1. Implementing a PLE in a secondary
school context by using free Web2.0
tools
Technology, Police, and Management Faculty
TU Delft
April 2012
Challenge the future 1

2. PLE approaches to learning
Ebrahim Rahimi, Jan Van Den Berg, Wim Veen, PLE 2011, Southampton
Challenge the future 2

3. Key Challenge for formal education
How should a PLE-based learning environment be
designed and integrated into educational settings to meet
the heterogeneous Learning demands of students?
Challenge the future 3

4. About our Research
Challenge the future 4

5. Research Context:
Participants: 29 students (12-13 years old)
Course name: People and Geography
Technological infrastructure: All students have their own laptop during school
time and they have (almost) full access to Internet during project period
Teacher: an adopter of web technologies
Project title : Research, design and develop a digital travelling guide for Egypt
Project duration: 6 Weeks
Educational objectives : For students:
-To being familiar with travelling guide concept,
-To Know important geographical and societal aspects of Egypt
-To learn how use web tools to manage information and group working
-To practice skills like mind mapping, story telling, and brain storming
Challenge the future 5

6. Introduced tools and learning techniques
Tools Learning
Tool Purpose techniques
iGoogle Personal Start Page Group brain storming
Mind Mapping
MindMeister Mind mapping
Group Story telling
Google Docs Document creating and sharing
Google Sites Project wiki, students websites
WordPress and Blogger Blogging
Twitter Micro blogging
Prezi Presentation
Free website building and hosting tools Create final traveling guide
YouTube Video Content
Challenge the future 6

7. Research Methodology:
Research methodology: Design-based research
Data collection : direct observation, Field note, Interview with teacher and
students, Archived information , Final artifacts created by students, Survey
Main Research questions:
Q1: What activities have been accomplished by the students by using
their PLEs?
Q2: How the PLE-based learning is perceived by the involved teachers and
students?
Challenge the future 7

8. Research Design
Challenge the future 8

9. Main elements of educational setting, being involved in PLE-based learning
Student
Student
Teacher
Teacher
Challenge the future 9

10. A model to integrate PLE constructing into teaching/learning process
Activity(es) Partner(s)
Selecting learning topic Teacher
Defining Learning Objectives
Teacher &
students
Defining Pedagogical/technical tasks, guidelines
and assignments based on the learning topic and Teacher
Phases of learning cycle objectives
tion
Selecting Organizational form and web tools
Teacher &
lora
for assigning to the tasks
students
Exp
me
tion
Accomplishing tasks, developing PLE Students
age
Evaluation
lan a
nt
Eng
Exp
tio
n
Supporting Learner pedagogically/technically Teacher /other students/ social
ora
contacts
Elab
Assessment& Evaluation Teacher/ Students
Reflection on process, learning experiences,
learning outcomes, and learning values of
Teacher/ Students
tools
Next Phase in learning cycle
Challenge the future 10

11. Results
Challenge the future 11

12. Question 1:
How do students integrate PLE tools into their learning
activities?
Challenge the future 12

13. Emerged themes of students activities during the PLE project
• Employing technology to support learning activities
• Collaborative learning
• Practicing Higher order thinking skills
• Self directed learning (taking control and responsibility over their own
learning)
Challenge the future 13

14. Challenge the future 14

15. Challenge the future 15

16. Challenge the future 16

17. Challenge the future 17

18. Question 2:
What are the students’ and teachers’ perceptions about the
PLE project?
Challenge the future 18

19. Challenge the future 19

20. Opinion of teachers about the (learning) benefits of PLE project and
working with introduced tools for students
Gijs: Great collaboration, deep brain storming, and complex mind map.
Oscar: They already are learning how to do research and they are
following a scientific process.
Challenge the future 20

21. Conclusions:
1- Lack of reflection on the learning process and enough time can lead to taking a
procedural surface learning strategy by the students. (i.e. in this project, the students
were being more busy with visual aspects of final websites than quality of content)
2- students need teacher’s support and facilitation to realize learning benefits of
not-ready-for-learning web2.0 tools and to integrate them, efficiently, into their
learning activities.
3- To improve students’ control over learning ,PLE tools should be positioned
within learning process comprised of active teaching and learning methods.
4-Shifting from a teacher-centered to a student-centered learning environment
commonly conflicts with students and teachers’ past educational experiences and
requires a shift in their conceptions of what learning involves and what constitutes
appropriate roles of students and teachers.
Getting involved students in designing learning activities might facilitate this shift.
Challenge the future 21

22. Posed questions:
-How can students be involved in designing of learning activities?
-What factors can encourage students to create and use PLE to support their
learning activities?
Challenge the future 22

23. Thank You:
By: Ebrahim Rahimi
E.rahimi@tudelft.nl
Blog: Ebrahimrahimi.wordpress.com
Project website:
https://sites.google.com/site/amaduespleproject/
Challenge the future 23