Innovation Clusters: Understanding Life Cycles
•
1 gefällt mir•537 views
Visit the content hub for further insights: destinationinnovation.economist.com This is an EIU programme, Sponsored by Dubai Tourism.
Empfohlen
Weitere ähnliche Inhalte
Was ist angesagt?
Was ist angesagt? (20)
Andere mochten auch
Andere mochten auch (11)
Ähnlich wie Innovation Clusters: Understanding Life Cycles
Ähnlich wie Innovation Clusters: Understanding Life Cycles (20)
Mehr von The Economist Media Businesses
Mehr von The Economist Media Businesses (20)
Kürzlich hochgeladen
Kürzlich hochgeladen (20)
Innovation Clusters: Understanding Life Cycles
- 1. Attractive Cost Structure Liveabillity The BIG 6 Success Factors BRIEFING PAPER Connective In- frastructure Serendipity Skilled Workforce Regulatory Framework Society Policy Research Geography Education Sharing Collaboration Set-up & Operating Costs Cosmopolitan Communities Public Amen- ities Education Global Work- force Social Infrastructure Access to Growth Markets Commercial Infrastructure 6 Innovation Clusters: Understanding Life Cycles A BRIEFING PAPER FROM THE ECONOMIST INTELLIGENCE UNIT
- 3. Innovationclusters:Understandinglifecycles Innovationclustersarelikethecompaniestheyhost:theycangrowrapidlyatinception,peak,and eventually–iftheydonotadapt–theystagnateordie.Therearethousandsofclustersaroundthe world,butmanystruggletoachievesustainabilityorscalability.Sometimes,theveryfactorsthatmade them successful,causethem tofaillateron. WWhatallowsclusterstocombinetheinnovativespiritofstart-upswiththeresilienceofestablished conglomerates,toextendtheirlifecycle?Throughcasestudyevidenceacrossfivecountries,andan expertinterviewprogram,theEconomistIntelligenceUnitexplores‘clusterlifecycles’inSilicon Roundabout(UK),Bangalore(India),Boulder(UnitedStates),Singapore,andEstoniaanddrawsoutkey lessonsfrom theirexperiences. Part1:InnovationClusters:Whycompaniesarebettertogether Part2:London’snextincarnation PPart3:Singapore:Builtfrom scratch Part4:PluckyEstonia:EasternEurope’sstartup Part5:Atalentmagnet:TheBeautyofBoulder Part6:T-Ecosystem:Bangalore’sgrowingpains Part7:Conclusion:Innovationclusters:TheSuccessRecipe ©TheEconomistIntelligenceUnitLimited2016 InnovationClusters:UnderstandingLifeCycles3
- 4. Part1: InnovationClusters:Whycompanies arebettertogether WRITTENBYTHEECONOMISTINTELLIGENCEUNIT BRIEFINGPAPER Innovationclustersrequiresixkeyingredients:skills,accommodating policyframework,infrastructure,lowcoststructures(inearlystages),a goodlifestyleofferingandserendipity. Clustersarelikethecompaniestheyhost:theychangeovertime,andtheir longterm successdependsonhowwelltheyadapttothechallengesof success,likecongestionandincreasedrents CClustersarestronglyreliantonanopenimmigrationpolicyatthenational level–tighteningbordersreducesacluster’saccesstoglobaltalent Innovationisoftenassociatedwithtriumphantloneinventors.ThelikesofThomas Edison,Louis PasteurorBillGatesarethecentralcharactersinthisnarrative.Butall innovatorsspringoutofa specificcontext.Theenvironmentsthatfostertheir individualandcollectivesuccessareveryoften ‘innovationclusters’:ecosystemsthat stimulateandnurturethebestideasandattractthebrightest talents. CClustersemergewhenanetworkofcompaniescoexistswithinageographic location,allowingeachof them tocollaborate–andcompete–inawaywhich deliversgreaterproductivitygainsthanthey wouldachieveinisolation.SiliconValley isthemostfamous,buttherearecountlessothersacross everycontinent. CClustersattractinnovativepeople.Theynetwork,leadingtothecrosspollinationof ideas.Companies benefitfrom eachother’ssuccess:Whatoneinvents,rivalscan access–thinkofa productivityboostingtoollikeDropbox.Andwhatonefirm invents,otherscanbuildon.Thinkofthe ‘sharingeconomy’,ledbytrailblazersUber andAirbnb,inturngivingrisetoanarmyofstartupstaking thesameideatonew applications.Thesharingofknowledge,thespillovereffectsofinnovationand the networkingthatdenselypopulatedspacesenableareallkeyingredientsforstartup success. ©TheEconomistIntelligenceUnitLimited2016 InnovationClusters:UnderstandingLifeCycles4
- 6. Part2: London’snextincarnation WRITTENBYTHEECONOMISTINTELLIGENCEUNIT BRIEFINGPAPER LondonisaglobalmetropolisthatreinventeditselfwithSilicon Roundabout’.Butrisingrents arepushingthenextgenerationofstart-ups out. Londonisafinancialpowerhouse,acentralnodeininternationalfinancialmarkets.Butover thelast decade,thecityshoweditspowersofreinventionbyhosting‘SiliconRoundabout’,a digitaltechcluster thanbroughttheworldnewgadgetsandappslikeTweetdeckandLivefm. SSiliconRoundaboutislocatedbetween‘theCity’,thefinancialheartlandofLondon,and Hackney,one ofthepoorestareasofLondon.Initsearlystages,itbenefittedfrom several favourableconditions. TheareaisaccessibletocentralLondonviapublictransport,allowing companiestotravelaroundthe cityeasily.Rentswerelow,andmanyentrepreneursfrom Hackneycouldaccesstheareaviabicycle. Therewerealreadyartists,mediaprofessionals andtechnologyentrepreneursinthearea.Many specialisedinfinancialservices,andhad linkageswiththeUK’snationalbroadcaster,theBBC.This fluidexchangeofknowledgeand ideasbetweentechnology,financeandmediacommunitieswas ststimulatedbytheUK’sopen immigrationpolicyinthelate-2000s. TheareaattractedalargecommunityofAmericanswhostudiedatLondonuniversitiesand started workinginthecitythereafter.OtherscamedirectlytoSiliconRoundaboutfrom San Franciscoand SiliconValley.Thesefactorscametogethertocreateaknowledge-sharing ecosystem.Successsoon followed.Live.fm andTweetDeckwereearlystart-ups,boughtby CBSfor$280millionin2007and Twitterfor$40millionin2011,respectively. However,asSiliconRoundabout’sstarascended,twofactorsthathelpedtodrivesuccess– lowrent andtheUK’sopenimmigrationpolicies–bothchanged.Rentsdoubledin5years, pushingsmaller firmsandstart-upsout.Developersacquiredproperties,andenforcedlarger securitydepositsand morestringentcreditchecksthatpreventedentryforsmallerfirms. Theygraduallymovedonandout, tootherareasofLondonlikeWhitechapelandAldgate. TThesecondshiftwasthetighteningofimmigrationpolicy:non-EUworkervisasarenow cappedat 21,700andrecentnon-EUgraduatesofUKuniversitiesarerequiredtofindajob within3monthsof graduating,sponsoredbytheiremployer(atacostof£1,476),earninga minimum of£20,800.Some firmscanabsorbthesecosts.Others,especiallyfragileand cash-poorstart-ups,cannot. ©TheEconomistIntelligenceUnitLimited2016 InnovationClusters:UnderstandingLifeCycles6
- 8. Part3: Singapore:Builtfrom scratch WRITTENBYTHEECONOMISTINTELLIGENCEUNIT BRIEFINGPAPER Singaporetransformeditselffrom anagrariansocietytoaninnovation world-leaderinhightechsectorslikeelectronicsandlifesciences.High qualityeducation,publicinvestmentandfar-reachingbusinessclimate reformswerecriticalengines.Butisthecitystatenowgettingtoo crowded? WhenSingaporebecameindependentin1965,itwasatropicalislandwithfewnatural resources,little freshwater,rapidpopulationgrowthanddomesticethnicandreligious conflict.Italsofacedhostilities inthebroaderregion:hardlyanauspiciousstartforanew country. Sincethen,Singaporehasfocusedwithlaser-likeprecisiononbecomingaseconomically powerfulas possible,asfastaspossible.Singaporeestablisheditselffirstasacentrefor low-costmanufacturing andlateronelectronicsand,morerecently,lifesciences.Its innovationcredentialshavestrengthened sincetheearly2000s,anditisnowaworld- leadingcentreinareassuchasbiotechnology. IItsperformanceislargelydowntothreefactors:talent,supportivegovernmentpolicy,and direct publicinvestment.Thefirstistheresultofasustainedpubliccommitmentto education.From avery lowbase,Singaporenowranksconsistentlyatornearthetopof mostmajorworldeducationranking systemsoverthelastdecadeaccordingtotheOECD. TThestrategystartedwiththe‘building’stageof1959-1978,whichsawtherapidconstruction of schools,massteacherrecruitmentandunificationofasingleSingaporeaneducation system which wasfollowedin1979to1996byimprovingeducationqualitythroughtoits finalphase,from 1997to thepresentday,whichwasfocussedonrefinement. DDuetoitssmallpopulation,Singaporealsolookedtoattractstudentsfrom nearbycountries through theASEANscholarship,whichcoversfeesandtuitionforqualifiedstudents,andthe TuitionGrant Scheme(TGS)forinternationalstudents,whichcoversuptotensemestersof tertiaryeducation.Both schemesrequirethatgraduatesremaininSingaporeforupto6 yearsandfor3years,respectively. Suchtactics,aswellasaliberalimmigrationpolicy,have aidedglobalinflowsofhighlyskilledlabour, leadingtotechnologyandskillstransferbetween largemultinationalsanddomesticcompanies. ©TheEconomistIntelligenceUnitLimited2016 InnovationClusters:UnderstandingLifeCycles8
- 9. Supportivegovernmentpolicyalsoplayedarole–througheffortstocreateanefficientand easy businessenvironment,anddirectinvestments.Astheeconomyshiftedtoknowledge- basedsectors andtheskillsbaseimproved,thegovernmentsoughttoattractmultinational companiesbyoffering taxincentives,eliminatingpoliticalcorruption,andbolsteringIP protection. AAlongwitheaseofbusinessreforms,therearealsograntstoencouragebusinessformation and start-ups,suchastheACEStart-upGrant,dedicatedtonewlyformed,localmajority- owned companiesdevelopingadifferentiatedbusinessconcept.Thegovernmenthasbeen adirectactive investorinbroaderinnovationinfrastructurestoo,spendingaround$6billion between2000and 2005inbiomedicalsciencesincludingtheformationofBiopolis,a biomedicalresearchand developmenthub.ThisisperhapsSingapore’smostpromising cluster. SSingaporebeganlookingtobiotechnologyinthe2000stodiversifyitseconomicbase,and utiliseda combinationoftaxholidaysandincentives–suchaspayingupto30%ofbuilding costsofcompanies undertakingbasicdrugresearchanddevelopment.Itsabilitytoattract stem cellinvestmentwasalso helpedbyareductioninfundingintheUSduetoethical objectionsfrom theBushadministration. Singaporeisalegallymoreliberalresearch environment,allowinganumberofresearchpractices, suchasuseoftheearlystagehuman embryosfortherapeuticresearch,whichisbannedinother countries.Asaresult,top biotechnologyexpertsfrom leadingestablishmentssuchasthe MaMassachusettsInstitutesof Technology,theNationalCancerInstituteinMarylandandtheUniversity ofCaliforniahave cometoSingaporeoverthelastdecade,citinggreaterfunding,moreorganisational freedom,amoreliberalresearchpolicy,andagreaterappreciationofthebenefitsoflong term R&D. ©TheEconomistIntelligenceUnitLimited2016 InnovationClusters:UnderstandingLifeCycles9
- 11. Part4: PluckyEstonia:EasternEurope’s startup WRITTENBYTHEECONOMISTINTELLIGENCEUNIT BRIEFINGPAPER Estonia’stechsectoristheproductofauniquehistory,includingan engineering-focusededucationsystem intheUSSRera Governmenthasactivelyrolledoutdigitaltechnologiesinavarietyofcitizen services,boostingthedigitalskillslevelsofthecountry’scivilians.TheEstonian governmenthasalsoinvestedinR&D,triplingR&Dspending,from 0.6%ofGDP in2000to1.7%in2013 EEstoniahasturnedchallengesintoopportunities.Thecountry’shighICT penetrationrateleftitexposedtocyber-crime,leadingentrepreneurstoexplore newwaysofboostingsecurity.SkypeandKazaawereamongtheresulting innovations. From modestbeginnings,thissmallEastEuropeaneconomyhasturned challengesintoopportunities,evenleveragingcyberthreatstogrowits telecomsindustry.Despitebeingasmallcountryofjust1.3millionpeople, Estoniahasproducedoneofthemostdramatictechdisruptersofthe modernera:Skype.Highqualityskillsandadigital-savvypopulationput thisoncebarreneconomyonthetechnologymap. Keytakeaways– WhenEstoniagainedindependencefrom theSovietUnionin1991,itwasasmallcountrywithlittle infrastructure.YetoneofthebenefitsofitsSovietpastwasegalitarianaccesstohighereducationas wellasEstonia’sstrategicimportancetotheUSSRduringtheColdWar,whichcreatedanative populationwithhighlevelsofeducationinfieldsrelevanttoemergingtechnologysectors. ©TheEconomistIntelligenceUnitLimited2016 InnovationClusters:UnderstandingLifeCycles11
- 12. Soviet-eraeducationfocusedheavilyonscience,engineeringandmathematics.Thepost-1991 governmentalsoinvestedheavilyintheknowledgeecosystem.In2015,30.7%of55-64yearoldswere educatedtotertiarydegreelevel,thehighestinEuropeandthesixthhighestintheOECD.The EstoniangovernmentalmosttripledR&Dspending,from 0.6%ofGDPin2000to1.7%in2013,andin 2011and2012EstoniaspentabovetheEUaveragebeforeloweringspendingin2013. TheEstoniangovernmentdidnotjustdevelopskills–italsoinvestedindigitaltechnologyforpublic services,creatingapopulationof‘digitalnatives’.Whenitgainedindependence,roughlyhalfofthe populationhadaccesstoalandlinephone,butbyMay2013,4Gservicesencompassedover95per centofthecountry.By1997,97%ofschoolshadinternetaccessand,beginningin2001,publicwifi becamemoreorlessubiquitous.1 EEUmembershiphasalsohelpedaidingEstoniatoshiftfrom alow-wage,lowvaluedaddedeconomy thatfocusedonmanufacturingandagriculturalexportstotheUSSRtoaservicesectororiented economythatexportshighvalueaddedtechnologyglobally.264%ofEstoniansnowworkinthe servicesectorcomparedto20%inmanufacturingand4%inagriculture,andstandardsoflivinghave increaseddramatically:GDPpercapitaincreasedfrom 55%oftheEUaveragein2004to73%in2014 (theearliestyearsforwhichEurostatprovidescomparabledata).3 1.TheEuropeanBankforReconstructionandDevelopment,“TransitionReport2014:Chapter5,PoliciesSupportingInnovation“ 2.In1997,theearliestyearforwhichtheOECDprovidesdata,unitlabourcostswere40%ofthe2010levelandincreasedbyroughly5.87%annuallyfrom1997to2012 3.Eurostat,“GDPpercapitainPP“ ©TheEconomistIntelligenceUnitLimited2016 InnovationClusters:UnderstandingLifeCycles12
- 13. EUmembershipalsobroughtaccesstoEUstructuralfundsandtheSingleMarket.Therelativelysmall sizeoftheEstonianeconomyalongwithdomesticpoliticaloppositiontothegovernmentrunninga budgetdeficit,canmakeitdifficultforthegovernmenttoinvestinlargescaleprojectslikeroadsand hospitals.During2007–2013,EUStructuralFundsprovided3.4billioneuroforR&Dandhospital investments,theformertosupporttheEstonianICTsectorandthelattertofosterinnovationsto Estonia’spressingdemographicproblems.4 SSingleMarketaccessincreasedgainsfrom tradeandtechnologyandknowledgetransfer.Because Estoniahasarelativelysmalldomesticmarket,manyofitsfirmshavetolooktoexpandexternallyas soonaspossible,andhaveintheprocessincreasedregionaltradedramatically.EightofEstonia’stop tentradingpartnersareEUmembersandin2013,betweenthetopfiveEuropeanUniontrading partners,bilateraltradeequalled7.78billioneuroinimportsand7.365inexportscomparedto1995 whentradeequalled1.495billioninimportsand1.141billioninexports.5Historicallinkageswith ScandinavianandNordiccountriesalsomeanthatmanyEstoniansspeakEnglish.55%ofEstonians spspeakEnglishforwork,doubletheEUaverage,and67%havelearnedaforeignlanguageforwork,6% higherthantheEUaverage.6 EUmembership,however,hasexacerbatedproblemsassociatedwithEstonia’sdecliningandageing population.WithhalfofEstoniansfluentinEnglish,emigrationfrom Estoniaincreasedbyroughly50% in2005,theyearafteritsascensiontotheEU.Thiswasespeciallythecaseamongtheyoung,33%of whom speakEnglishasasecondlanguage, andwhofacedanaverageunemploymentrateof14.3%from 2001to2014and17.1%from 2009to 2014.7 Althoughanageingpopulationandyouthemigrationhasplacedagreaterstrainonpublicserviceslike healthcareandpensions,innovationshavealsoemerged.In2011,twoEstonianslivinginLondon,UK, oneofwhom wasoriginallyaSkypeemployee,werefrustratedwithhavingtopayhighfeestotransfer moneybetweenthetwocountriesandsoestablishedanowgloballyrecognizedmoneytransfer service,TransferWise,inordertosendremittanceshomefrom abroad. 5.TheGovernmentofEstonia,“Estonianeconomyinnumbers“ 6.TheEuropeanCommission,“Europeansandtheirlanguages”July2012. 4.KPMG,“EUFundsinCentralandEasternEurope“ 7.LanguageKnowledgeintheEuropeanUnion,“Estonia”accessed27November2015 ©TheEconomistIntelligenceUnitLimited2016 InnovationClusters:UnderstandingLifeCycles13
- 14. InanattempttobringEstonianentrepreneursbackhome,thegovernmentisattemptingto increase repatriationandimmigration,fostering‘braincirculation’ratherthan‘braindrain’.It hasimplemented twokeyprograms:theIntegrationandMigrationFoundationande-Residency.TheFoundation providesfinancialsupportforethnicEstonianswhohave emigratedinthepasttenyearsandwishto repatriate.Overthecourseof2000–2012,it hassupportedthereturnofover1100people.8The e-Residencyprogram hasbeenmore successful.Withtheaim ofcompetingforinternationalbusiness withotherEUlocationslike Dublin,Ireland,maintainlinkageswithEstonia’srelativelylargediaspora, anandtoincreasethe likelihoodthatbusinessownerswillmovetoEstonia,theprogram makesopening and runningabusinesseasy.IndividualsareallowedtoestablishonlinefirmsinEstonia,sign contracts remotely,andpaytaxeswhilerunningtheirbusinessremotely.9Sinceitslaunchin December2014, 7000peoplefrom 119countrieshaveapplied,and6600havebeen grantede-residency.10 Estoniastandsoutasanexcellentexampleofhowgovernmentinvestmentinthebroaderinnovation ecosystem –spanningeducation,digitalservicedelivery,R&Dspending,globalmarketingand fosteringstrategictradepartnerships–cancatalyseclusters.Italsohelpsthat,accordingtoDoris Põld,theEstonianICTCluster’sClusterProjectManager,atradebodyforEstonianICTfirms,‘the governmentarethetruebelievers.TheyalwaysspeakaboutEstoniaandtheICTsectorwhentheygo onofficialvisits.Theyarethebestmarketingpeople.’ 8.TheIntegrationandMigrationFoundation,“Migrationstatistics” 9.e-Estonia,“Estoniane-Residency” 10.GovernmentoftheRepublicofEstonia,“Estoniane-ResidencyStatistics“ ©TheEconomistIntelligenceUnitLimited2016 InnovationClusters:UnderstandingLifeCycles14
- 15. Part5: Atalentmagnet:TheBeautyof Boulder WRITTENBYTHEECONOMISTINTELLIGENCEUNIT BRIEFINGPAPER Boulder,inColorado,hasoneofthehighestinnovationratesintheUSas measuredby patentapplications.Itsqualityoflifehasbeenessentialto attractingAmerica’sbestand brightest. Smartpeoplearenotjustinterestedinwork:theyalsocareabouttheirsurroundings,the qualityof schoolsandhospitals,leisureandentertainmentandallmanneroflifestylefactors. Young,talented, professionalworkerscanrelocatemoreeasilythanthosewithlarger familiesandmore responsibilities.Therearehigh‘opportunitycosts’oflocation,sothey havedemandedvibrant neighbourhoodsthatofferattractiveamenities,suchasaccessto culturalresourcesandhigh-ranking publicschools. WWithoutsuchingredients,clusterscanfailbeforetheyevenbegin.InHongKong,the governmentbuilt ‘Cyberport’,alargecampuswhereentrepreneurscouldrentcheapoffice spaceandcollaborate.The clusterfailedduetoitsdistancefrom thecitycentre,where peoplewantedtoliveandwork.In contrast,thetownofBoulderinColoradohasattracted talentfrom aroundtheUSthankstoits desirabilityasaplacetolive. BBoulderisatownofaround100,000peoplethatpunchesaboveitsweightasaninnovation hub.It hasthemosthighlyeducatedpopulationofanyAmericancity.From 2009to2013, therewere10 patentsper1,000residents,thefifthhighestintheUS,afterSanJose, California,andaboveSan Francisco.ItishometoclustersofaerospacecompanieslikeBall AerospaceandTechnologies Corporation,oneofthetop100defencecontractorsinthe world,andbiosciencescompanieslike Covidien. ©TheEconomistIntelligenceUnitLimited2016 InnovationClusters:UnderstandingLifeCycles15
- 20. US-basedtechnologyfirmsbeganoffshoringtoBangalore,incentivisinglocalSMEstospecialisein serviceslikecoding.Initially,thisoftenmeantimportingIndianprogrammerstotheUStoprovide maintenance.However,in1993,theUSmadeitmoredifficulttoobtainnon-immigrantvisas.Thisled USfirmstooutsourceworkbacktoBangalore.Indianfirmsquicklyadaptedtotherequirementsof USfirms,forexamplepunctualdeliveryandproductquality.SomeIndianfirmsdevelopedreputations asreliablesuppliersintheUSmarket,suchasInfosys.Overtime,theUS-Indiarelationshipevolvedyet fufurther.OnceUSfirmssawthequalityoftoptierIndiancompanies,theybegantooutsourceinternal R&Dtasks. However,Bangalorenowfacesitsownproblems.Itsabilitytoclimbthevaluechainhasbeeninhibited byIndia’sloosestanceonintellectualpropertyprotection–foreignfirmsareincreasinglyreluctantto outsourceR&D.ManyofBangalore’scompaniesstillprovidestandardisedservicesand,becausethere arenowsomanyfirms,multinationalshavelittleincentivetocreatealong-term relationshipwithany singlesupplier. Themushroomingofcompanieshasledtoaproblem of‘over-competition’.Asoftoday,thetop20 Indiansoftwareexportersaccountforover50%oftotalexports,leavingover800firmswiththerest ofthemarket.Competitionisfierceamongthebottom 800,leadingtoalackofcollaboration. Becausecompetitionissoaggressive,firmsinstilintheiremployeesacultureof“getitrightthefirst time.”Thismeanslowlevelsofexperimentationandrisk-taking.Asaresult,Bangaloreisfindingit difficulttoclimbthevaluechain. BBangalore’ssuccesshasalsocreatedcostinflationduetorisingwages,andcongestionhasincreased. InfrastructureprojectshavebeendifficulttoimplementrelativetoChina,oneofIndia’smainglobal competitors.EvenBangalore’snewairport,builtin2008,cannotrelievethetrafficthatmakesthetwo maintechnologyparksinaccessibleduringtheday,accordingtoCristinaChaminade,professorof innovationstudiesatLundUniversity.Takentogether,costincreases,lowR&Doutsourcingand congestionallshowtheneedforBangaloretoevolveifitwantstostayahead. ©TheEconomistIntelligenceUnitLimited2016 InnovationClusters:UnderstandingLifeCycles20
- 22. Moreimportantly,governmentsmustcarefullyweightheimpactofotherpolicychanges, suchas migrationcapsorvisarestrictions,ontheirnationalclusters’accesstotalent.The bestpractice principleisforgovernmenttoinvestinthefundamentalsandcontinuously evolvethenatureofits interventionbasedontheneedsofthegrowingcluster,andleavethe specificsoftheinnovation clusterprocesstothecompaniesandinnovatorsthemselves. Theinfrastructureimperative OOneofthekeycharacteristicsofsuccessfulclustersisthenetworkingthattheyenableas firms collaborate,andskilledpeopleintermingletoshareideas.Firmsneedtocollaborate withoneanother andworkersneedfreedom tomove,formeetingsuppliers,clients, financiersandsoon.Thisrequires efficientinfrastructuresthatcanallowworkerstomove aroundquicklyandcheaply.Expensivepublic transport,orgrowingcongestionsuchas facedbyBangalore,bothreducetheefficiencyofclusters whereitmattersmost:the interminglingofpeopleandideas.Itisworthlookingtohistoryforproof: accaccordingtothe economistJosephSchumpeter,muchoftheinnovationthatemergedduringthe earlyhigh growthyearsoftheUScameaboutasadirectresultoftheburgeoningrailroadsystem. Chanceandgoodfortune Sadlyforplanners,chanceandgoodfortuneplayaroleindeterminingthesuccessof clusters.By chance,werefertoallofthosedynamicswhichcouldnothavebeenbrought aboutwithforesightor purpose,butwhich–havingexisted–cametocatalyseinnovation. Historicalcircumstanceisoneexample.Estonia’s pastrelationshiptotheUSSRhadtwo impactsonits latertechnologicalsuccess:highlevelsofeducation,especiallyinmathsand engineering,duetoan egalitarianeducationsystem intheUSSRera,andacybersecurity threatinmorerecentyearsthat impelledinnovation.Boulderbuiltonthedecisionoflarge technologycompaniestolocatethereinthe distantpastthatsetupaprocessoftalent circulationleadingtospinoffswhobecameinnovators morerecently. GGeographyisalsoa‘goodfortune’factor,especiallyinpositioningaclusterclosetokey markets.Costa Ricaisagoodexampleofacountrywhoselifesciencesclusterhas benefitedfrom itsproximitytoUS markets. BButcrucially,chanceandgoodfortunedoesnotmeanthereisnoroleforhumandecisions. Companiesandgovernmentsmustconsciouslyrecognisethebenefitsthatsuch happenstance occurrencesprovide,andbuildonthem.Thereareplentyofcountriesthat wereformerlypartofthe USSR,andarestillcloselylocatedtoRussia,thatdidnotbuildon thatasEstoniahas.Similarly,there aremanycountriesinCentralAmericawithproximityto theUS,butwhohavenotcarvedoutalife sciencesclustersuchasCostaRica. Lowcoststructure LLowoperatingcosts,especiallyrentsoncommercialproperty,havebeenessentialdriversof cluster successintheearlystartupphases.Thisappliestorentalofofficespacebutalso theresidentialneeds oftheworkers.Otherlowcostscanalsohelp,suchastaxbreakson innovationrelatedactivities. ©TheEconomistIntelligenceUnitLimited2016 InnovationClusters:UnderstandingLifeCycles22
- 24. Whileeveryefforthasbeentakentoverifytheaccuracyofthisinformation,TheEconomist IntelligenceUnitLtd.cannotacceptanyresponsibilityorliabilityforreliancebyanypersononthis reportoranyoftheinformation,opinionsorconclusionssetoutinthisreport. EconomistIntelligenceUnit TTheEconomistIntelligenceUnit(EIU)istheworld’sleadingresourceforeconomicandbusiness research,forecasting,andanalysis.Itprovidesaccurateandimpartialintelligencetocompanies, governmentagencies,financialinstitutionsandacademicorganizationsaroundtheglobe,inspiring businessleaderstoactwithconfidencesince1946. Copyright ©©2016TheEconomistIntelligenceUnitLimited.Allrightsreserved.Neitherthispublicationnorany partofitmaybereproduced,storedinaretrievalsystem,ortransmittedinanyform orbyany means,electronic,mechanical,photocopying,recordingorotherwise,withoutpriorpermissionofthe EconomistGroup.Whilsteveryefforthasbeentakentoverifytheaccuracyofinformationpresented inthisdocument,neitherTheEconomistGroupnoritsaffliatescanacceptanyresponsibilityorliability forreliancebyanypersononthisinformation. LONDON 2020CabotSquareLondon E144QW UnitedKingdom Tel:(44.20)75768000Fax:(44.20)75768500E-mail:london@eiu.com NEW YORK 750ThirdAvenue5thFloor New York,NY10017,USTel:(1.212)5540600Fax:(1.212)5860248 EE-mail:newyork@eiu.com HONGKONG 6001,CentralPlaza 18HarbourRoad Wanchai HongKong Tel:(852)25853888 FFax:(852)28027638 E-mail:hongkong@eiu.com GENEVA Ruedel’Athenee321206GenevaSwitzerlandTel:(41)225662470 Fax:(41)223469347 E-mail:geneva@eiu.com ©TheEconomistIntelligenceUnitLimited2016 InnovationClusters:UnderstandingLifeCycles24