OOFHEC presentation by Jaana Kullaslahti, HAMK and Katri Huovinen, DIAK, 17/10/2019.

1. CampusOnline and quality
in online teaching
17.10.2019
Jaana Kullaslahti & Katri Huovinen

2. Universities of Applied Sciences in Finland
12. South-Eastern Finland University of Applied Sciences,
Mikkeli
13. Oulu University of Applied Sciences, Oulu
14. Karelia University of Applied Sciences, Joensuu
15. Police University College, Tampere
16. Lapland University of Applied Sciences, Rovaniemi
17. Saimaa University of Applied Sciences, Lappeenranta
18. Satakunta University of Applied Sciences, Pori
19. Savonia University of Applied Sciences, Kuopio
20. Seinäjoki University of Applied Sciences, Seinäjoki
21. Tampere University of Applied Sciences, Tampere
22. Turku University of Applied Sciences, Turku
23. Vaasa University of Applied Sciences, Vaasa
24. Novia University of Applied Sciences, Vaasa
25. Åland University of Applied Sciences, Maarianhamina
1. Arcada University of Applied Sciences, Helsinki
2. Diaconia University of Applied Sciences,
Helsinki
3. HAAGA-HELIA University of Applied Sciences,
Helsinki
4. HUMAK University of Applied Sciences,
Helsinki
5. Häme University of Applied Sciences,
Hämeenlinna
6. JAMK University of Applied Sciences, Jyväskylä
7. Kajaani University of Applied Sciences, Kajaani
8. Centria University of Applied Sciences, Kokkola
9. Lahti University of Applied Sciences, Lahti
10. Laurea University of Applied Sciences,
Vantaa/Helsinki
11. Metropolia University of Applied Sciences,
Helsinki

5. CampusOnline.fi
Coaching program for teachers
Coaching:
• Self- and peer-evaluation
• Webinars (5)
• Face-to-face meeting
• LinkedIn
• Online meetings (3)
• CampusOnline open badge

7. CampusOnline expert
is able to plan and implement an online course consistent with the quality
criteria of the online implementations (eAMK). The online course has
been a part of the CampusOnline.fi portal offering of Finnish universities
of applied sciences, and students from different universities of applied
sciences have participated in the course.
• plan an online course in accordance with the eAMK quality criteria
• make the online course available in the CampusOnline study portal
• implement the online course by applying the quality criteria
• collect feedback, subject the implementation to a peer review, and
evaluate your implementation and the necessary development
measures
19.2.2020

8. How can we ensure that CampusOnline -implementations
achieve our standards of quality criteria?
• Student feedback
• Quality criteria known and
introduced
• Coaching teachers – mentoring,
support, workshops
• Self- and peer-evaluation – working
together
• Cross-institutional peer-evaluation
• Resources for development
• Long-term development together

9. Teacher, why do you offer your
course on the CampusOnline.fi?
Student, why did you choose a
course on the CampusOnline.fi?
I think this is a good way for
teacher to share her/his
knowledge across the country.
Not everyone has to offer
everything, and in the small
country, it makes sense to pool
resources where it is possible.
CampusOnline was like a
gift from heaven.

10. Student feedback autumn 2018 and spring 2019
19.2.2020

11. 0 % 10 % 20 % 30 % 40 % 50 % 60 % 70 % 80 % 90 % 100 %
Technical support was available during the course.
The materials used on the course were readily available.
The implementation plan clearly described the objectives and content of the
course.
The structure of the course and the different stages of progress were presented
clearly.
The responsible persons, channels and schedules related to student guidance
could be easily found on the online platform.
The course timetable was clearly announced on the online platform.
Information about the basic equipment required for completing the course, as
well as any other necessary applications, could be found in the course description.
The course entry level requirements could be found from the course description.
Basic information of the online course (spring 2019)
completely disagree disagree undecided agree completely agree

12. 0 % 10 % 20 % 30 % 40 % 50 % 60 % 70 % 80 % 90 % 100 %
The working methods were well in line with the number of course
participants.
The course made it possible to utilise a range of technological
solutions, e.g. sound, video, image and various kinds of texts.
The course assignments had working-life relevance.
The course assignments were easy to understand.
The online tools provided support in the studies and in achieving
the intended learning outcomes.
The course working methods provided me with support in
achieving my intended learning outcomes.
The course content provided me with support in achieving my
intended learning outcomes.
Content, assignments and tools (spring 2019)
completely disagree disagree undecided agree completely agree

13. 0 % 10 % 20 % 30 % 40 % 50 % 60 % 70 % 80 % 90 % 100 %
The teacher and the student had an opportunity to interact online.
The course made it possible to learn from others and share
experiences online.
The guidance and feedback received during the course was provided
on a timely basis and made available throughout the course.
The course made it possible to receive feedback from the other
students in the course.
Assessment was carried on a continuous basis throughout the
course.
The course assessment criteria were provided on the online
platform.
A varied range of methods was utilised in the assessment.
Self-evaluation was carried out during the course using the tools
provided by the online platform.
Assessment, guidance and interaction (spring 2019)
completely disagree disagree undecided agree completely agree

14. Student, would you
recommend CampusOnline
studies for a friend?
Teacher, would you recommend
CampusOnline teaching for a
colleague?
”For me it has been interesting to work with different
educational fields (5) and different institutions (students
from 9 different UAS). Because the students have
chosen the course themselves, they are motivated to
study and it has been the best in this.” CampusOnline
teacher
“All UAS offer just a few courses for their specializations. We
might not have enough courses to complete the specialization
at our own school or would like to have skills in our repertoir
which are not offered by our institution. Also, online courses
can be done by anyone anytime (you can do it besides work,
other classes or raising children). Campus online is a very
good idea and helps us students a lot, even if the course
quality is a bit low here and there...” CampusOnline student
99 %
1 %
Autumn 2018
yes no
98 %
2 %
Spring 2019
yes no
84 %
6 %
10 %
Autumn 2018
yes no with reservation
70 %
7 %
23 %
Spring 2019
yes no I don't know

15. Together we are more!
https://www.eamk.fi/en