated on May 1st
[Epiphany Moors] and he was a
Lenape-Delaware Chief. The word Tammany is rooted in the words "Tami"> ancient group and
"Tame" originally meaning those who tame, that is to say, civilization bringers. Tammany also means
affable, friendly or easy to approach.
37. The European Denizen proprietors of the United Colonies of America found themselves
comfortable and at ease in Tamrnany's presence while attempting to negotiate an agreement that would
allow them to become an annexed part of the Aborigina1- Indigenous Native United States of North
America's Government, in the Family of Nations. See, e.g., Tammany, Dictionary of the American
Indian (D.A.I.) by John Stoutenberg, Jr., 1960, p. 404.
38. The leaders of United peoples of America was the MoRhocKs [pronounced Mohocks];
and now falsely written as Mohawks. The Lenape Monocan Empire strayed away from the Great Law
of Peace, warred amongst themselves, at the behest of their British Denizens, reinstituted Slavery and
adopted Christianity. By 1677 the Monocan people were forced into a treaty as "Liege Subjects" with
Lord Charles II, which, by 1729-1774 the Monocan "corrupt" Empire was all but finished. See, e.g.,
Authentic Virginia Colonial Records- 1677 Treaty, Between Virginia And The Indians.
39. However, on the 4th
day of July, 1776, the Resurrected Monocan Empire Pronounced to
the World the Authentic “A Declaration” By the Representatives of THE UNITED STATES OF
AMERICA, In General Congress Assembled [not to be confused with the Denizen British Proprietors
"Declaration of Independence". For further information on free Maures people in pre-Columbian
America, see “Strangers In Their Mist”, S. & R. McLeRoy and “The Melungeons, Brent & Robyn
Kennedy”.
BRITISH COLONIES WERE NEVER GRANTED
INDEPENDENCE AND SOVEREIGNTY
21

22. THE BIG LIE
40. The USA, a corporation of the English Crown, is bankrupt, and has been since at least
1788. The Articles of Confederation states in Article 12: “All bills of credit emitted, monies borrowed,
and debts contracted by, or under the authority of Congress, before the assembling of the United
States, in pursuance of the present confederation, shall be deemed as considered a charge against the
United States, for payment and satisfaction whereof the said United States, and the public faith are
hereby solemnly pledged.” The Colony's 1791 Federal United States so-called “Founding Fathers,” as
constitutors, acknowledged and reorganized the debt in the “Original 1787 Constitution”, Article VI,
hence “constitution.” Bankruptcy occurred on January 1, 1788 based on 21 loans that the United States
of America received from the King of England dating from February 28, 1778 through July 5, 1782, the
repayment of which had been ratified by Congress on January 22, 1783. The United States Bank,
created in 1791, was a private bank, with 18,000 of 25,000 shares owned by England.
41. No de jure, constitutional Congress has existed since March 27, 1861 when seven (7)
Southern States walked out of Congress leaving Congress without a quorum for adjourning and
therefore ending sine die. That which is called “Congress” today assembles and acts under the authority
of the President acting in capacity of being Commander-In-Chief of the Armed Forces, under
emergency war-powers rule, i.e. “law of necessity,” i.e. no law (see 12 Stat 319, which has never been
repealed and exists in Title 50 USC §§ 212, 213, 215, Appendix 16, 26 CFR Chapter 1 § 303.1-6(a),
and 31 CFR Chapter 5 § 500.701 Penalties).
42. Since the above-referenced date, March 27, 1861, the original people of North America
have been under Fascist rule via presidential executive order under the aforementioned Emergency War
Powers, 12 USC 95 a, b., which the original people and their governments, is now “legally” established
as an “enemy” via the Amendatory Act of March 9, 1933, 48 Stat. 1, amending Trading With Enemy
22

23. Act of October 6, 1917, H.R. 4960, Public Law No. 91. 4. December 6th, 1865, the 14th Amendment
was proclaimed as ratified (even though it never properly was, see below). The 14th Amendment,
(which is private Roman Catholic Ecclesiastical Trust Law, known as the Saint Peters Trust),
constitutes a constructive, cestui que trust, a public charitable trust, “PCT,” that was expressly designed
to bring every corporate franchise artificial person called a “citizen of the United States” into an
inseparable merging with the government until the two are united (with the power inhering in the
government, not the people). A cestui que trust is fundamentally different from a regular trust, which is
express in nature and consists of a contractual indenture involving three (3) parties: Grantor (Creator or
Trustor), Trustee, and Beneficiaries. In an express trust, legal ownership is transferred by written
contract between Grantor and Trustee in which the Grantor surrenders ownership of property to the
legal person, the Trust, to be managed by the Trustee on behalf of those who are to benefit from the
arrangement, the Beneficiaries. A cestui que trust, on the other hand, differs from an express trust in
several crucial ways:
a. It is not formed by express contract, i.e. overt agreement expressed
in writing, but by legal construction, i.e. fiat.
b. A cestui que trust has no Grantor, but, being a constructive trust
created by operation of law, i.e. by make-believe, has only co-trustees
and co-beneficiaries. The co-trustees are the parties with the duties
for managing property for the “public good,” i.e. for the benefit of
those designated as co-beneficiaries.
43. The Legislative Act of February 21, 1871, Forty-first Congress, Session III, Chapter 62,
page 419, chartered a Federal company entitled “United States,” a/k/a “US Inc.,” a “Commercial
Agency” originally designated as “Washington, D.C.,” in accordance with the so-called 14th
Amendment, which the record indicates was never ratified (see Utah Supreme Court Cases, Dyett v
Turner, (1968) 439 P2d 266, 267; State v Phillips, (1975) 540 P 2d 936; as well as Coleman v. Miller,
23

24. 307 U.S. 448, 59 S. Ct. 972; 28 Tulane Law Review, 22; 11 South Carolina Law Quarterly 484;
Congressional Record, June 13, 1967, pp. 15641-15646). A “citizen of the United States” is a civilly
dead entity operating as a co-trustee and co-beneficiary of the PCT, the constructive, cestui que trust of
US Inc. under the 14th Amendment, which upholds the debt of the USA and US, Inc. in Section 4.
44. In conformity with the above-referenced creation of United States (1871) and the 14th
Amendment, the Legislature of each State created a limited-liability corporation, chartered in a private,
military, international, commercial, admiralty/maritime jurisdiction, entitled “STATE OF…” e.g.
“STATE OF CALIFORNIA,” as evidenced by, inter alia, the change in the seal and the creation of a
new constitution, e.g. Constitution of the State of California (1879), concerning which, re California:
a. A general partnership agreement, hereinafter “General
Partnership,” exists between the California Republic (1849), and
STATE OF CALIFORNIA (1879), with STATE OF CALIFORNIA
acting as governmental controller.
b. STATE OF CALIFORNIA now acts as an agent/instrumentality of
United States, collecting whole life insurance premiums, known as
“taxes,” for the International Monetary Fund, based, inter alia, upon
the Limited Liability Act of 1851 and the bankruptcy of United States
of 1933, (see House Joint Resolution 192 of June 5, 1933; Public Law
73-10; Perry v. U.S. (1935), 294 U.S. 330-381, 79 L Ed 912; 31 USC
5112, 5119).
45. Inasmuch as all law is contract, the contract involved in a constructive trust is an implied
contract. An implied contract can be ratified by two (2) means:
a. Acquiescence by silence, i.e. the “government” asserts its intentions
concerning your life, rights, and property and you assent, don’t rebut,
and compliantly go along with what they claim. In 1871 the
Government changed the nature of its contract with the people from
law as defined by the original Constitution of 1787 that recognizes law
(common law), admiralty (on the sea only), and equity (functioning by
voluntary contract between all participating parties), and began
relating to people as if they were “citizens of the Unites States”
within/under the private, commercial, international, military
24

25. jurisdiction of the new de facto corporation, i.e. US Inc. They offered
people a “new deal,” and almost everyone bought it (based on naïve
and foolish trust and assuming that everything was OK).
46. The We the people, e.g. 'original people' of North America were thereby denied access to
its original sovereign government's law and placed on the ship of state of US Inc. where the captain’s
word is law and no one has any rights. As Jefferson phrased the matter, “As government grows, liberty
recedes.”
b. You expressly accept “benefits” offered by the government, and
thereby finalize the contract by deed. This is similar to finalizing a
contract with a restaurant by sitting down at a table, reading a menu,
and then ordering and consuming a meal. By your deeds you affirm to
the restaurant that you will pay for the meal in accordance with the
price stated on the menu. No written contract is signed, but a contract
is formed nevertheless.
47. By the above two (2) means people give implied assent that they are bound by an
alleged contract with US Inc. in accordance with the terms and conditions that inhere in being treated
as a “citizen of the United States” under the 14th Amendment, and are therefore placed into permanent
legal status as a Debtor and Surety for U.S. Inc.. In such a position, the original We, the People of
North America leave the ground of sovereignty and all capacity for asserting their birthrights,
nationality, inheritance rights, and rights of self-governess in favor of being presumed as having
exercised their sovereignty and free-will autonomy for the purpose of going along with the
government’s assertion that they sacrifice everything for the “public good,” (i.e. the PCT). By so doing
the original people lose their standing in law, (i.e. they “die a civil death in the law.”) They are placed
in the legal position of mortmain (i.e. as if deceased) and are shorn of capacity for asserting their rights,
since the presumption is that they have already exercised those rights for the purpose of being placed in
the position they are in, i.e. property of the foreign government with a lien against them and everything
including life labor could ever create, and their posterity, children. The private being (the real
25

26. individual) is sacrificed for the good of the public (the imaginary collective).
48. When people die such a civil death in the law they are like ghosts, and thereby incapable
of managing their own affairs and enjoying their birth rights. Like the estate of a decedent, they are
then managed by the executors/administrators of the estate, in probate. Such is the condition of every
“citizen of the United States” today in law, managed by the government agencies acting as
executors/administrators of their estates in bankruptcy, legal incapacity, and civil death as assets of the
bankrupt US. The US is property of the private Real Parties of Interest, the Creditors in bankruptcy.
49. The 14th Amendment was allegedly established for the purpose of creating a citizenship
for the liberated White Negroes, and other disenfranchised people, who otherwise had no citizenship
because they could not comply with the requirements for state citizenship. What actually happened was
that the White Negroes were taken off of the Southern slave plantations and placed into the slave
plantation of the foreign US Inc., a far worse lot. The foreign government then gradually absorbed
everyone else — including the original sovereign people, e.g. We, the people, of the land — into the
same condition.
50. 1871-1913. Officers of the actual government held office in dual capacity, (i.e. in both
USA and US Inc. status).
51. 1912. Bonds issued by US Inc. came due but US Inc. did not have the resources for
paying their creditors (the seven families that founded the Federal Reserve Bank), so US Inc.’s owner
(the actual government) was required to pay the balance. The national government was also without
sufficient funds to meet US Inc.’s obligations, so the foreign creditors settled for all of the assets of
both US Inc. and the national government instead of foreclosure on and liquidation of the entire
country. By so doing, they expropriated the nation — both USA and US Inc. Sic transit America.
52. 1912. US Inc. forms an agreement with the Federal Reserve Bank (It is important to note
that both of these entities are foreign private corporations which removes the general allegations of
26

27. treason or fraud from this relationship). Through this agreement, US Inc. must function in debt, even
though they have neither funds nor resources for financing their operation.
53. 1912. The first corporate only Senators are seated in the next election year by popular
vote of the US Inc. registered voters. The original-jurisdiction national Senators of the States did not
assume office that year and at least one third of the nation’s Senators seats were lawfully and
voluntarily vacant.
54. February 3rd, 1913. US Inc. passes its 16th Amendment and Congress orders the
Secretary of State to enter it as ratified even though the States had not ratified it according to Law. The
Secretary complied. It should be noted that this would not have been lawful if it were a national
Constitution amendment, however it was perfectly legal within the colorable, de facto foreign
corporation. It should also be noted that where the national Constitution already had a 16th Amendment
and where the Supreme Court says that the new 16th Amendment did not do anything, this corporate
Amendment must simply be a space filler entered such that US Inc.’s Constitution (1871) would have
the same number of Amendments as that of the national Constitution (1787).
55. April 8th, 1913. US Inc. passes its 17th Amendment and Congress orders it to be entered
as ratified in the exact same manner as they did with US Inc.’s 16th Amendment. This Amendment
changes where US Inc.’s Senators are elected. This Amendment is not even lawfully possible as a
national Constitution Amendment for several reasons, not the least of which is that the Amendment
would have required that Congress first pass an Amendment that stated that they had the power to say
where Senators are elected before they could even deliberate on such a subject matter, after which they
would then have to have competent ratifications performed on such Amendments in accord with
Constitutional limits, not as was done with US Inc.’s 16th Amendment.
56. December 23, 1913. The Congress, (late at night with only a small cadre of supporters
present), passed the Federal Reserve Act, surrendering the creation and management of the nation’s
27

28. currency into the hands of a cartel of private — and mostly foreign — bankers. Currency is the single
most essential and critical commodity in the world, embodying more law and principles of commerce
than any other. Since all interactions are “commerce,” and the medium of doing business in commerce
is currency, money is in a very significant sense the measure of all things.
57. By abandoning control and management of the money supply, the nation surrendered all
capacity for claiming sovereignty. The government lost its independent treasury (one of the
requirements in law for national sovereignty). The United States Government became a mere fiefdom,
or administrative arm, of the foreign bankers, who now owned the store.
58. Massage of the Federal Reserve Act was a major milestone on the “road to serfdom” that
this entire progression outlines. The conspiratorial nature of matters is exemplified in comments by one
of the major actors in the triumph of the Federal Reserve, Edward Mandell House, who had this to say
in a private meeting with President Woodrow Wilson:
“[Very] soon, every American will be required to register their
biological property in a national system designed to keep track of the
people and that will operate under the ancient system of pledging. By
such methodology, we can compel people to submit to our agenda,
which will affect our security as a chargeback for our fiat paper
currency. Every American will be forced to register or suffer being
able to work and earn a living. They will be our chattel, and we will
hold the security interest over them forever, by operation of the law
merchant under the scheme of secured transactions. Americans, by
unknowingly or unwittingly delivering the bills of lading to us will be
rendered bankrupt and insolvent, forever to remain economic slaves
through taxation, secured by their pledges. They will be stripped of
their rights and given a commercial value designed to make us a profit
and they will be none the wiser, for not one man in a million could ever
figure our plans and, if by accident one or two should figure it out, we
have in our arsenal plausible deniability. After all, this is the only
logical way to fund government, by floating liens and debt to the
registrants in the form of benefits and privileges. This will inevitably
reap to us huge profits beyond our wildest expectations and leave
every American a contributor to this fraud which we will call “Social
28

29. Insurance.” Without realizing it, every American will insure us for any
loss we may incur and in this manner, every American will
unknowingly be our servant, however begrudgingly. The people will
become helpless and without any hope for their redemption and, we
will employ the high office of the President of our dummy corporation
to foment this plot against America.”
59. 1917. Corporate-only Senators begin participating in all matters with those Senators who
still had original jurisdiction government capacity, as a result of which all activities of the government
were performed in corporate capacity only.
60. 1917. President Wilson was re-elected by the Electoral College, but only US Inc.’s
Senate performed the Senate confirmation necessary for seating the national President. There was no
national government Senate confirmation; no national seats were seated and all remained vacant.
61. Note: the national President is also the Military’s Commander in Chief, and under the
nation’s status of being ruled by the private, commercial, martial-law rule of the Bankers and English
Crown, the business needs of the nation have remained under US Inc. control since 1871, (i.e. ever
since US Inc. was incorporated and made operational over such matters).
62. 1917-1944. All national government seats are and remain vacant, and US Inc. continues
maintaining the business needs of the government under martial-law rule.
63. June 5, 1933. US Inc. declares bankruptcy under House Joint Resolution, “HJR,” 192.
22. 1935. The Social Security Act is passed.
64. On application, the new Social Security Administration (hereinafter “SSA”) creates a
private Trust with a trust name that sounds like the name of the applicant except the Trust’s name is
spelled with all capital letters. SSA makes the applicant a co-trustee of the namesake Trust, designates
the SSA General Trust Fund as the Beneficiary of the namesake trust, and assigns the Trust a Social
Security General Trust Fund Account number regarding the applicant for accounting and identification
purposes.
29

30. 65. 1938. In Erie Railroad v. Tompkins, 1938, 304 U.S. 64-92, the U.S. Supreme Court sets
the presumption regarding the status and capacity of an individual as that of General Capacity/General
Partnership relationship with the namesake Trust, as if the two (2) entities — individual and namesake
Trust — were one-in-the-same person.
66. 1944. In the Bretton Woods Agreement, US Inc. is quit-claimed into the newly formed
International Monetary Fund (hereinafter “IMF”) in exchange for the power allowing US Inc.’s
President the right of naming (seating and controlling) the governors and general managers of the
International Monetary Fund, The World Bank for Reconstruction and Development, and the Inter-
American Bank also formed in that agreement (codified at United States Code Title 22 § 286). It must
be noted that this Act created an unlawful conflict of interest between US Inc. (with its new foreign
owner) and its purpose of carrying out the business needs of the national government. This is the cause
of our use of the term “original-jurisdiction” government. With the new foreign owner of US Inc. a
conflict of interest is created between the general national government and US Inc., even though the
contracted purpose of US Inc. has not changed on its face.
67. Since 1953 – 1975 at least, MKULTRA (Mind Control, etc.), CIA, and Military are
unlawfully engaging in human experimentation with and without the knowledge of the subjects.
Military airborne toxins are sprayed on large cities without warning for the purpose of studying
distribution and effect patterns, and other more sinister purposes (see numerous cites on the Internet re
“chem-trails”). Cite: Joint Hearing before the US Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, 95th
Congress, 1st Session, August 3, 1977.
68. 1962. At the National Governor’s Conference in Lexington, Kentucky; US Inc. informs
the governors (under the guise of “public necessity”) that they must all form, or reform existing, private
corporations under US Inc. (in their State’s interest), so that the people will not discover what the State
governments are doing with the original people’s assets (dabbling in foreign notes, i.e. Federal Reserve
30

31. Notes (FRNs), bonds, and evidences of debt), which activity is forbidden from State governments by
their own State Constitutions, which information would likely cause a people’s revolt ending in the
State official’s being, at worst, killed and at least replaced. The proposed incorporation deadline was
1968.
69. 1970. By this time, each State revised its Constitution and Statutes and formed private
corporate entities [> Title 5, U.S.C.S., § 1501(2)] of the name “STATE OF (X)” (where “(X)” is
representative of the common State name), and then vacated the original people of North America, We
the people, original jurisdiction sovereign nation government seats [> Title 5, U.S.C., § 1501(1)] in
favor of foreign ownership and control under the mandate of US Inc.
70. It appears that this was all done so a General Partnership could be presumed as existing
between “The State” (of the national Union of States) and “STATE OF (X)”, a private corporation. Said
STATE OF (X), as General Partner, then assumes the role of governmental operator/controller. This
scenario is further proven by the fact that these corporate entities cannot handle gold and silver coin of
the United States of America in commercial transactions without violating the Par Value Modifications
Act and the Foreign Currency Exchange Act.
71. September 5, 1996, U.S. Patent & Trademark Office application number 709471 is filed,
consisting of a plan for marking the alleged “human property” of US Inc., (i.e. every “citizen of the
United States”) reminiscent of the Christian Biblical reference in the nature of the Mark of the Beast.
This plan is a violation of foundational law.
72. April 19th, 1994. Federal agents attack, burn, and raze the compound, killing
approximately 100 of the members of the sect, without any lawful cause for the action.
73. 50 USC 1520 et seq. demonstrates that there exists an agenda for using the original
people of North America (Sovereign and otherwise) as biological test subjects. This is a fundamental
breach of an alleged Constitutional contract and violation of Offenses Against Law of Nations.
31

32. 74. President Clinton pushes for a mandatory Health Care Bill for the purpose of placing the
physical bodies of all the original people of North America, We the people, under control of US Inc.,
with international identification attached, for the purpose of tagging the populace, as per the Biblical
prophecy of the Mark of the Beast. The computer that would handle the tracking is even identified with
the acronym: B.E.A.S.T.
75. What the above progression depicts is the systematic growth of the power, scope, and
pervasive control of Government exercised against the original people of North America, We the
people, by foreign, criminal, and hostile powers.
76. This same dreary gestalt constitutes the nature of man’s history on this planet as far back
as the eye can see. Civilizations rise, fall, and disappear, replaced by new ones that — based upon
being founded on, and functioning in accordance with, wrong principles — are foredoomed for
extinction, as were all of their predecessors and as all future civilizations will be until mankind finally
learns and ceases “beating a dead horse” by structuring law, commerce, religion, and social
organization in general on principles that are existentially impossible.
77. The above progression has proceeded in North America by implementing such strategy
as:
1. Relentlessly instilling in the Aboriginal people of North America, We the people, the
foundational idea that governments in general are absolutely essential in the society of man and
that the Government in North America is the people’s friend and servant, (i.e. a “government of
the people, by the people, and for the people.”) These premises are untrue — self-serving cons
by those who want the foreign power.
2. Creating governmentally owned corporate franchises, such as a “citizen of the United States”
and one’s all-capital-letter name, with which the Aboriginal people of North America, We the
people, are deceived into identifying.
3. Regarding every citizen of the United States as contractually being:
a. A foreign corporate citizen, i.e. a corporate franchise;
b. A co-trustee (with duties) and co-beneficiary (with privileges) of the 14th Amendment Public
32

33. Charitable cestui que Trust;
c. Pledged as an asset in the bankruptcy of US Inc., and therefore a co-surety for the debts of
US Inc.;
d. An enemy of the Creditors;
e. Chattel property of the foreign Bankers and foreign Power Elite;
f. A slave with no capacity for asserting any rights, no standing in law, and no capacity for
contracting.
4. Functioning on the presumption that the individual being, with autonomy and free will,
knowingly, intentionally, and voluntarily contracted into the situation of being united — like
heads and tails of a coin — with a corporate entity created and owned by the foreign
Governments.
78. As per the established maxim of law, “As a thing is bound, so it is unbound,” the way
out of the problem is within and through the problem. This is accomplished by understanding what the
problem is, (i.e. its structure and character, just as solving the problem of a plugged drain is
accomplished by realizing that the problem is the plugged drain, whereby the solution consists of
unplugging the drain.) “Know the truth and the truth shall make you free.”
79. The United States Library of Congress now has between 2,000,000 and 3,000,000 books
on colonial corporate partisan-political copyright law lobbied by foreign entities. Any law library is a
daunting place, possessing row after row of shelves with foreign copyrighted books full of fine print.
Making knowledge of such “law” even more unattainable is not only that what passes for law today
perpetually changes, altered by every new Court Case/Opinion, by non 'natural born' [>Aboriginals of
North America] Legislators and Judges, by and through, Legislative foreign colonial corporate partisan-
political enactment, and all of the ever-changing Policies, Rules, and Regulations of Administrative
Agencies, but an immense amount of the world’s law today (as actually implemented) is unwritten and
inaccessible.
33

34. 80. This is not only because non 'natural born' Judges operate in General Equity in which the
ultimate Arbiter of a matter is the “conscience of the court” (i.e. how the judge feels about something
that day), but because almost all of the world’s law is the private Law Merchant of the foreign
Creditors in bankruptcy of the world’s Nations, essentially all of which are insolvent and in
receivership to the foreign Bankers. [3] This private Law Merchant is of ancient origin, and is
implemented today by men whose identities are unknown to the mass of mankind.
81. In the face of this undependability of law we may ask some fundamental and ingenuous
questions:
1. Is there such a thing as genuine law that is timeless, stable, and dependable?
2. If so, can such universal law be effectively invoked and utilized in practice today? How can I
use it to ensure my natural law sovereign birth rights to life and happiness to the original people
of North America?
3. If genuine law exists, why is it not taught and uniformly utilized instead of the chaotic and
colorable charade that dominates the legal field against the sovereign Aboriginal people of
North America, today?
4. Can we integrate said universal law with the ephemeral, desultory “law” that now enslaves
the overwhelming majority of the Aboriginal people of North America?
STATEMENT OF FACTS
82. It's quite evident by the following Treaties and Agreements that the British colonies were
never granted Sovereignty nor Independence in North America and the Brutish/British Moors including
their colonial Caucasian/White serfs remain “natural-born subjects” of the United States of Great
Britain's Federal Corporation's known as United States, Incorporated > “United States [c]itizens” and
United States of America, Incorporated, franchise “[c]itizens of the United States”, and fifty (50)
34

35. Federal States [> Title 5, U.S.C.S. § 1501(2)] thereof, to wit:
Secret 1781 1st
American Company, Secret 1783 Trilateral Tripartite
Agreement (The United States of North America, THE UNITED
STATES OF AMERICA, United States & Britain), Secret Puerto
Rican Agreement, Secret 1664 Titulo Torrens of North America, Secret
1772-Present Treaty of Versailles, 1773 Secret Treaty of Paris, Federal
Pacem Terris Covenant & Concordant, Five Books, Sixteen Copies,
Black Book of Exchequer, Blue Book; and holds the Secret 1919 Treaty
of Versailles, Secret 1950 Bilateral Minefield Agreement, Secret 1950
Trilateral Tripartite Agreement and Secret 1963 Green Hilton
Agreement.
83. The United States of North America/ The Republic of North America became involved
with the British Colonial Confederal/Federal Corporation in 1791 via the above-mentioned Treaties
and Agreements which made the Federal United States a subordinate and Annexed Business Trust of
the General Government of The United States of North America, this colonial Federal Corporation
government of and in the United States is and was completely distinct from any and all Municipal
(Lat. Muni-capio) Incorporation, and the post 1933 Administrative government of the United States.
84. The subordinate and Annexed colonial United States 1791 Federal Corporation
government went bankrupt several times including the year of 1933-Present. However, the colonial
Federal “Agency of the United States” White/Caucasian colonial serfs raised the Administrative
Commercial Bankruptcy Flag of the 1791 British Colonial Federal United States between 1929-1935
adding gold fringes to its flag while attempting to declare “White Independence” in North America,
which they too remain bankrupt, since 2005.
85. There are three types of [C]itizens within North America:
(a). Title 8, U.S.C.S., Section 1101(a)(22)(A) "a citizen [> a Preamble natural born and
Resident] of the United States" [of North America in the family of nations] is the principalized pre-
entitled national of the United States. The word "citizen" used previously is NOT a corporation but a
citizen within the meaning of the original 1787 Constitution, i.e., Article. 1-7 and a citizen of the
35

36. Republican States entitled to privileges and/or immunities [> see, e.g., 8 U.S.C.S., Section 1503(a)] of
the 14th Amendment prohibiting any States from abridging privileges and/or immunities of Citizens of
the United States. Also, neither the Federal nor State Governments are Citizens. All Preamble and
Articles 1-7 individual human beings who are natural-born Citizens are LIGIUS> LIGA and Allegiance
in Alliance or by TREATY> The Preamble and United States Constitution, with the United States of
America Government, in the Family of Nations.
(b). Title 8, U.S.C.S., Section 1101(a)(22)(B) "a PERSON [> both natural and artificial, or
native and alien] who, though not a citizen [Preamble, Articles 1-7, entitled, natural born, Allegiance,
etc.] of the United States OWES [> to bound or bind> compulsory constraints, also contractual]
permanent [> not subject to change] allegiance to the United States", in the family of nations [> FON
or fon].
(c). Title 8, U.S.C.S., Section 1401(a) "The following shall be nationals and citizens of the
United States at BIRTH: [> born=delivered over to] (1) a person born in the United States, and
subject to the jurisdiction thereof.” The word "Slave" in Black’s Law Dictionary, 4th Ed. p. 1559,
reads as follows: "A person who is wholly subject to [> permanently owes] the will [one wishes or
a revocable contract] of another.”
86. There are three types of Nationals within North America:
(a) Preamble "Posterity", (b) "free persons" [Art. 1, Sec. 2, Clause 3], (c) “natural born”, (d)
Naturalized Resident Citizens [Articles 1, Sec. 8, Clause 4 & 2, Sec. 1, Clause 5], (e) Republican
State Citizens [Art. 4, Sec. 4 & Sec. 2, Clause 1 with added "privileges and immunities" so written in
Amendment 14, Sec. I, sentence two]. This National Citizen can also be found in 8 U.S.C.S., Section
1101 (a)(22)(A).
(b) The Denizen or (a) "free Person", including those bound to SERVICE for a TERM of YEARS
(> word of art) [Art. 1, Section 2, Clause 3 and (b) Naturalized [Nationalized] Resident Citizens of
the United States [Art. I, Section 8, Clause 4 & Article 2, Section 1, Clause 5]. Also this denizen
national is attached to the Preamble National Citizenship according to 8 U.S.C.S., Section 1101(a),
(22)(B) via “Allegiance”, and amalgamated within “A Declaration of 1776” as "The Declaration of
Independence", especially the last paragraph of both the authentic “A Declaration” and the historic
“Declaration of Independence”.
(c) “Three fifths. …Persons [Art. 1, Section 2, Clause 3]. Esoterically a person who is three
fifths- human, simply represents an individual who lacks [Ar. Lak> Angel] complete control of
the Spiritual or Mental inner senses outwardly described as the physical senses of seeing and
36

37. hearing. The other three are the sense of smell, taste and touch. Hue or complexion has nothing to
do with a person being Truly classified as being three fifths a person, however, anyone who
designates themselves as Black, Brown, Red, Yellow or White, or allows others the authority to
do so is a "Colored person or person of color"> three fifths human.
87. More importantly, the “original” 1787 Constitution4
prohibited “African Nativity”
citizenship, in pertinent part:
88. “Original 1787” Constitution Article XIII § 12 states:
"The traffic in Slaves WITH AFRICA is hereby forever
prohibited on pain of death and the forfeiture of all rights and
property of persons engaged therein: and the descendants of
Africans shall not be Citizens" (of the Federal Corporation
United States).5
89. A type of freedom for Africans is also found in § B of the same Article.
"Involuntary Servitude (of Africans) except for crime, shall
not be permanently established within the District …
Persons held to Service or Labor for life, shall not be
denied" the Sojourn.
90. However, the “U.S.” Supreme Court rendered a decision in the matter of Dred Scott vs.
Sandford on the 12th
day of May, 1856, thereafter, on the 28th day of July, 1868, the 1791 Federal
4 See, e.g., Alden vs. Maine, 527 US 706: “Sovereign Immunity drives not from the Eleventh Amendment but
from the structure of the “original Constitution”; McCreary County vs. ACLU, 545 US at page 872: “and it is
no less baffling to leave out the “original Constitution” of 1787 while quoting the 1215 Magna Carta”; Kansa
vs. Marsh, 548 U.S. 163, 165 L.Ed 2d 429, note 1: “The original Constitution contained few guarantees of
individual rights against the states, and in a clash of governmental authority there was a small risk that the state
courts would erroneously side with the new Federal Government”.
5 Scientifically speaking the modem day fields of Archeology and Anthropology has, without a doubt
shown that there are only two types of human beings and that both types came from the vogue popular
term, erroneous as it may be, African Ancestry. What they are not telling the public is that “African
Descent” does not mean “African Nativity”; and that Africa today was named after a Canaanite Moorish
Roman citizen named Scipo Africanus.
Further, Contrary to most judicial perverted opinions, Blacks are not monolithic, and African-Americans (>
African Nativity), British colonial Moors who enslaved the European Caucasian colonial White serfs, are not
the same rank nor status of the “original people” (>Blacks) of North America, e.g., Petitioner.
37

38. Colonial Corporate United States enacted their 14th Amendment to its Constitution. Ironically,
naturalization was extended repeatedly by Treaty and acts of Congress to Indians and Negroes long
before Dred Scott and the enactment of the Federal 14th
Amendment Constitution. See, e.g., Treaty of
Choctaws, Article 14, 20th September, 1830; Treaty with the Cherokees, 12th Article, Vol V, U.S.
Laws, 647; Treaties of 1803 for Louisiana, 1819 for Florida, 1847 for California. Therefore, with the
combination of the aforementioned Treaties and Acts of Congress and the “Original 1787” Constitution
Art. 1, Section. 9, Clause 1, (esoterically terminating White Negro Slavery by 1807-08), the Ninth
Circuit Court of Appeals now must address which “United States” the aforementioned Black citizens of
before the 1856 Dred Scott decision and the 1868 enactment of the Federal United States 14th
Amendment Constitution? The answer to that question can easily be found in Dred Scott vs. Sanford,
4 Cranch at 212: “original United States”. Also see, Harcourt v. Gaillard, 6 L.Ed 216, 12 Wheat at
523: “There was no territory within the (original) United States, USNA.
91. The Federal Colony 14th
Amendment Citizen:
(a) Section I. " All persons [natural and artificial] born [> the "act of being delivered" via a birth
certificate application: delivery "the transfer from one person to another of the res or a right or interest
therein, which means more than physical transfer of possession". Black’s Law Dictionary, 4th Ed.], or
naturalized [> an adoption of an alien or foreigner via an Oath of Allegiance and not the Pledge of
Allegiance: a naturalized citizen is a Title 8, U.S.C.S., § 1401 subjugated citizen as a 14th
Amendment
born citizen] in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, [> Lat. serv, serf or slave] are
citizens of the United States and of the State [> State of Consciousness, Status or rank in society or
Municipal> Muni-capio political party and Democracy State] wherein they reside.
(b) No State [not even the Administrative Municipal States] shall make or enforce any law
which shall abridge the privileges or immunities or the citizens of the “original” United States [> these
citizens of the United States are the Preamble, natural born and Allegiance Citizens of (1) the A.O.C.,
Article 4, Section 1, (2) Preamble Posterity, (3) “Original 1787 Constitution”, Art. 4, Section 2, Clause
1, (4) the free inhabitants/Freeman of the Republican Form of Government guaranteed to all
constitutional States in the Confederation and (5) 8 U.S.C.S., Section 1101(a)(22)], nor shall any State
deprive any person [> natural or artificial: note the word citizen is not used] of life, liberty, or property,
without due process of law [> within one of the many jurisdictions or different types of Citizenships of
38

39. the United States, i.e., Preamble vs. Subject to] nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction [> there
are different jurisdictions for different types of citizens in the US] the equal protection [according to
ones citizenship] of the law".
92. In order to better comprehend the word of art phrase & > idiom "subject to the
jurisdiction" we shall go to the United States Code Service (U.S.C.S.) Lawyers Edition, Interpretive
Note and Decisions, (1) 13th
and (2) 14th
and (3) 42 U.S.C.S., § 1981:6
(1) Prohibition against Slavery... “...and involuntary servitude...”: “...
and obvious purpose of the Thirteenth Amendment is to forbid all
shades and conditions of AFRICAN SLAVERY [> African slavery is
NOT, and has never been, until recently, NEGRO SLAVERY]: while
NEGRO SLAVERY [> those who were supplanted completely about
6000 years ago: see Genesis 2:4-20> part of the Neanderthal people:
this is NOT ADAM-Kadmon but it is a man of the dust of the ground]
alone (only) was in the mind of Congress which proposed the 13th
Amendment, it (the 13th Amendment) forbids any other [i.e. other
than Negro Slavery: Property via seizure or contracts] kind of slavery,
now (1865- Present) or hereafter".
6 The following quotes are taken from Title 42 U.S.C.S., § 1981 and it is describing (a) what rights white
Negro Slaves have had since the Civil War to the present and (b) the rights of the amalgamated free
inhabitants who unintentionally and unknowingly Volunteered themselves and their offspring's to inherit the
subjugated White-Negro citizenship defined in Amendments 13-27.
This will be quoted in three different manners for a clearer understanding. The first shall be quoted without
the prepositional phrase. The second to distinctly indicate the power of contracts and thirdly the entire quote,
to wit:
(1) " All persons … of the United States shall have the same rights, in every State and Territory to make and
enforce CONTRACTS [> Voluntary contractual slavery of the 14th
Amendment regardless of your
color],...as is (now and was) enjoyed by white citizens...".
(2) All persons [>artificial persons, corporations, aliens etc.] within the jurisdiction of the United States shall
have the SAME rights, in every State and Territory to make and enforce (common law) contracts, to sue,
be parties, give evidence, and to the full and equal benefit of all laws and proceeding for the security of
persons and property as is enjoyed by white citizens, and shall be subject to (>enslaved) like punishment,
pains, penalties, taxes, licenses, and exactions of EVERY KIND, and to no other". As if there needs to be
any other types of subjugation.
(3) “All persons within the jurisdiction of the United States shall have the same rights...as is enjoyed by
White citizens, and shall be SUBJECT TO like punishment, pains, penalties [> the word wite/white, in
law, means punishment, pain, penalties, etc.: Black’s Law Dictionary, 4th Ed. p. 1776], taxes [> burdens],
licenses, and EXACTIONS [> "The wrongful act of an officer or other person in compelling payment of a
fee or reward for his services, under the color [(> pretense)] of his official authority, when none is due".
39

40. 93. The question must be asked before the Ninth Circuit Court is why/how come Congress
did not forbid "Negro Slavery" in the 13th
Amendment, nor Voluntary slavery-servitude. The answer is
found, in part, in U.S.C.S., L. Ed., #2 Citizenship, 4 Generally:
"While the main purpose of the Fourteenth Amendment was to
establish [c.f. the Preamble that also establishes the Posterity, who are
the natural born and Allegiance Citizens of the United States]
citizenship of NEGRO, phrase subject to its [another or someone
else's] jurisdiction …”.
94. The Ninth Circuit Court should be able to plainly comprehend that the idiom Negro, as
codified by Congress, simply meant between 1865-66, as indicated within the 13th
and 14th
Amendments, a voluntary slave, who is subject to the jurisdiction of another/United States by way of
being (a) Conquered, (b) Seizure or (c) Contracts. Therefore, the word of art "Negro" means subject
to another's-jurisdiction and Slave means subject to another's will and both describing the conditions
of not being free> "white person" opposed to "free white person"-color> Femme Couleur Libre.
Femme Couleur Libre means, when properly translated, FREE COLORED PEOPLE/NATION.
Femme Couleur Libre. “Up to the time of Civil war, term applied to all persons not of the White race,
including Indians.” See, e.g., Black’s Law 6th
Edition, p. 618, Indi, Cassell’s New Latin Dictionary
(C.L.D.) by D.P. Simpson, 1960, p. 299.
95. Further, the Civil War Office of the President established between 1861 - 1865
constructed Military Districts throughout the United States and a Corporate Military District in the
"Seat of Government of the United States", i.e., The District of Columbia. The transfer of
"Blakkr>White Black "Persons" as property was partially accomplished with the Emancipation
Promulgare" > Emancipation Proclamation of January 1, 1861 and completed with Amendments 13th
and 14th, and the Repatriation of those Individuals, or persons who Expatriated. The 14 Amendment
Civil Rights citizenship is "subject to the jurisdiction of others" or the Administrative-Federal
40

41. Corporation that presently occupy specific quarters in the Seat of Government in the United States
located within the District of Columbia and contracted, in part, on the presidential Civil War Office of
the President's Executive Orders of January, 1863.
96. The introduction of the 1868 Administrative Military District and with all persons born
or naturalized in the [Federal Corporation] United States, and subject to the [Agency of the] United
States jurisdiction are Artificial Permanent Resident Alien citizens belonging to the District of
Columbia United States and in the keep of its Administrative Foreign Domestic Corporation
government and of the 50 Municipal Partisan Political Federal States [5 USCS, § 1501 (2)] wherein
they reside, that is to say, an artificially constructed or Corporate person citizenship, or "Permanent
Resident Alien" citizenship [that is Totally Foreign or "Stranger" to the Preamble People-Posterity,
Constitution [>Art. 1-7] and ''the Sovereign Power of the United States of North America, in the
Family of Nations. All 14th Amendment and 8 U.S.C.S., § 1401 & 1452] are "Americans*." or
"White Negroes" subject to presidential executive orders and Congressional control, including "Native
Americans" a.k.a. the 2nd Americans when they are wards of the State.
97. Therefore, the Civil War did not, nor has any other war, free(d) the slaves no matter
what color they were or are, and it was never intended to do so.
98. In Star Wars, Episode I, AnaKim Skywalker a.k.a. Darth Vader represent the Slave(s)
who eventually destroy virtually, i.e., all of the former masters [> those of the Republic] and who in
return is destroyed and saved by his seed, Luke, Skywalker, who was mixed with the bloodline of the
Republic. This negative Karma lead to the Civil war [clone Wars episode II, or artificially created
people fighting for freedom] to set Caucasian White persons free but instead of freeing the Slaves it
enslaved the amalgamated free people by the ratification of the 13th
and 14th
Amendments, and the
Emancipation Proclamation.
41

42. 99. The Slave holding Corporate States were defeated and the property> Negro white
persons was seized and transferred over to the Federal Corporation United States for Management.
These Caucasian Negroes did not have a citizenship and the Masonically guided United States
Representatives did not allow them to be Congressionally Naturalized in accordance with the United
States Constitution, Art. 1, Section 8, Clause 4 of the “Original 1787 Constitution”, not to be
confused with the British Colonial Federal 14th
Amendment Constitution Naturalization of 1868, that
is, 81 years later.
100. Emancipation the term comes from the Latin word amancipatio and literally means,
"to transfer or make over property" (See, e.g., Cassell's New Latin Dictionary, 1960, p. 212).
101. The word Property also means Rights and Slaves do not have rights, however,
Preamble “original people” > natural born Citizens who are NOT delivered over to by way of the
Federal 14th
Amendment adhesion contracts do possess, all Preamble Rights afforded by the
“Original 1787 Constitution”.
102. The British Colonial Federal 13th
and 14th
Amendments, and the Emancipation
Proclamation are major sources in the illusion of freedom to the American public and together they
established the transference of the White Negro> Property, via seizure, from the federal corporate
states [> Title 5, U.S.C.S. § 1501(2) > British Colony States > STATE OF WASHINGTON, CITY
OF SEATTLE & COUNTY OF KING] to the Federal Corporation [> Title 28, U.S.C.S. § 3002],
such mirroring of governments, created a delusional avenue of freedom and liberty for the Mulatto
and Maurus indigenous to America [> both being the native- “natural-born” citizens of the United
States]. This 1791 British Colonial Federal United States 13th
/ 14th
Amendment citizenship is no
more than “voluntary slavery” through Adhesion contracts (e.g., recipient of federal governmental
services and federal local political elections), via the British Colonial Federal Corporation United
42