2. EcoWest mission
Inform and advance conservation in the American
West by analyzing, visualizing, and sharing data
on environmental trends.
1/20/13
3. EcoWest decks
This is one of six presentations that illustrate key environmental
metrics. Libraries for each topic contain additional slides.
Issue Sample metrics
Water Per capita water consumption, price of water,
trends in transfers
Biodiversity Number of endangered species, government
funding for species protection
Wildfires Size and number of wildfires, suppression costs
Land Area protected by land trusts, location of
proposed wilderness areas
Climate Temperature and precipitation projections
Politics Conservation funding, public opinion
Download presentations and libraries at ecowest.org
1/20/13
4. Table of contents
1. Public opinion
• State of the environment
• Specific issues and policies
• Climate change
2. Conservation funding
• Federal budget and agencies
• Ballot measures
• Philanthropy
1/20/13
6. Key points: public opinion
• The environment doesn’t rank high on the public’s agenda,
but a majority of Americans remain concerned about a wide
variety of environmental problems
• The public agrees with many of the environmental
movement’s policy goals, but only about a fifth of Americans
identify themselves as active participants
• The Great Recession has shifted public opinion away from
environmental concerns over the past few years
• Air and water pollution tend to be the most worrisome
environmental issues
• Disasters, such as the BP oil spill, can cause spikes of interest
in environmental issues
• Who’s in the White House can influence perceptions of
environmental quality: the 2008 election caused more
Americans to say things are improving
• Americans remain split on global warming, especially along
party lines, with a significant percentage saying the threat is
exaggerated and will not affect their lives
1/20/13
8. What’s the most important problem facing the U.S.?
Economy in general
Unemployment/Jobs
Dissatisfaction with government
Federal budget deficit/Federal debt
Poor healthcare/hospitals; High cost of healthcare
Lack of money
Education/Poor education/Access to education
Ethics/moral/religious/family decline; Dishonesty
Immigration/Illegal aliens
Care for the elderly/Medicare
Corporate corruption
Energy/Lack of energy sources
Environment/Pollution
Foreign aid/Focus overseas
Fuel/Oil prices
Gap between rich and poor
International issues, problems
Judicial system/Courts/Laws
Lack of military defense
Lack of respect for each other 1% each
Poverty/ Hunger/Homelessness
Taxes
The media
Unifying the country
Wage issues
Wars/War (nonspecific)/Fear of war
Welfare
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35
Percent
Source: Gallup 1/20/13
9. Public concern about the environment
How much do you personally worry about the quality of the environment?
100
No opinion
90
Not at all
80 Only a little
70 Fair amount
Percent
60 Great deal
50 Great deal +
fair amount
40
30
20
10
0
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Source: Gallup 1/20/13
10. Environmental quality
How would you rate the overall quality of the environment in this country today?
100
90
80
70
Percent
60
Excellent
50
Good
40
Only fair
30
20 Poor
10
No opinion
0
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Source: Gallup 1/20/13
11. Trajectory of environmental quality
Right now, do you think the quality of the environment in the country as a
whole is getting better or worse?
80 Obama
elected
70
60
Percent
50
40
30 Getting better
Getting worse
Same
20
No opinion
10
0
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Source: Gallup 1/20/13
12. President’s performance on environment protection
Do you think the President is doing a good job or a poor job in protecting the
nation’s environment?
Obama
90 elected
80
70
Percent
60
50
40
30
20
Good job
Poor job
10
0
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Source: Gallup 1/20/13
13. Participation in environmental movement
Do you think of yourself as an active participant in the environmental movement;
sympathetic towards the movement, but not active; neutral; or unsympathetic?
60
50
Percent
40 Sympathetic, b
ut not active
Neutral
30
Active
20 participant
Unsympathetic
10
No opinion
0
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Source: Gallup 1/20/13
14. Public’s opinion of the environmental movement
All things considered, do you think the environmental movement in this nation has
done more good than harm, or more harm than good?
Definitely more good than harm Probably more good than harm
50 Probably more harm than good Definitely more harm than good
No opinion
45
40
35
Percent
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
Source: Gallup 1/20/13
15. Environment vs. economy
Do you think that protection of the environment should be given priority, even at
the risk of curbing economic growth, or do you think economic growth should be
given priority, even if the environment suffers to some extent?
80
Gulf oil
70 spill
60
Percent
50
40
30
20
Protection of the environment should be given priority
10
Economic growth should be given priority
0
1990
1993
2003
1987
1984
2000
2011
1986
1989
1995
2005
2012
1997
1998
2008
1991
2001
2007
2010
1985
1994
2004
1988
1996
1999
2006
2009
1992
2002
Source: Gallup 1/20/13
16. Environment vs. energy supply
Do you think protection of the environment should be given priority, even at the risk
of limiting the amount of energy supplies—such as oil, gas and coal—which the United
States produces, or do you think the development of U.S. energy supplies should be
given priority, even if the environment suffers to some extent?
Gulf oil
70
spill
60
Percent
50
40
30
Protection of the environmental should be given priority.
Development of U.S. energy supplies should be given priority.
20 Both/equally
Neither/other
10 No opinion
0
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Source: Gallup 1/20/13
17. Government’s role in environmental protection
Do you think the government is doing too much or too little to protect the
environment?
80
Too much
70 Too little
About the right
60 amount
No opinion
Percent
50
40
30
20
10
0
Source: Gallup 1/20/13
18. Environment versus economy in the West
As part of efforts to improve their state economy and generate jobs as quickly as
possible, some people have proposed reducing protections on land, air and water that apply to
major industries, including construction and agriculture. Would you prefer your state to
reduce these protections or maintain them?
100
90
80
Percent
70
60
50 Maintain
Reduce
40
30
20
10
0
Colorado Utah Wyoming Montana New Mexico
Source: State of the Rockies Project 1/20/13
19. Strength of environmental laws: the West
What is your feeling about the current status of environmental laws?
Laws strong enough, but should be better enforced
Laws, enforcement should be left as they are
Laws strong enough
Laws too strict, need to be relaxed
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Percent
Source: State of the Rockies Project 1/20/13
21. What environmental issues are most worrisome?
How much do you personally worry about the following environmental issues?
100
90
Percent saying “great deal” or “fair amount”
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
Pollution of rivers, lakes, and reservoirs Pollution of drinking water
Nation's supply of freshwater for household needs Air pollution
Extinction of plant and animal species Global warming
Source: Gallup 1/20/13
22. What environmental issues are most worrisome?
How much do you personally worry about the following environmental issues?
80
Pollution of lakes, rivers, and
reservoirs
70
Air pollution
Percent saying “great deal”
60 Global warming
Pollution of drinking water
50
Extinction of plant and animal
species
40
Maintenance of the nation's
supply of fresh water for
household needs
30 Loss of tropical rainforests
Contamination of soil and water
20 by toxic waste
Source: Gallup 1/20/13
23. What environmental issues are most worrisome?
Pollution of drinking water
Contamination of soil and water by toxic waste
Pollution of lakes, rivers, and reservoirs
Maintenance of freshwater supply for household needs
Loss of natural habitat for wildlife
Air pollution
Loss of tropical rainforests
Damage to the ozone layer
Extinction of plant and animal species
Global warming
Urban sprawl and loss of open space
Acid rain
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Percent
Source: Gallup 1/20/13
24. Most important environmental issue: CA
What is the most important environmental issue facing California?
Don't know
Other
Regulation/environmentalists
Jobs/economy/budget
Pollution in general
Loss of forests/wildfires
Landfills/waste/recycling
Global warming/climate change
Gas prices
Energy, oil drilling
Water supply, drought
Water pollution
Air pollution
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30%
Source: Public Policy Institute of California 1/20/13
25. Worry over environmental issues: the West
What areas are most frequently expressed as environmental concerns?
Air/air pollution/clean air
Water/water pollution clean water
Water supplies/drought
Wildlife
Pollution (general)
Oil/gas drilling
Federal government
Energy issues/general
Public lands/drilling/development on them
Renewable energy/alternative fuels
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35
Percent
Source: State of the Rockies Project 1/20/13
26. Seriousness of environmental problems: the West
What is the seriousness of the following environmental problems?
Poorly-planned growth and development
Loss of family farms and ranches
Pollution of rivers, lakes and streams
Air pollution and smog
Funding cuts for state parks, natural area protection, and water quality
Loss of habitat for fish and wildlife
Inadequate water supplies
Toxins and pesticides in food and drinking water Extremely Serious
Serious
Loss of natural areas
The impact of mining
The impact of oil and gas and drilling
Lack of access to public lands
Global warming
Cliamte change
Lack of access to lands and rivers for hunting and fishing
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90%
Source: State of the Rockies Project 1/20/13
28. Understanding of global warming
Thinking about the issue of global warming, how well do you feel you understand
this issue?
100
90
80
70
Percent
60 No opinion
50 Not at all
40 Only a little
Fair amont
30
Great deal
20
Great deal +
10 fair amount
0
Source: Gallup 1/20/13
29. Anticipating the effects of global warming
Which of the following statements reflects your view of when the effects of global
warming will begin to happen?
70
60
50
Already begun
Percent
Within a few years
40
Within your lifetime
30
Not within
lifetime, but affect
future
20 Will never happen
No opinion
10
0
Source: Gallup 1/20/13
30. Causes of global warming
Do you believe increases in the Earth's temperature over the last century are due
more to the effects of pollution from human activities or natural changes in the
environment that are not due to human activities?
70
60
50
Percent
40
30 Human activities
Natural causes
20 No opinion
10
0
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Source: Gallup 1/20/13
31. Will global warming pose a serious threat?
Do you think that global warming will pose a serious threat to you or
your way of life in your lifetime?
80
Yes
No
70 No opinion
60
Percent
50
40
30
20
10
0
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Source: Gallup 1/20/13
32. Is global warming exaggerated in the news?
Thinking about what is said in the news, in your view is the seriousness of global
warming generally exaggerated, generally correct, or is it generally
underestimated?
60
Generally exaggerated
Generally underestimated
50
Generally correct
No opinion
Percent
40
30
20
10
0
1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Source: Gallup 1/20/13
33. Is the global warming threat exaggerated?
Percentage saying news of global warming is exaggerated, by party identification
70
60
50
Percent
40
Republicans
Independents
30 Democrats
20
10
0
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
Source: Gallup 1/20/13
34. Views of global warming: the West
What are your views of global warming? Is immediate action required?
Concern greatly exagerrated
Enough evidence, take some action
Global warming serious, need immediate action
Don't know enough, need more research
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35
Percent
Source: State of the Rockies Project 1/20/13
35. Support for regulating carbon emissions
Do you support the EPA regulation of carbon emissions?
80
70
60
Percent
50
40
30
20
10
0
Colorado New Mexico Utah Montana Wyoming
Source: State of the Rockies Project 1/20/13
36. Concern over climate change impact: CA
What do you perceive as the most threatening impacts of climate change in California?
90
80
70
60
Percent
50
40
30
20
10
0
Wildfires that are more Increased air pollution Droughts that are more Increased flooding
severe severe
Source: Public Policy Institute of California 1/20/13
38. Key points: conservation funding
1) Federal funding
– In real terms, the budgets of major environmental
agencies have been fairly steady over the past decade
– The distribution among different programs also tends
to remain relatively constant
2) Ballot measures
– Open-space bonds and other conservation measures
usually pass at the polls but considerably fewer have
been put to voters during the economic downturn
3) Philanthropic
– The distribution of funding by issue area changes
significantly from year to year
– Energy and climate-related funding saw big increases
1/20/13
40. How your federal tax dollars are spent
Medicaid
Low-income 8%
assistance
9%
Net interest Unemployment
payments compensation
7% 5%
Medicare
13%
Veterans Affairs
3% Education
3%
Law
enforcement/homeland
security
2%
Transportation
2%
Health (not
Defense Medicare/Medicaid)
20% 2%
Management of federal
employees and buildings
1%
Social Security Environmental protection
21% and natural resources
1%
All others
3%
Source: Third Way 1/20/13
41. Top federal programs related to the environment
Electric reliability organizations
Ocean oil drilling regulation and natural resource leases
Energy efficient housing
Lead hazard control and healthy homes
Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Regulation and Enforcement
Natural Resources Conservation Service
Efficient vehicle development
Mine Safety and Health Administration
U.S. Terroritories oversight
Coal mine oversight and cleanup
U.S. Geological Survey
Dams, powerplants and reservoirs
Department of Interior
Bureau of Land Management
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
National Park Service
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Energy research, statisics and analysis
Clean energy
U.S. Forest Service
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Environmental Protection Agency
$0 $5 $10 $15
Billions
Source: Third Way 1/20/13
42. EPA budget by major category
12
10
8
Billions (2012 dollars)
Chemicals and pollution
Enforcing environmental laws
6
Climate change and air quality
Cleaning up communities
Protecting water
4
2
0
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
Source: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 1/20/13
43. Forest Service: wildfires consume largest slice
10
9
8
7
6
Billions (Dollars)
5 Supplemental/Emergency/Reserve
Other Appropriations
4 Land Acquisition: LWCF
State and Private Forestry
3 Forest and Rangeland Research
Capital Improvement and
2 Maintenance
Mandatory Appropriations
National Forest System
1
Wildland Fire Management
0
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
Source: U.S. Forest Service 1/20/13
44. Department of Interior budgets: 2003-2013
25
Other
Offices of the Solicitor and Inspector
General
20 Minerals Management Service/Ocean
Energy Management
Insular Affairs
Office of Special Trustee for American
Indians
15 Office of Surface Mining
Billions (2012 dollars)
Geological Survey
Bureau of Reclamation
10
Bureau of Land Management
Department Wide Programs
Fish and Wildlife Service
5
Departmental Management
Bureau of Indian Affairs
National Park Service
0
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
Source: Department of Interior 1/20/13
45. Funding for key agencies in Department of Interior
4.5
4
3.5
3
Billions (2012 dollars)
2.5 National Park Service
Fish and Wildlife Service
Bureau of Land Management
2
Bureau of Reclamation
Geological Survey
1.5
1
0.5
0
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
Source: Department of Interior 1/20/13
46. National Park Service
4.5
4 Land and Water Conservation Fund
Contract Authority
Miscellaneous Trust Funds (Includes
3.5 Donations)
Outer Continental Shelf Oil Lease Revenues
3 Spectrum Relocation Activities
Other Permanent Appropriations
Billions (2012 dollars)
2.5
Recreation Fee Permanent Appropriations
2 Land Acquisition and State Assistance
Construction
1.5
Historic Preservation Fund
Urban Park and Recreation Fund
1
National Recreation and Preservation
0.5 Park Partnership Project Grants
Operation of the National Park System
0
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Source: National Park Service 1/20/13
47. US Bureau of Land Management
Construction and access
1,600
Permanent operating funds
Range improvements
1,400 Land acquisition
Oregon and California grant lands
1,200 Management of lands/resources
Millions (2012 dollars)
1,000
800
600
400
200
0
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
Source: Bureau of Land Management 1/20/13
48. US Fish and Wildlife Service
3.5
Construction
3
North American wetlands
conservation fund
2.5 Migratory bird conservation
account
State and tribal wildlife grants
Billions (2012 dollars)
2
Land acquisition
1.5
Cooperative endangered
species conservation fund
Federal aid in wildlife
1
restoration
Sport fish restoration
0.5
Resource management
0 Other
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
-0.5
Source: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 1/20/13
49. Land and Water Conservation Fund
1200
1000
800 Receipts
received
Fund
Millions (Dollars)
600 appropriations
400
200
0
Source: Department of Interior 1/20/13
51. Conservation funding from ballot measures
$180 $10
Conservation funds approved
Funds per measure $9
$160
$8
$140
$7
Billions (2012 dollars)
Millions (2012 dollars)
$120
$6
$100
$5
$80
$4
$60
$3
$40
$2
$20 $1
$- $-
Source: Trust for Public Land 1/20/13
52. Conservation ballot measures: number and success
100.0% 250
Number of measures
90.0% Passage rate
80.0% 200
Number of Measures Passed
70.0%
60.0% 150
Percent
50.0%
40.0% 100
30.0%
20.0% 50
10.0%
0.0% 0
Source: Trust for Public Land 1/20/13
54. EGA member funding by issue area: 2007
International Trade & Finance
Population
Material Consumption & Waste Management
Indigenous Populations/Communities
Toxics
Transportation
Environmental Health
Environmental Justice
Fresh Water/Inland Water Ecosystems
Sustainable Communities
Sustainable Agriculture & Food Systems
Energy
Climate/Atmosphere
General/Multi-Issue
Biodiversity & Species Preservation
Coastal & Marine Ecosystem
Terrestrial Ecosystems & Land-use
0 100 200 300
Millions (Dollars)
Source: Environmental Grantmakers Association 1/20/13
55. EGA member funding by issue area: 2009
Population
Material Consumption & Waste Management
Indigenous Populations/Communities
Toxics
International Trade & Finance
Environmental Justics
Environmental Health
Sustainable Communities
Sustainable Agriculture & Food Systems
Transportation
Fresh Water/Inland Water Ecosystems
Biodiversity & Species Preservation
Undefined
Coastal & Marine Ecosystem
Terrestrial Ecosystems & Land-use
Energy
Climate/Atmosphere
-50 50 150 250
Millions (Dollars)
Source: Environmental Grantmakers Association 1/20/13
56. Change in funding: 2007 to 2009
Transportation
Toxics
Terrestrial Ecosystems & Land-use
Sustainable Communities
Sustainable Agriculture & Food Systems
Population
Material Consumption & Waste
Management
International Trade & Finance
Indigenous Populations/Communities
General/Multiple/Undefined
Fresh Water/Inland Water Ecosystems
Environmental Justice
Environmental Health
Energy
Coastal & Marine Ecosystem
Climate/Atmosphere
Biodiversity & Species Preservation
-100 -50 0 50 100
Millions (Dollars)
Source: Environmental Grantmakers Association 1/20/13
57. Percent change in funding: 2007 to 2009
Transportation
Toxics
Terrestrial Ecosystems & Land-use
Sustainable Communities
Sustainable Agriculture & Food Systems
Population
Material Consumption & Waste
Management
International Trade & Finance
Indigenous Populations/Communities
General/Multiple/Undefined
Fresh Water/Inland Water Ecosystems
Environmental Justice
Environmental Health
Energy
Coastal & Marine Ecosystem
Climate/Atmosphere
Biodiversity & Species Preservation
-100 -50 0 50 100 150
Percent Source: Environmental Grantmakers Association 1/20/13
58. Conclusion
• Environmental issues rank low on the public’s agenda, but
Americans remain concerned about many environmental
problems, especially pollution.
• While Americans often agree with environmentalists’ policy
goals, only about a fifth identify themselves as active
participants in the movement.
• Hostility toward environmentalists appears to be rising and
the Great Recession has shifted public opinion away from
environmental concerns over the past few years
• Disasters, such as the BP oil spill, and presidential elections
can cause big changes in public opinion on the environment
but they may be short-lived.
• Budgets for federal environmental agencies have remained
relatively steady, but philanthropic funding priorities may
vary greatly from year to year.
• Open-space bonds and other conservation measures usually
pass at the polls but considerably fewer have been put to
voters during the economic downturn.
1/20/13
59. Download more slides and other libraries
ecowest.org
Contact us by e-mailing mitch@ceaconsulting.com
1/20/13
60. EcoWest advisors
Jon Christensen, Adjunct Assistant Professor and Pritzker
Fellow at the Institute of the Environment and Sustainability
and Department of History at UCLA; former director of Bill
Lane Center for the American West at Stanford.
Bruce Hamilton, Deputy Executive Director for the Sierra
Club, where he has worked for more than 35 years; member
of the World Commission on Protected Areas; former Field
Editor for High Country News.
Robert Glennon, Regents’ Professor and Morris K. Udall
Professor of Law and Public Policy, Rogers College of Law at
the University of Arizona; author of Water Follies and
Unquenchable.
1/20/13
61. EcoWest advisors
Jonathan Hoekstra, head of WWF’s Conservation Science
Program, lead author of The Atlas of Global
Conservation, and former Senior Scientist at The Nature
Conservancy.
Timothy Male, Vice President of Conservation Policy for
Defenders of Wildlife, where he directs the Habitat and
Highways, Conservation Planning, Federal Lands, Oregon
Biodiversity Partnership, and Economics programs.
Thomas Swetnam, Regents' Professor of
Dendrochronology, Director of the Laboratory of Tree-Ring
Research at the University of Arizona, and a leading expert on
wildfires and Western forests.
1/20/13
62. Contributors at California Environmental Associates
Mitch Tobin
Editor of EcoWest.org
Communications Director at CEA
Micah Day
Associate at CEA
Matthew Elliott Contact us by e-mailing
Principal at CEA mitch@ceaconsulting.com
Max Levine
Associate at CEA
Caroline Ott
Research Associate at CEA
Sarah Weldon
Affiliated consultant at CEA
1/20/13
Hinweis der Redaktion
Narrative: In this deck of slides, we focus on two major topics: public opinion on environmental issues and funding for conservation.
Narrative: First, let’s take a look at some polling on environmental issues, both nationally and in the West. Most of the slides that follow are based on longstanding surveys conducted by the Gallup Organization. Some other polls examine the views of Westerners in particular, but they haven’t been around for very long so they don’t say much about long-term trends.
Narrative: Here are some of the key points on public opinion.
Narrative: Many of the questions that Gallup asks concern the overall state of the environment.
Narrative: Before we delve intopublic opinion on environmental issues, it’s important to remember that the environment usually ranks very low on the public’s agenda. When Gallup asks Americans “what’s the most important problem facing the nation,” only one or two percent of people will say it’s the environment or energy issues. This graphic shows the public’s ranking for June 2012.Source: GallupURL: http://www.gallup.com/poll/155162/Satisfaction-Slips-Slightly.aspxNotes: Responses with less than 1 percent excluded
Narrative: Although few Americans rate the environment as the nation’s top priority, a majority has consistently said that they worry about the quality of the environment. Over the past decade, more than a third of Americans surveyed said they were worried a “great deal,” and about a third have said they worry a “fair amount.” This pattern hasn’t changed much over the past decade.Source: Gallup URL: http://www.gallup.com/poll/1615/Environment.aspxNotes: No data for 2009
Narrative: Nationally, fewer than 10 percent of Americans believe that the overall quality of the environment is excellent. A higher percentage rate the quality as good, but combining these two categories still accounts for less than 50 percent. Public opinion on this question has also remained relatively stable since 2001.Source: Gallup URL: http://www.gallup.com/poll/1615/Environment.aspxNotes:
Narrative: Obama’s election could help explain why there was a shift in the public’s outlook between March 2008 and March 2009. When asked to rate the trajectory of environmental quality, more Americans still think things are getting worse, but that gap narrowed substantially after Obama took office and has remained relatively constant since then.Source: Gallup URL: http://www.gallup.com/poll/1615/Environment.aspxNotes:
Narrative: A similar patterns exists if you look at the public’s judgment of the president’s performance on environmental issues. The share of Americans saying the president was doing a “good job” surged around 50 percentage points after Obama took office, to about 80 , but it has since fallen to about 50 percent and remained relatively constant. Throughout the Bush administration, the public’s rating of the president generally declined.Source: Gallup URL: http://www.gallup.com/poll/1615/Environment.aspxNotes:
Narrative: Most Americans say they’re concerned about environmental issues, but fewer than one in five consider themselves active participants in the environment movement. About 40 percent consider themselves sympathetic but not active. The percentage of people saying they were “unsympathetic” to the environmental movement has risen slightly in recent years, to about 10 percent, while the fraction describing themselves as neutral has climbed to about 30 percent. Source: Gallup URL: http://www.gallup.com/poll/1615/Environment.aspxNotes: No data for 2009
Narrative: Some increasing hostility toward the environmental movement is also seen in this graphic. The percentage of people saying the movement has definitely or probably done more harm than good has risen since 1992. But, overall, a plurality of Americans say the movement has probably done more good than harm. Source: Gallup URL: http://www.gallup.com/poll/1615/Environment.aspxNotes:
Narrative: When asked about balancing environmental and economic priorities, an increasing percentage of people say that economic growth should be given a priority. In some polls during the 1980s and 1990s, twice as many people said the environment was more important, but starting about 10 years ago, that gap narrowed and eventually reversed. Gallup also asked this question right after the 2010 Gulf of Mexico oil spill and registered a jump in the share of Americans favoring environmental protection, but that spike appears to have been temporary.Source: Gallup URL: http://www.gallup.com/poll/1615/Environment.aspxNotes:
Narrative: When pollsters ask people to weigh environmental protections against developing U.S. energy supplies, slightly more Americans now favor energy production. A decade ago, the situation was reversed. Note that all of these poll results were done in March, except in 2010, when another survey was conducted in May of that year. Environmental protection trumped energy concerns in that poll, probably because the Deepwater Horizon oil spill was in progress at the time. Source: Gallup URL: http://www.gallup.com/poll/1615/Environment.aspxNotes:
Narrative: About half of Americans think that the government is doing too little to protect the environment, but in 1992, the figure was almost 70 percent. Over the past few years, there’s been some increasing polarization on this question: the percentages of people saying the government is doing too little and doing too much has been increasing, while the share of Americans saying things are about right has been declining. Source: Gallup URL: http://www.gallup.com/poll/1615/Environment.aspxNotes:
Narrative: The previous slides showed results from national polls conducted by Gallup. In this graphic, we focus on five Rocky Mountain states. When residents of Colorado, Utah, Wyoming, Montana and New Mexico were asked in 2011 about balancing the environment and economy, the vast majority of respondents argued for maintaining environmental regulations. This poll from Colorado College generally found strong support for environmental protection, especially for public lands.Source: Conservation in the West: A Survey of the Attitudes of Voters in Five Western StatesURL:http://www2.coloradocollege.edu/stateoftherockies/Conservation_West_Survey/ConservationWestSurvey_02_20_11ev1.pdfNotes:
Narrative: In these five Western states, some of them quite conservative,nearly 50 percent of respondents feel that environmental laws are tough enough but should be better enforced. Only 10 percent of people surveyed thought that environmental laws need to be relaxed.Source: Conservation in the West: A Survey of the Attitudes of Voters in Five Western StatesURL: http://www2.coloradocollege.edu/stateoftherockies/Conservation_West_Survey/ConservationWestSurvey_02_20_11ev1.pdfNotes:
Narrative: Let’s focus on some specific environmental problems.
Narrative: Which environmental issues generate the most worry among Americans? This graphic shows that the level of concern for various problems has remained relatively constant over the past decade or so. Air and water pollution consistently rank at the top of the list, while extinction of species and global warming register less anxiety. Source: Gallup URL: http://www.gallup.com/poll/1615/Environment.aspxNotes:
Narrative: This graphic shows what percent of Americans say they worry a “great deal” about a specific environmental issue. Generally, the lines tend to move together, although there are exceptions, such as the jump in concern about the water supply registered between 2001 and 2002. It’s not clear why this happened. Compared to pollution, the issues of global warming and the extinction of plant and animal species tend to cause less anxiety among Americans.Source: Gallup URL: http://www.gallup.com/poll/1615/Environment.aspxNotes:
Narrative: Here’s another look at the data, from 2008, when Gallup asked respondents about all of these issues in the same poll. Pollution and contamination issues worried a majority of Americans a great deal, but some issues that the environmental movement concentrates on, such as global warming and the extinction of plant and animal species, registered less concern, while some issues that the environmental movement has shifted away from, such as the ozone layer and acid rain, still cause plenty of worry among some Americans.Source: Gallup URL: http://www.gallup.com/poll/1615/Environment.aspxNotes:
Narrative: According to Californians, air pollution is the most important environmental issue facing the state. Source: Public Policy Institute of CaliforniaStatewide Survey: California and the Environment (2011)URL: http://www.ppic.org/content/pubs/survey/S_711MBS.pdfNotes:
Narrative: A similar pattern exists in the West, where air and water quality concerns were the most frequently volunteered environmental problems. Source: Conservation in the West: A Survey of the Attitudes of Voters in Five Western StatesURL: http://www2.coloradocollege.edu/stateoftherockies/Conservation_West_Survey/ConservationWestSurvey_02_20_11ev1.pdfNotes:
Narrative: This survey of voters in five Western states—Colorado, Utah, New Mexico, Wyoming, and Montana—also revealed that non-pollution issues also rank high in the region. More than 80 percent of Westerners describe poorly planned growth and development and the loss of family farms and ranches as “serious” or “extremely serious” problems. As with the national surveys, global warming and climate change are seen as less troubling than other environmental issues, yet more than half of the Westerners surveyed still described these as serious or extremely serious problems. Source: Conservation in the West: A Survey of the Attitudes of Voters in Five Western StatesURL:http://www2.coloradocollege.edu/stateoftherockies/Conservation_West_Survey/ConservationWestSurvey_02_20_11ev1.pdfNotes:
Narrative: Now let’s take a closer look at climate change, an issue that looms large for the American West.
Narrative: Over the past two decades, Americans’ understandingof global warming has increased. In 1992, only about half the country said they understood a great deal or a fair amount about the issue, but by 2011, that number had risen to about 80 percent. Gallup only asked this question a couple times in the 1990s.Source: Gallup URL: http://www.gallup.com/poll/1615/Environment.aspxNotes:
Narrative: About half of Americans believe that global warming has already begun, but over the past five years, that percentage has declined by about 10 points. At the same time, the percentage of people who think global warming will never happen has increased from about 10 percent to nearly 20 percent. Source: Gallup URL: http://www.gallup.com/poll/1615/Environment.aspxNotes:
Narrative: A majority of Americans now believe that global warming is primarily due to human activities, but that gap has narrowed somewhat over the past decade. In 2010, almost as many people said it was due to natural causes.Source: Gallup URL: http://www.gallup.com/poll/1615/Environment.aspxNotes:
Narrative: While climate change has become a top-priority for many environmental groups, land managers, and government agencies, most Americans do not think that global warming will affect them or their way of life. Source: Gallup URL: http://www.gallup.com/poll/1615/Environment.aspxNotes:
Narrative: Today, about 40 percent of Americans think that the seriousness of global warming is exaggerated and that number has been growing over the past few years. Still, about 30 percent of people think that the seriousness of the problem is being downplayed and around a quarter say the media’s portrayal is generally correct.Source: Gallup URL: http://www.gallup.com/poll/1615/Environment.aspxNotes:
Narrative: Divisions in public opinion on climate change are particularly striking when the data is broken down by party identification. Since 1997, Republicans have grown increasingly likely to believe thatmedia coverage of global warming is exaggerated. The same trend exists for independents and, to a lesser extent, Democrats, but this question has not been asked since 2009. Source: Gallup, “Increased Number Think Global Warming is ‘Exaggerated’” (March 2009)URL:http://www.gallup.com/poll/116590/increased-number-think-global-warming-exaggerated.aspx#1Notes:
Narrative: Looking at the West, many residents also see the global warming threat as exaggerated, but about half of respondents believe that we should be taking action to mitigate the effects.Source: Conservation in the West: A Survey of the Attitudes of Voters in Five Western StatesURL: http://www2.coloradocollege.edu/stateoftherockies/Conservation_West_Survey/ConservationWestSurvey_02_20_11ev1.pdfNotes:
Narrative: There are still plenty of climate change skeptics, but a majority of respondents in the West support the US EPA requiring reductions in carbon emissions from sources like power plants, cars, and factories in an effort to reduce global warming. Evenin Wyoming, a state known for its coal resources, a majority of voters agreed with that policy. It’ll be interesting to see if these results hold up in future polls.Source: Conservation in the West: A Survey of the Attitudes of Voters in Five Western StatesURL: http://www2.coloradocollege.edu/stateoftherockies/Conservation_West_Survey/ConservationWestSurvey_02_20_11ev1.pdfNotes:
Narrative: What elements of climate change cause the most worry? At least in California, the threat of wildfires, increased air pollution, and more severe droughts top Californians’ concerns about the impacts of climate change. Source: Public Policy Institute of CaliforniaStatewide Survey: California and the Environment (2011)URL: http://www.ppic.org/content/pubs/survey/S_711MBS.pdfNotes:
Narrative: Now let’s move on to another important element of environmental politics: funding for conservation.
Narrative: Here are some of the key points.
Narrative: Our look at conservation funding begins with the federal budget. Much of the West is federal land, so the resources allocated to government agencies and their spending priorities can have major impacts on the region’s residents and natural resources.
Narrative: First, let’s examine the overall federal budget. As with public opinion, the environment ranks near the bottom when it comes to federal spending priorities. This pie chart shows where your federal tax dollars are spent, using data from 2011. More than half the budget is consumed by Social Security, Defense, and Medicare. Environmental protection and natural resources receive about 1 percent of the federal budget. There are a few other environmental programs in the other slices, such as clean energy development and conservation of farmland, but their share of the pie is also tiny.Source: Third WayURL: http://www.thirdway.org/taxreceiptNotes:
Narrative: This chart shows the top federal programs related to the environment. You can see that the big federal agencies, such as the EPA, Army Corps of Engineers, and Forest Service account for the vast majority of federal spending. Energy-related programs also rank high.Source: Third WayURL: http://www.thirdway.org/taxreceiptNotes:
Narrative:Let’s take a closer look at some of those agencies. The EPA saw its budget jump in 2010 thanks to the federal stimulus package. The EPA breaks down its spending according to five categories and the allocation has remained relatively steady over the past decade, with water-related programs accounting for the biggest chunk.Source: EPAURL: http://www.epa.gov/planandbudget/budget.htmlNotes:
Narrative: Here’s how the Forest Service spent its money over the past 10 years. The blue bar is for wildland fire management, but sometimes bad fire years have forced the agency to rely on supplemental and emergency appropriations from Congress. Aside from fires, the next biggest category of spending is for running the national forest system, shown in green.Source:US Forest ServiceURL: http://www.fs.fed.us/aboutus/budget/
Narrative: The Department of Interior, home to a number of key environmental agencies, has also had a relatively constant budget over the past decade, aside from a jump in 2009. Source: Department of InteriorURL: http://www.doi.gov/budget/ http://www.doi.gov/budget/budget_general/bgindex.html
Narrative: Here are the budget trends for some of those Interior Department agencies. All of them experienced a temporary spike in funding in 2009.Source: Department of InteriorURL: http://www.doi.gov/budget/ http://www.doi.gov/budget/budget_general/bgindex.htmlNotes: Figures are for “actual” budgets reported by Interior, except 2003, which is for “enacted” (DOI does not provide “actual” figures for that year)
Narrative: Let’s take a closer look at the National Park Service’s spending priorities. The great majority of the agency’s funding is devoted to the day-to-day operation of national parks, monuments, recreation areas, and historic sites. Over the past decade, construction has accounted for the second biggest share of spending.Source: National Park ServiceURL: http://home.nps.gov/applications/budget2/documents/NPS_10-YearBudgetHistory.pdf http://home.nps.gov/applications/budget2/tables.htm
Narrative: Like other environmental agencies, the BLM has seen its budget remain fairly constant over the past decade, except for 2009. The vast majority of its spending is focused on management of the vast federal domain in the West.Source: Bureau of Land ManagementURL: http://www.blm.gov/wo/st/en/prog/more/division_of_budget.htmlNotes: Figures are for “actual” budgets reported by Interior, except 2003, which is for “enacted” (DOI does not provide “actual” figures for that year). Reduction of $14 million in permanent operating fund in 2009 excluded.
Narrative: The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service spends about half of its budget on resource management, which includes national wildlife refuges and endangered species. The agency also spends money on sport fishing, migratory birds, and aid for wildlife programs managed by states and tribes.Source: Fish and Wildlife ServiceURL: http://www.fws.gov/budget/Notes: Other category is a negative total in 2012 due to a credit.
Narrative: The Land and Water Conservation Fund (LWCF) is another major source of federal funding for Western conservation, but over the past few decades Congress has diverted more than half of the fund—$17 billion—to non-conservation purposes. Initially, the LWCF was funded through sales of surplus federal real property, motorboat fuel taxes, and fees for recreation use of federal lands. But today, most LWCF funding comes from the royalties that energy companies pay when they drill offshore on the Outer Continental Shelf (OCS). This graph shows that about $900 million is deposited into the LWCF every year, but money that isn’t appropriated by Congress remains in the U.S. Treasury and can be spent on other federal programs. Since 1980, Congress has diverted as much as 85 percent of the LWCF. Source: Department of InteriorURL: http://www.doi.gov/budget/budget_general/bgindex.htmlNotes:
Narrative: Let’s take a look at another important source for conservation funding: open space bonds and other ballot measures that are put to voters in state and local elections.
Narrative: Since 1988, American voters have approved nearly 1,800 ballot measures that have generated more than $57 billion for conservation. Funding peaked in 2008 when some $8 billion was approved. The average funding per conservation measure approved has varied considerably from year to year.Source: Trust for Public LandURL: https://www.quickbase.com/db/bbqna2qct?a=dbpage&pageID=10Notes:
Narrative: Conservation measures generally do well at the polls, in part because backers tend to avoid placing them on ballots when the chances of passage are low, such as during a recession. The green line in this graphic shows the percentage of conservation-related ballot measures that passed each year. On average 74 percent are approved, but in some years the rate has approached 90 percent. The number of measures tends to be lower in off-year elections and peaked in 2004. In recent years, with the economy in the doldrums, fewer measures have been placed on ballots.Source: Trust for Public LandURL: https://www.quickbase.com/db/bbqna2qct?a=dbpage&pageID=10Notes:
Narrative: Finally, let’s turn to environmental philanthropy. Foundations and other donors are critical sources of funding for conservation groups, but there is only limited data available on spending patterns in the philanthropic sector.
Narrative: Our best source of information comes from the Environmental Grantmakers Association. EGA has conducted two studies in recent years of the funding priorities of its members, which include the major foundations. However, only some of this data is available to the public. This graphic shows the breakdown in funding by issue area for 2007. Source: Environmental Grantmakers AssociationURL: http://ega.org/sites/default/files/pubs/summaries/Executive%20Summary%20TTF%20v3%20small.pdfNotes:
Narrative: Here’s the same data for 2009. Climate and energy issues jumped to the top of funding priorities.Source: Environmental Grantmakers AssociationURL: http://ega.org/sites/default/files/pubs/summaries/Executive%20Summary%20TTF%20v3%20small.pdfNotes:
Narrative: You can see that even more clearly by looking at the change in funding from 2007 to 2009. There was a big shift from terrestrial, coastal, marine and biodiversity issues to climate and energy.Source: Environmental Grantmakers AssociationURL: http://ega.org/sites/default/files/pubs/summaries/Executive%20Summary%20TTF%20v3%20small.pdfNotes:
Narrative: The previous slide showed the change in absolute dollars from 2007 to 2009. Here we see the percentage change. Some of the biggest percentage declines were in population and environmental justice; the greatest percentage increases were for international trade and finance, energy, and climate. You can see that funding priorities change a lot from year to year, unlike federal budgets, which tend to be fairly steady over time. Source: Environmental Grantmakers AssociationURL: http://ega.org/sites/default/files/pubs/summaries/Executive%20Summary%20TTF%20v3%20small.pdfNotes:
Narrative: Here are some of the key points on public opinion.