1. Onderzoek, onderwijs en
innovatie: de drie-eenheid
van het hoger onderwijs
Dirk Van Damme
Head of the Centre for Educational
Research and Innovation - OECD
2. Vragen
Welke rol speelt het HO in
Stimuleert het HO ook zijn de creatie van nieuwe
kennis?
eigen innovatie? Onderzoek
In welke mate ontwikkelt
het HO de competenties
voor employability, sociale In welke mate draagt het
participatie en innovatie? HO bij tot innovatie?
Hoger
onderwijs
Onderwijs Innovatie
2
3. Basisstelling
• Het Nederlandse HO doet het qua
onderzoek, innovatie en onderwijs vrij
goed, maar er is ruimte voor
verbetering, ook gezien de groei in andere
landen, en sommige zaken dienen echt
aangepakt om een duurzame kwaliteit te
garanderen in de toekomst.
3
5. Researchers, per thousand
employment
R&D Volumes in 2000 USD - constant BRIICS FIN
16.0 prices and PPP North America
1 Billion EU27
10 Billion
14.0
ISL
DNK
12.0 100 Billion
JPN
NZL NOR USA SWE
10.0 KOR
PRT
FRA
CAN
GBR AUS AUT
8.0 BEL
EST IRL DEU
SVN
ESP LUX
SVK RUS
6.0
NLD CHE
CZE
HUN
GRC ITA
4.0 POL
TUR
2.0
ZAF CHN
MEX
CHL
0.0
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0
Gross domestic expenditures on
R&D as a percentage of GDP
5
6. Sweden (1999-2008)
Switzerland
Denmark
Iceland
Finland
Canada
Austria
Israel
Singapore
Australia (1998-2006)
Netherlands
Norway (1999-2008)
Portugal
United Kingdom
Japan (1998-2007)
Germany
EU27
Belgium
France
OECD
Ireland
2008
Italy
Korea
New Zealand (1999-…
Spain
1998
United States
Turkey
Greece (1999-2007)
Czech Republic
Hungary
Slovenia
Poland
South Africa (2001-07)
Romania
Argentina (1998-2007)
China (1998-2007)
Slovak Republic
Mexico (1998-2007)
Russian Federation
Luxembourg (2001-08)
6
Higher education expenditure on R&D as % of GDP
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
%
7. Regionale kennisclusters
Share of region in
country's
biotechnology patents
100
(log scale) %
Hovedstaden (DK)
Capital Region (KR)
Ontario (CA)
West-Nederland (NL)
Ile de France (FR) Southern-Kanto (JP)
Zuid-Nederland (NL)
Bayern (DE)
California (US)
Chungcheong Region
10 Tokai (JP) (KR)
Baden-Wuerttemberg Rhône-Alpes (FR)
Nordrhein-Westfalen
(DE) (DE)
Massachusetts (US)
Hessen (DE)
Maryland (US) Pennsylvania (US)
New York (US)
New Jersey (US)
North Carolina (US) Texas (US)
Washington (US)
Illinois (US)
1 Minnesota (US)
Michigan (US)
0
0 1 10 100
Share of region in country's nanotechnology patents (log scale) %
7
8. Wetenschappelijke publicaties en co-authoring 1998-2008
1998 2008
Sweden Sweden
Poland Belgium France Poland Belgium France
Russian Federation Russian
Italy Federation. Italy
Netherlands Netherlands
Switzerland Switzerland
Germany Spain Germany Spain
Japan
Japan
Korea Korea
United Kingdom United Kingdom
United States
United States
China Canada Canada
China
Australia Australia
Brazil Brazil
India India
8
9. %
0.00
2.00
4.00
6.00
8.00
10.00
12.00
14.00
16.00
20.00
18.00
48.8
United States
United Kingdom
Germany
France
Canada
China
Italy
Netherlands
Japan
Single author
Australia
Switzerland
Spain
Sweden
Belgium
Denmark
Korea
Austria
India
International co-authorship
Finland
Brazil
Norway
Russian Federation
Poland
Turkey
Ireland
Greece
Domestic co-authorship
New Zealand
Portugal
Czech Republic
Hungary
Mexico
Iceland
Highly cited (top 1%) scientific articles by type of collaboration, 2006-08
Slovak Republic
9
Luxembourg
Internationale onderzoekssamenwerking
11. Internationale co-authoring toppublicaties
Country 1-10 Index Country 11-20 Index
Belgium 3.48 Canada 2.05
Sweden 3.41 Spain 2.01
Austria 3.39 Australia 2.00
Switzerland 3.24 Germany 1.95
Denmark 3.10 United Kingdom 1.80
Finland 3.02 Korea 1.19
France 2.67 Japan 1.10
Italy 2.66 China 0.82
Brazil 2.46 India 0.64
Netherlands 2.15 United States 0.58
11
18. 10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
0
5
Canada
%
United States
New Zealand
Estonia
Finland
Australia
Norway
Sweden
Netherlands
Switzerland
2000's
United Kingdom
Denmark
Japan
Germany
Iceland
1990's
Belgium
OECD average
Luxembourg
EU19 average
Ireland
1980's
France
Spain
Hungary
Slovenia
Greece
1970's
years, 35-44 years, 45-54 years and 55-64 years
Austria
Poland
Korea
Slovak Republic
Czech Republic
Italy
Growth in university-level qualifications
Mexico
Chile
Percentage of the population that has attained tertiary-type A education in the age groups 25-34
Brazil
Turkey
Portugal
19. %
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
0
Korea
Canada
Japan
Russian Federation1
Ireland
Norway
New Zealand
Luxembourg
United Kingdom
Australia
Denmark
France
Israel
Belgium
Sweden
United States
Netherlands
Switzerland
Finland
Spain
55-64 year-olds
OECD average
Estonia
G20 average
Iceland
Poland
Chile
Slovenia
Greece
25-34 year-olds
Germany
Hungary
Portugal
Educational attainment
Austria
Slovak Republic
Czech Republic
Mexico
Italy
Turkey
Percentage of population that has attained tertiary education, by age group (2009)
Brazil
19
21. Percentage of 25-64 year-olds in employment, by level of education (2009)
Tertiary education
100
Upper secondary and post-secondary non-
tertiary
90
% 80
70
60
50
40
30
20
Turkey
Italy
Netherlands
Germany
Belgium
France
Portugal
Greece
Austria
Hungary
Iceland
Estonia
Israel
Japan
Norway
Sweden
Finland
Ireland
Spain
Denmark
Brazil
Australia
Chile
Canada
Korea
United States
Poland
United Kingdom
Switzerland
Slovenia
Luxembourg
OECD average
New Zealand
Slovak Republic
Czech Republic
Mexico
Countries are ranked in descending order of the employment rate for individuals with tertiary education.
Source: OECD. Table A7.3a. See Annex 3 for notes (www.oecd.org/edu/eag2011). 21
22. Tertiary graduates in science-related fields among 25-34 year-
olds in employment, by gender (2009)
Number of graduates per
100.000 employed
5,000
Total Men Women
4,500
4,000
3,500
3,000
2,500
2,000
1,500
1,000
500
0
Note: Science-related fields include life sciences; physical sciences, mathematics and statistics, computing;
engineering and engineering trades, manufacturing and processing, architecture and building.
1. Year of reference 2008 for the number of graduates.
Countries are ranked in descending order of the percentage of tertiary science-related graduates in tertiary-type A
22
23. Shanghai-China
Korea
Finland
Hong Kong-China
Canada
Singapore
Estonia
Japan
Australia
Netherlands
New Zealand
Macao-China
Norway
Poland
Denmark
Chinese Taipei
Liechtenstein
Switzerland
Iceland
Ireland
Sweden
Hungary
Latvia
United States
Portugal
Belgium
United Kingdom
Germany
Spain
France
Italy
Slovenia
Greece
Slovak Republic
Croatia
Czech Republic
Lithuania
Turkey
Luxembourg
Israel
Russian Federation
Austria
Chile
Dubai (UAE)
Serbia
Mexico
Romania
Bulgaria
Uruguay
Thailand
Trinidad and Tobago
Colombia
Jordan
Montenegro
Brazil
Tunisia
Argentina
Indonesia
Albania
PISA Reading score 2009
Kazakhstan
Qatar
Peru
Panama
Azerbaijan
Kyrgyzstan
0
20
40
80
60
-60
-40
-20
-80
100
-100
23
25. Trends in PISA
Number of years
Mean score in for which PISA
Reading Mathematics Science
reading 2009 results are
available
Korea 539 9 1.6 0.7 5.3
Finland 536 9 -1.2 -0.6 -3.1
Hong Kong-China 533 8 1.0 0.7 2.3
Canada 524 9 -1.1 -0.9 -1.9
New Zealand 521 9 -0.9 -0.7 0.5
Japan 520 9 -0.3 -0.9 2.7
Australia 515 9 -1.5 -1.7 0.1
Netherlands 508 6 -0.8 -2.0 -0.9
Belgium 506 9 -0.1 -2.3 -1.3
Norway 503 9 -0.2 0.5 4.4
Estonia 501 3 0.1 -0.8 -1.2
Switzerland 501 9 0.7 1.2 1.7
Poland 500 9 2.4 0.8 3.4
Iceland 500 9 -0.7 -1.4 1.6
United States 500 9 -0.5 0.8 4.4
25
26. Science score and interest in science in PISA
640
LOW SCORE HIGH SCORE
Interest in Science Topics
HIGH INTEREST HIGH INTEREST
620
IDN
MEX
600
BRA CHL
580
PRT
560
GRC
540 TUR RUS ESP HKG
ITA
FRA MAC
520 SVK DEU
HUN
ISR LUX AUT SVN JPN
500 POL BEL CHE EST
CZE
KOR
480 USA IRL
NOR CAN
ISL GBR AUS
460 DNK NZL
LOW SCORE FIN HIGH SCORE
SWE
LOW INTEREST NLD LOW INTEREST
440
380 400 420 440 460 480 500 520 540 560 580 600 620
PISA 2006 Science Score
26
28. NL universiteiten in THEWUR ranking
Europe – total score
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
Erasmus University Rotterdam
University of Twente
Wageningen University
28
30. Indicators of Innovation in education
Proportion of professionals in the education sector
working in a very highly or highly innovative organisation
80
Knowledge or method
71 72
70 66 67 68
63 64 64
61 61 62
59 60
60
55
53
50 51
50
50
43
40 36
30
20
10
0
Source: OECD, based on REFLEX (2005) and HEGESCO (2008)
31. Innovation in Education is Mainly about Knowledge and
Methods
Percentage of graduates working in the education sector perceiving
innovation intensity in their organisation as very high or high in 2005
80%
70%
59%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
Knowledge or method innovation Product or service innovation Technology, tools or instruments innovation
Source: REFLEX (2005) and HEGESCO (2008)
Year 2008 instead of 2005 for Slovenia, Turkey, Lithuania, Poland and Hungary
31
32. Educational Research and Development
Science-driven innovation in education
40
Public budget for education research per student (2008)
35.0 (2000 Dollars - Constant Prices and PPPs)
35
30
27.0
25 23.7
20 17.8
15 13.0
10.7 10.4
10 8.5 7.8
7.1 6.6
6.2
5.1
5 3.4 3.3 2.9 2.9 2.8 2.8 2.7
2.4 2.4 2.3 2.1 2.1
0.4
0
33. Dank voor uw
aandacht !
dirk.vandamme@oecd.org
www.oecd.org/edu/ceri
33
Hinweis der Redaktion
In all European countries, intensity of knowledge or method innovation in the education sector is higher than the intensity of product or technology innovations, according to the graduate perceptions.51 % of Estonian graduates working in the education sector consider that intensity of knowledge or method innovation is very high or high in their organisation (5 or 4 in the 5 point scale) – against 44% for technology and 36% for product innovation.This is close to an average European country.While we know this about how innovation in education is perceived….But we still lack hard evidence on… What exactly is actually happening in schools and classrooms? What really has changed or is changing in education? What is the impact of the change?Need to measure innovation in education, including related drivers and barriers and what it means for policy